Skip to main content
Log in

Corrosion Behaviour of Mg, Graphite-, B4C and Ti-Reinforced Hybrid Aluminium Composites

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corrosion of metal matrix composite significantly affects the mechanical properties of the composites. Therefore, it is important to analyse the corrosion resistivity of newly developed metal matrix composites. In the current study, corrosion resistivity of newly developed hybrid metal matrix composite was investigated. Composites were developed using aluminium matrix and different reinforcements like Mg, graphite, B4C and Ti. The study was conducted by simple immersion of composite material for 21 days. Three different reagents 3.5% w/v NaOH, 3.5% w/v NaCl and 3.5% w/v HCl with concentration in water were used for the corrosion study. The initial and final weight of the specimens was measured to find out the corrosion rate. Moreover, optical microscopic, scanning electron microscopic (SEM) and electron-dispersive X-ray (EDX) techniques were used to validate the results after the immersion test. It was observed that the initial corrosion rate of MMC (metal matrix composite) is higher compared to pure aluminium due to reinforcement, but afterwards, it reduces due to the formation of the passive oxide layer and higher diffusion path length. Moreover, MMC with high carbon content (B4C and graphite) shows the highest corrosion rate due to the presence of C. However, MMC with high Mg content shows better immunity against corrosion. The pitting corrosion mechanism was found profound in all the composite samples while general corrosion was observed in pure aluminium. Therefore, this study provides in-depth information about the effect of pH, diffusion path and corrosive environment on newly developed aluminium metal matrix composites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bandil, K., Vashisth, H., Kumar, S., Verma, L., Jamwal, A., Kumar, D., Singh, N., Sadasivuni, K. K. & Gupta, P. 2019. Microstructural, mechanical and corrosion behaviour of Al–Si alloy reinforced with SiC metal matrix composite. Journal of Composite Materials, 0021998319856679.

  2. Dikici, B., Bedir, F. & Gavgali, M. 2019. The effect of high TiC particle content on the tensile cracking and corrosion behavior of Al–5Cu matrix composites. Journal of Composite Materials, 0021998319884098.

  3. Suthar, J. & Patel, K. 2017. Processing issues, machining, and applications of aluminum metal matrix composites. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 1–29.

  4. J. Basumatary, R. Wood, Synergistic effects of cavitation erosion and corrosion for nickel aluminium bronze with oxide film in 3.5% NaCl solution. Wear 376, 1286–1297 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M.O. Bodunrin, K.K. Alaneme, L.H. Chown, Aluminium matrix hybrid composites: a review of reinforcement philosophies; mechanical, corrosion and tribological characteristics. J. Market. Res. 4, 434–445 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. A.S. Verma, N.M. Suri, Corrosion behavior of aluminum base particulate metal matrix composites: a review. Mater. Today Proc. 2, 2840–2851 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Zhang, J. Wu, W. Qi, J. Wang, Effect of porosity defects on the long-term corrosion behaviour of Fe-based amorphous alloy coated mild steel. Corros. Sci. 110, 57–70 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Alaneme, M. Bodunrin, Corrosion behavior of alumina reinforced aluminium (6063) metal matrix composites. J. Miner. Mater. Characterization Eng. 10, 1153 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. K.A. El-Aziz, D. Saber, H.E.-D.M. Sallam, Wear and corrosion behavior of Al–Si matrix composite reinforced with alumina. J. Bio-and Tribo-Corrosion 1, 1–10 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Bahrami, N. Soltani, M. Pech-Canul, C. Gutiérrez, Development of metal-matrix composites from industrial/agricultural waste materials and their derivatives. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 143–208 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Bobić, S. Mitrović, M. Babić, I. Bobić, Corrosion of aluminium and zinc-aluminium alloys based metal-matrix composites. Tribol. Ind. 31, 44–53 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Cao, G.-L. Song, A. Atrens, Corrosion and passivation of magnesium alloys. Corros. Sci. 111, 835–845 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghali, E. 2010. Corrosion resistance of aluminum and magnesium alloys: understanding, performance, and testing, John Wiley & Sons.

  14. P.R. Kumari, J. Nayak, A.N. Shetty, Corrosion behavior of 6061/Al-15 vol. pct. SiC (p) composite and the base alloy in sodium hydroxide solution. Arab. J. Chem. 9, S1144–S1154 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Pardo, M. Merino, S. Merino, F. Viejo, M. Carboneras, R. Arrabal, Influence of reinforcement proportion and matrix composition on pitting corrosion behaviour of cast aluminium matrix composites (A3xx. x/SiCp). Corros. Sci. 47, 1750–1764 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Shimizu, T. Nishimura, I. Matsushima, Corrosion resistance of Al-based metal matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 198, 113–118 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suthar, J., Patel, K. Corrosion Behaviour of Mg, Graphite-, B4C and Ti-Reinforced Hybrid Aluminium Composites. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C 103, 689–704 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-021-00785-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-021-00785-6

Keywords

Navigation