Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Trends of CT Utilization in North America Over the Last Decade

  • Radiation Exposure and Reduction (R Semelka, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Radiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the improvements in technology and usefulness of CT for diagnosis and therapeutic-planning, the growth in CT utilization is not surprising. Current estimates are that more than 85 million CT scans are performed annually (Prochaska G, Latest IMV CT survey shows hospitals seek to improve productivity to manage increased outpatient and emergency CT procedure volume). However, this increasing trend has prompted increased publicity and concern over the risks of radiation exposure (Cedars-Sinai investigated for significant radiation overdoses of 206 patients, LA Times October 10, 2009; Radiation Concerns Rise with Patient’s Exposure, The New York Times June 12, 2012). Recent research has focused on which patient populations are “at risk” for high radiation exposure and what efforts can be undertaken to decrease this risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Prochaska G. Latest IMV CT survey shows hospitals seek to improve productivity to manage increased outpatient and emergency CT procedure volume. http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/6/prweb9578648.htm. Accessed 3 Aug 2014.

  2. Cedars-Sinai investigated for significant radiation overdoses of 206 patients. LA Times October 10, 2009. http://articles.latimes.com/2009/oct/10/local/me-cedars-sinai10. Accessed 22 Jan 2013.

  3. Radiation Concerns Rise with Patient’s Exposure. The New York Times June 12, 2012. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/6/13/health/as-medical-imaging-rises-radiation-concerns-follow/html?_r=0.

  4. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. Bethesda, MD; NCRP; Report No. 160. 2009.

  5. Mettler FJ, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources—1950–2007. Radiology. 2009;253(2):520–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brenner D, Doll R, Goodhead D, et al. Cancer risks attributed to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(24):13761–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brenner D, Hall E. Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(22):2277–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.

  9. Brambilla M, De Mauri A, Lizio D, et al. Cumulative radiation dose estimates from medical imaging in paediatric patients with non-oncologic chronic illnesses. A systematic review. Phys Med. 2014;30(4):403–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mathews J, Forsythe A, Brady Z, et al. Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ. 2013;346:f2360.

  11. Fazel R, Krumholz H, Wang Y, et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(9):849–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Levin D, Rao V, Parker L, Frangos A, Sunshine J. Bending the curve: the recent marked slowdown in growth of noninvasive diagnostic imaging. AJR. 2011;196(1):W25–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti D, Johnson E, et al. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996–2010. JAMA. 2012;307(22):2400–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Burke LM, Biola H, Grey L, Lahlou RM, Best RM, Semelka RC. Computed tomography utilization in the North Carolina Medicaid population with a focus on “high exposure” patients, 2007–2012. N C Med J. 2014;75(2):95–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hess E, Haas L, Shah N, Stroebel R, Denham C, Swensen S. Trends in computed tomography utilization rates: a longitudinal practice-based study. J Patient Saf. 2014;10(1):52–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Levin D, Rao V, Parker L. The recent downturn in utilization of CT: the start of a new trend? J Am Coll Radiol. 2012;9(11):795–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miglioretti D, Johnson E, Williams A, et al. The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(8):700–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stein E, Haramati L, Bellin E, et al. Radiation exposure from medical imaging in patients with chronic and recurrent conditions. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7(5):351–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Westphalen A, Hsia R, Maselli J, Wang R, Gonzales R. Radiological imaging of patients with suspected urinary tract stones: national trends, diagnoses, and predictors. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(7):699–707.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lang K, Huang H, Lee D, Federico V, Menzin J. National trends in advanced outpatient diagnostic imaging utilization: an analysis of the medical expenditure panel survey, 2000–2009. BMC Med Imaging 2013. 13:40.

  21. Fahimi J, Herring A, Harries A, Gonzales R, Alter H. Computed tomography use among children presenting to emergency departments with abdominal pain. Pediatrics. 2012;130(5):1069–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rao V, Levin D, Parker L, Frangos A, Sunshine J. Trends in utilization rates of the various imaging modalities in emergency departments: nationwide Medicare data from 2000 to 2008. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8(10):706–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Korley F, Pham J, Kirsch T. Use of advanced radiology during visits to US emergency departments for injury-related conditions, 1998–2007. JAMA. 2010;304(13):1465–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pines J. Trends in the rates of radiography use and important diagnoses in emergency department patients with abdominal pain. Med Care. 2009;47(7):782–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kirsch T, Hsieh Y, Horana L, Holtzclaw S, Silverman M, Chanmugam A. Computed tomography scan utilization in emergency departments: a multi-state analysis. J Emerg Med. 2011;41(3):302–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Broder J, Fordham L, Warshauer D. Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the pediatric emergency department, 2000–2006. Emerg Radiol. 2007;14(4):227–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Broder J, Warshauer D. Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000–2005. Emerg Radiol. 2006;13(1):25–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Inaba K, Branco B, Lim G, et al. The increasing burden of radiation exposure in the management of trauma patients. J Trauma. 2011;2011(70):6.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jones A, Woldemikael D, Fisher T, Hobbs G, Prud’homme B, Bal G. Repeated computed tomographic scans in transferred trauma patients: Indications, costs, and radiation exposure. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6):1564–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Barnes E. Trauma CT is overkill for transferred patients. http://www.auntminnie.com/index.aspx?sec=sup&sub=cto&pag=dis&ItemID=103261. Accessed 3 Aug 2014.

