Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laboratory Assessment of the Effectiveness of Rice Husk Ash, Rice Husk, and Groundnut Shells in Soil Improvement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Utilizing waste materials to improve soil properties can reduce construction costs, benefiting the environment. To this end, studies are conducted to examine the potential for using agricultural wastes, such as rice husk (RH), groundnut shells (GS), and rice husk ash (RHA), to modify clayey sands from Mysore district, India. This paper focuses on the results of Atterberg limits, compaction, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), and California bearing ratio (CBR) tests conducted on mixtures of soil-RHA-RH + GS. This study investigates the effects of varying weight percentages of RHA (5, 10, 15, and 20%) and RH and GS (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5%) on the strength of soil-RHA-RH + GS mixtures, at curing periods of 1, 7, 14, and 21 days. The results indicated a decrease in the maximum dry density (MDD) and an increase in the optimum moisture content (OMC). Additionally, Atterberg limits, CBR, and UCS showed slight improvement with the addition of RHA, RH, and GS. The soil mixture was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rashid AS, Kalatehjari R, Noor NM, Yaacob H, Moayedi H, Sing LK (2014) Relationship between liquidity index and stabilized strength of local subgrade materials in a tropical area. Measurement 55:231–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.05.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abou Diab A, Sadek S, Najjar S, Abou Daya MH (2016) Undrained shear strength characteristics of compacted clay reinforced with natural hemp fibres. Int J Geotech Eng 10(3):263–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anupam AK, Kumar P, Ransingchung GDRN (2014) Performance evaluation of structural properties for soil stabilised using rice husk ash. Road Mater Pavem Design 15(3):539–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eberemu AO, Amadi AA, Sule J (2011) Desiccation effect on compacted tropical clay treated with rice husk ash. In: Geo-Frontiers 2011: Adv Geotechn Eng, pp 1192–1201

  5. Anagnostopoulos CA, Tzetzis D, Berketis K (2014) Shear strength behaviour of polypropylene fibre reinforced cohesive soils. Geomechanics Geoengin 9(3):241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anguria P, Chemining’wa GN, Onwonga RN, Ugen MA (2017) Decomposition and nutrient release of selected cereal and legume crop residues. J Agric Sci 9:108. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v9n6p108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fondjo AA, Theron E, Ray RP (2021) Stabilization of expansive soils using mechanical and chemical methods: a comprehensive review. Civil Eng Arch 9(5):1295–1308. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2021.090503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh A, Singh B (2020) Characterization of rice husk ash obtained from an industrial source. J Sustain Cement-Based Mater 10(4):193–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2020.1789010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bera AK (2014) Compaction characteristics of fine-grained soil and rice husk ash mixture. Int J Geotech Eng 8(2):121–129. https://doi.org/10.1179/1939787913Y.0000000007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Behak L (2017) Soil stabilization with rice husk ash. Rice Technol Product 45:652. https://doi.org/10.5772/66311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen Z, Xu Y, Shivkumar S (2018) Microstructure and tensile properties of various varieties of rice husk. J Sci Food Agric 98(3):1061–1070. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8556. (Epub 2017 Aug 28 PMID: 28722221)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen FH (1988) Foundations on expansive soils. Elsevier Publisher B V, UK

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nguyen DT, Nguyen NT, Pham HN, Phung HH, Nguyen HV et al (2020) Rice husk ash and its utilization in soil improvement: an overview. J Mining Earth Sci 61(3):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Firoozi AA, Guney Olgun C, Firoozi AA et al (2017) Fundamentals of soil stabilization. Geo-Eng 8:26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#compare

  16. Moayedi H, Aghel B, Nguyen H, Rashid AS et al (2019) Applications of rice husk ash as green and sustainable biomass. J Clean Product 237:117851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. IS:1498 – 1970, Classification and identification of soils for general engineering purposes

  18. Lim JS, Manan ZA, Alwi SR, Hashim H (2012) A review on utilisation of biomass from rice industry as a source of renewable energy. Renewable Sustain Energy Rev 16(5):3084–3094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jha JN, Gill KS (2006) Effect of rice husk ash on lime stabilization of soil. J Inst Eng (India) Part CV, Civil Eng Division 87:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mansaray KG, Ghaly AE (1997) Physical and thermochemical properties of rice husk. Energy Sources 19(9):989–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar A, Walia BS, Mohan J (2006) Compressive strength of fiber-reinforced highly compressible clay. Construct Build Mater 20:1063–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maliakal T, Thiyyakkandi S (2013) Influence of randomly distributed coir fibres on shear strength of clay. Geotech Geol Eng 31(2):425–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Adajar MA, Aquino CJ, Martin CP, Urieta DK (2019) Investigating the effectiveness of rice husk ash as stabilizing agent of expansive soil. Geomate J 16(58):33–40

    Google Scholar 

  24. Leconte MC, Mazzarino MJ, Satti P, Iglesias MC, Laos F (2009) Cocomposting rice hulls and/or sawdust with poultry manure in NE Argentina. Waste Manage 29(9):2446–2453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jaiswal M, Lal B (2016) Impact of rice husk ash on soil stability (including micro level investigation). Ind J Sci Technol 9(30):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kalra MS, Panwar JS (1986) Anaerobic digestion of rice crop residues. Agricultural wastes 17(4):263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Grandawa MM (2014) Characterisation of physico-chemical properties of arachis hypogaea l. shells (groundnut) as environmental remediation. In: International conference on chemical, biological, and environmental sciences (ICCBES’14), pp 12–13

  28. Daimary N, Bhattacharjee A, Goswami R (2016) Effect of rice husk ash on shear and consolidation of lateritic soil. In: Proceedings of the Indian geotechnical conference IGC, IIT Madras, Chennai, India, pp 15–17

  29. Najjar S, Sadek S, Taha H, (2014) Use of hemp fibres in sustainable compacted clay systems. In: Abu-Farsakh M, Yu X, Hoyos LR (Eds.), Geo-congress 2014 Technical Papers: Geo-Characterization and Modeling for Sustainability. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Atlanta, Georgia, pp 1415–1424

  30. Nautiyal LPC (2007) National Research Centre for Groundnut (ICAR)

  31. Fasina OO (2008) Physical properties of peanut hull pellets. Bioresource Technol 9(5):1259–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nicholson PG (2015) Soil improvement and ground modification methods. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2015, pp 3–7, ISBN 9780124080768, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-408076-8.00001-7. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780124080768000017)

  33. Duc PA, Dharanipriya P, Velmurugan BK, Shanmugavadivu M (2019) Groundnut shell-a beneficial bio-waste. Biocatalysis Agricult Biotechnol 20:101206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Phonphuak N, Chindaprasirt P (2015) Types of waste, properties, and durability of pore-forming waste-based fired masonry bricks. Eco-Efficient Masonry Bricks Blocks 45:103–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-78242-305-8.00006-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Prabakar J, Sridhar RS (2002) Effect of random inclusion of sisal fibre on strength behaviour of soil. Construct Build Mater 16(2):123–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Prabhakar, Nagendra & Kumar, B V Suresh & K.N, Prakash & B M, Thanmaya & Urs, Samarth. (2020) Geotechnical Analysis of the Soils in and around Mysore, South India

  37. Jauberthie R, Rendell F, Tamba S, Cisse I (2000) Origin of the pozzolanic effect of rice husks. Construct Build Mater 14(8):419–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Genieva S, Turmanova S, Dimitrova A, Vlaev L (2008) Characterization of rice husks and the products of its thermal degradation in air or nitrogen atmosphere. J Therm Anal Calorim 93(2):387–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Miller SA, Habert G, Myers RJ, Harvey JT (2021) Achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions in the cement industry via value chain mitigation strategies. One Earth 4(10):1398–1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schaefer VR, Mitchell JK, Berg RR, Filz GM, Douglas SC (2012) Ground improvement in the 21st century: a comprehensive web-based information system. Geotechnical Special Publication. pp 272–293. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412138.0011

  41. Pourakbar S, Huat BK (2016) A review of alternatives traditional cementitious binders for engineering improvement of soils. Int J Geotech Eng 11(2):206–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2016.1207042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sizirici B, Fseha Y, Cho CS, Yildiz I, Byon YJ (2021) A review of carbon footprint reduction in construction industry, from design to operation. Materials 14(20):6094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14206094. (PMID: 34683687 PMCID: PMC8540435)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Malik V, Priyadarshee A (2017) Compaction and swelling behaviour of black cotton soil mixed with different non-cementitious materials. Int J Geotechn Eng 12(4):413–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1288355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wei L, Chai SX, Zhang HY, Shi Q (2018) Mechanical properties of soil reinforced with both lime and four kinds of fibre. Construct Build Mater 172:300–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhao X, Chen J, Fangling Du (2012) Potential use of peanut by-products in food processing: a review. J Food Sci Technol 49(5):521–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yanping Z, Tiankui Y, (2019) Chapter 9 rice husk, rice husk ash and their applications, In: Ling-Zhi C, Xuebing X (Eds), Rice bran and rice bran oil, AOCS Press, pp 207–246, ISBN 9780128128282, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812828-2.00009-3. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128128282000093)

Download references

Funding

No funds, grants, or other supports were received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, AMC Engineering College, Bengaluru, India

    K. L. Maithili & A. Shashishankar

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, R V College of Engineering, Bengaluru, India

    M. S. Nagakumar

Authors
  1. K. L. Maithili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. S. Nagakumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Shashishankar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. L. Maithili.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maithili, K.L., Nagakumar, M.S. & Shashishankar, A. Laboratory Assessment of the Effectiveness of Rice Husk Ash, Rice Husk, and Groundnut Shells in Soil Improvement. Indian Geotech J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-023-00850-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-023-00850-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation