Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sugarcane Yield and Juice Quality as Affected by Harvest Age and Chemical Ripeners in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia

  • FULL-LENGTH RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chemical ripening is a promising technology at Metahara and Kessem sugarcane plantations where conditions are not optimal for natural ripening in the early and late period of sugarcane processing. However, the harvest age at which sucrose yield could be maximized with application of ripeners has not been established. Thus, field experiments were conducted to determine the effects of harvest age and chemical ripeners on yield and juice quality of sugarcane. The experiments were conducted in the late period (June) harvesting at Metahara, and in the early (October) and late period (June) harvesting at Kessem. A split plot design with three replications was used where the main plot treatments were two sugarcane varieties, viz. B52-298 and SP70-1284, and the sub-plot treatment consisted of combinations of four harvest ages (10, 12, 14 and 16 months) and two ripener treatments [Moddus™ at 250 g ai ha−1 + Fusilade Forte™ (M + FF) at 25.6 g ai ha−1 combination sequentially sprayed and unsprayed control]. The results showed significant difference between the varieties for stalk height and stalk weight in early period study at Kessem with variety SP70-1284 being superior as compared to variety B52-298. Furthermore, harvest age and ripener combination significantly affected all yield and quality parameters, while there was a significant cane and sucrose yield response at Kessem at both sites and seasons. The highest cane yield was recorded in the unsprayed 16-month harvest age treatment, while the highest sucrose yield was recorded in the M + FF ripener combination 12-month harvest age treatment in all the studies. The economic analysis showed the highest marginal rate of return and net revenue in the M + FF ripener combination 12-month harvest age treatment and represents the best cane quality management practice for varieties B52-298 and SP70-1284 at these plantations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ayele N, Tana T, van Heerden PDR, W/Tsadik K, Alemayehu Y (2023) Response of sugarcane cultivars to chemical ripeners during the mid-period of harvesting in ethiopia. Sugar Tech 25(1):177–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ayele N, Tana T, van Heerden PRD, Wsadik K, Alemayehu Y (2021) Ripening response of sugarcane varieties to chemical ripeners and economic benefits during the early period of harvesting at Wonji-Shoa and Metahara sugarcane plantations, central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Int J Agronomy, Hindawi 2021:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ayele N Tegene S (2014). Effect of number of buds per sett and intra-row spacing of setts on yield and yield components of sugarcane. AASCIT, 115–121.

  4. Ayele N, Tegene S, Negi T, Getaneh A, Mengistu L, Mequannint Y, Dilnesaw Z (2016) Challenges of ripening of sugarcane at Tendaho, Metahara and Wonji-Shoa sugarcane plantations. European J Food Sci Technol 4(4):22–30

    Google Scholar 

  5. Banasihan VT, Macalaguim VV, Mendoza TC (2007) Glyphosate as a ripener in sugarcane production in Batangas. Philippine J Crop Sci 32(3):31–45

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berg V (1972) Control of the cane sugar manufacture. Manual for sugar chemist course of H.V.A. Wonji-Shoa Sugar Factory, Ethiopia.

  7. Caputo MM, Beauclair EGF, Silva MA, Piedade SMS (2008) Response of sugarcane genotypes to the application of ripeners. Bragantia 67(1):15–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cardozo NP, Sentelhas PC (2013) Climatic effects on sugarcane ripening under the influence of cultivars and crop age (Review). Scientia Agricola 70(6):449–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. CIMMYT (1988). From agronomic data to farmer recommendations: an economics training manual completely revised edition. Mexico, DF.

  10. TC Culverwell (1996) Joint session on cane quality: the Umfolozi experience.In: Proceedings of the South African Sugar Cane Technologists Association, 70: 265–286

  11. Dalley CD, Richard JEP (2010) Herbicides as ripeners for sugarcane. Weed Sci 58:329–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Donaldson RA (1999) Sugarcane ripening in South Africa: review of past decade. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Sugarcane Technologists, 23: 8–12

  13. Eastwood D, Davis HD (1997) Chemical ripening in Guyana - progress and prospects. Sugar Cane 3:4–17

    Google Scholar 

  14. EIA. (Ethiopian Investment Agency), 2012.Investment Opportunity Profile for Sugar Cane Plantation and Processing In Ethiopia. Ethiopian Investment Agency (EIA).

  15. Getaneh A, Negi T (2014) Effect of length of pre-harvest drying-off period during the cool season on soil moisture content and cane quality of sugarcane cultivars at Metahara Sugarcane plantation. Int Scholar J 2(9):211–218

    Google Scholar 

  16. JM Gosnell, JE Lonsdale, (1974) Some effects of drying off before harvest on cane and yield quality.In: Proceedings of International Society of Sugarcane Technologists, 15: 701–711

  17. Gronwald JW (1991) Lipid biosynthesis inhibitors. Weed Sci 39:435–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van Heerden PDR, Donaldson RA, Watt DA, Singels A (2010) Biomass accumulation in sugarcane: unravelling the factors underpinning reduced growth phenomena. Rev J Experiment Bot 61(11):2877–2887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. van Heerden PDR, Eggleston G, Donaldson RA (2014). Ripening and post-harvest deterioration. In: Botha FC, Moore PH (eds.), Sugarcane Physiology, Biochemistry and Functional Biology.John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Iowa, USA.

  20. van Heerden PDR, Mbatha TP, Ngxaliwe S (2015) Chemical ripening of sugarcane with trinexapac-ethyl (Moddus™) —mode of action and comparative efficacy. Field Crop Res 181:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. PDR Heerden van (2019) Response of selected South African coastal sugarcane varieties to chemical ripeners: active ingredient effectiveness and associated impacts on grower and miller sustainability. In: Proceedings of South African Sugar Cane Technologists Association, 92: 18–21

  22. Jaramillo H, Schuitemaker F, Garcia C (1977). Ripening sugarcane with EthrelTM plant growth regulator in Colombia. In: Proceedings of International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 16:1931-1935

  23. Morgan T, Jackson P, McDonald L, Holtum J (2007) Chemical ripeners increase early season sugar content in a range of sugarcane varieties. Aust J Agric Res 58:233–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Park SE, Robertson M, Inman-Bamber NG (2005) Decline in the growth of a sugarcane crop with age under high input conditions. Field Crop Res 92:305–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. R Core Team (2023). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL

  26. Resende, P.A.P., Soares, J.E., Hudetz, M. 2000. ModdusTM, a plant growth regulator and management tool for sugarcane production in Brazil. Sugar Cane International, April, pp. 5–9.

  27. CM Rixon, LP Bella Di, G Kingston, K Dorahy, B Davies, AW Wood, (2007), Moddus® a sugar enhancer. In: Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 29: 318–327

  28. Robertson MJ, Muchow RC, Donaldson RA, Inman-Bamber NG, Wood AW (1999) Estimating the risk associated with drying-off strategies for irrigated sugarcane before harvest. Aust J Agric Res 50:65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. H Rostron (1977) Prolonged chemical ripening of sugarcane following multiple applications of Ethrel. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Sugarcane Technologists, 16: 1743–1753

  30. Rostron H (1996) Chemical ripening of sugarcane in Swaziland. In: Wilson JR, Hogarth DM, Campbell JA, Garside AL (eds) Sugarcane: Research towards Efficient and Sustainable Production. CSIRO, Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, Brisbane, Australia, pp 172–175

    Google Scholar 

  31. Santos F, Diola V (2015). Chapter 2: Physiology. In: Santos F, Borem A, Caldas C. Sugarcane- Agricultural production, bioenergy and ethanol. Elsevier Inc. 13.

  32. Sweet CPM, Wite PW, Dodsworth GH (1987). Commercial experience with chemical sugarcane ripeners at Simuye Sugarcane plantation in Swaziland. In: Proceedings of The South African Sugar Technologists Association, 121–127.

  33. Tena E, Mekbib F, Ayana A (2018) Sugarcane landraces of Ethiopia: germplasm collection and analysis of regional diversity and distribution”. Adv Agri 2014:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  34. Thompson GD, (1988). The composition of plant and ratoon crops of variety N14 at Pongola. Proc. S. Afr. Sug. Technol. Assoc, 185–189.

  35. Zhou D, Wang C, Li Z, Chen Y, Gao S, Guo J, Lu W, Su Y, Xu L, Que Y (2016) Detection of bar transgenic sugarcane with a rapid and visual loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay. Front Plant Sci 7:279

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by Ethiopian Sugar Corporation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Centre, Eastern Showa Zone, Ethiopian Sugar Corporation, P.O. Box 15, Wonji, Ethiopia

    Netsanet Ayele

  2. Department of Crop Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Eswatini, M 205, P.O.Luyengo, Kwaluseni, Eswatini

    Tamado Tana

  3. South African Sugarcane Research Institute, Mount Edgecombe, 4300, South Africa

    Philippus Daniel Riekert van Heerden

  4. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, 0028, South Africa

    Philippus Daniel Riekert van Heerden

  5. School of Plant Sciences, Haramaya University, P.O. Box 138, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia

    Kebede W/Tsadik & Yibekal Alemayehu

Authors
  1. Netsanet Ayele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tamado Tana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Philippus Daniel Riekert van Heerden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kebede W/Tsadik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yibekal Alemayehu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by NA. Data analysis was performed by NA and TT. The first draft of the manuscript was written by NA and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Netsanet Ayele.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayele, N., Tana, T., van Heerden, P.D.R. et al. Sugarcane Yield and Juice Quality as Affected by Harvest Age and Chemical Ripeners in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Agric Res 12, 421–427 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-023-00664-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-023-00664-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation