Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

16S rDNA PCR for the aetiological diagnosis of culture-negative infective endocarditis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Culture-negative infective endocarditis (IE) accounts for 7–31% of all cases. Metagenomics has contributed to improving the aetiological diagnosis of IE patients undergoing valve surgery. We assessed the impact of 16S ribosomal DNA gene polymerase chain reaction (16S rDNA PCR) in the aetiological diagnosis of culture-negative IE.

Methods

Between January 2016 and January 2020, clinical data from culture-negative IE patients were reviewed retrospectively. Identification of bacteria was performed using 16S rDNA PCR in heart valve specimens.

Results

36 out of 313 patients (12%) with culture-negative IE had their valve tissue specimens submitted for 16S rDNA PCR. 16S rDNA PCR detected and identified bacterial nucleic acid in heart valve tissue significantly more frequently compared to valve culture alone 25(70%) vs 5(12%); p < 0.05. Mean age was 57 years (SD 18) and 80% were male. Native and aortic valve were involved in 76% and 52% of cases, respectively. Streptococcus spp. (n 15) were the most commonly detected organisms, followed by bacteria of the HACEK group (Haemophilus parainfluenzae 2, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans 1), nutritionally variant streptococci (Abiotrophia defectiva 2), and one each of Staphylococcus aureus, Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum, Helcococcus kunzii, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Tropheryma whipplei.

Conclusion

16S rDNA PCR may be a useful diagnostic tool for the identification of the causative organism in culture-negative IE. Efforts towards a shorter turnaround time for results should be consider and further studies assessing the clinical impact of this technique in culture-negative IE are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Houpikian P, Raoult D. Blood culture-negative endocarditis in a reference center: etiologic diagnosis of 348 cases. Medicine. 2005;84:162–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lamas CC, Eykyn SJ. Blood culture negative endocarditis: analysis of 63 cases presenting over 25 years. Heart. 2003;89:258–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mylonakis E, Calderwood SB. Infective endocarditis in adults. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1318–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Greub G, Lepidi H, Rovery C, Casalta JP, Habib G, Collard F, et al. Diagnosis of infectious endocarditis in patients undergoing valve surgery. Am J Med. 2005;118:230–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Imai A, Gotoh K, Asano Y, Yamada N, Motooka D, Fukushima M, et al. Comprehensive metagenomic approach for detecting causative microorganisms in culture-negative infective endocarditis. Int J Cardiol. 2014;172:e288–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fukui Y, Aoki K, Okuma S, Sato T, Ishii Y, Tateda K. Metagenomic analysis for detecting pathogens in culture-negative infective endocarditis. J Infect Chemother. 2015;21:882–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim MS, Chang J, Kim MN, Choi SH, Jung SH, Lee JW, et al. Utility of a direct 16S rDNA PCR and sequencing for etiological diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Ann Lab Med. 2017;37:505–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarridge JE 3rd. Impact of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for identification of bacteria on clinical microbiology and infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17:840–62 (Table of contents).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sontakke S, Cadenas MB, Maggi RG, Diniz PP, Breitschwerdt EB. Use of broad range16S rDNA PCR in clinical microbiology. J Microbiol Methods. 2009;76:217–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Li JS, Sexton DJ, Mick N, Nettles R, Fowler VG Jr, Ryan T, et al. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:633–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG, Casalta JP, Del Zotti F, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: the task force for the management of infective endocarditis of the European society of cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS), the European association of nuclear medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J. 2015;36:3075–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellis ME, Al-Abdely H, Sandridge A, Greer W, Ventura W. Fungal endocarditis: evidence in the world literature, 1965–1995. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:50–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pierrotti LC, Baddour LM. Fungal endocarditis, 1995–2000. Chest. 2002;122:302–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Corp I. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 21.0. Armonk: IBM Corp; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fournier PE, Gouriet F, Casalta JP, Lepidi H, Chaudet H, Thuny F, et al. Blood culture-negative endocarditis: improving the diagnostic yield using new diagnostic tools. Medicine. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008392.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Siciliano RF, Mansur AJ, Castelli JB, Arias V, Grinberg M, Levison ME, et al. Community-acquired culture-negative endocarditis: clinical characteristics and risk factors for mortality. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;25:191–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fournier PE, Thuny F, Richet H, Lepidi H, Casalta JP, Arzouni JP, et al. Comprehensive diagnostic strategy for blood culture-negative endocarditis: a prospective study of 819 new cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:131–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lamas CC, Fournier PE, Zappa M, Brandão TJ, Januário-da-Silva CA, Correia MG, et al. Diagnosis of blood culture-negative endocarditis and clinical comparison between blood culture-negative and blood culture-positive cases. Infection. 2016;44:459–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Faraji R, Behjati-Ardakani M, Moshtaghioun SM, Kalantar SM, Namayandeh SM, Soltani M, et al. The diagnosis of microorganism involved in infective endocarditis (IE) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time PCR: a systematic review. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018;34:71–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Harris KA, Yam T, Jalili S, Williams OM, Alshafi K, Gouliouris T, et al. Service evaluation to establish the sensitivity, specificity and additional value of broad-range 16S rDNA PCR for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis from resected endocardial material in patients from eight UK and Ireland hospitals. Eur J Clinmicrobiol Infect Dis. 2014;33:2061–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Breitkopf C, Hammel D, Scheld HH, Peters G, Becker K. Impact of a molecular approach to improve the microbiological diagnosis of infective heart valve endocarditis. Circulation. 2005;111:1415–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng J, Hu H, Kang Y, Chen W, Fang W, Wang K, et al. Identification of pathogens in culture-negative infective endocarditis cases by metagenomic analysis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2018;17:43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Armstrong C, Kuhn TC, Dufner M, Ehlermann P, Zimmermann S, Lichtenstern C, et al. The diagnostic benefit of 16S rDNA PCR examination of infective endocarditis heart valves: a cohort study of 146 surgical cases confirmed by histopathology. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021;110:332–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Halavaara M, Martelius T, Järvinen A, Antikainen J, Kuusela P, Salminen US, et al. Impact of pre-operative antimicrobial treatment on microbiological findings from endocardial specimens in infective endocarditis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38:497–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rampini SK, Bloemberg GV, Keller PM, Büchler AC, Dollenmaier G, Speck RF, et al. Broad-range 16S rRNA gene polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of culture-negative bacterial infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:1245–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fox GEWJ, Jurtshuk P Jr. How close is close: 16S rRNA sequence identity may not be sufficient to guarantee species identity. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1992;42:166–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the contribution of the BIDS 16s rDNA PCR service.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanesa Anton-Vazquez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anton-Vazquez, V., Dworakowski, R., Cannata, A. et al. 16S rDNA PCR for the aetiological diagnosis of culture-negative infective endocarditis. Infection 50, 243–249 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-021-01690-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-021-01690-x

Keywords

Navigation