Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimization of a two-stage reverse osmosis pilot system for Caspian seawater desalination using response surface methodology: SEC reduction through recovery increase, Fe fouling, and scaling control

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The scarcity of freshwater has become one of the most critical global problems, and seawater desalination is considered an effective approach to tackling this problem. Caspian seawater with low total dissolved solids (TDS) (< 16,000 mg/L) is a potential source for desalination, but it contains high levels of calcium, magnesium, and bicarbonate alkalinity, also more than the permissible amount of iron at the connection points to the rivers. In this study, a two-stage reverse osmosis (RO) pilot was designed for Caspian seawater desalination with the aim of enhancing the recovery rate and reducing specific energy consumption (SEC) as much as controlling the carbonate scaling and Fe fouling. The effects of main input parameters, including operational pressure, initial TDS, and pH, besides their interaction with each other on output variables, namely system desalination removal (SDR), permeate flux, recovery rate, Fe rejection, and Fe fouling probability, were assessed and optimized using response surface methodology (RSM). An adequate correlation between the predicted and experimental data was gained through the analysis of variance (ANOVA). In the first stage, the scaling controlling was performed by pH adjusting in acidic ranges. The maximum SDR, permeate flux, and recovery rate (96.86%, 41.47 Lmh, and 48.17%, respectively), and the minimum SEC and Fe fouling probability (1.809 kWh/m3 and 0.25, respectively) were obtained at average initial TDS of 12,000 mg/L, operational pressure of 21.9 bar, and pH of 5.235; furthermore, the Fe concentration was completely rejected in all tests. The concentrated water was then introduced to the second stage after removing 91% of the inorganic carbon which was done by acidification. Adding the second stage led to increases in overall recovery and permeate flux of 18.7% and 17.56 Lmh, respectively, and also decreased total SEC by 0.56 kWh/m3, which confirmed the efficiency of the optimized two-stage system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahunbay MG (2019) Achieving high water recovery at low pressure in reverse osmosis processes for seawater desalination. Desalination 465:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.04.023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali A, Tufa RA, Macedonio F, Curcio E, Drioli E (2018) Membrane technology in renewable-energy-driven desalination. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:1–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alkaisi A, Mossad R, Sharifian-Barforoush A (2017) A review of the water desalination systems integrated with renewable energy. Energy Procedia 110:268–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Applegate LE, Sackinger CT (1987) Avoiding iron fouling in reverse osmosis desalination plants. Desalination 61:39–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arjmandi M, Chenar MP, Altaee A, Arjmandi A, Peyravi M, Jahanshahi M, Binaeian E (2020) Caspian seawater desalination and whey concentration through forward osmosis (FO)-reverse osmosis (RO) and FO-FO-RO hybrid systems: Experimental and theoretical study. J Water Process Eng 37:101492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardona E, Piacentino A, Marchese F (2005) Energy saving in two-stage reverse osmosis systems coupled with ultrafiltration processes. Desalination 184:125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.063

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Cohen Y (2022) Calcium sulfate and calcium carbonate scaling of thin-film composite polyamide reverse Osmosis membranes with surface-tethered polyacrylic acid chains. Membranes (basel) 12:1287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daneshmand H, Mahmoudi P (2017) Estimation and assessment of temporal stability of periodicities of droughts in Iran. Water Resour Manag 31:3413–3426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dastbaz A, Karimi-Sabet J, Ahadi H, Amini Y (2017) Preparation and characterization of novel modified PVDF-HFP/GO/ODS composite hollow fiber membrane for Caspian Sea water desalination. Desalination 424:62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.09.030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flores AM, Shukla MK, Daniel D, Ulery AL, Schutte BJ, Picchioni GA, Fernald S (2016) Evapotranspiration changes with irrigation using saline groundwater and RO concentrate. J Arid Environ 131:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenlee LF, Testa F, Lawler DF, Freeman BD, Moulin P (2011) Effect of antiscalant degradation on salt precipitation and solid/liquid separation of RO concentrate. J Memb Sci 366:48–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ISI Water (2023). https://isi-water.com/products/membrane-replacement/?gclid=Cj0KCQjwgNanBhDUARIsAAeIcAu7z9Ne2Va8d8mYNrGn1P1AgDQe_lSCR9rVkOwOzjjKtg_52fQaYgkaAsy8EALw_wcB.

  • Kadhom M (2023) A review on the polyamide thin film composite (TFC) membrane used for desalination: Improvement methods, current alternatives, and challenges. Chem Eng Res Des

  • Kalankesh LR, Ali M, Mansouri A (2019) Efficiency of low-pressure reverses osmosis (RO) in desalination and TOC removal from Caspian seawater and Tajan River. J Renew Energy 6:32–37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-H, Lee S-H, Yoon J-S, Moon S-Y, Yoon C-H (2007) Pilot plant demonstration of energy reduction for RO seawater desalination through a recovery increase. Desalination 203:153–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JE, Phuntsho S, Chekli L, Choi JY, Shon HK (2018) Environmental and economic assessment of hybrid FO-RO/NF system with selected inorganic draw solutes for the treatment of mine impaired water. Desalination 429:96–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Park K, Hong S (2020a) Application of two-stage reverse osmosis system for desalination of high-salinity and high-temperature seawater with improved stability and performance. Desalination 492:114645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Park K, Hong S (2020) Optimization of two-stage seawater reverse osmosis membrane processes with practical design aspects for improving energy efficiency. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.117889.

  • Lakretz A, Mamane H, Asa E, Harif T, Herzberg M (2018) Biofouling control by UV/H2O2 pretreatment for brackish water reverse osmosis process. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 4:1331–1344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HJ, Halali MA, Baker T, Sarathy S, de Lannoy CF (2020) A comparative study of RO membrane scale inhibitors in wastewater reclamation: antiscalants versus pH adjustment. Sep Purif Technol 240:116549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Tian T, Jia Y, Xu N, Yang S, Zhang C, Gao S, Shen W, Wang Z (2023) Adsorption performance and optimization by response surface methodology on tetracycline using Fe-doped ZIF-8-loaded multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:4123–4136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22524-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin L, Xu X, Papelis C, Xu P (2017) Innovative use of drinking water treatment solids for heavy metals removal from desalination concentrate: synergistic effect of salts and natural organic matter. Chem Eng Res Des 120:231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHERD.2017.02.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin M, Hu X, Pan D, Han H (2018) Determination of iron in seawater: from the laboratory to in situ measurements. Talanta 188:135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TALANTA.2018.05.071

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linares RV, Li Z, Yangali-Quintanilla V, Ghaffour N, Amy G, Leiknes T, Vrouwenvelder JS (2016) Life cycle cost of a hybrid forward osmosis–low pressure reverse osmosis system for seawater desalination and wastewater recovery. Water Res 88:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Wang J, Sun X (2016) Energy-saving “NF/EDR” integrated membrane process for seawater desalination Part I. Seawater desalination by NF membrane with high desalination capacity. Desalination 397:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.06.023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Xu GR, Das R (2019) Inorganic scaling in reverse osmosis (RO) desalination: mechanisms, monitoring, and inhibition strategies. Desalination 468:114065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.07.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • M A (2003) The ancient geographical names of the heritage of humanity, a research on the two names of the Persian Gulf and the Caspian and the challenges ahead. In: Geomatic conference

  • Mu’Azu ND (2022) Insight into ANN and RSM models’ predictive performance for mechanistic aspects of Cr(VI) uptake by layered double hydroxide nanocomposites from water. Water (Switzerland) 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14101644

  • Ncube R, Inambao F (2019) Sea water reverse osmosis desalination: energy and economic analysis 716–731

  • Pan S-Y, Haddad AZ, Kumar A, Wang S-W (2020) Brackish water desalination using reverse osmosis and capacitive deionization at the water-energy nexus. Water Res 183:116064

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park HG, Kwon YN (2018) Investigation on the factors determining permeate pH in reverse osmosis membrane processes. Desalination 430:147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DESAL.2017.12.060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park K, Burlace L, Dhakal N, Mudgal A, Stewart NA, Davies PA (2020) Design, modelling and optimisation of a batch reverse osmosis (RO) desalination system using a free piston for brackish water treatment. Desalination 494:114625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pervov AG, Andrianov AP, Efremov RV, Desyatov AV, Baranov AE (2003) A new solution for the Caspian Sea desalination: low-pressure membranes. Desalination 157:377–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pramanik BK, Gao Y, Fan L, Roddick FA, Liu Z (2017) Antiscaling effect of polyaspartic acid and its derivative for RO membranes used for saline wastewater and brackish water desalination. Desalination 404:224–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pressure Chamber (2023). https://vacuumchambers.eu/en_US/p/Pressure-chamber-12.5l%2C-steel-powder-painted-PC2623S/89.

  • Qasim M, Badrelzaman M, Darwish NN, Darwish NA, Hilal N (2019) Reverse osmosis desalination: a state-of-the-art review. Desalination 459:59–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.02.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qin J-J, Oo MH, Coniglio B (2005) Relationship between feed pH and permeate pH in reverse osmosis with town water as feed. Desalination 177:267–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quantum J, Mcgovern RK, JH Lienhard (2018) Saving energy with an optimized two-stage reverse osmosis system. Quantum

  • Reliable chemical price (2021). https://www.merckmillipore.com/INTL/en

  • Ruiz-García A, de la Nuez-Pestana I (2018) A computational tool for designing BWRO systems with spiral wound modules. Desalination 426:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-García A, Feo-García J (2017) Estimation of maximum water recovery in RO desalination for different feedwater inorganic compositions. Desalin Water Treat 70:34–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarker NR, Cherukupally P, Gourevich I, Wilbur J, Jons SD, Bilton AM (2022) Multi-scale visualization of incipient CaCO3 scaling on the polyamide layer of reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 539:115956

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sefatjoo P, Alavi Moghaddam MR, Mehrabadi AR (2020) Evaluating electrocoagulation pretreatment prior to reverse osmosis system for simultaneous scaling and colloidal fouling mitigation: application of RSM in performance and cost optimization. J Water Process Eng 35:101201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal H, Birnhack L, Nir O, Lahav O (2018) Intensification and energy minimization of seawater reverse osmosis desalination through high-pH operation: temperature dependency and second pass implications. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 131:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2018.07.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei QJ, McGovern RK (2017) Saving energy with an optimized two-stage reverse osmosis system. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 3:659–670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wittholz MK, O’Neill BK, Colby CB, Lewis D (2008) Estimating the cost of desalination plants using a cost database. Desalination 229:10–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang F, Cui F, Di Yuan Y, Yu X, Zhao D (2023) Mechanistic Insights into the role of nanoparticles towards the enhanced performance of thin-film nanocomposite membranes. J Membr Sci Lett 100046

  • Youssef PG, Al-Dadah RK, Mahmoud SM (2014) Comparative analysis of desalination technologies. Energy Procedia 61:2604–2607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusefi F, Zahedi MM, Ziyaadini M (2021) Evaluation for the optimization of two conceptual 200,000 m3/day capacity RO desalination plant with different intake seawater of Oman Sea and Caspian Sea. Appl Water Sci 11:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01338-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao DL, Japip S, Zhang Y, Weber M, Maletzko C, Chung T-S (2020) Emerging thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes for reverse osmosis: a review. Water Res 173:115557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, K.N.Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Z. Ghasemi, S. A. MirBagheri & F. Vafaei

Authors
  1. Z. Ghasemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. A. MirBagheri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Vafaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z. Ghasemi.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors “Zeynab Ghasemi, Prof. Seyed Ahmad Mirbagheri, Dr. Freydoon Vafaei” certify that they have have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patentlicensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Samareh Mirkia.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghasemi, Z., MirBagheri, S.A. & Vafaei, F. Optimization of a two-stage reverse osmosis pilot system for Caspian seawater desalination using response surface methodology: SEC reduction through recovery increase, Fe fouling, and scaling control. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 21, 493–514 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05277-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05277-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation