Skip to main content
Log in

Morphology-dependent photocatalytic performance of ZnO nanostructures in organic dye and antibiotic degradation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles with diverse morphologies were synthesized using an economical and environmentally friendly co-precipitation method. The samples underwent characterization through X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive spectra analysis. The photocatalytic degradation capabilities of the synthesized samples were assessed using organic dyes and antibiotics as model pollutants. SEM images revealed nanospheres, nanorods, and nanotubes structures of ZnO under three distinct conditions. The average crystallite sizes of hexagonal wurtzite ZnO samples were determined using Debye–Scherrer’s formula from the full width at half maximum of XRD peaks, resulting in sizes of 52.80, 57.23, and 78.02 nm for ZnO nanospheres (ZnO-S), ZnO nanotubes (ZnO-T), and ZnO nanorods (ZnO-R), respectively. The optical band gap energies were measured at 3.25, 3.26, and 3.28 eV for ZnO-S, ZnO-T, and ZnO-R, respectively, demonstrating lower values compared to bulk ZnO (3.37 eV). Photocatalytic efficiency assessment using methylene blue indicated that ZnO-S exhibited the highest degradation efficiency (98.64%), followed by ZnO-T (97.63%) and ZnO-R (59.94%) under optimized conditions of 0.05 g/L catalyst dose, 90-min irradiation time, 130-W light intensity, and 1-mg/L methylene blue concentration. ZnO-S demonstrated effective photocatalysis in the ofloxacin degradation with a rate constant of 0.0112 min−1. According to a study on photocatalytic mechanisms, hydroxyl radicals play an important role in the degradation of pollutants. The photocatalyst maintains high photocatalytic efficiency even after five uses. Collectively, ZnO with different morphologies holds promise as a potential catalyst for environmental protection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data will be available on request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by department of creative innovation in science and technology and Nanomaterials Chemistry Research Unit, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PP and PN collected the dataset and writing—original draft. PR and AK were involved in the conceptualization, data analysis and interpretation, and writing—review and editing. PN and RP assisted in the conceptualization, writing—review and editing, visualization, and supervision. The completed manuscript was reviewed and endorsed by all authors. Corresponding Author: PN. All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Paweena Porrawatkul, Rungnapa Pimsen, Arnannit Kuyyogsuy, Parintip Rattanaburi, and Prawit Nuengmatcha. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Paweena Porrawatkul and Prawit Nuengmatcha and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Nuengmatcha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

We confirmed that this manuscript has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal. Ethical approval and informed consent are not applicable for this study.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Nabin Aryal.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Porrawatkul, P., Pimsen, R., Kuyyogsuy, A. et al. Morphology-dependent photocatalytic performance of ZnO nanostructures in organic dye and antibiotic degradation. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05530-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05530-x

Keywords

Navigation