  31. Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim K, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2071–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. • Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009;169(22):2078–86. This reference provides an estimate of the number of patients undergoing CT that would lead to the development of 1 radiation-induced cancer by age at exposure and sex.

  33. Hartin CJ, Jordan J, Gemme S, et al. Computed tomography scanning in pediatric trauma: opportunities for performance improvement and radiation safety. J Surg Res. 2013;180(2):226–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. • Pearce M, Salotti J, Little M, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012;380(9840):499–505. This pivotal study directly assesses the risk of CT scan exposure in children.

  35. Lee C, Haims A, Monico E, Brink J, Forman H. Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology. 2004;231(2):393–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lehnert B, Bree R. Analysis of appropriateness of outpatient CT and MRI referred from primary care clinics at an academic medical center: how critical is the need for improved decision support? J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7(3):192–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hricak H, Brenner D, Adelstein S, et al. Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. Radiology. 2011;258(3):889–905.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hendee W, Becker G, Borgstede J, et al. Addressing overutilization in medical imaging. Radiology. 2010;257(1):240–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. • Amis EJ, Butler P. ACR white paper on radiation dose in medicine: three years later. J Am Coll Radiol 2010;7(11):865–70. This article discusses 37 recommendations from the ACR to address issues related to radiation exposure.

  40. Sistrom C, Dang P, Weilburg J, Dreyer K, Rosenthal D, Thrall J. Effect of computerized order entry with integrated decision support on the growth of outpatient procedure volumes: seven-year time series analysis. Radiology. 2009;251(1):147–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ip I, Schneider L, Hanson R, et al. Adoption and meaningful use of computerized physician order entry with an integrated clinical decision support system for radiology: ten-year analysis in an urban teaching hospital. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012;9(2):129–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Goske M, Frush D, Brink J, Kaste S, Butler P, Pandharipande P. Curbing potential radiation-induced cancer risks in oncologic imaging: perspectives from the ‘image gently’ and ‘image wisely’ campaigns. Oncology. 2014;28(3):232–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Brink J, Amis EJ. Image Wisely: a campaign to increase awareness about adult radiation protection. Radiology. 2010;257(3):601–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Biola H, Best RM, Lahlou RM, et al. With “big data” comes big responsibility: outreach to North Carolina Medicaid patients with 10 or more computed tomography scans in 12 months. N C Med J. 2014;75(2):102–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Larson D, Johnson L, Schnell B, Goske M, Salisbury S, Forman H. Rising use of CT in child visits to the emergency department in the United States, 1995–2008. Radiology. 2011;259(3):793–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Boutis K, Cogollo W, Fischer J, Freedman S, Ben David G, Thomas K. Parental knowledge of potential cancer risks from exposure to computed tomography. Pediatrics. 2013;132(2):305–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Miglioretti D, Smith-Bindman R. Overuse of computed tomography and associated risks. Am Fam Physician. 2011;83(11):1252–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kofler J, Cody D, Morin R. CT protocol review and optimization. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014;11(3):267–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sodickson A, Baeyens P, Andriole K, et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology. 2009;251(1):175–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Schindera S, Diedrichsen L, Müller H, et al. Iterative reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose in a phantom study. Radiology. 2011;260(2):454–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kim J, Kim M, Kim H, Lee M. Radiation dose reduction and image quality in pediatric abdominal CT with kVp and mAs modulation and an iterative reconstruction technique. Clin Imaging 2014;14.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA

    Lauren M. B. Burke & Richard C. Semelka

  2. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 350 Parnassus Ave, Ste 307, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0336, USA

    Rebecca Smith-Bindman

Authors
  1. Lauren M. B. Burke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard C. Semelka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rebecca Smith-Bindman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren M. B. Burke.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Radiation Exposure and Reduction.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burke, L.M.B., Semelka, R.C. & Smith-Bindman, R. Trends of CT Utilization in North America Over the Last Decade. Curr Radiol Rep 3, 78 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-014-0078-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-014-0078-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation