Abstract
Purpose of Review
To provide the radiologist with tools to recognize findings atypical for Graves’ ophthalmopathy and differentiate between the most important and common alternative causes of extraocular muscle enlargement on CT and MR imaging.
Recent findings
We introduce five ‘red flags’ representing features that are atypical for Graves’ ophthalmopathy: unilateral disease, atypical pattern of muscle involvement, adjacent structure involvement, restricted diffusion, and absence of pain.
Summary
About 95% of the cases with extraocular enlargement are due to Graves’ ophthalmopathy, other causes are less well known and recognized. The ‘red flags’ may aid in recognizing and suggesting alternative diagnoses.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The most known and common cause of orbital muscle enlargement is Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO). This is an extra-thyroidal manifestation of Graves’ disease and occurs in about 25–50% of the patients with Graves’ disease [1]. The prevalence is higher in women, but the disease tends to be worse for men [2, 3]. GO is defined as an autoimmune inflammation of the orbital and retro-orbital soft tissues. The most characteristic signs of GO are swelling of the extraocular muscles and orbital fat [4]. However, when encountering a patient with extraocular muscle enlargement, other etiologies should also be considered. Lacey et al. described 1849 cases with extraocular muscle enlargement of which 95% were due to GO and 5% were due to other causes [5, 6•].
Most radiologists know how to report a Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the orbit with GO, but it becomes more challenging when alternative causes of extraocular muscle enlargement are present. The first step is recognizing when the imaging does not meet the requirements or is at least atypical for GO. This is very important since the radiologist can be the first to suggest a different diagnosis. Second, an alternative diagnosis or differential diagnosis should be found. This article will elucidate characteristics that are atypical for GO: the ‘red flags’. We will illustrate the most important and most common alternative causes of extraocular muscle enlargement that may be suggested based on the ‘red flags’.
Graves’ Orbitopathy
Patients with GO can present with pain, proptosis, eyelid retraction, inflammation of the eyelids and conjunctiva, restricted ocular movement, diplopia, optic neuropathy and vision loss [7•]. The eye disease is bilateral in most cases, but in 10% of the patients it is unilateral [2]. Age of onset is usually around 40 to 60 [4]. Not all patients with Graves’ disease develop GO.
The main purpose of imaging in patients with GO is to confirm the clinical diagnosis or assess treatment response. Patients without clinical signs of orbitopathy may have enlargement of the extraocular muscles on imaging [3]. Besides, patients with unilateral clinical disease may show bilateral involvement on imaging [2].
CT and MRI are both appropriate for the assessment of extraocular muscle size. The advantage of MRI is extra information about the state of the muscles. Two different phases of clinical disease can be distinguished: (1) the ‘active phase’ with inflammation and edema of the extraocular muscles, lacrimal gland and adipose tissue (2) the ‘inactive or chronic phase’ with fibrosis and fatty infiltration of the extraocular muscles [8]. In both stages there may be enlargement of the extraocular muscles, but in the ‘active phase’ MRI shows T2 hyperintense extraocular muscles in addition (Fig. 1). Fatty degeneration in the ‘chronic phase’ is best observed on non-fat saturated T1-weighted images [9]. The differentiation between these two phases can be important for GO treatment: immunosuppressive therapy or radiotherapy may work in the ‘active phase’ but not in the fibrotic stage [8]. The role of contrast enhancement in these phases is not quite clear: some studies show decreased contrast enhancement in the ‘active phase’ owing to destruction of the microcirculation, other studies show increased contrast enhancement in the ‘active phase’ due to vascular congestion [8].
Involvement of the extraocular muscles in GO has a typical pattern: the inferior rectus muscle is most frequently affected, followed by the medial rectus, superior rectus (with the levator palpebrae), lateral rectus and oblique muscles, also memorized as the mnemonic ‘I’M SLOw’ [10]. The belly of the muscle is enlarged and the tendinous insertion is typically spared. The coronal plane can best be used for evaluation of the extraocular muscles or possible optic nerve compression.
Red Flags
In this chapter we list characteristics that should prompt radiologists to consider alternative causes of extraocular muscle enlargement. These red flags and possible differential diagnosis are summarized in Table 1.
Unilateral
Extraocular muscle enlargement is bilateral in 90% of the GO cases [2]. Unilateral may still represent GO when following the typical pattern of muscle involvement, but other possible diagnoses should at least be considered. These are lymphoma, idiopathic orbital inflammation (IOI), cellulitis, metastasis and vascular etiologies.
Atypical Muscle Involvement
The extraocular muscles involvement in GO follows the I’M SLOw mnemonic: inferior rectus, medial rectus, superior rectus (with the levator palpebrae), lateral rectus and oblique muscles. When there is a single muscle enlarged other than the inferior rectus or muscle involvement occurs in a different pattern, alternative causes should be considered.
IgG4- related ophthalmic disease (IgG4-ROD), lymphoma, metastasis and sarcoidosis have a predilection for the lateral rectus muscle. In IgG4-ROD multiple muscles may be involved, but overall the lateral rectus muscle is most frequently affected and the inferior rectus and medial rectus are usually spared [11,12,13]. Metastasis can occur in any extraocular muscle but has a preference for the lateral rectus muscle.
The superior rectus muscle is the most affected muscle in lymphoma and sarcoidosis [14, 15]. In both diseases the superior-lateral quadrant is most frequently affected with enlargement of the superior and lateral rectus muscles.
The medial rectus muscle is the most common affected muscle in orbital cellulitis as this muscle has a close relation with the ethmoidal sinus [2, 14]. IOI also has a preference for the medial rectus muscle, but involvement of the other rectus muscles is also possible [16, 17].
Involvement of Adjacent Structures
In GO the lacrimal gland might increase in size and show hyperintensity on T2 due to inflammatory edema [18]. Although it is seen in GO, other diagnoses as: lymphoma, IOI, IgG4-ROD, cellulitis, sarcoidosis and GPA are more likely [19•].
When the cavernous sinus or orbital fissure are involved, orbital cellulitis and IOI are to be considered.
The salivary glands may be affected in IgG4-ROD and sarcoidosis.
Restricted Diffusion
Restricted diffusion should not be encountered in GO. The presence of restricted diffusion in enlarged extraocular muscles raises the suspicion of a malignancy such as lymphoma or metastasis.
Clinical Sign: Absence of Pain
There is a lot of variation in the clinical presentation of a patient with enlarged extraocular muscles. As GO regularly presents with pain, the complete absence of pain is somewhat atypical. Overall, when there is no pain and the presentation is not acute, a neoplastic cause should be considered [5]. Typical painless causes of muscle enlargement are lymphoma and IgG4-ROD.
Alternative Causes of Extraocular Muscle Enlargement
Lymphoma
This is the most common primary orbital malignancy in adults and accounts for about 55% of the orbital neoplasms [20, 21]. The most common described cases of orbital lymphoma are of B-cell origin of which the most frequent type is extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma [22, 23]. The conjunctiva, eyelid, orbital connective tissue and lacrimal gland are most frequently involved [23]. Primary extraocular muscle lymphomas are rare, it accounts for about 0.1% and 8.7% of all extranodal lymphomas [24, 25]. In most cases extraocular muscle involvement is due to infiltration of extramuscular masses [26, 27].
Unilateral thickening of the muscle and tendon is most common [24]. The cases that are bilateral (about 25%) are usually high grade lesions [21]. The most typical location of involvement is the superior-lateral quadrant [28]. The rectus muscles are more frequently affected, especially the superior rectus and lateral rectus muscles, but the lacrimal gland and eyelid in this quadrant may also be infiltrated [14, 25, 28]. Advanced cases can show sinus bone erosion and intracranial spreading. Due to mass effect patients experience proptosis, diplopia and motility disturbances, similar to symptoms in GO [21]. Sometimes there is ptosis and a palpable mass. A key clinical feature is that patients usually experience no pain [29].
CT typically shows a hyperdense, enhancing mass with or without the lacrimal gland involved [30]. Larger masses encase and infiltrate other orbital structures [21]. MR characteristics are a T1 hypo to isointense and T2 hypointense mass with homogeneous enhancement and restricted diffusion [31, 32] (Fig. 2).
The clinical features and imaging characteristics of orbital lymphoma may overlap with idiopathic orbital inflammation (IOI), which can make the distinction challenging. Eissa et al. found that the use of DWI (diffusion-weighted imaging) and ASL (arterial spin labeling) can be helpful. Lymphoma shows higher ASL values (hyperperfusion) and lower ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient) values in contrast to IOI which shows lower ASL values (hypoperfusion) and a higher ADC [33•]. Purohit et al. states that orbital lymphoma can be differentiated from IOI by using an ADC threshold of 1.0 × 10–3 mm2/s, lymphoma shows values below this threshold and IOI values above. This can also be used for differentiating between lymphoma and IgG4-related orbital disease or metastases, the latter show ADC values above the mentioned threshold [30].
Idiopathic Orbital Inflammation (IOI)
Idiopathic Orbital Inflammation (IOI) was previously known as orbital pseudotumor. This condition has a quick onset and is a diagnosis of exclusion [11]. After GO and lymphoproliferative disorders, IOI is the most common orbital disease [34, 35]. Patients with IOI typically present with acute pain, erythema, proptosis, diplopia, orbital swelling and decreased eye movement [10, 16]. The inflammation can occur in various tissues such as the lacrimal gland, anterior part of the globe, retro-orbital tissue or the extraocular muscles (myositis). The extraocular muscles are most frequently affected [33•].
The characteristic appearance of IOI myositis is unilateral extraocular muscle enlargement, affecting muscles in any order and including the tendinous insertion [10, 16]. The most affected muscle is the medial rectus, followed by the superior rectus, lateral rectus and inferior rectus [16, 17]. Sometimes the signs are atypical with more than one affected muscle and cases with bilateral muscle involvement and sparing of the tendons as in GO have also been reported [21]. Soft tissue stranding in the orbital fat is usually present in addition to the muscle enlargement [10]. The disease may spread to the cavernous sinus, superior orbital fissure, meninges or dura.
CT imaging shows enlargement and enhancement of the extraocular muscles, but also enhancing soft tissue, fat stranding, lacrimal gland enhancement and optic nerve sheath enhancement may be present [30]. On MR imaging the extraocular muscles are usually T1 hypo to isointense and T2 hypointense due to fibrosis, although T2 hyperintensity may also be seen [32, 36]. There is increased enhancement after contrast administration and no restricted diffusion. (Fig. 3). ASL shows hypoperfusion [33•].
Orbital Cellulitis
Orbital cellulitis starts acute and can progress rapidly. It is an infection with the usual signs as fever, pain, eyelid edema, proptosis, restricted motility and sometimes visual loss. Orbital cellulitis is frequently associated with a history of sinusitis, but also with recent dental care, orbital fracture, scleral buckling or recent eye surgery [32]. In post-septal cellulitis, extraocular muscles may be involved and show edema (Fig. 4). Due to its close contact with the ethmoidal sinus, the medial rectus muscle is mostly affected [2, 14]. The disease is usually unilateral. Complications of cellulitis that can be observed on imaging are an abscess (subperiosteal, intraconal or intracranial), superior ophthalmic vein thrombosis and cavernous sinus thrombosis.
CT of the orbit is the imaging of choice since quick treatment needs to be started to avoid or treat complications. Characteristics are intraconal or extraconal fat stranding and possibly edema of the extraocular muscles. MR shows T2 hyperintensity of the intra-orbital fat, variable enhancement and no restricted diffusion, unless complicated by abscess formation [32].
Metastasis
Metastases represent 2–3% of all orbital neoplasms [7•]. El Hadad et al. found that 60% of the 118 cases with orbital metastases were located in the extraocular muscles [37]. More than half (58%) of the patients diagnosed with metastases in extraocular muscles have a known primary malignancy at presentation [14, 21]. The most common primary tumors are breast cancer, melanoma, prostate cancer and gastrointestinal tumors [14, 38]. In general, the prognosis is poor [39].
Patients report diplopia, pain, restricted eye movement and proptosis [21, 40]. Most metastases are unilateral, bilateral cases are rare [39].
On imaging orbital metastases usually present as a focal mass in one or multiple muscles [2]. The lateral rectus muscle is the most vulnerable, possibly because this muscle gets more blood supply than the other muscles due to the lacrimal artery [41,42,43]. There is usually irregularity and nodularity of the enlarged muscle (Fig. 5). In most cases, there are other metastatic lesions nearby, for example in the bony orbit or intracranial. The affected muscle is usually T1 hypointense and T2 iso- to hyperintense, and shows homogenous enhancement and restricted diffusion [6•].
Vascular Etiologies
These include carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas, cavernous sinus thrombosis, dural-venous shunts and vascular malformations. All these vascular conditions can cause unilateral extraocular muscle enlargement. According to Shafi et al. there is usually enlargement of the horizontal rectus muscles (lateral and medial rectus), although sometimes only a single rectus muscle can be affected [14]. The muscle expansion is the result of tissue edema due to increased venous pressure and vascular distention [14, 44]. The severity of muscle enlargement is variable as it depends on flow dynamics [5].
Clinical signs are exophthalmos, conjunctival hyperemia and less frequently vision loss or paralysis of the extraocular muscles.
CT and MR can show venous dilatation, thickened extraocular muscles and fat stranding (Fig. 6). Due to venous congestion the muscles appear T2 hyperintense [7•].
IgG4- Related Ophthalmic Disease (IgG4-ROD)
This is an autoimmune disease with diffuse or tumefactive lesions filled with IgG4 positive plasma cells [2]. The orbit and salivary glands are the most frequent involved locations of the head and neck [19•]. The clinical signs are nearly similar to GO: patients present with eye lid swelling, proptosis, diplopia and decreased vision [45]. They have no or little pain and eye movements can be normal.
In IgG4 related orbitopathy, extraocular muscle disease is almost always accompanied by other manifestations, the lacrimal gland is the most commonly involved but there may also be paranasal sinus disease or infra- or supra-orbital nerve enlargement [13, 19•, 46]. Furthermore, multiple other organs can be affected, e.g., salivary glands, pituitary gland, thyroid gland, lungs, pancreas, biliary ducts and retroperitoneal tissue [12]. As with GO, involvement is usually bilateral and does not involve the tendinous part. In contrary, the lateral rectus is the most affected muscle and the inferior rectus and medial rectus are often spared [11, 12].
On MR T1 and T2 hypointense and enhancing soft tissue is present [30]. Since lymphoma shows the same MR features, the ADC threshold can be used to differentiate. As previously described IgG4-ROD shows a higher ADC than lymphoma. A very helpful sign is enlargement of the trigeminal nerve, especially the infraorbital nerve [12, 45] (Fig. 7).
Sarcoidosis
Isolated myositis is rare in sarcoidosis, there are less than 20 case reports [15]. Sarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disease with granulomas in various organs. Involvement of the orbit is seen in 25–60% of the patients and uveitis is the most common manifestation [11, 47].
Patients present with diplopia, proptosis, reduced eye movement and the presence of pain is variable [13, 21]. Extraocular muscle involvement is usually bilateral [7•]. There is fusiform enlargement of the muscles, but sometimes also involvement of the tendons. The most likely affected muscles are the levator palpebrae muscle, superior rectus and lateral rectus. This preference is probably be due to neighboring dacryoadenitis [15].
The involved muscles are hypointense on T2, show enhancement and no restricted diffusion, these findings do not differ from GO. The lacrimal gland is enlarged in about 7–16% of cases [48]. There may be optic nerve thickening and enhancement or multiple pseudotumoral orbital masses [30]. A radiological clue to the diagnosis may be the visible involvement of the salivary glands or intracranial lesions [10, 21].
Other Conditions
There are more diagnoses that may have extraocular muscle enlargement, but these are rare and usually hard to distinguish based on imaging. Some of these rare diseases are briefly described in this paragraph.
Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA)
Also known as Wegener’s granulomatosis. This vasculitis is necrotizing and mainly affects the small- and medium sized vessels. About 45% of the patients with GPA have orbitopathy and in 12% it is the initial manifestation [7•]. Ocular involvement in GPA can affect every structure of the eye and in 4–10% of the patients with orbital GPA, there is involvement of the extraocular muscles (orbital myositis) [49]. The GPA masses are usually unilateral. CT can show diffuse inflammation with bone destruction. MR shows T1- and T2-weighted hypointense enhancing lesions [50]. Most importantly, imaging is not always specific for GPA. Biopsy is frequently needed [51].
Amyloidosis
In amyloidosis there is accumulation of amyloid protein in tissues. Depositions in the extraocular muscle are rare: only 1.3% of orbital amyloidosis occurs in the extraocular muscles [52]. All muscles may be affected and can show fusiform enlargement with tendon sparing or irregular nodularity [53, 54]. MR shows T2 hypointense foci and T1 hypointense or isointense foci and contrast enhancement. CT can show calcifications in the extraocular muscles, adjacent hyperostosis and bony irregularity [54, 55].
Specific Orbital Myositis
Specific orbital myositis is less common than idiopathic orbital myositis and accounts for about 5% of the orbitopathy cases [21]. This is myositis that is secondary to a disease or condition. This may be a systemic disease such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), giant cell myocarditis, rheumatoid arthritis, Churg Strauss syndrome and Behçet disease [13, 56,57,58]. It can also be the result of an infection such as herpes zoster ophthalmicus, Lyme disease and cysticercosis [13]. And lastly, there is an association with medication such as ipilimumab, alemtuzumab, bisphosphonates, statins, Interferon α-2b and ribavirin and infliximab [13, 59]. The extraocular muscles are enlarged on imaging and show a T2 hyperintense signal.
Acromegaly
As part of the generalized organomegaly, the extraocular muscles may also be enlarged in patients with excess growth hormone secreting pituitary tumors. The extraocular muscles may be diffuse and symmetrically enlarged or some muscles may be spared [5, 60].
Conclusion
Extraocular muscle enlargement is due to GO in 95% of the cases, and recognizing alternative causes of muscle enlargement can be challenging. We propose ‘red flags’ that suggest alternative diagnoses. These red flags are signs that are atypical for GO: unilateral disease, atypical pattern of muscle involvement, adjacent structure involvement, restricted diffusion, and absence of pain. The most important and common alternative causes of extraocular muscle enlargement are lymphoma, IOI, orbital cellulitis, metastasis, vascular etiologies, and IgG4-ROD.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
Chin YH, Ng CH, Lee MH, Koh JWH, Kiew J, Yang SP, Sundar G, Khoo CM. Prevalence of thyroid eye disease in Graves’ disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2020;93(4):363–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.14296.
Debnam JM, Koka K, Esmaeli B. Extrathyroidal manifestations of thyroid disease: graves eye disease. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2021;31(3):367–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2021.04.006.
Kikani N, Gaba R. Primer on graves’ disease: what the ophthalmologist should know and do. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2021;61(2):21–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/IIO.0000000000000354.
Wiersinga WM, Regensburg NI, Mourits MP. Differential involvement of orbital fat and extraocular muscles in graves’ ophthalmopathy. Eur Thyroid J. 2013;2(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1159/000348246.
Lacey B, Chang W, Rootman J. Nonthyroid causes of extraocular muscle disease. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999;44(3):187–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6257(99)00101-0.
• Savino G, Midena G, Tartaglione T, Milonia L, Caputo CG, Grimaldi G. Clinical-radiological patterns and histopathological outcomes in non-thyroid extraocular muscle enlargement: retrospective case series and current concepts. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;36(3):284–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000001533. This study shows radiological key feature differences between neoplastic and inflammatory causes of extraocular muscle enlargement.
• Marinò M, Ionni I, Lanzolla G, Sframeli A, Latrofa F, Rocchi R, Marcocci C. Orbital diseases mimicking Graves’ orbitopathy: a long-standing challenge in differential diagnosis. J Endocrinol Invest. 2020;43(4):401–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-019-01141-3. This review shows a large overview of the differential diagnoses of graves’ orbitopathy with clinical and radiological features.
Tortora F, Cirillo M, Ferrara M, Belfiore MP, Carella C, Caranci F, Cirillo S. Disease activity in Graves’ ophthalmopathy: diagnosis with orbital MR imaging and correlation with clinical score. Neuroradiol J. 2013;26(5):555–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/197140091302600509.
Gonçalves AC, Gebrim EM, Monteiro ML. Imaging studies for diagnosing Graves’ orbitopathy and dysthyroid optic neuropathy. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012;67(11):1327–34. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(11)18.
Cunnane MB, Curtin HD. Imaging of orbital disorders. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;135:659–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53485-9.00031-3.
Ferreira TA, Saraiva P, Genders SW, Buchem MV, Luyten GPM, Beenakker JW. CT and MR imaging of orbital inflammation. Neuroradiology. 2018;60(12):1253–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-018-2103-4.
Erdei A, Steiber Z, Molnar C, Berenyi E, Nagy EV. Exophthalmos in a young woman with no graves’ disease—a case report of IgG4-related orbitopathy. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0672-y.
McNab AA. Orbital myositis: a comprehensive review and reclassification. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;36(2):109–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000001429.
Shafi F, Mathewson P, Mehta P, Ahluwalia HS. The enlarged extraocular muscle: to relax, reflect or refer? Eye (Lond). 2017;31(4):537–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.248.
Vahdani K, Rose GE. Sarcoid orbital myopathy: clinical presentation and outcomes. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;36(1):61–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000001462.
Eshraghi B, Sonbolestan SA, Abtahi MA, Mirmohammadsadeghi A. Clinical characteristics, histopathology, and treatment outcomes in adult and pediatric patients with nonspecific orbital inflammation. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2019;31(3):327–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2019.03.004.
Kang MS, Yang HK, Kim N, Hwang JM. Clinical features of ocular motility in idiopathic orbital myositis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(4):1165. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9041165.
Wu D, Zhu H, Hong S, Li B, Zou M, Ma X, Zhao X, Wan P, Yang Z, Li Y, Xiao H. Utility of multi-parametric quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of the lacrimal gland for diagnosing and staging Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Eur J Radiol. 2021;141: 109815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109815.
• Thompson A, Whyte A. Imaging of IgG4-related disease of the head and neck. Clin Radiol. 2018;73(1):106–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2017.04.004. This article discusses different key imaging patterns of IgG4 including infraorbital nerve enlargement.
Eckardt AM, Lemound J, Rana M, Gellrich NC. Orbital lymphoma: diagnostic approach and treatment outcome. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;18(11):73. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-73.
Boddu N, Jumani M, Wadhwa V, Bajaj G, Faas F. Not all orbitopathy is Graves’: discussion of cases and review of literature. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017;31(8):184. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00184.
Olsen TG, Heegaard S. Orbital lymphoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 2019;64(1):45–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2018.08.002.
Izambart C, Robert PY, Petellat F, Petit B, Gastaud P, Lagier J, Labrousse F, Adenis JP. Extraocular muscle involvement in marginal zone B-cell lymphomas of the orbit. Orbit. 2008;27(5):345–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830802328469.
Watkins LM, Carter KD, Nerad JA. Ocular adnexal lymphoma of the extraocular muscles: case series from the University of Iowa and review of the literature. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;27(6):471–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e31822e5c1b.
Guo PD, Xian JF, Man FY, Liu ZH, Yan F, Zhao J, Wang ZC. Magnetic resonance imaging features of extraocular muscle lymphoma in five cases. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016;129(19):2384–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.190679.
Polito E, Galieni P, Leccisotti A. Clinical and radiological presentation of 95 orbital lymphoid tumors. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996;234(8):504–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00184859.
Klingenstein A, Garip-Kuebler A, Priglinger S, Hintschich C, Mueller-Lisse UG. Morphologic cross-sectional imaging features of IgG4-related orbitopathy in comparison to ocular adnexal lymphoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;12(15):1119–27. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S299655.
Priego G, Majos C, Climent F, Muntane A. Orbital lymphoma: imaging features and differential diagnosis. Insights Imaging. 2012;3(4):337–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-012-0156-1.
Sullivan TJ, Whitehead K, Williamson R, Grimes D, Schlect D, Brown I, Dickie G. Lymphoproliferative disease of the ocular adnexa: a clinical and pathologic study with statistical analysis of 69 patients. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21(3):177–88. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.iop.0000159173.42243.ad.
Purohit BS, Vargas MI, Ailianou A, Merlini L, Poletti PA, Platon A, Delattre BM, Rager O, Burkhardt K, Becker M. Orbital tumours and tumour-like lesions: exploring the armamentarium of multiparametric imaging. Insights Imaging. 2016;7(1):43–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0443-8.
Ren J, Yuan Y, Wu Y, Tao X. Differentiation of orbital lymphoma and idiopathic orbital inflammatory pseudotumor: combined diagnostic value of conventional MRI and histogram analysis of ADC maps. BMC Med Imaging. 2018;18(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-018-0246-8.
Kapur R, Sepahdari AR, Mafee MF, Putterman AM, Aakalu V, Wendel LJ, Setabutr P. MR imaging of orbital inflammatory syndrome, orbital cellulitis, and orbital lymphoid lesions: the role of diffusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(1):64–70. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1315.
• Eissa L, Abdel Razek AAK, Helmy E. Arterial spin labeling and diffusion-weighted MR imaging: Utility in differentiating idiopathic orbital inflammatory pseudotumor from orbital lymphoma. Clin Imaging. 2021;71:63–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.10.057. This study shows that using ASL and DWI can be a helpful tool to differentiate between IOI and orbital lymphoma.
Pakdaman MN, Sepahdari AR, Elkhamary SM. Orbital inflammatory disease: pictorial review and differential diagnosis. World J Radiol. 2014;6(4):106–15. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v6.i4.106.
Weber AL, Romo LV, Sabates NR. Pseudotumor of the orbit. Clinical, pathologic, and radiologic evaluation. Radiol Clin North Am. 1999;37(1):151–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70084-1.
Ronquillo Y, Patel BC. Nonspecific Orbital Inflammation. (2021). StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551576/. Accessed 7 Oct 2021.
El-Hadad C, Koka K, Dong W, Do T, Haider M, Ursua JD, Ning J, Debnam JM, Esmaeli B. Multidisciplinary management of orbital metastasis and survival outcomes. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;37(6):541–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000001939.
Shields JA, Shields CL, Scartozzi R. Survey of 1264 patients with orbital tumors and simulating lesions: the 2002 montgomery lecture, part 1. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(5):997–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.01.002.
Crisostomo S, Cardigos J, Fernandes DH, Luís ME, Pires GN, Duarte AF, Boavida AM. Bilateral metastases to the extraocular muscles from small cell lung carcinoma. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2019;82(5):422–4. https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20190081.
Wiggins RE Jr, Byrne SF. Metastatic tumor to the extraocular muscles: report of 5 cases. J AAPOS. 2012;16(5):489–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.06.009.
Mombaerts I, Rose GE, Verity DH. Diagnosis of enlarged extraocular muscles: when and how to biopsy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017;28(5):514–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000395.
Kiratli H, Balci KE, Himmetoğlu C, Uner A. Isolated extraocular muscle involvement as the ophthalmic manifestation of leukaemia. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;37(6):609–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02099.x.
Aydin A, Cakir A, Ersanli D. Isolated extraocular muscle involvement as the ophthalmic manifestation of leukaemia: an alternative explanation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;38(6):651. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02345.x.
Lo C, Ugradar S, Rootman D. Management of graves myopathy: orbital imaging in thyroid-related orbitopathy. J AAPOS. 2018;22(4):256.e1-256.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2018.06.002.
Wu A, Andrew NH, McNab AA, Selva D. IgG4-related ophthalmic disease: pooling of published cases and literature review. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015;15(6):27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-015-0530-4.
Tiegs-Heiden CA, Eckel LJ, Hunt CH, Diehn FE, Schwartz KM, Kallmes DF, Salomão DR, Witzig TE, Garrity JA. Immunoglobulin G4-related disease of the orbit: imaging features in 27 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(7):1393–7. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3865.
Demirci H, Christianson MD. Orbital and adnexal involvement in sarcoidosis: analysis of clinical features and systemic disease in 30 cases. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(6):1074-1080.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.12.011.
Conti ML, Osaki MH, Sant’Anna AE, Osaki TH. Orbitopalpebral and ocular sarcoidosis: what does the ophthalmologist need to know. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317423.
Franco J, Lee NG. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis presenting as recurrent, multifocal orbital myositis. Orbit. 2021;40(6):529–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2020.1817949.
Guzman-Soto MI, Kimura Y, Romero-Sanchez G, Cienfuegos-Alvear JA, Candanedo-Gonzalez F, Kimura-Sandoval Y, Sanchez-Nava DA, Alonso-Ramon I, Hinojosa-Azaola A. From head to toe: granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Radiographics. 2021;41(7):1973–91. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2021210132.
Sfiniadaki E, Tsiara I, Theodossiadis P, Chatziralli I. Ocular manifestations of granulomatosis with polyangiitis: a review of the literature. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019;8(2):227–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0176-8.
Eneh AA, Farmer J, Kratky V. Primary localized orbital amyloid: case report and literature review; 2004–2015. Can J Ophthalmol. 2016;51(4):e131–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.03.019.
Nishikawa N, Kawaguchi Y, Konno A, Kitani Y, Takei H, Yanagi Y. Primary isolated amyloidosis in the extraocular muscle as a rare cause of ophthalmoplegia: a case report and literature review. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2021;26(22): 101052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2021.101052.
Tong JY, Juniat V, McKelvie PA, O’Donnell BA, Hardy TG, McNab AA, Selva D. Clinical and radiological features of intramuscular orbital amyloidosis: a case series and literature review. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002061.
Murdoch IE, Sullivan TJ, Moseley I, Hawkins PN, Pepys MB, Tan SY, Garner A, Wright JE. Primary localised amyloidosis of the orbit. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(12):1083–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.80.12.1083.
Colon M, El Khoury L. Letter to the editor: orbital compartment syndrome as the first manifestation of SLE. Clin Rheumatol. 2020;39(12):3895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05437-1.
Kono S, Takashima H, Suzuki D, Terada T, Konishi T, Miyajima H. Orbital myositis associated with discoid lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2014;23(2):220–2. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203313517156.
Hoilat GJ, Subedi A, Ayas MF, Ozden N. Keep an eye out for Crohn’s disease: orbital myositis as the initial sign before gastrointestinal manifestations. Eur J Case Rep Intern Med. 2020;7(12): 001964. https://doi.org/10.12890/2020_001964.
Jordan DR, Park JSY, Al-Breiki D. Acute orbital inflammation with loss of vision: a paradoxical adverse event associated with infliximab therapy for Crohn’s disease. Orbit. 2021;13:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2021.1939726.
Zafar A, Jordan DR. Enlarged extraocular muscles as the presenting feature of acromegaly. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20(4):334–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.iop.0000132179.74910.79.
Funding
No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Research Involving Human and Animal Participants
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on ENT Imaging.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lakerveld, M., van der Gijp, A. Orbital Muscle Enlargement: What if It’s Not Graves’ Disease?. Curr Radiol Rep 10, 9–19 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-022-00392-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-022-00392-y