Abstract
Introduction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is mainly diagnosed in women of reproductive age. However, there is a paucity of guidelines jointly prepared by neurologists and gynaecologists on managing women with MS and the desire for motherhood. Therefore, in this review we propose recommendations for such cases, with an particular focus on those requiring assisted reproductive techniques (ART).
Methods
A group of seven MS experts (4 neurologists and 3 gynaecologists) came together for three discussion sessions to achieve consensus.
Results
The recommendations reported here focus on the importance of early preconception counselling, the management of disease-modifying therapies before and during ART procedures, important considerations for women with MS regarding ART (intrauterine insemination, in vitro fertilisation and oocyte cryopreservation) and the paramount relevance of multidisciplinary units to manage these patients.
Conclusions
Early preconception consultations are essential to individualising pregnancy management in women with MS, and an early, well-planned, spontaneous pregnancy should be the aim whenever possible. The management of women with MS and the desire for motherhood by multidisciplinary units is warranted to ensure appropriate guidance through the entire pregnancy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Since age is the main factor affecting a woman’s fertility, an early preconception consultation is crucial. |
In terms of multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment, if clinically indicated, interferon beta and glatiramer acetate could be considered throughout pregnancy and natalizumab until the third trimester. |
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists are used in ovarian stimulation procedures for in vitro fertilisation to avoid risks. |
Oocyte cryopreservation is an alternative assisted reproductive technique for young women recently diagnosed with MS who will have to delay their desire for motherhood. |
The management of women with MS and maternal desire by multidisciplinary units is warranted to guide them appropriately through their pregnancy. |
Introduction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune neurologic disease of the central nervous system that negatively impacts the patient’s quality of life. MS is mainly diagnosed in women in their 30s—that is, women of reproductive age [1]. However, MS does not impair women’s or men’s fertility [2], and more than 40% of women with MS have become pregnant after receiving a MS diagnosis [3, 4]. MS also does not affect the course of the pregnancy nor is it associated with obstetric pathologies [5,6,7], unlike other autoimmune diseases, such as autoimmune hepatitis [8] or thyroid diseases [9]. Therefore, pregnancy is not discouraged in women with MS, although careful management of the each woman’s condition before, during and after pregnancy is advised [10,11,12].
Women with MS need to wait for a period of stable disease and low radiological activity before attempting to conceive [7]. Consequently, these patients are often constrained to delay their desire for motherhood and may, therefore, be older than their healthy counterparts when ready to become pregnant [13, 14]. This reality renders women with MS more likely to require assisted reproductive techniques (ART) than the general population [15], but the risk-to-benefit ratio of pregnancy should be assessed individually. Also, the monitoring requirements of these patients, together with the inherent complexity of pregnancy, prompt a multidisciplinary approach to managing women with MS and maternal desire. Unfortunately, there are no guidelines or recommendations for managing these patients from a multidisciplinary gynaecology and neurology perspective.
The aim of this review was to put forward recommendations from a panel of neurologists and gynaecologists on managing people with MS and parenthood desire. In this context, we have reviewed the process in detail, from preconception counselling to in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and oocyte cryopreservation (OC). We also suggest approaches for implementing and improving multidisciplinary units to manage these patients.
Methods
A group of seven experts, coordinated by the first author (CO-G), including four neurologists who are experts in MS and three gynaecologists specialised in ART, met for three discussion sessions to establish recommendations regarding ART in patients with MS. Before starting the consensus sessions, an update on the topic of interest from the neurological and gynaecological point-of-view, respectively, was given. In the first two preparatory sessions, key questions on infertility and ART in MS were formulated and discussed. The topics addressed were the importance of age in fertility, the risks of ART in MS, the optimal time of MS stability before undergoing ART and seeking pregnancy, the management of disease-modifying therapies (DMT) in patients undergoing ART, the ovarian stimulation procedure in women with MS, the waiting time for natural conception and the recommended age to request ART and age limits for oocyte or embryo cryopreservation. The consensus was established in a third virtual session. For each key issue, a recommendation was accepted if unanimous agreement was achieved. The information collected during the three sessions served as the basis for the writing of this article, in which all authors participated.
This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Ovarian Cycle Overview
During the first days of the menstrual cycle (follicular phase), the growth of ovarian follicles is stimulated by the increasing concentration of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) [16]. Usually all but one follicle will stop growing, and the dominant follicle will continue to mature in the ovary. At the same time, oestradiol levels suppress the production of luteinising hormone (LH) and FSH from the anterior pituitary gland, the so-called negative feedback loop. At a certain point, the increase of in the plasma levels of these hormones stimulate a surge of LH (positive feedback) that leads to ovulation; this event is mandatory for the oocyte to achieve the first meiotic division. Then, the mature ovum is released into the fallopian tube. In the second part of the ovarian cycle (i.e. luteal phase), FSH and LH induce the transformation of the remaining parts of the follicle into the corpus luteum, which produces progesterone, oestradiol and various types of peptides, including other signalling molecules. Both progesterone and oestradiol downregulate FSH and LH production, which leads to corpus luteum atrophy. If no fertilisation occurs, progesterone triggers menstruation and the next menstrual cycle begins [16]. However, in the case of fertilisation, the newly formed syncytiotrophoblast (and, later on, the placenta) produces human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)—a hormone with a similar mechanism of action to LH but with a longer half-life—that allows the corpus luteum to survive.
The proper functioning of the corpus luteum is determinant for the appropriate development of gestation during the first 7–9 weeks of pregnancy. The corpus luteum produces progesterone in large quantities until approximately the 10th week of pregnancy, at which time the placenta takes the lead in progesterone synthesis. Oestrogen levels also increase gradually during gestation; the production of oestrone and oestradiol is increased by 100-fold and that of oestriol by 1000-fold [17].
Recommendations
Preconception Counselling
Multiple sclerosis is an incurable disease that entails an inherent degree of hardship, forcing those with the disease to be constantly challenged with accepting and coping with the new reality driven by their illness. Therefore, before initiating any steps towards pregnancy, specialists must ensure that the person with MS has accepted the disease [18]. Acceptance can be defined as the awareness of the need to adapt to a chronic illness while being willing to accept its unpredictable and uncontrollable nature [19]. However, in women with MS, as in the general population, age is the main factor affecting pregnancy rates [20], although other factors do play a critical role, such as ovarian reserve (estimated by plasma levels of anti-Müllerian hormone and/or antral follicle count by transvaginal ultrasound), body mass index and smoking [21]. Importantly, the DMT chosen to manage MS must be appropriate to the desire of the patient for parenthood over the short or long term [10,11,12]. Therefore, shared decision-making, including family planning, is fundamental [22].
Early preconception counselling is paramount to inform and evaluate all parameters that could affect pregnancy. For example, the Spanish Society of Gynaecology recommends a preconception consultation for all women with the desire for motherhood [23]. The partner of the patient with MS, especially men, should also attend informative preconception consultations to rule out potential issues for both of them. During this consultation, the most important factor regarding fertility, which is the woman’s age, should be emphasised [24], and subfertility factors could be identified. Notably, the DMT should be assessed, especially if a switch of DMT, or a washout period, is necessary before conception. Current recommendations from regulatory agencies include avoiding pregnancy during treatment and, depending on the DMT, maintaining a 2- to 6-month washout period before conception [25,26,27]. Finally, in women with MS, an evaluation of cervical pathologies through cytology tests should be undertaken since some DMT, in particular those with an immunosuppressing mechanism, such as mitoxantrone, azathioprine and alemtuzumab, have been associated with a potential risk of cervical dysplasia (Table 1) [28, 29].
Multiple Sclerosis and ART
Time frames should be individualised according to disease activity and gestation prognosis. However, a natural approach to becoming pregnant is generally recommended for a period of 6–12 months in women aged > 35 years and for 1 year in those aged < 35 years. This time frame would allow these women to shorten the time without treatment or with a suboptimal DMT [30]. Ideally, people with MS should begin the ART process with the lowest possible number of symptomatic treatments and at the minimum effective dose. Beyond their effects on pregnancy [31], DMT do not seem to hamper ART processes, whether stimulation, fertilisation or implantation. Regarding natural pregnancies, DMT should be withdrawn according to their prescribing information, an individual risk-to-benefit assessment before pregnancy and/or after a positive pregnancy test result (neither during stimulation nor before implantation). Nonetheless, and based on post-marketing experience, some DMT can be considered during pregnancy if clinically indicated: interferon beta and glatiramer acetate throughout pregnancy, and natalizumab up to the third trimester, provided that their benefits to the patient outweigh their risks to the foetus (Table 1) [32, 33]. Despite data on pregnancy in women with MS exposed to antiCD20 being currently limited, taking into account the pharmacokinetics of these DMT, their low risk for placental transfer during the first trimester and the reassuring post-marketing clinical experience, they could also be considered in women with high-activity MS on a case-by-case basis [34].
In Vitro Fertilisation
The efficiency of ART techniques, mainly intrauterine insemination (IUI) and IVF, should be considered on an individual patient and/or couple basis, albeit IVF is economically more costly than IUI but has a higher live birth rate (LBR) per cycle [35]. A subclass of IVF, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), is the most widely used fertility technique in developed countries [36]. In addition, a single embryo transfer in IVF-ICSI could avoid the risk associated with multiple pregnancies [37, 38]. Multiple pregnancy is the most frequent and serious iatrogenic complication in ART procedures [39], entailing not only obstetric risks for the mother (e.g. hypertension, preeclampsia, preterm labour) that should be avoided in women with pre-existing pathologies, but also risks for the foetus (e.g. preterm delivery, congenital malformations, cerebral palsy) [40]. Therefore, although the criteria for choosing one ART over the other are not different in women with MS compared to the general population, in this context the older age of women with MS and the importance of these women avoiding multiple pregnancies are the main reasons why IVF-ICSI is the most used ART in this patient group. Most ovarian stimulations in IVF are currently performed with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists, which are considered to be safer than GnRH agonists, to prevent an uncontrolled LH surge and ovulation [16, 41, 42]. No conclusive evidence is yet available on the effect of ovarian stimulation on disease activity or the relapse risk in people with MS, but in a recent study [43], the largest to date, which analysed 338 IVF procedures in 225 women, no increase in MS activity after ART cycles was observed. However, this study assessed relapses through healthcare registries, and milder ones may not have been included. Discrepancies between older [44, 45] and more recent studies may be explained, at least in part, by recent substantial changes in the treatment of MS, as preconception stabilisation of the disease has been strongly recommended in recent decades. In this context, Mainguy et al. observed a lower relapse rate before and after IVF in women who remained receiving DMT until IVF [43]. In addition, the switch from GnRH agonists to GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation protocols may also have reduced inflammatory activity in women with MS undergoing ART. Finally, the observed relapses after an unsuccessful IVF cycle may likely be due to discontinuation of DMT before the procedure, a sudden increase in hormone levels during ART and/or the effect these hormones may have on the activity of immune cells [16, 46].
The whole IVF-ICSI process in women with MS does not differ from that in the general population and consists of four steps: (1) preliminary consultations; (2) ovarian stimulation and ovulation induction; (3) oocyte retrieval and IVF; and (4) endometrium preparation and embryo transfer [47]. The patient’s parameters, such as age, ovarian reserve and pre-existing diseases, all of which will determine the doses of hormones required, are analysed in informative preliminary consultations [48]. In the following step, ovaries are stimulated with a combination of hormones (such as synthetic FSH, LH and GnRH antagonists); this combination should be tailored to each individual patient, driven by clinical experience [48, 49]. Although the paucity of guidelines on ART proves the lack of general consensus on many technical aspects, the current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend a limit of three full cycles of IVF [50], which has also been demonstrated in real clinical practice [51]. Likewise, the ideal number of oocytes retrieved, albeit still debated, ranges from 10 to 15 [52]. Importantly, in patients with a pre-existing pathology, such as MS, the risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome should be minimised [53]. This can be achieved by using a GnRH agonist instead of hCG in the ovulation induction step and by deferring embryo transfer (cryopreservation or transfer in following cycles). In summary, the risk-to-benefit ratio of ovarian stimulation should be carefully assessed in people with MS. The IVF-ICSI process continues with ovulation induction with hCG, a GnRH agonist or both, which also induces the final oocyte maturation [47]. Oocytes are then retrieved and can be cryopreserved or fertilised in vitro with a pre-prepared sample of the partner’s semen or a sperm donor. The resulting embryos are then classified according to morphological and cellular kinetics parameters of development/division; the better the embryo’s class, the higher the implantation chances [54]. These embryos can be transferred in the same cycle or cryopreserved, and the remaining good quality embryos can also be cryopreserved for further cycles, if necessary. Indeed, the recent evolution and optimisation of cryopreservation processes have enabled equivalent results in terms of cumulative LBR with frozen-thawed embryos and fresh embryo transfers [55]. Importantly, cumulative LBR is a suitable concept for reporting the success of an IVF programme incorporating fresh and thawed embryo transfers. In contrast with the conventionally reported chance of pregnancy and delivery per cycle or per embryo transfer, the cumulative LBR captures the totality of live births after successive treatment. Since this term better summarises the chance of a live birth over the entire assisted reproduction process, it is most appropriate from the couple’s perspective [56]. Moreover, cumulative LBR supports reducing the number of embryos per transfer [57]. This should be explained and considered in people with MS to avoid multiple pregnancy risks and dampen the psychological impact of potential unsuccessful implantation.
In relation to men with MS, the ART technique (IVF or IUI) decided upon will also depend on the couple’s characteristics, but the management is more straightforward in men than in women. In general, DMT do not affect male fertility and are usually not withdrawn when the patient expresses a desire for fatherhood [58]. Nevertheless, in the case that a proven effect of the DMT on sperm quality is observed, the therapy could be switched, and after waiting for a potential washout period, the patient’s sperm sample could be frozen before the original DMT is reinitiated. In addition, sexual dysfunction is common in men with MS and can stem directly from the demyelinating lesions caused by MS (e.g. erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction, numbness, sensory paresthesias) or be secondary to the disease (e.g. fatigue, spasticity, bowel dysfunction) [59]. Regardless, a sperm sample can be collected for the purpose of IVF by electroejaculation, in cases of physical impairments, or testicular biopsy, if the patient presents ejaculatory issues (Table 1) [60].
Oocyte Cryopreservation
As mentioned above, oocytes retrieved after ovulation induction can be cryopreserved for future use. OC is a relatively new ART from which women with MS can benefit. In women requiring ART and presenting a pre-existing disease that can force them to delay their desire for motherhood, OC can be considered a reasonable option. Thus, trends of OC in oncologic patients have increased over recent years [61], as have, most likely, those in women with endometriosis, although data are scarce for this patient population [62]. However, early pregnancy (stemming from an early, well-planned preconception counselling) is much more cost-effective than OC, even in women with pre-existing pathologies.
The OC process is similar to the IVF process and uses the same drugs described above for ovarian stimulation. Similar to IVF, after performing the appropriate controls, oocyte extraction is undertaken in an operating room. However, contrary to IVF, the next step is ultrafast freezing (vitrification) of non-fertilised oocytes, which can remain vitrified indefinitely. Alternatively, oocytes can be fertilised before vitrification, resulting in indefinite preservation of the resulting embryos, although embryo cryopreservation could clash with personal religious or moral beliefs [63].
Notwithstanding the above points and according to data based on social cryopreservation (i.e. OC in women without any pathology), as well as considering the experience in the field with women with endometriosis, OC can be beneficial to women with MS as long as they meet certain criteria [64]. First and foremost, the age at which they undertake OC is crucial: the older the woman, the higher the number of vitrified oocytes required to increase the LBR [65]. Therefore, OC is recommended in women younger than 35–37 years old, with data showing that women aged 37 years maximum reap the highest benefit over electing not to cryopreserve oocytes [66]. From that age onwards, the delay of motherhood in terms of ovarian quality and decline in fertility is more marked [66, 67]. Second, OC can benefit women with a decent number of oocytes that can be retrieved with a reasonable number of stimulations; as for IVF, three oocytes are generally considered to be the maximum to be retrieved. Therefore, women must, ideally, present moderate-good ovarian reserve, estimated by their levels of anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count assessed by transvaginal ultrasound [66, 67]. Women fulfilling these requirements also have a higher probability of needing their frozen oocytes than those who do not fulfil them. In addition, women with MS who are compelled to delay motherhood for ≥ 1 years (e.g. because their MS is not under control, they have been on DMT for a short time or their DMT has a long washout period) are also eligible for OC. Therefore, women with MS could benefit from “fertility preservation” programmes (spontaneous fertility cannot be restored nor preserved) based on medical reasons (Table 1).
Multidisciplinary Units
For people with MS, time without DMT can be crucial. Thus, anticipation of motherhood through early family planning is vital in order that the patient remain without her DMT for the shortest possible time. From the ART perspective, the management of some people with MS can be complex because they may suffer relapses if DMT are withdrawn. Consequently, if women needing ART have a pre-existing pathology, as in people with MS, a multidisciplinary approach is justified. In addition, excellent neurology-gynaecology bidirectional communication is essential to coordinate DMT timing and ART in these patients.
Multidisciplinary units have been put forward as the best management option for a disease as complex as MS [68]. In people with MS diagnosed in their reproductive years, which represent the lion’s share of MS patients, these multidisciplinary units are vital to addressing their needs. The specialists involved in these multidisciplinary units should be diverse and include specialists in addition to neurologists and gynaecologists. For example, social care workers may be needed in some instances to help evaluate the suitability of the couple to care for a child. Indeed, the ethical implications of pregnancy in people with MS are numerous [69, 70]. Although pregnancy should be generally supported and managed by physicians [71], the latter should ponder their duty to the patient, the foetus and the healthcare system to provide the best counselling [72]. Ultimately, pregnancy in women with MS should be assessed on a case-by-case basis. Importantly, it is in the best interest of people with MS that multidisciplinary care units are formed with good coordination and communication among all specialists involved in managing their disease (Table 1). If such units are unavailable, we consider that people with MS and parenthood desire should still be managed, as much as possible, by all of the abovementioned specialists, although the coordination and communication between these specialists might be deficient in these cases.
Limitations
Given that data analysing ART in people with MS are limited, the main limitation of our recommendations is that they are chiefly based on experts’ reproductive-assisted experience in women without MS. However, in a recent large populational study, the chance of a live birth with ART in women with MS was found to be similar to that of women without MS [73]. Nonetheless, further research is needed to analyse, in large observational and prospective studies, the impact and efficacy of ART regarding some important aspects of MS (e.g. relapses, disability scores, potential effects and interactions of corticosteroids and other DMT during ART). Finally, our recommendations were provided by Spanish neurologists and gynaecologists and, albeit our belief they can be extended to other Western European countries, the specific characteristics of people in regions other than Spain may preclude their generalisability.
Conclusions
Multiple sclerosis is mainly diagnosed in women of childbearing age, but the disease does not directly affect the pregnancy course and, therefore, does not necessarily deter pregnancy. However, because women with MS must wait for a period of low clinical and radiological activity, they tend to delay their desire for motherhood. Since age strongly impacts a woman’s fertility, an early preconception consultation is paramount to provide people with MS and their partners with tools to achieve a shared decision on a future pregnancy. Regarding treatment, if clinically indicated, interferon beta and glatiramer acetate can be considered throughout pregnancy, and natalizumab can be used up to the third trimester, provided that their benefits to the patient outweigh their risks to the foetus. In addition, antiCD20, albeit supported by limited data, can also be envisaged as therapy on a case-by-case basis. Because women with MS are often older than the general population when ready to become mothers, they are more likely to require ART. In this context, IVF-ICSI is the most widely used technique in people with MS and is considered safe for both men and women. Also, GnRH antagonist protocols are currently preferred in ovarian stimulation procedures to avoid unnecessary risks. OC or embryo cryopreservation are alternatives procedure to ponder in the cases of young women recently diagnosed with MS who will have to delay their desire for motherhood. Bearing in mind that an early, well-planned, spontaneous pregnancy should always prevail as the best option, the best candidates for OC are women aged around 35–37 years, with a moderate-good ovarian reserve, who are willing and able to delay their pregnancy 12–18 months. In addition, good neurology–gynaecology coordination is crucial to avoid the risk of relapse that could result from an extended period off treatment. Finally, the management of women with MS with the desire for motherhood by multidisciplinary units is warranted to guide them appropriately through the course of their pregnancy.
References
Westerlind H, Boström I, Stawiarz L, et al. New data identify an increasing sex ratio of multiple sclerosis in Sweden. Mult Scler J. 2014;20(12):1578–83.
Amato MP, Portaccio E. Fertility, pregnancy and childbirth in patients with multiple sclerosis: Impact of disease-modifying drugs. CNS Drugs. 2015;29(3):207–20.
Masera S, Cavalla P, Prosperini L, et al. Parity is associated with a longer time to reach irreversible disability milestones in women with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2015;21(10):1291–7.
Carvalho AT, Veiga A, Morgado J, et al. Esclerosis múltiple y decisión de la maternidad: estudio observacional en pacientes portuguesas [Multiple sclerosis and motherhood decision: an observational study on portuguese women]. Rev Neurol. 2014;59(12):537–42.
Vukusic S, Confavreux C. Pregnancy and multiple sclerosis: the children of PRIMS. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2006;108(3):266–70.
Pozzilli C, Pugliatti M. An overview of pregnancy-related issues in patients with multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2015;22(S2):34–9.
Coyle PK. Management of women with multiple sclerosis through pregnancy and after childbirth. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2016;9(3):198–210.
Westbrook RH, Yeoman AD, Kriese S, Heneghan MA. Outcomes of pregnancy in women with autoimmune hepatitis. J Autoimmun. 2012;38(2–3):J239–44.
Poppe K, Glinoer D. Thyroid autoimmunity and hypothyroidism before and during pregnancy. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9(2):149–61.
Hughes SE, Spelman T, Gray OM, et al. Predictors and dynamics of postpartum relapses in women with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2014;20(6):739–46.
Bove R, Alwan S, Friedman JM, et al. Management of multiple sclerosis during pregnancy and the reproductive years. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(6):1157–68.
Miller DH, Fazekas F, Montalban X, Reingold SC, Trojano M. Pregnancy, sex and hormonal factors in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2014;20(5):527–36.
Kelly VM, Nelson LM, Chakravarty EF. Obstetric outcomes in women with multiple sclerosis and epilepsy. Neurology. 2009;73(22):1831–6.
Macdonald SC, McElrath TF, Hernández-Díaz S. Pregnancy outcomes in women with multiple sclerosis. Am J Epidemiol. 2019;188(1):57–66.
Hellwig K, Correale J. Artificial reproductive techniques in multiple sclerosis. Clin Immunol. 2013;149(2):219–24.
Hellwig K, Brzosko B, Airas L, Smith EK. Fertility and assisted reproductive techniques in women with MS. In: Houtchens MK, Dessa Sadovnick A, editors. Health issues in women with multiple sclerosis. Vienna: Springer Verlag GmbH Austria; 2017. p. 9–17.
Fritz MA, Speroff L. Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
Pakenham KI, Fleming M. Relations between acceptance of multiple sclerosis and positive and negative adjustments. Psychol Health. 2011;26(10):1292–309.
Wilski M, Gabryelski J, Brola W, Tomasz T. Health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: links to acceptance, coping strategies and disease severity. Disabil Health J. 2019;12(4):608–14.
te Velde ER, Pearson PL. The variability of female reproductive ageing. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8(2):141–54.
Hansen KR, Hodnett GM, Knowlton N, Craig LB. Correlation of ovarian reserve tests with histologically determined primordial follicle number. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):170–5.
Colligan E, Metzler A, Tiryaki E. Shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2017;23(2):185–90.
Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia. Guía de asistencia Práctica. Control prenatal del embarazo normal. [Practical assistance guidelines. Prenatal control of normal pregnancy]. Progresos Obstet Ginecol. 2018;61(5):510–27.
van Houten ELAF, Themmen APN, Visser JA. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH): regulator and marker of ovarian function. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2010;71(3):191–7.
Vukusic S, Marignier R. Multiple sclerosis and pregnancy in the “treatment era.” Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11(5):280–9.
Krysko KM, Bove R, Dobson R, Jokubaitis V, Hellwig K. Treatment of women with multiple sclerosis planning pregnancy. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2021;23:11.
Bsteh G, Hegen H, Riedl K, et al. Estimating risk of multiple sclerosis disease reactivation in pregnancy and postpartum: the VIPRiMS score. Front Neurol. 2022;12:766956.
Doosti R, Togha M, Naser Moghadasi A, et al. Evaluation of the risk of cervical cancer in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with cytotoxic agents: a cohort study. Curr J Neurol. 2018;17(2):64–70.
Rauma I, Mustonen T, Seppä JM, et al. Safety of alemtuzumab in a nationwide cohort of Finnish multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol. 2022;269(2):824–35.
Barnett R, Banks N, Decherney AH. Endometriosis and fertility preservation. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;60(3):517–23.
Coyle PK, Oh J, Magyari M, Oreja-Guevara C, Houtchens M. Management strategies for female patients of reproductive potential with multiple sclerosis: an evidence-based review. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;32:54–63.
European Medicines Agency. Rebif—summary of product characteristics. 2021. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/rebif. Accessed
Technical data Copaxone, AEMPS Online Medicines Information Centre-CIMA. https://cima.aemps.es/cima/pdfs/es/ft/65983/65983_ft.pdf.
Galati A, McElrath T, Bove R. Use of B-cell—depleting therapy in women of childbearing potential with multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Neurol Clin Pract. 2022;12(2):154–63.
Bahadur G, Homburg R, Bosmans JE, et al. Observational retrospective study of UK national success, risks and costs for 319,105 IVF/ICSI and 30,669 IUI treatment cycles. BMJ Open. 2020;10(3): e034566.
Oseguera-López I, Ruiz-Díaz S, Ramos-Ibeas P, Pérez-Cerezales S. Novel techniques of sperm selection for improving IVF and ICSI outcomes. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:298.
Pandian Z, Templeton A, Serour G, Bhattacharya S. Number of embryos for transfer after IVF and ICSI: a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(10):2681–7.
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Multiple gestation associated with infertility therapy: an American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(4):825–34.
Vlaisavljevic V, Apter S, Capalbo A, et al. The Maribor consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of performance indicators for clinical practice in ART. Hum Reprod Open. 2021;2021(3):hoab022.
Lewis V. Vademecum. Reproductive endocrinology and infertility. Austin: Landes Bioscience; 2007.
Al-Inany HG, Youssef MAFM, Aboulghar M, et al. GnRH antagonists are safer than agonists: an update of a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(4):435.
Bove R, Rankin K, Lin C, et al. Effect of assisted reproductive technology on multiple sclerosis relapses: case series and meta-analysis. Mult Scler J. 2020;26(11):1410–9.
Mainguy M, Tillaut H, Degremont A, et al. Assessing the risk of relapse requiring corticosteroids after in vitro fertilization in women with multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2022;99(17):e1916–25.
Hellwig K, Schimrigk S, Beste C, Müller T, Gold R. Increase in relapse rate during assisted reproduction technique in patients with multiple sclerosis. Eur Neurol. 2009;61(2):65–8.
Michel L, Foucher Y, Vukusic S, et al. Increased risk of multiple sclerosis relapse after in vitro fertilisation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83(8):796–802.
Sparaco M, Bonavita S. The role of sex hormones in women with multiple sclerosis: from puberty to assisted reproductive techniques. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2021;60:100889.
Taylor TH, Wright G, Jones-Colon S, et al. Comparison of ICSI and conventional IVF in patients with increased oocyte immaturity. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(1):46–52.
Jungheim ES, Meyer MF, Broughton DE. Best practices for controlled ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization. Semin Reprod Med. 2015;33(2):77–82.
Alper MM, Fauser BC. Ovarian stimulation protocols for IVF: is more better than less? Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;34(4):345–53.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Fertility problems: assessment and treatment. 2017. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156. Accessed
Chambers GM, Paul RC, Harris K, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand: cumulative live birth rates as measures of success. Med J Aust. 2017;207(3):114–8.
Esteves SC, Roque M, Bedoschi GM, et al. Defining low prognosis patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology: POSEIDON criteria-the why. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9(AUG):1–10.
Whelan JG III, Vlahos NF. The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(5):883–96.
Balaban B, Urman B. Effect of oocyte morphology on embryo development and implantation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12(5):608–15.
Wong KM, Mastenbroek S, Repping S. Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success rates. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(1):19–26.
Maheshwari A, Mclernon D, Bhattacharya S. Cumulative live birth rate: time for a consensus? Hum Reprod. 2015;30(12):2703–7.
Veleva Z, Vilska S, Hydén-Granskog C, et al. Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36–39 years. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(8):2098–102.
Thöne J, Thiel S, Gold R, Hellwig K. Expert opinion on drug safety treatment of multiple sclerosis during pregnancy—safety considerations. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017;16(5):523–34.
Prévinaire JG, Lecourt G, Soler JM, Denys P. Sexual disorders in men with multiple sclerosis: evaluation and management. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014;57(5):329–36.
Fode M, Ohl DA, Sønksen J. A step-wise approach to sperm retrieval in men with neurogenic anejaculation. Nat Rev Urol. 2015;12:607–16.
Specchia C, Baggiani A, Immediata V, et al. Oocyte cryopreservation in oncological patients: eighteen years experience of a tertiary care referral center. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:600.
Llarena NC, Falcone T, Flyckt RL. Fertility preservation in women with endometriosis. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2019;13:1–8.
Somigliana E, Viganò P, Filippi F, et al. Fertility preservation in women with endometriosis: for all, for some, for none? Hum Reprod. 2015;30(6):1280–6.
Mathieu E, Ferrier C, Zacharopoulou C, et al. Outcomes of fertility preservation in women with endometriosis: comparison of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus antagonist protocols. J Ovarian Res. 2020;13:18.
Stoop D, Maes E, Polyzos NP, et al. Does oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion influence future relational and reproductive choices? A follow-up of bankers and non-bankers. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(2):338–44.
Mesen TB, Mersereau JE, Kane JB, Steiner AZ. Optimal timing for elective egg freezing. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(6):1551-1556.e4.
Doyle JO, Richter KS, Lim J, et al. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(2):459-466.e2.
Soelberg Sorensen P, Giovannoni G, Montalban X, et al. The multiple sclerosis care unit. Mult Scler J. 2019;25(5):627–36.
Morgan-Followell BN, Nicholas JA, Weisleder P. Reproductive issues in women with multiple sclerosis: ethical considerations. Neurol Pregnancy. 2014;20(1):177–80.
Vrtačnik Bokal E, Vrtačnik U. Impact of multiple sclerosis on infertility and impact of infertility treatments on multiple sclerosis relapses in slovenia: medical outline, legal and ethical outcomes. Med Law Soc. 2020;13(2):153–72.
Payne D, McPherson KM. Becoming mothers. Multiple sclerosis and motherhood: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(8):629–38.
Hendren E, Hladunewich MA, Lefkowitz A. Caring for pregnant patients with CKD—an ethical discussion of 5 cases. Kidney Int Rep. 2021;6(5):1273–9.
Riis Jølving L, Due Larsen M, Fedder J, Mertz NB. Live birth in women with multiple sclerosis receiving assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;40(5):711–8.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Matías Rey-Carrizo, PhD, who provided medical writing support on behalf of Springer Healthcare.
Funding
Merck, S.L.U., Madrid, Spain, an affiliate of Merck KGaA funded this work without participating in its design, data analysis or manuscript preparation. Merck, S.L.U also funded the journal’s Rapid Service Fee.
Author Contributions
All authors equally participated in the development of the study and the manuscript, had full editorial control, reviewed and edited various drafts and provided their final approval of all content and submission for publication.
Authorship
All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.
Disclosures
Celia Oreja-Guevara has received speaking and/or consultancy fees from Alexion, Biogen, BMS, Jannsen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and Teva. Yolanda Aladro has received funding for research projects or in the form of conference fees, mentoring and assistance for conference attendance from Bayer, Biogen, Roche, Merck, Novartis, Almirall and Sanofi. Mar Mendibe Bilbao has received funding for research projects and conference fees, mentoring and assistance for conference attendance from Teva, Merck, Biogen, Roche, Merck, Novartis, Almirall and Sanofi. Inés González-Suárez has received funding for research projects and conference fees, mentoring and assistance for conference attendance from Merck, Biogen, Roche, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi. José Luis Gómez-Palomares has received funding for conference fees, mentoring and assistance for conference attendance from Gedeon-Richter, Fertypharm, Theramex, Angelini, Ferring, MSD, Igenomix and Stada. The remaining authors declare no financial or other conflicts of interest.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
This is a consensus guideline based on evidence obtained from published literature and does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Data Availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Oreja-Guevara, C., Rabanal, A., Rodríguez, C.H. et al. Assisted Reproductive Techniques in Multiple Sclerosis: Recommendations from an Expert Panel. Neurol Ther 12, 427–439 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-023-00439-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-023-00439-y