Abstract
The disposal of sewage sludge (SS) is an environmental issue in many large cities worldwide. Due to its high nutrients and organic matter contents, the SS can be used as a substrate to produce tree seedlings. However, few studies evaluate the suitability of SS from different wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) as seedlings' substrates. The present study assessed the chemical and physical properties of three SS from different WWTPs and two commercial substrates (CS), aiming to evaluate how the SSs’ properties can affect the production of seedlings from two tree species. SS from Alegria, Ilha, and Sarapuí WWTP were assessed, and CS was composed mainly of peat and pine bark. As chemical properties, heavy metals, macro, and micronutrients total contents were evaluated. Meanwhile, density and porosity were measured as physical properties. The growth in shoot height was measured for seedlings of two Atlantic Forest species (Colubrina glandulosa and Peltophorum dubium). The SS showed higher nutrients (mainly N and P), and the CS had better physical properties. The Ilha and Sarapuí SS are recommended as substrates to produce seedlings of both species. Considering its low macroporosity, the Alegria SS must be mixed or composted with other materials to be used as a substrate for tree species. Although the contents of aluminum, zinc, and other metal were high in the SS, no adverse effects were observed in seedlings. Without chemical fertilizers, SS from Ilha and Sarapuí produced seedlings in a shorter period and with higher growth than those grown with CS plus chemical fertilizers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from JMA upon reasonable request. Experimental material is not available from the authors. All authors have read and agree to the submitted version of the manuscript.
References
Abaurre GW, Alonso JM, Saggin Júnior OJ, Faria SM (2021) Sewage sludge compared with other substrates in the inoculation, growth, and tolerance to water stress of Samanea saman. Water 13:1306. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091306
Abreu AHM, Leles PSS, Alonso JM, Abel ELS, Oliveira RR (2017a) Characterization of sewage sludge generated in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and perspectives for agricultural recycling. Semin Ciências Agrárias 38:2433. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4Supl1p2433
Abreu AHM, Leles PSS, Melo LA, Oliveira RR, Ferreira DHAA (2017b) Caracterização e potencial de substratos formulados com biossólido na produção de mudas de Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi. e Handroanthus heptaphyllus (Vell.) Mattos. Ciência Florest 27:1179–1190. https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509830300
Alonso JM, Pereira RN, Abel EL, Ochoski M, Santos GL, Abreu AHM (2022) Sewage sludge as substrate in Schinus terebinthifolia Raddi seedlings commercial production. Sci Rep 12:17245. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21314-0
Andreoli CV, Sperling MV, Fernandes F (2007) Sludge treatment and disposal. IWA Publishing, London, p 241
Azim K, Soudi B, Boukhari S, Perissol C, Roussos S, Alami IT (2018) Composting parameters and compost quality: a literature review. Org Agr 8:141–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-017-0180-z
Badza T, Tesfamariam EH, Cogger C (2020) Sludge stabilization process, drying depth and polymeric material addition: implication on nitrogen content, selected chemical properties and land requirement in sand drying beds. Energies 13(24):6753. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13246753
Bettiol W, Camargo OAA (2006) A disposição de lodo de esgoto em solo agrícola. In: Bettiol W, Camargo OAA (eds) Lodo de esgoto: Impactos ambientais na agricultura. Embrapa Meio Ambiente, Jaguariúna, pp 25–37
Bonnet BRP, Wisniewski C, Reissmann CB, Nogueira AC, Andreoli CV, Barbieri SJ (2002) Effects of substrates composed of biosolids on the production of Eucalyptus viminalis, Schinus terebinthifolius and Mimosa scabrella seedlings and on the nutritional status of Schinus terebinthifolius seedlings. Water Sci Technol 46:239–246
Cabreira GV, Leles PSS, Alonso JM, de Abreu AHM, Lopes NF, Santos GR (2017) Biossólido como componente de substrato para produção de mudas florestais. Floresta 47:165–176. https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v47i1.44291
Cai H, Chen T, Liu H, Gao D, Zheng G, Zhang J (2010) The effect of salinity and porosity of sewage sludge compost on the growth of vegetable seedlings. Sci Hortic (amsterdam) 124:381–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.01.009
Carvalho CS, Ribeirinho VS, Andrade CA, Grutzmacher P, Pires AMM (2015) Composição Química da Matéria Orgânica de Lodos de Esgoto. Rev Bras Ciênc Agrár 10:413–419. https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v10i3a5174
Černe M, Palčić I, Pasković I, Major N, Romić M, Filipović V, Igrc MD, Perčin A, Goreta Ban S, Zorko B, Vodenik B, Glavič Cindro D, Milačič R, Heath DJ, Ban D (2019) The effect of stabilization on the utilization of municipal sewage sludge as a soil amendment. Waste Manag 94:27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.032
Collivignarelli MC, Canato M, Abbà A, Carnevale Miino M (2019) Biosolids: What are the different types of reuse? J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117844
Conama, Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente, 2020. Resolução 498/20: Define critérios e procedimentos, para produção e aplicação de biossólidos em solos, e dá outras providências. DOU 21 de ago. 2020.
Dalpisol M, Serrat BM, Motta ACV, Poggere GC, Bittencourt S, Barbosa JZ (2017) Zinc, copper, and manganese availability in soils treated with alkaline sewage sludge from Paraná state (Brazil). Ciência e Agrotecnologia 41:81–93. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-70542017411036916
Davide AC, Melo LA, Teixeira LAF, Prado NJS, Fiorine RA, Carvalho RP (2015) Fatores que afetam a qualidade de mudas destinadas aos projetos de restauração de ecossistemas florestais. In: Davide AC, Botelho SA (eds) Fundamentos e métodos de restauração de ecossistemas florestais: 25 anos de experiência em matas ciliares. Editora UFLA, Lavras, pp 181–274
Demirbas A, Coban V, Taylan O, Kabli M (2017) Aerobic digestion of sewage sludge for waste treatment. Energy Sour Part a: Recovery Util Environ Eff 39:1056–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2017.1289282
ECC, Europen Comunity Council, (1986). Council Directive 86/278/EEC of 12 June 1986 on the protection of the environment, and in particular of the soil, when sewage sludge is used in agriculture. Off. J. Eur. Comm. L181, 6–12
Fermino MH, Mieth P (2018) Análise de substratos para a produção de mudas de espécies florestais. In: Araújo MM, Navroski MC, Schorn LA (eds) Produção de sementes e mudas, um enfoque à silvicultura. Editora UFSM, Santa Maria, pp 167–186
Ferreira E.B., Cavalcanti P.P., Nogueira D.A. 2021. ExpDes.pt: Pacote Experimental Designs (Português). (R package version 1.2.1, 2021). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ExpDes.pt. Accessed 14 April 2022.
Gabira MM, Silva RBG, Bortolheiro FPAP, Mateus CMDA, Boas RLV, Rossi S, Girona MM, Silva MR (2021) Composted sewage sludge as an alternative substrate for forest seedlings production. iForest 14:569–575. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3929-014
Gonçalves JLM, Santarelli ED, Neto SPM, Manara MP (2000) Produção de mudas de espécies nativas: substrato, nutrição, sombreamento e fertilização. In: Gonçalves JLM, Benedetti V (eds) Nutrição e fertilização florestal. IPEF, Piracicaba, pp 309–350
Guerra A, Reis LK, Borges FLG, Ojeda PTA, Pineda DAM, Miranda CO, Maidana DPFL, Santos TMR, Shibuya PS, Marques MCM, Laurance SGW, Garcia LC (2020) Ecological restoration in Brazilian biomes: Identifying advances and gaps. For Ecol Manage 458:117802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117802
Guerrini IA, Trigueiro RM (2004) Atributos físicos e químicos de substratos compostos por biossólidos e casca de arroz carbonizada. Rev Bras Cienc Do Solo 28:1069–1076. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832004000600016
Hernández-Apaolaza L, Gascó AM, Gascó JM, Guerrero F (2005) Reuse of waste materials as growing media for ornamental plants. Bioresour Technol 96:125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.028
Higashikawa FS, Silva CA, Nunes CA, Bettiol W, Guerreiro MC (2016) Physico-chemical evaluation of organic wastes compost-based substrates for Eucalyptus seedlings growth. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 47:581–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2016.1146741
Horttanainen M, Deviatkin I, Havukainen J (2017) Nitrogen release from mechanically dewatered sewage sludge during thermal drying and potential for recovery. J Clean Prod 142:1819–1826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.102
Landis, T. D.; Jacobs, D. F.; Wilkinson, K. M.; Luna, T. (2014). Growing Media In: Tropical Nursery Manual: a Guide to Starting and Operating a Nursery for Native and Traditional Plants. Washington (DC): USDA Forest Service. Agriculture Handbook 732. p. 101–121.
Lopes JLW, Guerrini IA, Saad JCC, Silva MR (2008) Atributos químicos e físicos de dois substratos para produção de mudas de eucalipto. Cerne 14:358–367
López R, Cabrera F, Madejón E, Sancho F, María J (2008) Urban composts as an alternative for peat in forestry nursery growing media. Glob Sci Books 2:60–66
Lu Q, He ZL, Stoffella PJ (2012) Land application of biosolids in the USA: a review. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2012:201462. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/201462
Mañas P, Castro E, De Las Heras J (2009) Quality of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) seedlings using waste materials as nursery growing media. New for 37:295–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-008-9125-4
Manca A, da Silva MR, Guerrini IA, Fernandes DM, Villas Bôas RL, da Silva LC, da Fonseca AC, Ruggiu MC, Cruz CV, Lozano Sivisaca DC, de Moura D’Andréa Mateus C, Murgia I, Grilli E, Ganga A, Capra GF (2020) Composted sewage sludge with sugarcane bagasse as a commercial substrate for Eucalyptus urograndis seedling production. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122145
Martins CC, da Silva JDR, Pereira MRR, de Oliveira SSC (2012) Efeito do sombreamento e do substrato sobre a germinação e o crescimento de plântulas de Acacia mangium e Acacia mearnsii. Ciência Florest 22:283–293. https://doi.org/10.5902/198050985735
Mtshali JS, Tiruneh AT, Fadiran AO (2014) Characterization of sewage sludge generated from wastewater treatment plants in Swaziland in relation to agricultural uses. Resour Environ 4:190–199
Nascimento AL, Souza AJ, Oliveira FC, Coscione AR, Viana DG, Regitano JB (2020) Chemical attributes of sewage sludges: relationships to sources and treatments, and implications for sludge usage in agriculture. J Clean Prod 258:120746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120746
Nóbrega RSA, Boas RCV, Nóbrega JCA, Paula AM, Moreira FMS (2007) Utilização de biossólido no crescimento inicial de mudas de aroeira (Schinus terebynthifolius Raddi). Rev Árvore 31:239–246. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622007000200006
R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/>
Ribeiro HM, Vasconcelos E, Cabral F, Ribeiro D (2009) Fertilization of Pinus pinea L. seedlings with a sewage sludge-based compost. Waste Manag Res 27:112–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X08089463
SOS Mata Atlântica, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE), 2022. Atlas dos remanescentes florestais da Mata Atlântica, período 2020–2021. https://cms.sosma.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Sosma-Atlas-2022-1.pdf.
Teixeira PC, Donagema GK, Fontana A, Teixeira WG (2017) Manual de métodos de análise do solo. Embrapa, Brasília, p 573
Trigueiro RM, Guerrini IA (2014) Utilização de lodo de esgoto na produção de mudas de aroeira-pimenteira. Rev Arvore 38:657–665. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622014000400009
Uesugi G, Simões D, Moraes CB, da Silva MR (2019) Economic and financial analysis of tree seedling production using composted biosolids substrate. Floresta e Ambient. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.074017
UNGA, United Nations General Assembly, 2019. United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030). UN Doc A/RES/73/284 (6 March 2019).
US EPA, Environmental Protection Agency, (1994). 40 CFR Part 503—Standards for the use and disposal of sewage sludge: final rule. Fed. Regist. 58:9248–9415
Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
Zapata N, Guerrero F, Polo A (2005) Evaluación de corteza de pino y residuos urbanos como componentes de sustratos de cultivo. Agric Técnica 65:378–387. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0365-28072005000400004
Zhou G, Gu Y, Yuan H, Gong Y, Wu, Y (2020) Selecting sustainable technologies for disposal of municipal sewage sludge using a multi-criterion decision-making method: A case study from China. Resour Conserv Recycl 161:104881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104881
Acknowledgements
This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001. The work was also financed in part by the Associação Pró-Gestão das Águas da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Paraíba do Sul (AGEVAP). We thank the Companhia Estadual de Águas e Esgotos do Rio de Janeiro (CEDAE) for providing the sludges.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JMA and PSSL conceived the study; JMA, PSSL, EFMP, and LFSA analyzed and interpreted the data; JMA, LFSA, TCL, and JGR collected and processed the data; JMA wrote the original draft; PSSL oriented the study and the data analysis; all authors wrote and edited the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: S. Mirkia.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Alonso, J.M., Pinheiro, É.F.M., de Sousa Antunes, L.F. et al. Chemical and physical properties of sewage sludge as a substrate for tree seedlings. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05533-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05533-8