Skip to main content
Log in

Consumer Technology for Sleep-Disordered Breathing: a Review of the Landscape

  • Sleep Apnea (B Rotenberg, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The consumer market for devices that quantify sleep is quickly evolving. We conducted a review of the consumer technology available for sleep disorders, including its potential and limitations to screen obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Recent Findings

There are many commercial devices claiming to objectively measure sleep, but only a few are tested rigorously in research. We critically review the technology available, including its overall ability to provide objective measures of sleep (total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency (SE), sleep latency (SL), wake after sleep onset (WASO)), and to estimate apnea-hypopnea indexes in OSA patients.

Summary

Although consumer devices performed similarly to standard actigraphy, they still overestimated TST and SE, and underestimated WASO and SL. Biomotion sensors and mattress-based devices showed potential for use as an OSA screening tool. However, research in the sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) population is limited, needs further external validation, and should be implemented in the course of multiple days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Skaer TL, Sclar DA. Economic implications of sleep disorders. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28:1015–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sateia MJ. International classification of sleep disorders-third edition. Chest. 2014;146:1387–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hargens TA, Kaleth AS, Edwards ES, Butner KL. Association between sleep disorders, obesity, and exercise: a review. Nat Sci Sleep. 2013;5:27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hayes SM, Murray S, Castriotta RJ, Landrigan CP. Malhotra A (Mis) Perceptions and interactions of sleep specialists and generalists: obstacles to referrals to sleep specialists and the multidisciplinary team management of sleep disorders. J Clin Sleep Med. 8:633.

  5. • American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Hidden health crisis costing America billions. 2016. Retrieved from: https://aasm.org/resources/pdf/sleep-apnea-economic-crisis.pdf. This study provides one of the few cost evaluations to date of the impact of under-diagnosing SDB.

  6. Ballesio A, Raisa M, Aquino JV, et al. The effectiveness of behavioural and cognitive behavioural therapies for insomnia on depressive and fatigue symptoms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2017.01.006.

  7. Qaseem A, Kansagara D, Forciea MA, Cooke M (2017) Management of chronic insomnia disorder in adults: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-2175

  8. de Zambotti M, Claudatos S, Inkelis S, Colrain IM, Baker FC. Evaluation of a consumer fitness-tracking device to assess sleep in adults. Chronobiol Int. 2015;32:1024–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. de Zambotti M, Goldstone A, Claudatos S, Colrain IM, Baker FC. A validation study of Fitbit Charge 2™ compared with polysomnography in adults. Chronobiol Int. 2018;35:465–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pigeon WR, Taylor M, Bui A, Oleynk C, Walsh P, Bishop TM. Validation of the sleep-wake scoring of a new wrist-worn sleep monitoring device. J Clin Sleep Med. 2018;14:1057–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cook JD, Prairie ML, Plante DT. Ability of the multisensory jawbone UP3 to quantify and classify sleep in patients with suspected central disorders of hypersomnolence: a comparison against polysomnography and actigraphy. J Clin Sleep Med. 2018;14:841–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dickinson DL, Cazier J, Cech T. A practical validation study of a commercial accelerometer using good and poor sleepers. Health Psychol Open. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102916679012.

  13. Mantua J, Gravel N, Spencer RMC. Reliability of sleep measures from four personal health monitoring devices compared to research-based actigraphy and polysomnography. Sensors (Switzerland). 2016;16:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brooke SM, An H-S, Kang S-K, Noble JM, Berg KE, Lee J-M. Concurrent validity of wearable activity trackers under free-living conditions. J Strengths Cond Res. 2017;31:1097–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Blackwell T, Ancoli-Israel S, Redline S, KL S. Factors that may influence the classification of sleep-wake by wrist actigraphy: the MrOS Sleep Study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2011;7:357–67.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheung J, Zeitzer JM, Lu H, Mignot E. Validation of minute-to-minute scoring for sleep and wake periods in a consumer wearable device compared to an actigraphy device. Sleep Sci Pract. 2018;2:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. •• Pallin M, O’Hare E, Zaffaroni A, Boyle P, Fagan C, Kent B, et al. Comparison of a novel non-contact biomotion sensor with wrist actigraphy in estimating sleep quality in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. J Sleep Res. 2014;23:475–84. One of the few studies comparing devices simultaneously to PSG in the OSA population.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Chazal P, Fox N, O’Hare E, Heneghan C, Zaffaroni A, Boyle P, et al. Sleep/wake measurement using a non-contact biomotion sensor. J Sleep Res. 2011;20:356–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Hare E, Flanagan D, Penzel T, Garcia C, Frohberg D, Heneghan C. A comparison of radio-frequency biomotion sensors and actigraphy versus polysomnography for the assessment of sleep in normal subjects. Sleep Breath. 2015;19:91–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liang Z, Chapa Martell MA. Validity of consumer activity wristbands and wearable EEG for measuring overall sleep parameters and sleep structure in free-living conditions. J Healthc Informatics Res. 2018:1–27.

  21. Pion-Massicotte J, Godbout R, Savard P, Roy JF. Development and validation of an algorithm for the study of sleep using a biometric shirt in young healthy adults. J Sleep Res. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12667.

  22. •• Tal A, Shinar Z, Shaki D, Codish S, Goldbart A. Validation of contact-free sleep monitoring device with comparison to polysomnography. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13:517–22. This study provides one of the few evaluations of devices in the OSA population tested in the home environment.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosa T, Bellardi K, Viana A, Ma Y, Capasso R. Digital health and sleep-disordered breathing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2018;14:1606–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zaffaroni A, Kent B, O’Hare E, Heneghan C, Boyle P, O’Connell G, et al. Assessment of sleep-disordered breathing using a non-contact bio-motion sensor. J Sleep Res. 2013;22:231–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weinreich G, Terjung S, Wang Y, Werther S, Zaffaroni A, Teschler H. Validierung von SleepMinder als Screeninggerat fur die obstruktive Schlafapnoe. Somnologie. 2014;18:238–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Davidovich MLY, Karasik R, Tal A, Shinar Z, Gan R, Sheva B. Sleep apnea screening with a contact-free under-the-mattress sensor methods. Comput Cardiol. 2016;43:849–52.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Agatsuma T, Fujimoto K, Komatsu Y, Urushihata K, Honda T, Tsukahara T, et al. A novel device (SD-101) with high accuracy for screening sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome. Respirology. 2009;14:1143–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Takasaki Y, Kaneko Y, Sakakibara H, Sasaki F, Uchiyama Y, Mieno Y, et al. Clinical usefulness and health-economic benefits of a new sheet-like medical device (SD-101) for the diagnosis of sleep apnea syndrome. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi. 2008;46:181–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Norman MB, Middleton S, Erskine O, Middleton PG, Wheatley JR, Sullivan CE. Validation of the Sonomat: a contactless monitoring system used for the diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing. Sleep. 2014;37:1477–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tenhunen M, Elomaa E, Sistonen H, Rauhala E, Himanen SL. Emfit movement sensor in evaluating nocturnal breathing. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2013;187:183–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kapur VK, Auckley DH, Chowdhuri S, Kuhlmann DC, Mehra R. Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnostic Testing for Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea : An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13:479–504.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Camacho M, Robertson M, Abdullatif J, Certal V, Kram YA, Ruoff CM, et al. Smartphone apps for snoring. J Laryngol Otol. 2015;129:974–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kuhn E, Weiss BJ, Taylor KL, Hoffman JE, Ramsey KM, Manber R, et al. CBT-I Coach: A Description and Clinician Perceptions of a Mobile App for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia. J Clin Sleep Med. 2016:12, 597–606.

  34. Koffel E, Kuhn E, Petsoulis N (2016) A randomized controlled pilot study of CBT-I Coach: feasibility, acceptability, and potential impact of a mobile phone application for patients in cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458216656472

  35. • Babson KA, Ramo DE, Baldini L, Vandrey R, Bonn-Miller MO. Mobile app-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: feasibility and initial efficacy among veterans with cannabis use disorders. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015;4:e87 This study provides one of the earlier evaluations of feasibility studies for treatment of insomnia through the use of mobile apps.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Espie CA, Kyle SD, Williams C, Ong JC, Douglas NJ, Hames P, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of online cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic insomnia disorder delivered via an automated media-rich web application. Sleep. 2012. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.187.

  37. Daskalova N, Metaxa-Kakavouli D, Tran A, Nugent N, Boergers J, McGeary J, Huang J. SleepCoacher: A personalized automated self-experimentation system for sleep recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM; 2016. p. 347–358.

  38. Horsch CHG, Lancee J, Brinkman W. Mobile phone-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: a randomized waitlist controlled trial abstract background. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Talita D. Rosa.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Rosa and Dr. Zitser have nothing to disclose. Dr. Capasso is in the Advisory Board for Bryte LLC.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Sleep Apnea

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosa, T.D., Zitser, J. & Capasso, R. Consumer Technology for Sleep-Disordered Breathing: a Review of the Landscape. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep 7, 18–26 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-019-00222-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40136-019-00222-4

Keywords

Navigation