Skip to main content
Log in

Failure Modes of Air Desaturated Sand in Undrained Cyclic Loading: A Systematic Experimental Investigation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic experimental investigation to understand different failure modes of air desaturated clean sand in undrained cyclic loading for a degree of saturation in the range of 70% to full saturation. Five distinct failure modes have been observed depending on the degree of saturation, relative density, effective confining pressure and cyclic shear stress ratio. Nearly saturated samples of loose sand at low confining pressure underwent hybrid cyclic liquefaction failure wherein it reached dense of critical state during compression stage of loading only. However, nearly saturated samples of medium dense sand at low confining pressure accumulated large plastic strain on the compression side owing to gradual strain softening. Both loose and medium dense samples, with a high degree of saturation, underwent cyclic mobility failure at high effective confining pressure, wherein the sample reached dense of critical state during both compression and extension stage of loading. Moreover, two types of cyclic softening failures, demarcated by two distinct phase transformation trends, were observed in samples with a low degree of saturation. Investigation from the critical state soil mechanics framework revealed that all test samples lay on the dense-of-critical side, and nearly saturated samples closest to critical state underwent cyclic mobility failure, whereas those at farthest from critical state failed by gradual strain softening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

S :

Degree of saturation of the sample

e :

Void ratio of the sample

n :

Porosity of the soil sample

K s :

Bulk modulus of soil skeleton

K w :

Bulk modulus of water

u a :

Absolute pore fluid pressure

B :

Skempton’s pore pressure parameter

D r :

Relative density of the sample

N :

Number of loading cycles

r u :

Pore pressure ratio

q :

Deviatoric stress

\(\sigma_{c}^{^{\prime}}\) :

Initial effective confining pressure

\(\sigma_{3}^{^{\prime}}\) :

Effective minor principal stress

\(\sigma_{1}^{^{\prime}}\) :

Effective major principal stress

CSR:

Cyclic shear stress ratio

References

  1. Castro G (1969) Liquefaction of sands. Harvard University, Cambridge Masschusetts

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ishihara K (1993) Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Geotechnique 43:351–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ishihara K (1996) Soil behavoiur in earthquake geotechnics. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Pearson, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Idriss IM, Boulanger R (2008) Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. EERI

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sze HY, Yang J (2014) Failure modes of sand in undrained cyclic loading: impact of sample preparation. Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ishihara M, Okamura M, Oshita T (2003) Desaturating sand deposit by air injection for reducing liquefaction potential. In: Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering

  8. Pietruszczak S, Pande GN, Oulapour M (2003) A hypothesis for mitigation of risk of liquefaction. Géotechnique 53:833–838. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.9.833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yegian MK, Eseller-Bayat E, Alshawabkeh A, Ali S (2007) Induced-partial saturation for liquefaction mitigation: experimental investigation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133:372–380. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:4(372)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Takemura J, Igarashi R, Izawa J, Okamura M, Masuda M (2009) Centrifuge model tests on soil desaturation as a liquefaction countermeasure. Proc Int Conf Soil Mech Geotech Eng Acad Pract Geotech Eng 1:502–505. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-031-5-502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marasini NP, Okamura M (2015) Numerical simulation of centrifuge tests to evaluate the performance of desaturation by air injection on liquefiable foundation soil of light structures. Soils Found 55:1388–1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zeybek A, Madabhushi SPG (2016) Centrifuge testing to evaluate the liquefaction response of air-injected partially saturated soils beneath shallow foundations. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9968-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Okamura M, Takebayashi M, Nishida K, Fujii N, Jinguji M, Imasato T et al (2011) In-Situ desaturation test by air injection and its evaluation through field monitoring and multiphase flow simulation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137:643–652. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. He J, Chu J, Ivanov V (2013) Mitigation of liquefaction of saturated sand using biogas. Géotechnique 63:267–275. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.SIP13.P.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zeybek A, Madabhushi SPG (2017) Influence of air injection on the liquefaction-induced deformation mechanisms beneath shallow foundations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 97:266–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marasini NP, Okamura M (2015) Air injection to mitigate liquefaction under light structures. Int J Phys Model Geotech 15:129–140. https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.14.00005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. He J, Chu J (2014) Undrained responses of microbially desaturated sand under monotonic loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140:04014003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. IS: 2720 (Part 4) – 1985 (2006) (Reaffirmed 2006)

  19. IS: 2720 (Part 3/Sec 1) - 1980 (2002) (Reaffirmed 2002)

  20. IS: 2720 (Part 14) -1983 (2006) (Reaffirmed 2006)

  21. Xin L, Jun Y, Gonghui W, Longzhu C (2016) Small-strain shear modulus of volcanic granular soil: an experimental investigation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 86:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Black D, Lee K (1973) Saturating laboratory samples by back pressure. J Soil Mech Found Div 99:75–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Skempton AW (1954) The pore-pressure coefficients A and B. Géotechnique 4:143–147. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1954.4.4.143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yoshimi Y, Tanaka K, Tokimatsu K (1989) Liquefaction resistance of a partially saturated sand. Soils Found 29:157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Celestino V, Kenneth H (2012) Seismic measurements in sand specimens with varying degrees of saturation using piezoelectric transducers. Can Geotech J 685:671–685. https://doi.org/10.1139/T2012-033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lade PV (2016) Triaxial Testing of Soils, 1st edn. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Schofield A, Wroth P (1968) Critical state soil mechanics. McGraw-hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Been K, Jefferies MG (1985) A state parameter for sands. Géotechnique 35:99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Salgado R (2008) The engineering of foundations. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Poulos SJ, Castro G, France JW (1985) Liquefaction evaluation procedure. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng I:772–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Boulanger RW, Idriss IM (2006) Liquefaction susceptibility criteria for silts and clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132:1413–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhanaji Chavan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chavan, D., Sitharam, T.G. & Anbazhagan, P. Failure Modes of Air Desaturated Sand in Undrained Cyclic Loading: A Systematic Experimental Investigation. Indian Geotech J 52, 249–269 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-021-00577-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-021-00577-w

Keywords

Navigation