Skip to main content
Log in

APRV vs Oscillation

  • Critical Care (J Giuliano and M Bigham, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Pediatrics Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

We compare the effectiveness of a conventional mode of ventilation, airway pressure release ventilation with non-conventional high frequency ventilation in achieving safety, comfort and liberation in infants and children requiring mechanical ventilation.

Recent Findings

Mechanical ventilatory support is important to the care of infants and children with acute respiratory failure. A paucity of high-level evidence exists to support one single ventilator strategy. A better understanding of the nuances of conventional and non-conventional modes of ventilation is needed to provide safe and effective ventilatory assistance.

Summary

Technological advances enable clinicians to tailor a ventilation strategy to patient need and deliver mandatory breaths ranging from conventional to high frequency rates. The use of an open lung strategy and tidal volume delivery that prevents overdistention are key elements used to optimize oxygenation and support the ventilatory needs of children with respiratory failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Nguyen TT, Hoo AF, Lum S, Wade A, Thia LP, Stocks J. New reference equations to improve interpretation of infant lung function. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2013 Apr;48(4):370–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.22656.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guevorkian D, Mur S, Cavatorta E, Pognon L, Rakza T, Storme L. Lower distending pressure improves respiratory mechanics in congenital diaphragmatic hernia complicated by persistent pulmonary hypertension. J Pediatr. 2018;200:38–43. doi: 10.1016.

  3. Chiumello D, Chidini G, Calderini E, Colombo A, Crimella F, Brioni M. Respiratory mechanics and lung stress/strain in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0113-0. Outlines the conditions that contribute to changes in respiratory mechanics and lung stress in children with respiratory distress syndrome.

  4. Tsiligiannis T, Grivas T. Pulmonary function in children with idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2012 Mar 23;7(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-7-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. May C, Kennedy C, Milner AD, Rafferty GF, Peacock JL, Greenough A. Lung function abnormalities in infants developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Arch Dis Child. 2011;96(11):1014–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2011.212332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Calogero C, Fenu G, Lombardi E. Measuring airway obstruction in severe asthma in children. Front Pediatr. 2018 Jun 26;6:189. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00189.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chatburn RL, Volsko TA. Mechanical ventilators: classifications and principles of operation. In Hess DR, MacIntyre NR, Mishoe S,C, Galvin WF, Adams AB, Saposnick AD, eds Respiratory care; principles and practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Sanders; 2012:444–461.

  8. Facchin F, Fan E. Airway pressure release ventilation and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation: potential strategies to treat severe hypoxemia and prevent ventilator-induced lung injury. Respir Care. 2015;60(10):1509–21. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lalgudi GS. Airway pressure release ventilation in children. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019;25(1):63–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Daoud EG, Farag HL, Chatburn RL. Airway pressure release ventilation: what do we know? Respir Care. 2012;57(2):282–92. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lalgudi Ganesan S, Jayashree M, Chandra Singhi S, Bansal A. Airway pressure release ventilation in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. A randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(9):1199–1207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201705-0989OC. Reports outcomes associated with the use of APRV and conventional low tidal volume strategies in children with ARDS.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dettorre MD, Non-conventional mechanical ventilation. In Pediatric critical care study guide text and review. Lucking SE, Maffei FA, Tamburro RF, Thomas NJ, eds. Pp. 295–297 Springer 2012.

  13. Mireles-Cabodevila E, Kacmarek RM. Should airway pressure release ventilation be the primary mode in ARDS? Respir Care 2016 Jun;61(6):761–773. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04653. Narrative review of APRV.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kallet RH. Patient-ventilator interaction during acute lung injury, and the role of spontaneous breathing: part 2: airway pressure release ventilation. Respir Care. 2011;56(2):190–203; discussion 203-206. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.00968.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Varpula T, Jousela I, Niemi R, Takkunen O, Pettilä V. Combined effects of prone positioning and airway pressure release ventilation on gas exchange in patients with acute lung injury. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003;47(5):516–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Gara B, Talmor D. Airway pressure release ventilation. What’s good about it. ICU Management and Practice. 2017;17(2):100–2.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou Y, Jin X, Lv Y, Wang P, Yang Y, Liang G, Wang B, Kang Y. Early application of airway pressure release ventilation may reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(11):1648–1659. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4912-z. Reports clinical outcomes associated with the use of APRV and conventional low tidal volume strategies in children with ARDS.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Putensen C, Zech S, Wrigge H, Zinserling J, Stüber F, Von Spiegel T, et al. Long-term effects of spontaneous breathing during ventilatory support in patients with acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164(1):43–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Grazioli S, Karam O, Rimensberger PC. New generation neonatal high frequency ventilators: effect of oscillatory frequency and working principles on performance Respir Care 2015;60(3):363–370. doi: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.03048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hager DN, Fessler HE, Kaczka DW, Shanholtz CB, Fuld MK, Simon BA, et al. Tidal volume delivery during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(6):1522–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Slutsky AS, Drazen JM. Ventilation with small tidal volumes. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(9):630–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bostick AW, Naworol GA, Britton TJ, Ori TR, French SK, Derdak S. Inspiratory limb carbon dioxide entrainment during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation: characterization in a mechanical test lung and swine model. Respir Care. 2012;57(11):1865–72. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Veneroni C, Tossici M, Zannin E, Milesi I, Dellaca’ RL. Accuracy of oscillatory pressure measured by mechanical ventilators during high frequency oscillatory ventilation in newborns. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2018;53(7):901–906. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.24045. Outlines the operational characteristics of ventilators designed to delivery HFOV.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. El-Nawawy A, Moustafa A, Heshmat H, Abouahmed A. High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled study. Turk J Pediatr. 2017;59(2):130–143. doi: https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjped.2017.02.004. Reports outcomes associated with the use of HFOV on morbidity and mortality of children with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cools F, Offringa M, Askie LM. Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 19;3:CD000104.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tingay DG, Mills JF, Morley CJ, Pellicano A, Dargaville PA. Indicators of optimal lung volume during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in infants. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):237–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826a427a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Guo YX, Wang ZN, Li YT, Pan L, Yang LF, Hu Y, Sun YY, Cai LM, Chen ZG. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation is an effective treatment for severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome with refractory hypoxemia. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016;12:1563–1571. Retrospective review of the impact HFOV has on improving oxygenation and ventilation in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Roth CJ, Förster KM, Hilgendorff A, Ertl-Wagner B, Wall WA, Flemmer AW. Gas exchange mechanisms in preterm infants on HFOV - a computational approach. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):13008 doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30830-x. Illustrates gas transport during HFOV in preterm infants.

  29. de Jager P, Kamp T, Dijkstra SK, Burgerhof JGM, Markhorst DG, Curley MAQ, Cheifetz IM, Kneyber MCJ. Feasibility of an alternative, physiologic, individualized open-lung approach to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in children. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;9(1):9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0492-0. Prospective multicenter randomized control study reporting morbidity and mortality associated with the use of HFOV and an open lung strategy in children with non-cardiac respiratory failure.

  30. Bateman ST, Borasino S, Asaro LA, Cheifetz IM, Diane S, Wypij D, Curley MA, RESTORE Study Investigators. Early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in pediatric acute respiratory failure. A propensity score analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(5):495–503. doi: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201507-1381OC. A secondary analysis of data from the RESTORE (Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure) study evaluating outcomes associated with the timing (late verses early) of HFOV in children with ARDS.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zannin E, Ventura ML, Dognini G, Veneroni C, Pillow JJ, Tagliabue PE, Dellacà RL. Regional distribution of chest wall displacements in infants during high-frequency ventilation. J Appl Physiol. 2019;126(4):928–933. doi: 10.1152 Discusses the operator set parameters affecting oxygenation and ventilation in a small cohort of infants with respiratory distress.

  32. Bordessoule A, Piquilloud L, Lyazidi A, Moreira A, Rimensberger PC. Imposed work of breathing during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in spontaneously breathing neonatal and pediatric models. Respir Care. 2018;63(9):1085–1093. doi: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.05703. Evaluates the ventilators used to deliver HFOV and highlights the operational characteristics that can increase work of breathing.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sessler CN. Sedation, analgesia, and neuromuscular blockade for high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:209–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000156794.96880.DF.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Iranpour R, Armanian AM, Abedi AR, Farajzadegan Z. Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) as an initial therapy for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm and near-term infants. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019;3(1):e000443. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000443. Adds to the body of literature providing novel use of HFOV.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen L, Wang L, Ma J, Feng Z, Li J, Shi Y. Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome and ARDS after extubation: a randomized controlled trial. Chest. 2019;155(4):740–748. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2019.01.014. Outlines the clinical outcomes associated with the novel use of HFOV with non-invasive interfaces.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Belteki G, Morley CJ. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation with volume guarantee: a single-centre experience Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019;104(4):F384-F389. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-315490. Provides an alternate approach to the conventional use of HFOV.

  37. Mukerji A, Belik J, Sanchez-Luna M. Bringing back the old: time to reevaluate the high-frequency ventilation strategy. J Perinatol. 2014;34(6):464–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa A. Volsko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declares that they has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Critical Care

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Volsko, T.A., Naples, J.C. APRV vs Oscillation. Curr Pediatr Rep 8, 10–15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40124-020-00210-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40124-020-00210-z

Keywords

Navigation