Skip to main content
Log in

Isotach Elastoplasticity: A Case Study on Osaka Bay Clay

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The theory of isotach elastoplasticity (IEP) is applied to investigate the strain rate and time effects in Osaka Bay clay from Japan. The IEP theory considers geomaterials like clays as an overdamped oscillatory physical system, for which the strain rate (analogous to the vibration frequency) decays in an exponential manner. This feature can be captured by a characteristic strain rate and time relationship. The evolutionary change of strain rate is found to affect the mechanical response of soft clays in an isotach manner. A loading–isotach (LI) yield curve is proposed in the stress and strain rate plane. Combination of the characteristic strain rate and time relationship in an isotach manner into the framework of critical state soil mechanics renders an isotach (rate-dependent) elastoplastic (IEP) constitutive model. A total of 9 model parameters is required, and their values can be properly determined via conventional laboratory tests. The validity of the proposed IEP is demonstrated using experimental data for Osaka Bay clay under various stress paths and strain rates, namely, long-term creep, constant rate of strain loading, relaxation, and their combination. Comparison of the model predictions and experimental results demonstrates that the theory of isotach elastoplasticity can be successfully applied to capture the strain rate and time effects on the mechanical behaviour of Osaka Bay clay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adachi T, Oka F (1982) Constitutive equations for normally consolidated clay based on elasto-viscoplasticity. Soils Found 22(4):57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bjerrum L (1967) Engineering geology of Norwegian normally-consolidated marine clays as related to settlements of buildings. Géotechnique 17(2):83–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dafalias YF (1986) An anisotropic critical state soil plasticity model. Mech Res Commun 13(6):341–347

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Feda J (1989) Interpretation of creep of soils by rate process theory. Géotechnique 39:667–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gens A (1982) Stress–strain and strength of a low plasticity clay. Ph.D., University of London, UK

  6. Hashiguchi K, Okayasu T, Saitoh K (2005) Rate-dependent inelastic constitutive equation: the extension of elastoplasticity. Int J Plast 21(3):463–491

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim YT, Leroueil S (2001) Modeling the viscoplastic behaviour of clays during consolidation: application to Berthierville clay in both laboratory and field conditions. Can Geotech J 38(3):484–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leroueil S (1996) Compressibility of clays: fundamental and practical aspects. J Geotech Eng 122(7):534–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leroueil S, Hight DW (2002) Behaviour and properties of natural soils and rocks. In: Proceedings of the workshop on characterisation and properties of natural soils, Singapore, vol 1, pp 29–254

  10. Leroueil S (2006) The isotach approach. Where are we 50 years after its development by Professor Šuklje? In: Proceedings of the 13th Danube European conference on geotechnical engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia

  11. Leroueil S, Kabbaj M, Tavenas F (1988). Study of the validity of a \(\sigma^{{\prime }} - \varepsilon_{\text{v}} - \dot{\varepsilon }_{\text{v}}\) model in in situ conditions. Soils Found. 28(3): 13–25

  12. Leroueil S, Kabbaj M, Tavenas F, Bouchard R (1985) Stess-strain-strain rate relation for the compressibility of sensitive natural clays. Géotechnique 35(2):159–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leroueil S, Samson L, Bozozuk M (1983) Laboratory and field determination of preconsolidation pressures at Gloucester. Can Geotech J 20(3):477–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leroueil S, Tavenas F, Samson L, Morin P (1983) Preconsolidation pressure of champlain clays. Part II. Laboratory determination. Can Geotech J 20(4):803–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marques MES, Leroueil S, Soares de Almeida MDS (2004) Viscous behaviour of St-Roch-de-l’Achigan clay, Quebec. Can Geotech J 41(1):25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mesri G, Funk J (2015) Settlement of the Kansai International Airport Islands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(2):04014102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitchell JK (1993) Fundamentals of soil behavior. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Perzyna P (1966) Fundamental problems in viscoplasticity. Adv Appl Mech 9:243–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Puzrin AM, Alonso EE, Pinyol NM (2010). Unexpected excessive settlements: Kansai international airport, Japan. In: Geomechanics of failures. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp 23–43

  20. Rowe RK, Hinchberger SD (1998) The significance of rate effects in modelling the Sackville test embankment. Can Geotech J 35(3):500–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh A, Mitchell JK (1968) General stress–strain-time function for soils. Proc Am Soc Civ Eng 94:21–46

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sloan SW, Abbo AJ, Sheng D (2001) Refined explicit integration of elastoplastic models with automatic error control. Eng Comput 18(1–2):121–154

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Suklje L (1957) The analysis of the consolidation process by the isotach method. In: 4th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering. London, England, vol 1, pp 319–326

  24. Tanaka H, Tanaka M, Suzuki S, Sakagami T (2003) Development of a new cone penetrometer and its application to great depths of pleistocene clays. Soils Found 43(6):51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tanaka H (2005) Consolidation behaviour of natural soils around p_c value: inter-connected oedometer test. Soils Found 45(3):97–105

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tanaka H (2005) Consolidation behaviour of natural soils around p_c value: long term consolidation test. Soils Found 45(3):83–95

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tanaka H, Udaka K, Nosaka T (2006) Strain rate dependency of cohesive soils in consolidation settlement. Soils Found 46(3):315–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tavenas F, Leroueil S, Rochelle PL, Roy M (1978) Creep behaviour of an undisturbed lightly overconsolidated clay. Can Geotech J 15(3):402–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Taylor DW (1942) Research on consolidation of clays. Department of Civil and Sanitary Engineering, MIT. Publication 82

  30. Watabe Y, Tsuchida T, Adachi K (2002) Undrained shear strength of Pleistocene clay in Osaka Bay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128(3):216–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Watabe Y, Tanaka M, Tanaka H, Tsuchida T (2003) K0 consolidation in a triaxial cell and evaluation of in situ K0 for marine clays with various characteristics. Soils Found 43(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Watabe Y et al (2008) Strain rate effect on long-term consolidation of Osaka bay clay. Soils Found 48(4):495–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Watabe Y, Udaka K, Nakatani Y, Leroueil S (2012) Long-term consolidation behavior interpreted with isotach concept for worldwide clays. Soils Found 52(3):449–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Watabe Y, Leroueil S (2012) Modeling and implementation of the isotache concept for long-term consolidation behavior. Int J Geomech 15(5):A4014006. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Watabe Y, Leroueil S (2013) Simplified modelling of isotache concept for consolidation. In: Yang Q, Zhang J-M, Zheng H, Yao Y (eds) Constitutive modeling of geomaterials. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 139–143

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang C, Carter JP, Sheng D (2014) Description of compression behaviour of structured soils and its application. Can Geotech J 51(8):921–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang C, Sheng D, Carter JP, Sloan SW (2015) Modelling the plastic anisotropy of Lower Cromer Till. Comput Geotech 69:22–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang C, Carter JP, Sheng D, Sloan SW (2016) An isotach elastoplastic constitutive model for natural soft clay. Comput Geotech 77:134–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yin JH, Graham J (1989) Viscous–elastic–plastic modelling of one-dimensional time-dependent behaviour of clays. Can Geotech J 26(2):199–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yin J-H et al (2002) A new elastic viscoplastic model for time-dependent behaviour of normally and overconsolidated clays: theory and verification. Can Geotech J 39(1):157–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yin Z-Y, Chang CS, Karstunen M, Hicher P-Y (2010) An anisotropic elastic–viscoplastic model for soft clays. Int J Solids Struct 47(5):665–677

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this work from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science and Engineering, hosted at the University of Newcastle, Australia, is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. Carter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, C., Carter, J.P. Isotach Elastoplasticity: A Case Study on Osaka Bay Clay. Indian Geotech J 47, 161–172 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-016-0206-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-016-0206-6

Keywords

Navigation