Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparative Study on the Properties of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites Developed by Hand Layup and Vacuum Bagging Molding Techniques

  • ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study addressed the fabrication of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites using two different techniques: manual layup and vacuum bagging molding. The purpose was to compare their unique properties. CFRP composites employ woven roving mat carbon fiber as a reinforcing material, combined with an epoxy matrix consisting of Araldite and hardener. The resin to fiber ratio has been maintained at a 1:1 ratio, while the resin to hardener ratio has been maintained at a 10:1 ratio by weight. Various stacking sequences of carbon/epoxy composites (0/90) were made using both approaches. Optimization of several process parameters was carried out to enhance the mechanical properties of the polymer composites. Every laminate was composed of four to eight layers. Various carbon/epoxy composite orientations were subjected to testing until failure using a universal testing machine, in accordance with the relevant applicable standards (ASTM-D3039), in order to determine the ultimate tensile strength, % elongation (or ductility), and elastic constant. Furthermore, the adhesion intensity between the fiber and resin was assessed by conducting microstructural studies using a scanning electron microscope. The results demonstrated that the samples fabricated using the vacuum bagging mold technique exhibited superior tensile strength compared to the samples fabricated using the hand layup approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Bauer, S. Hengsbach, I. Tesari, R. Schwaiger, O. Kraft, High-strength cellular ceramic composites with 3d microarchitecture. Proc Natl Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am. 111, 2453e58 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315147111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Yang, Y. Kim, S. Ryu, G.X. Gu, Prediction of composite microstructure stress strain curves using convolutional neural networks. Mater. Des. 189, 9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G.X. Gu, M. Takaffoli, M.J. Buehler, Hierarchically enhanced impact resistance of bioinspired composites. Adv. Mater. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201700060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J.W.C. Dunlop, P. Fratzl, Biological composites. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 40, 1e24 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Chen, G.X. Gu, Generative deep neural networks for inverse materials design using backpropagation and active learning. Adv. Sci. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201902607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F.C. Campbell Jr., Manufacturing processes for advanced composites (Elsevier, The Netherlands, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. P.K. Mallick, Fiber-reinforced composites: materials, manufacturing, and design (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Forintos, T. Czigany, Multifunctional application of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites: electrical properties of the reinforcing carbon fibers–a short review. Compos. B Eng. 162, 331–343 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Toldy, G. Szebenyi, K. Molnar et al., The effect of multilevel carbon reinforcements on the fire performance, conductivity, and mechanical properties of epoxy composites. Polymers 11(2), 303 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11020303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Hegde, B. Satish Shenoy, K.N. Chethan, Review on carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) and their mechanical performance. Mater. Today: Proc. 19, 658–662 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Altin Karatas¸ M, Gokkaya H., A review on machinability of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) and glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite materials. Def. Technol. 14(4), 318–326 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2018.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M.-S. Scholz, J.P. Blanchfield, L.D. Bloom et al., The use of composite materials in modern orthopaedic medicine and prosthetic devices: a review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 71(16), 1791–1803 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A.P. Kumar, Analysis of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite hip prosthesis based on static and dynamic loading. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 10, 574–579 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. Forintos, T. Czigany, Reinforcing carbon fibers as sensors: the effect of temperature and humidity. Compos. Appl. Sci. Manuf. 131, 105819 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. F.S. Shahar, M.T. Hameed Sultan, S.H. Lee et al., A review on the orthotics and prosthetics and the potential of kenaf composites as alternative materials for ankle-foot orthosis. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 99, 169–185 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.07.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Cucinott, E. Guglielmino, F. Sfravara, Life cycle assessment in yacht industry: a case study of comparison between hand lay-up and vacuum infusion. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 3822–3833 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Meshram, S. Sahu et al., Study on mechanical properties of epoxy and nylon/epoxy composite. Mater. Today: Proc. 5, 5925–5932 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Muralidhara, S.P. Kumaresh Babu, B. Suresha, Utilizing vacuum bagging process to prepare carbon fiber/epoxy composites with improved mechanical properties. Mater. Today: Proc. 27, 2022–2028 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. S.Y. Kim, C.S. Shim, C. Sturtevant, H. Song, C Mechanical properties and production quality of hand-layup and vacuum infusion processed hybrid composite materials for GFRP marine structures. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 6, 723–736 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. K. Karthik, V. Ramesh, S. Kolappan, K. Arunkumar, J. Udayaprakash, R. Rameshkumar, Experimental investigation on hybrid fibre reinforced polymer epoxy LY556 composites by vacuum bag molding. Mater. Today: Proc. 62, 714–720 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Bharath, B. Sandhya Rani, V. Saritha, P. Irshadh Khan, Tensile and erosion behaviour of medium calcined alumina microparticles on GFRP composites fabricated with vacuum bagging process. Mater. Today: Proc. 46, 11–12 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  22. L. Amorim, A. Santos, J.P. Nunes, G. Dias, J.C. Viana, Quasi static mechanical study of vacuum bag infused bouligand inspired composites. Polym. Test. 100, 107261 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. H.B. Vinay, H.K. Govindaraju, P. Banakar, Evaluation of glass/carbon reinforced polymer composites. Polym. Polym. Compos. 24(7), 469–472 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. G. Francucci, S. Palmer, W. Hall, External compaction pressure over vacuum-bagged composite parts: effect on the quality of flax fiber/epoxy laminates. J. Compos. Mater. 52(1), 3–15 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S.Y. Nayak, R.C. Composites et al., Tensile and Flexural properties of chopped strand E-glass fibre mat tensile and flexural properties of chopped strand E-glass fibre mat reinforced CNSL- epoxy composites. Web Conf (2018). https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201714402025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. F. Correiaa, A.C. Robitaillea, C.D. Longa, P. Rudda, S.G. Sima, Analysis of the vacuum infusion I.A. moulding process: analytical formulation. Compos. Part A 36, 1645–1656 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Abdurohman K et al (2017) Effect of mesh-peel ply variation in vacuum infusion process to mechanical properties of glass composite. In: IOP Journal of Physics: Conference Series-5th International Seminar on Aerospace Science and Technology 2017.

  28. K. Abdurohman, A. Marta dan, An experimental study of polyester composite tensile properties reinforced unidirectional carbon fiber manufactured by vacuum infusion for LSU material. Jurnal Teknologi Dirgantara 14(1), 61–72 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. F. Cucinotta, E. Guglielmino, F. Sfravara, Life cycle assessment in yacht industry: a case study of comparison between hand lay-up and vacuum infusion. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 3822–3833 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. P. Meshram et al., Study on mechanical properties of epoxy and nylon/epoxy composite. Mater. Today: Proc. 5(2), 5925–5932 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.192

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu. Chen, Influence of multipass friction stir processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al5083 alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 650, 281–289 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. M.V.N.V. Satyanarayana, A. Kumar, Effect of microstructure and precipitate formation on mechanical and corrosion behavior of friction stir processed AA6061 alloy using different cooling media. Met. Mater. Int. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207211005790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. M.V.N.V. Satyanarayana, K. Adepu, K. Chauhan, Effect of overlapping friction stir processing on microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of AA6061 alloy. Met. Mater. Int. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-020-00757-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Marukurthi VNV, Satyanarayana KA Microstructure evolution, mechanical and corrosion behavior of AA2014 alloy processed through cryogenic friction stir processing. Advanced Engineering Materials (SCI, IF-3.9) (2020)

  35. K. Abdurohman, T. Satrio, N.L. Muzayadah, A comparison process between hand lay-up, vacuum infusion and vacuum bagging method toward e-glass EW 185/lycal composites. IOP Conf. Ser.: J. Phys. 1130, 012018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1130/1/012018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. M. Farooq, N. Banthia, An innovative FRP fibre for concrete reinforcement: Production of fibre, micromechanics, and durability. Constr. Build. Mater. 172, 406–421 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. M.A. Faizal, Y.K. Beng, K.N. Dalimin, Tensile properties of hand lay-up plain weave woven E-glass/polyester composite: curing pressure and ply arrangement effect. Borneo Sci. J. Sci. Technol. 19, 27–34 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  38. S. Mahale, D. Rajamani, A. Revathi et al., Hot-wet property characterisation of a high-temperature cured glass–epoxy composite in immersion environment. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 23(17), 1883–1892 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. A. Behera, P. Dupare, M.M. Thawre et al., Effects of hygrothermal aging and fiber orientations on constant amplitude fatigue properties of CFRP multidirectional composite laminates. Int. J. Fatigue 136, 105590 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. R.B.A. Ouled Ahmed, S. Chatti, D.H. Ben, Modeling of hygrothermal damage of composite materials. Mech. Adv. Compos. Struct. 3, 137–144 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Y. Wang, T.H. Hahn, AFM characterization of the interfacial properties of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites subjected to hygrothermal treatments. Compos. Sci. Technol. 67, 92–101 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. U. Gaur, C.T. Chou, B. Miller, Effect of hydrothermal ageing on bond strength. Composites 25, 609–612 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Production and Industrial Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, Jharkhand, 835215, India

    Thakur Abhinav Amar

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Patna, Bihar, 800005, India

    Amit Kumar

  3. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, 831014, India

    D. K. Yadav

Authors
  1. Thakur Abhinav Amar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amit Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. K. Yadav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thakur Abhinav Amar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have not disclosed any conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amar, T.A., Kumar, A. & Yadav, D.K. A Comparative Study on the Properties of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites Developed by Hand Layup and Vacuum Bagging Molding Techniques. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. D (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-023-00631-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-023-00631-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation