Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inclusive green productivity growth in China: identification of sources and evolutionary patterns

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Enhancing inclusive green total factor productivity (GITFP) growth has become an unavoidable option for economic development in light of high-quality economic development. This study contributed by improving the static green Solow model with the incorporation of energy environment and residential income gap factors. It uses the two-period directional distance function and the green inclusive Luenberger productivity indicator to identify the source and evolution of GITFP growth in China between 2001 and 2019. The regularity assessment data indicate that (1) China's GITFP increased from 2001 to 2019, with technical advancement as the primary driver and efficiency deterioration preventing future improvement. (2) For factor power sources, green productivity growth is mainly driven by energy saving and emission reduction effectiveness, with emission reduction performance being superior to energy conservation performance. In China, labor performance beats capital growth and GDP growth, whereas social performance adds a certain degree of green for inclusive TFP development. The eastern and western regions exhibit a single-wheel development pattern of efficiency decline and technological advancement. In contrast, the central region exhibits a two-wheel development pattern of efficiency increase and technological advancement. (3) Provinces in the East with strong economies, like Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangdong, are at the forefront of technology and act as "innovators" during the research, while provinces in the center and west are trying to catch up. On the basis of the above research, among the policy recommendations presented are the establishment of a performance evaluation mechanism for China's inclusive green growth and the modification of the notion of economic development.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The division of the three regions: the east includes Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei,Shanghai, Liaoning, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian, Guangdong, Shandong, Hainan, and other 11 provinces; the central includes Jilin, Shanxi, Heilongjiang, Jiangxi, Anhui, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, and other 8 provinces, and the west includes Inner Mongolia, Guangxi, Sichuan, Guizhou, Chongqing, Yunnan, Shaanxi, Qinghai, Gansu, Xinjiang, Ningxia, and other 11 provinces.

Abbreviations

GITFP:

Inclusive green total factor productivity

DDF:

Directional distance function

TFP:

Total factor productivity

DEA:

Data envelopment analysis

SBM:

Slacks-based measure

GML:

Global-Malmquist-Luenberger

EBM:

Epsilon-based measure

BDDF:

Biennial directional distance function

TC:

Technological change

EC:

Efficiency change

LSTC:

Labor saving technological change

KSTC:

Capital saving technological change

ESTC:

Energy saving technological change

GGTC:

GDP growth technical change

DRTC:

Carbon dioxide emission reduction technical change

SRTC:

Income disparity technical change

LSEC:

Labor saving efficiency change

KSEC:

Capital saving efficiency change

ESEC:

Energy saving efficiency change

GGEC:

GDP growth efficiency change

DREC:

Carbon dioxide emission reduction efficiency

SREC:

Income disparity efficiency change

LSP:

Labor saving performance

KSP:

Capital saving performance

ESP:

Energy saving performance

GGP:

GDP growth performance

DRP:

Carbon dioxide emission reduction performance

SRP:

Income gap reduction performance

CEADs:

China emission accounts and datasets

References

Download references

Funding

The authors acknowledge financial support from , the key project of Beijing Municipal Education Commission Social Science Planning Fund (SM202010017003), Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province of China (2022C35060), the fund National Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program of Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology (2022X00094), and the Special Fund for the Joint Development Program of the Beijing Municipal Commission of Education. The authors are also very grateful to the anonymous reviewers and Managing Editor Prof. Dr. Maryam Shabani for their insightful comments that helped us sufficiently improve the quality of this paper. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Hao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: S. R. Sabbagh-Yazdi.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, Z., Zhang, F., Li, L. et al. Inclusive green productivity growth in China: identification of sources and evolutionary patterns. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 21, 399–416 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05000-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-05000-w

Keywords

Navigation