Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of heavy metal contamination and its effect on earthworms in different types of soils

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Earthworms encourage the mineralization of soil organic matter, the production of nutrients and the growth of plants through their feeding habits in the soil. But unsustainable development along with rapid urbanization and industrialization degrades the soils at an alarming rate which increases the level of different contaminants, i.e., heavy metals in the soil. The present study was conducted to assess the heavy metals, pH and organic carbon in agricultural, non-agricultural and industrial soils and their effects on the earthworm community structures. A total of seven earthworm species belonging to two families (Megascolecidae and Octochaetidae) were reported in this study. The earthworm species Metaphire posthuma was the most abundant in all collected soils, i.e., agricultural, non-agricultural and industrial soil with a relative abundance of 76.56%, 77.19% and 78.85%, respectively. The abundance and biomass of M. posthuma were in the order of agricultural soil > non-agricultural soil > industrial soil. It was also reported that the abundance of both anecic and endogeic species was higher in agricultural soils followed by non-agricultural and industrial soil. The findings of heavy metals indicated that industrial soil has the highest concentration of heavy metals followed by non-agricultural and agricultural soils. The contamination factor, enrichment factor, geoaccumulation index, pollution index and modified pollution index showed high, moderate and less pollution levels at industrial, non-agricultural and agricultural soil, respectively. The present study also  indicated that Cd and As showed severe contamination in all studied soil types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Audusseau H, Vandenbulcke F, Dume C, Deschins V, Pauwels M, Gigon A, Bagard M, Dupont L (2020) Impacts of metallic trace elements on an earthworm community in an urban wasteland: Emphasis on the bioaccumulation and genetic characteristics in Lumbricus castaneus. Sci Total Environ 718:137259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouché MB (1977) Strategies lombriciennes. Ecol Bull 25:122–132

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wandeler H, Sousa-Silva R, Ampoorter E, Bruelheide H, Carnol M, Dawud SM, Dănilă G, Finer L, Hättenschwiler S, Hermy M, Jaroszewicz B (2016) Drivers of earthworm incidence and abundance across European forests. Soil Biol Biochem 99:167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado J, Nieto JM, Boski T (2010) Analysis of the spatial variation of heavy metals in the Guadiana Estuary sediments (SW Iberian Peninsula) based on GIS-mapping techniques. Estuarine Coast Shelf Sci 88(1):71–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gowd SS, Reddy MR, Govil PK (2010) Assessment of heavy metal contamination in soils at Jajmau (Kanpur) and Unnao industrial areas of the Ganga Plain, Uttar Pradesh, India. J Hazard Mater 174:113–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hadda MS, Singh G, Chandel S, Mohan N (2020) Soil organic carbon and soil physical characteristics as affected by land uses under semiarid irrigated conditions. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 51:1293–1305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hakanson L (1980) An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control. A sedimentological approach. Water Res 14(8):975–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(80)90143-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidari A, Kumar V, Keshavarzi A (2019) Appraisal of metallic pollution and ecological risks in agricultural soils of Alborz province, Iran, employing contamination indices and multivariate statistical analyses. Int J Environ Health Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2019.1677864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ML (1967) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt, Ltd, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. In: Ecosystem management. Springer, New York, pp 130–147

  • Julka JM (2008) Know your earthworms. Rashtriya Vigyan Evam Prodyogiki Sanchar Parishad (RVPSP) Solan (HP, India)

  • Kopittke PM, Menzies NW, Wang P, McKenna BA, Lombi E (2019) Soil and the intensification of agriculture for global food security. Environ Int 132:105078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Pandita S, Sharma A, Bakshi P, Sharma P, Karaouzas I, Bhardwaj R, Thukral AK, Cerda A (2019) Ecological and human health risks appraisal of metal(loid)s in agricultural soils: a review. Geol Ecol Landscapes. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2019.1701310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Sharma A, Minakshi Bhardwaj R, Thukral AK (2018) Temporal distribution, source apportionment, and pollution assessment of metals in the sediments of Beas river. India Hum Ecol Risk Assess 24(8):2162–2181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Latifi F, Musa F, Musa A (2020) Heavy metal content in soil and their bioaccumulation in earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris L.). Agri For 66(1):57–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipiec J, Frąc M, Brzezińska M, Turski M, Oszust K (2016) Linking microbial enzymatic activities and functional diversity of soil around earthworm burrows and casts. Front Microbiol 7:1361. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CW, Lin KH, Kuo YM (2003) Application of factor analysis in the assessment of groundwater quality in a blackfoot disease area in Taiwan. Sci Total Environ 313(1–3):77–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahey S, Kumar R, Sharma M, Kumar V, Bhardwaj R (2020) A critical review on toxicity of cobalt and its bioremediation strategies. SN Appl Sci 2:1279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-3020-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Majeed R (2014) Effect of chemical treatments on storage life and fruit quality of plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) cv. Satluj purple. Doctoral dissertation, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana

  • McCallum HM, Wilson JD, Beaumont D, Sheldon R, O’Brien MG, Park KJ (2016) A role for liming as a conservation intervention? Earthworm abundance is associated with higher soil pH and foraging activity of a threatened shorebird in upland grasslands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 223:182–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller G (1981) The heavy metal pollution of the sediments of Neckars and its tributary: a stocktaking. Chem Ztg 105:157–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3. Chem Methods 5:961–1010

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemerow NL (1991) Stream, Lake, Estuary, and Ocean Pollution. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandit P, Mangala P, Saini A, Bangotra P, Kumar V, Mehra R, Ghosh D (2020) Radiological and pollution risk assessments of terrestrial radionuclides and heavy metals in a mineralized zone of the siwalik region (India). Chemosphere 254:126857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rybak AV, Belykh ES, Maystrenko TA, Shadrin DM, Pylina YI, Chadin IF, Velegzhaninov IO (2020) Genetic analysis in earthworm population from area contaminated with radionuclides and heavy metals. Sci Total Environ 723:137920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137920

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez EG, Munoz B, Garvin MH, Jesus JB, Cosín DD (1997) Ecological preferences of some earthworm species in southwest Spain. Soil Biol Biochem 29:313–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Shi Y, Zheng L (2020) Individual and cellular responses of earthworms (Eisenia fetida) to endosulfan at environmentally related concentrations. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 74:103299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2019.103299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sikka R, Nayyar VK (2016) Monitoring of lead (Pb) pollution in soils and plants irrigated with untreated sewage water in some industrialized cities of Punjab. India Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 96(4):443–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sikka R, Nayyar V, Sidhu SS (2009) Monitoring of Cd pollution in soils and plants irrigated with untreated sewage water in some industrialized cities of Punjab, India. Environ Monit Assess 154:53–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Singh J, Vig AP (2016) Earthworm as ecological engineers to change the physico-chemical properties of soil: soil vs vermicast. Ecol Eng 90:1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Singh J, Vig AP (2020a) Diversity and abundance of earthworms in different landuse patterns: relation with soil properties. Asian J Biol Life Sci 9(2):111–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Sharma A, Khajuria K, Singh J, Vig AP (2020b) Soil properties changes earthworm diversity indices in different agro-ecosystem. BMC Ecol 20:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sizmur T, Richardson J (2020) Earthworms accelerate the biogeochemical cycling of potentially toxic elements: Results of a meta-analysis. Soil Biol Biochem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroud JL (2019) Soil health pilot study in England: Outcomes from an on-farm earthworm survey. PLoS ONE 14(2):e0203909. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suthar S (2009) Earthworm communities a bioindicator of arable land management practices: a case study in Semiarid Region of India. Ecol Indic 9(3):588–594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland RA (2000) Bed sediment-associated trace metals in an urban stream, Oahu. Hawaii Environ Geol 39(6):611–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002540050473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SR, McLennan SM (1995) The geochemical evolution of the continental crust. Rev Geophys 33(2):241–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian K, Huang B, Xing Z, Hu W (2017) Geochemical baseline establishment and ecological risk evaluation of heavy metals in greenhouse soils from Dongtai, China. Ecol Indic 72:510–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Groenigen JW, Van Groenigen KJ, Koopmans GF, Stokkermans L, Vos HM, Lubbers IM (2019) How fertile are earthworm casts? A meta-analysis. Geoderma 338:525–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Qiao Y, Zhang H, Yue S, Li H, Ji X, Liu L (2018) Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in earthworms from field contaminated soil in a subtropical area of China. Ecotox Environ Safe 148:876–883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wcisło E (2012) Polish soil quality standards versus risk-based soil screening levels for metals and arsenic. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 18(3):569–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeotikar PV, Nayyar S, Singh C, Mukhopadhyay CS, Kakkar SS, Jindal R (2019) Seasonal variation in oxidative stress markers of Murrah buffaloes in heavy metal exposed areas of Ludhiana. Ind J Ani Res 53(10):1310–1315

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Dai J, Chen X, Li H, Lavelle P (2020) Effects of a native earthworm species (Amynthas morrisi) and Eisenia fetida on metal fractions in a multi-metal polluted soil from South China. Acta Oecologica 102:103503

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Singh.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Maryam Shabani.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verma, F., Singh, S., Singh, J. et al. Assessment of heavy metal contamination and its effect on earthworms in different types of soils. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 4337–4350 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03297-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03297-z

Keywords

Navigation