Abstract
In this article, we defined the generalized fractional differential Tremblay operator in the open unit disk that by usage the definition of the generalized Srivastava–Owa operator. In particular, we established a new operator denoted by \( \Theta ^{\beta ,\tau , \gamma }_{z}\) based on the normalized generalized fractional differential operator and represented by convolution product. Moreover, we studied the coefficient criteria of univalence, starlikeness and convexity for the last operator mentioned.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Let \( \mathcal {A}(m)\) denoted the class of functions \( \psi (z)\) of the form:
which are analytic and univalent functions in the open unit disk
and we set \( \mathcal {A}(1)\equiv \mathcal {A}\) when \( m=1\). Let \( \mathcal {S}(m)\) denoted the subclass of \(\mathcal {A}(m)\) representing of all the univalent functions (or schlict or one-to-one) in \(\mathbb {U}\) for \( \psi (0)=0\) and \( \psi ^{\prime }(0)=1\). The functions \( \psi (z) \in \mathcal {A}(m)\) are said to be the starlike functions of order \( \lambda \,(0 \le \lambda <1)\) in \( {\mathbb {U}}\), if it satisfies the form
we note that \( \mathcal {S}_{\lambda }^{*}(m) \subseteq \mathcal {S}_{0}^{*}(m)\equiv \mathcal {S}^{*}(m)\subseteq \mathcal {S}(m)\). Otherwise, The functions \( \psi (z) \in \mathcal {S}(m)\) are said to be convex functions of order\( \lambda \,(0 \le \lambda <1)\), if it satisfies the form
which symbolized by \( \mathcal {K}_{\lambda }(m) \subseteq \mathcal {K}_{0}(m) \equiv \mathcal {K}(m) \) and \(\mathcal {K}_{\lambda }(m) \subseteq \mathcal {S}_{\lambda }^{*}(m)\). The classes \(\mathcal {S}_{\lambda }^{*}(m)\) and \( \mathcal {K}_{\lambda }(m)\) have been discussed by many researchers (see [1, 2]). For \( m=1\), the classes \( \mathcal {K}_{\lambda }(1)\) and \( \mathcal {S}_{\lambda }^{*}(1)\) of order \( \lambda \,( 0\le \lambda <1)\) were studied before by Robertson [3], and by setting \( \lambda =0\), they are represented as equivalent form:
Theorem 1
(Bieberbach’s Conjecture [4, 5]) The functions \( \psi (z)\) which is defined in (1), is the univalent function in class \(\mathcal {S}(1)\), if \( | a_{\kappa }| \le \kappa \) for all \( \kappa \ge 2 \) and its convex functions in the class \( \mathcal {K}(1)\) if \(| a_{\kappa }|\le 1. \)
Next, the concept of convolution (or Hadamard product) for two analytic and univalent functions \( \psi (z)\) given by (1) and \( h (z)= z + \sum \nolimits _{\kappa = m+1}^{\infty } b_{\kappa } z^{\kappa }, \, m= \lbrace 1,2,3,\ldots \rbrace \) defined by
Let us here recall some the well known geometric properties for the convolution (or Hadamard product) due to Ruscheweyh (see [6]).
Lemma 1
-
(1)
For the functions \( \psi (z)\) and \( h(z) \in \mathcal {A}(m),\) and c a constant, then we have
$$\begin{aligned} c \big ( \psi * h\big )(z) = c\,\psi * h(z) = \psi * c\, h(z). \end{aligned}$$ -
(2)
The derivative convolution of two functions belong to the class \( \mathcal {A}(m)\) is defined as:
$$\begin{aligned} z(h* \psi )^{\prime }(z)&= \; h*z \psi ^{\prime }(z)\\&=\; z+ \sum _{\kappa =m+1}^{\infty }\kappa a_{\kappa }b_{\kappa } z^{\kappa }. \end{aligned}$$ -
(3)
Let the functions \( \psi (z) \in \mathcal {S}^{*}(m)\) and \( h(z) \in \mathcal {K}(m),\) then \( (\psi * h)(z) \in \mathcal {S}^{*}(m)\).
-
(4)
For each functions \( \psi (z) \) and \( h(z) \in \mathcal {K}(m),\) then \( (\psi * h)(z) \in \mathcal {K}(m).\)
In [8, 9], Srivastava and Owa defined the fractional integral and differential operators in the complex z-plane \( \mathbb {C}\) as the formula:
Definition 1
The fractional integral of order \( \sigma \) is defined, for a function f(z) by:
where \( 0 \le \sigma < 1, \) and the function f(z) is analytic in simply-connected region of the complex z-plane \(\mathbb {C}\) containing the origin and the multiplicity of \( (z-\zeta )^{\sigma -1}\) is removed by requiring \( \log (z-\zeta )\) to be real when \((z-\zeta )> 0. \)
Definition 2
The fractional derivative of order \( \sigma \) is defined, for a function f(z), by
where \( 0 \le \sigma < 1, \) and the function f(z) is analytic in simply-connected region of the complex z-plane containing the origin and the multiplicity of \( (z-\zeta )^{-\sigma }\) is removed, same in the Definition (1) above.
Tremblay defined one of the successful fractional operators in [10]. Recently, some geometric properties and applications for Termblay’s operator \( {{\mathfrak {T}}}_{z}^{\beta ,\gamma }\) in complex plane and in particular on the open unit disk \(\mathbb {U},\) studied and discussed by [11–13].
Definition 3
For \( 0< \beta \le 1, 0 < \tau \le 1 \) and \( 1> \beta -\tau \ge 0.\) The Tremblay operator \( {{\mathfrak {T}}}_{z}^{\beta ,\tau }f(z)\) of function \( f(z) \in \mathcal {A}(1),\) for all \( z \in \mathbb {U}\) is defined as:
Example 1
We find the fractional derivative Termblay operator \( {{\mathfrak {T}}}_{z}^{\beta ,\tau }f(z)\) in Definition 3, where the function \( f(z) = z^{\mu },\) and \( \mu \in \mathbb {R}.\)
if \( \mu =1 ,\) we have
and, if \( \beta , \tau =1 ,\) then
Ibrahim defined a generalization of the fractional differential and integral Srivastava–Owa operators in the open unit disk \( \mathbb {U}\) as follows [14]:
Definition 4
If \( 0 \le \alpha <1,\) \(\eta \ge 0,\) then defined the generalized fractional integral Srivastava–Owa operator of order \( \alpha \) such as
where f(z) function is analytic in simply-connoted region of the complex z-plane \( \mathbb {C} \) containing the origin, and the multiplicity of \( (z^{\eta +1} - \zeta ^{\eta +1})^{-\alpha } \) is removed by requiring \( \log (z^{\eta +1} - \zeta ^{\eta +1})\) to be real when \( (z^{\eta +1} - \zeta ^{\eta +1}) > 0 .\)
Definition 5
If \( 0 \le \alpha <1,\) \(\eta \ge 0,\) then defined the generalized fractional derivative Srivastava–Owa operator of order \( \alpha \) such as
where \( 0 \le \alpha <1,\) \(\eta > 0\) and f(z) function is analytic in simply-connoted region of the complex z-plane C containing the origin, and the multiplicity of \( (z^{\eta +1} - \zeta ^{\eta +1})^{-\alpha } \) is removed , as in Definition 4 above.
Lemma 2
Let \( f(z) \in \mathcal {A};\) for all \(z\in \mathbb {U},\) \( \rho \in \mathbb {R},\) \( 0 \le \alpha <1\) and \( \eta \ge 0,\) then
and
Next, we included the Fox–Wright function, which is one of the special functions that generalize hypergeometric functions (see [10]), let denoted this function by \( {}_{p}\Lambda _{q} \) and defined as:
In particular, \( A_{1}= \cdots = A_{p}=B_{1}= \cdots = B_{q} = 1\), then they turn into (see [15, 16])
where \( \rho _{i}, \lambda _{j} \) are parameters in complex plan \(\mathbb {C}\). \( A_{i}>0 \), \( B_{j}>0 \) for all \( j=1, \ldots , q \) and \( i=1,\ldots ,p \), such that \( 0\le 1 + \sum \nolimits _{j=1}^{q} B_{j} - \sum \nolimits _{i=1}^{p} A_{i} \) for fitting values \( |z| <1. \) For all \( z \in \mathbb {C} \) and \( \kappa \in \lbrace 2,3,4,\ldots \rbrace \), the Pochhammer symbol \(( z)_{\kappa }\) defined as:
where \( (z)_{\kappa }=\frac{\Gamma (z+\kappa )}{\Gamma (z)}\) and the formula \( \Gamma (z)\) is the well known gamma function. In fact, this function have many remarkable properties in complex plan, we here review some of them. For \( z \in \mathbb {C}\), then
and
Moreover, we consider the Bloch space \( \mathbb {B}(\mathbb {U})\) of all functions analytic and univalent functions f in \(\mathcal {A}\) which is defined as [17]:
In the present paper, the generalized Tremblay operator with univalent function \( \mathcal {S}(1)\), which is considered as the generalized fractional derivative operator in Definition 5, was defined. After ward, we utilized the normalized generalized Tremblay operator in a class of analytic functions \( \mathcal {A}(m)\), with subclasses \( \mathcal {S}(m), \mathcal {S}_{\lambda }^{*}(m)\) and \( \mathcal {K}_{\lambda }(m)\) in the open unit disk. Furthermore, we performed some applications to prove the bound coefficient for the last operator.
Results
In this section, we defined the generalized fractional differential of the Tremblay operator in Definition 6 according to definition of the generalized fractional derivative of the Srivastava–Owa operator in complex plane \( \mathbb {C}\), for the special case, \( m=1 \) in classes \( \mathcal {A}\) and \( \mathcal {S}\). Examples of power function in complex z-plane and some boundedness properties in Bloch space for the operator mentioned were presented as well.
Definition 6
Let \( 0 \le \beta \le 1\), \( 0 \le \tau \le 1 \) and \( \gamma \ge 0\). The generalized fractional differential Tremblay operator of two parameters, is defined as
where the function f(z) is analytic and univalent in simple-connected region of the complex z-plane \( \mathbb {C}\) containing the origin, and the multiplicity of \( ( z^{\gamma +1}-\zeta ^{\gamma +1})^{-\beta +\tau } \) is removed by requiring \(\log (z^{\gamma +1} - \zeta ^{\gamma +1})\) to be non-negative when \(( z^{\gamma +1}-\zeta ^{\gamma +1}) > 0 .\)
Next, we provided a survey of the interest operator \( {\mathfrak {T}}_{z}^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }\) to satisfy a boundedness property in the open unit disk and gave an example by using Definition 6. Note that proving the boundedness operator on Bloch space requires using expression (1), when \( m=1.\)
Example 2
Let \( f (z):= z^{\kappa },\) \( z \in {\mathbb {U}}\) and \(\kappa \in N. \) If \( 0 < \beta \le 1,\) \( 0 < \tau \le 1, \) \( \gamma \ge 0,\) and \( 0\le \beta - \tau <1,\) then the generalized of Termblay operator with power function satisfy
note here, if \( \kappa =1,\) we obtain
now go back to Example 1, we see that, if \( \gamma = 0,\) then
and if \(\beta =1, \tau =1,\) \( \gamma =0,\) we get
In next theorem, we considered the form of definition of the power series to prove the operator \({\mathfrak {T}}_{z}^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }\) is bounded with the univalent function \( \mathcal {S}\) on Bloch space \( \mathbb {B}(\mathbb {U})\) in the open unit disk.
Theorem 2
Let the function \( f \in \mathcal {S}(1) \equiv \mathcal {S} \) belongs to \( {\mathbb {U}}.\) Then the operator \( {\mathfrak {T}}_{z}^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }: \mathcal {S}\rightarrow \mathcal {S} \) is bounded on the Bloch \( \mathbb {B}({\mathbb {U}}),\) if
where
Proof
By supposing f(z) in class of \( \mathcal {S}\), we employ Lemma 1 and Example 2, we obtain
since \( |z| < r, \) for all \( z\in \mathbb {U},\) then
where \( M:= \frac{r^{(1+\tau -\beta )\gamma }(\gamma +1)^{\beta -\tau }\Gamma (\tau )}{\Gamma (\beta )} {}_{2}\Lambda _{1}(r)\) and
Normalized operator
In this section we defined a new operator in Theorem 3, which is normalized for the generalized Tremblay operator \( {\mathfrak {T}}_{z}^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }f(z)\) with an analytic function in the class \( \mathcal {A}(m)\).
Theorem 3
Let the following conditions to be realized:
Then the normalized of generalized Tremblay operator in Definition 6 is denoted by \( \Theta ^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }_{z} f(z)\) and defined as:
For all \( f(z) \in \mathcal {A}(m)\) and \( |z| < 1,\) where
Proof
From Definition 6, and by considering the function
we have
then
which equals to
Thus, the normalized for the generalized Tremblay operator is represented as the power series and preserves the class \( \mathcal {A}(m)\) with their subclasses, where \( m = 1,2,\ldots \) in the open unit disk \(\mathbb {U},\) as
\(\square \)
Lemma 3
Let the operator \( \Theta _{z}^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma } f(z)\) defined in the class \( \mathcal {S}(m),\) \( m \in N\backslash \lbrace 0\rbrace ,\) for all \( z\in \mathbb {U} .\) Then
Proof
By employing the Cauchy–Hadamard formal, we find the radius of convergence of the series function in \(\Theta ^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }_{z} f(z).\) Supposing the function \( f(z) \in \mathcal {S} (m)\) then the coefficient \( |a_{\kappa }|\le \kappa \) for \(\kappa \in N=\lbrace 2,3,4,\ldots \rbrace \) through Theorem 1, we see that
and
By using the property of gamma function, we have
thus follows \( r \le 1.\) \(\square \)
Criteria for Hadamard product
In this section, the operator in (17) is represented as the convolution product of two univalent functions in class of \( \mathcal {S}(m) \in \mathbb {U}\), in particular, when \( m=1\).
Theorem 4
Let \( f \in \mathcal {S}(1)\equiv \mathcal {S}\) be an univalent function in \( \mathbb {U}\). Then we appear the operator \( \Theta ^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }_{z} \) as the convolution of two functions in \( \mathcal {S},\)
where \( g(z): =\frac{\Gamma \left( \frac{\beta }{\gamma +1}+1-\beta +\tau \right) }{\Gamma \left( \frac{\beta }{\gamma +1}+1\right) } {}_{2} \Lambda _{1}(z).\)
Proof
By equality (20), we have
hence
by letting
Then the proof is completed. \(\square \)
Based on the results, the following observations were obtained. Let \( f(z) \in \mathcal {A}(1) \subseteq \mathbb {U}\).
-
1.
If \( \beta ,\tau =1,\gamma =0\), then \(\Theta ^{1,1,0}_{z} f(z) := f(z)\) defined in (1), for \( m=1\).
-
2.
If \(\gamma =0,\) then \(\Theta ^{\beta ,\tau ,0}_{z} f(z) := {\mathfrak {T}}^{\beta ,\tau }_{z} f(z)\) defined in (7), for \( m=1.\)
-
3.
It is clear that the operator \({\Theta }^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }_{z}f(z)\) is generalized of Carlson–Shaffer operator, when \(\gamma =0 \) and \(\frac{\tau }{\beta } = 1\) in (21), while the linear operator of Carlson and Shaffer defined as [18]:
$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal {L}(a,c) f(z) = \varphi (a,c;z) * f(z), f \in \mathcal {A} \end{aligned}$$where \(\varphi (a,c;z)= \sum \nolimits _{\kappa =0}^{\infty } \frac{(a)_{\kappa }}{(c)_{\kappa }} z^{\kappa },\) \( z \in \mathrm {U}, a \in R, c \in \lbrace 1,2,3,\ldots \rbrace. \)
Note here the proof of the following Theorems comes immediately from Eq. (20) and Lemma 1.
Theorem 5
Let \( 0< \beta \le 1, \, 0< \tau \le 1\) and the condition (16). If the function f(z) given by (1) in the class \( \mathcal {S}^{*}(m)\) and the function g(z) defined by (22) in \( \mathcal {K}(m).\) Then
Theorem 6
Let \( 0< \beta \le 1, \, 0< \tau \le 1\) and the condition (16). If the functions f(z) given by (1) and g(z) defined by (22) in \( \mathcal {K}(m).\) Then
Univalency of the operator \(\Theta ^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }_{z} \)
We discussed the initialization of a univalent criteria and convexity by employing the normalized Tremblay operator in the open unit disk, in particular when \( m=1\).
Theorem 7
Let \( f\in \mathcal {S}(1). \) If the following conditions satisfied
-
(i)
for \( 0 < \beta \le 1 ,\) \( 0 < \tau \le 1 \) such that \( 0 \le \beta -\tau < 1\).
-
(ii)
\( 0 < \rho _{i}, \, i= 1, \ldots , p \) and \( 0 < \lambda _{j}, \, j= 1, \ldots , q; \) \( p \le q + 1,\)
then the operator \(\Theta ^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }_{z} f(z) \in \mathcal {S}\) in open unite disk \( \mathbb {U} .\)
Proof
By supposing the function \( f \in \mathcal {S}\) with equality (17), we have
where \( w_{\kappa }:=\vartheta _{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }(\kappa ) a_{\kappa } \) and the function \(\vartheta _{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }(\kappa )\) defined in (18) satisfied the following condition in class \( \mathcal {S}\) as follows:
By using Theorem 1, we give the estimate for the coefficients of an univalent function belong to \(\mathcal {S}\) in \( \mathbb {U}\) also, by employ this estimate, we can get another estimate for \( \ell _{1} \) in \( \mathcal {S}\) as follows,
where
The series in (23) is transformed into a sum of twice the terms by employing the following relation:
Depending on \( (1)_{\kappa }=\kappa ! \) and \( (1)_{\kappa -1}=(\kappa -1)!, \) the estimate (23) becomes the next form:
by considering some properties of the gamma function in (13) and (12), we have
and by using the Fox–Wright function, we can transform the estimate \( \ell _{1}\) at \( z \rightarrow 1,\)
We conclude from the above theorem that the operator \( \Theta ^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }_{z} f(z) \) maps preserve the property (univalent function) in class \( f \in \mathcal {S}\) from a linear space to another. Further, the operator \( \Theta ^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }_{z} f(z) \) is univalent for \( f \in \mathcal {S}\) for all \( z\in \mathbb {U}\) in the open unit disk and \( \Theta ^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }_{z} : \mathcal {S} \rightarrow \mathcal {S}.\)
Theorem 8
Let the condition i as in the Theorem 7 is satisfied, then
then the operator maps a convex function f(z) into a univalent function that is \( \Theta ^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }_{z} : \mathcal {K}\rightarrow \mathcal {S}.\)
Proof
Presume that \( f(z) \in \mathcal {K},\) \( z \in \mathcal {U}\) and the operator (17), such that
where
and the function \(\vartheta _{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }\) is defined in inequality (18), satisfied the following condition in class \( \mathcal {S}\) as follows:
We know That the coefficient of a convex function belong to \(\mathcal {S}\) is \( |a_{\kappa }|<1\). So we can get another estimate for \( \ell _{2} \) as follows,
where
where \( a _{\kappa } \) is Pochhammer symbol defined in (11),with the following relation
and \( (1)_{\kappa }=\kappa !, \) then the estimate (26) become as the next form
employ the properties of gamma function, we have
then with the Fox–Wright function, we transform the estimate \( \ell _{1}\) at \( z=1,\)
hence
We conclude from the above theorem that the maps preserve the property (univalent function) in class \( \mathcal {S}\) from a linear space to another. \(\square \)
Coefficients bound
Now, we study the coefficient bounds for the operator \(\Theta _{z}^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma } f(z),\) which is defined in (20), where the function f(z) is in the class \( \mathcal {A}(m),\) for all \( z\in \mathbb {U}.\) We also discuss the bounded coefficient in two subclasses \( \mathcal {S}_{\lambda }^{*}(m)\) and \( \mathcal {K}_{\lambda }(m),\) \((m=1,2,\ldots )\) of order \( \lambda \) in the open unit disk \( \mathbb {U}.\) In the first step, we are looking to prove that the operator \(\Theta _{z}^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma } f(z)\) in \( \mathcal {S}_{\lambda }^{*}(m),\) and that by finding a coefficient bound.
Theorem 9
Let \( f(z)\in \mathcal {A}(m) \) given by (1) satisfy the condition (16). If
where
Then the operator \( \Theta _{z}^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma } f(z) \in \mathcal {S}_{\lambda }^{*}(m)\) and satisfy the sharp result.
Proof
By assuming that the function \( f\in \mathcal {S}_{\lambda }^{*}(m),\) we obtain
we see in inequality (28) is bounded by \( ( 1-\lambda ),\) if it satisfy
By use the inequality \( 0 \le \vartheta _{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }(\kappa ) \le \vartheta _{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }(m+1);\) for each \(m+1 \le \kappa \) and for all \( m = 1,2,\ldots, \) we have
which is on a par with
hence
From Theorem (9), we have a special case compared with the well-known results, which are reviewed in the next corollary.
Corollary 1
Let \( \Theta _{z} ^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }f(z)\, \in \mathcal {S}_{\lambda }^{*}(m),\) for all \( z\in \mathbb {U} ,\) with
-
(i)
If \( \lambda =0, \beta =1, \tau =1, m=1\) and \( \gamma =0,\) we get
$$\begin{aligned} \sum _{\kappa =2}^{\infty } \kappa | a_{\kappa }| \le 1 \end{aligned}$$then \( f(z) \in \mathcal {S}_{0}^{*}(1)\equiv \mathcal {S}^{*} \) (see [19]).
-
(ii)
If \( \beta =1, \tau =1, m=1\) and \( \gamma =0\), we get
$$\begin{aligned} \sum _{\kappa =2}^{\infty } (\kappa -\lambda ) | a_{\kappa }| \le (1-\lambda ) \end{aligned}$$then \( f(z) \in \mathcal {S}_{\lambda }^{*}(1)\equiv \mathcal {S}^{*}_{\lambda }\) (see [20]).
-
(iii)
If \( \lambda = 0 ,\) we get
$$\begin{aligned} \sum _{\kappa =m+1}^{\infty } \kappa \, \, | a_{\kappa }| \le \frac{1}{\vartheta _{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }(m+1)}. \end{aligned}$$(30)then \( \Theta _{z}^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma } f(z) \in \mathcal {S}_{0}^{*}(m)\), (see [21]).
All these results are sharp.
Corollary 2
Let the operator \( \Theta _{z} ^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }f(z)\, \in \mathcal {S}_{\lambda }^{*}(m).\) Then
for \( m= \lbrace 1, 2,3,\ldots \rbrace. \)
Example 3
The function belongs to the class \( \mathcal {S}_{\lambda }^{*}(m),\) is defined as
We prove a bound coefficient in Theorem (10) by using similar methods in the starlike class.
Theorem 10
Let the function \( f(z) \in \mathcal {A}(m)\) and satisfied the condition (16). If
Then \( f \in \mathcal {K}_{\lambda }(m),\, \lambda \,(0\le \lambda < 1),\) this result is sharp.
Corollary 3
Let the operator \( \Theta _{z} ^{\beta ,\tau ,\gamma }f(z)\, \in \mathcal {K}_{\lambda }(m)\) . Then
for \( \kappa \,\in \, \lbrace 2,3,\ldots \rbrace. \)
Example 4
The equality (32) is realized by the function
Conclusion
All results of the present work are valid in open unit disk U with respect to the fractional calculus in a complex domain. We defined a normalized fractional differential operator in the concept of the generalized Tremblay operator. Moreover, we assumed sufficient conditions for this operator to become starlike and convex functions. Finally, univalency and convolution properties are discussed.
Author’s contributions
All the authors jointly worked on deriving the results and approved the final manuscript.
References
Srivastava, H.M., Owa, S., Chatterjea, S.K.: A note on certain classes of starlike functions. Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Universita di Padova 77, 115–124 (1987)
Kiryakova, V., Saigo, M., Srivastava, H.M.: Some criteria for univalence of analytic functions involving generalized fractional calculus operators. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 1(1), 79–104 (1998)
Robertson, M.I.: On the theory of univalent functions. Ann. Math. 37(2), 374–408 (1936)
Graham, I., Kohr, G.: Geometric function theory in one and higher dimensions. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003)
Duren, P.L.: Univalent functions, vol. 259. Springer, New York (1983)
Ruscheweyh, S.: New criteria for univalent functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 49(1), 109–115 (1975)
Ruscheweyh. S., Montreal. U.D.: Convolutions in geometric function theory (Seminaire de mathematiques superieures). Gaetan Morin Editeur Ltee, February 1982
Owa, S.: On the distortion theorems. I. Kyungpook Math. J. 18(1), 53–59 (1978)
Owa, S., Srivastava, H.M.: Univalent and starlike generalized hypergeometric functions. Can. J. Math. 39, 1057–1077 (1987)
Tremblay, R.: Some Operational Formulas Involving the Operators \(xD\), \(x\Delta \) and Fractional Derivatives. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 10(5), 933–943 (1979)
Abdulnaby, Z.E., Ibrahim, R.W., Kılıçman, A.: Some properties for integro-differential operator defined by a fractional formal. Springerplus 5(1), 1–9 (2016)
Kılıçman, A., Ibrahim, R.W., Abdulnaby, Z.E.: On a generalized fractional integral operator in a complex domain. Appl. Math. 10(3), 1053–1059 (2016)
Ibrahim, R.W., Jahangiri, J.M.: Boundary fractional differential equation in a complex domain. Bound. Value Prob. 66(1), 1–11 (2014)
Ibrahim, R.W.: On generalized Srivastava-Owa fractional operators in the unit disk. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2011(1), 1–10 (2011)
Eslahchi, M.R., Masjed-Jamei, M.: Some applications of a hypergeometric identity. Math. Sci. 9(4), 215–223 (2015)
Dziok, J., Srivastava, H.M.: Classes of analytic functions associated with the generalized hypergeometric function. Appl. Math. Comput. 103, 1–13 (1999)
El-Sayed Ahmed, A., Bakhit, M.A.: Characterizations involving Schwarzian derivative in some analytic function spaces. Math. Sci. 7(1), 1–8 (2013)
Carlson, B.C., Shaffer, D.B.: Starlike and prestarlike hypergeometric functions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 15(4), 737–745 (1984)
Goodman, A.W.: Univalent functions and nonanalytic curves. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. JSTOR. 8(3), 598–601 (1957)
Silverman, H.: Univalent functions with negative coefficients. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 51(1), 109–116 (1957)
Kiryakova, V: The operators of generalized fractional calculus and their action in classes of univalent functions. In: Proc. Intern. Symp. on Geometric Function Theory and Applications 2010, Sofia, pp. 29–40. 27–31 August 2010
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Editor for useful suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Kılıçman, A., Ibrahim, R.W. & Abdulnaby, Z.E. Upper bound of fractional differential operator related to univalent functions. Math Sci 10, 167–175 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40096-016-0191-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40096-016-0191-z
Keywords
- Univalent function
- Subclasses of univalent function
- Generalized fractional differential operator
- Convolution