Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of the biological soil improvement procedure

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biocalcification is a developing method in the realm of bio-geotechnics, potentially invaluable for soil stabilization. The method is based on microbial-induced calcite precipitation. Hydrolysis of urea by the urease enzyme discharging from bacteria in the presence of Ca2+ is one of the most notable methods for calcium carbonate precipitation. However, partial clogging may occur as a result of premature bacterial activity that hinders free flow of the mixture, prohibiting spatial homogeneity of the sediment formation, thus limiting the extent of calcification. In order to circumvent clogging, bacterial activity was suppressed in this study prior to injection by lowering the temperature of the suspension and the reaction to 3 °C prior to mixture, delaying CaCO3 precipitation and thus allowing more uniform dispersion of the mixture. Sporosarcina pasteurii and Arthrobacter crystallopoietes were cultured in two different media and injected with reactant agent into samples of non-cohesive sand. The effect of culture media and temperature was studied on the rate and volume of CaCO3 precipitation. Furthermore, the effect of cementation of each batch on the shear strength of the treated soil was evaluated in unconfined compression test. Compressive strengths in excess of 400 kPa were recorded for samples that were injected in two phases, an hour apart. Whereas the highest compressive strength obtained from a single-phase injection at room temperature was approximately 80 kPa. By lowering the temperature of the bacterial suspension and the reactant solution prior to injection, the compressive strength of the sample treated in a single phase was increased to 230 kPa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Urea hydrolysis is the conversion of urea to carbonate and ammonium ions in the presence of water.

  2. Amino acid deamination is the removal of an amine group from a molecule.

  3. Urease is an enzyme which catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea.

  4. 16S rRNA gene sequences test (was done by Iranian Biological Resource Centre (IBRC)) has been used for the identification of selected bacterium. BLAST results shows that the isolated strains has phylogenetically affinities with Arthrobacter Crystallopoietes (DSM 20117 (T)), a gram positive, aerobic, rod shape, non-spore forming, and urease positive bacterium.

  5. Refer to a suspension which contain Sporosarcina pasteurii bacteria cultivated in Caso* culture media.

  6. SP/2/Caso* refer to a double shot treatment using Sporosarcina pasteurii bacteria cultivated in Caso* culture media.

  7. SP/1/Caso* similar to the SP/2/Caso* trend using a single shot.

  8. AC/2/Caso* refer to a double shot treatment using Arthrobacter crystallopoietes bacteria cultivated in Caso* culture media.

  9. AC/1/Caso* similar to the AC/2/Caso* trend using a single shot.

  10. AC/2/Y-Ext* similar to the AC/2/Caso* trend using Y-Ext* culture media, etc.

  11. This image was taken by Thin Film and Nano-Electronic Research Center—Tehran University.

  12. This test was done by Iranian Material and Energy Research Center.

References

  • Abo-El-enein S, Ali A, Talkhan FN, Abdel-Gawwad H (2012) Utilization of microbial induced calcite precipitation for sand consolidation and mortar crack remediation. HBRC J 8:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abo-El-enein S, Ali A, Talkhan FN, Abdel-Gawwad H (2013) Application of microbial biocementation to improve the physico-mechanical properties of cement mortar. HBRC J 9:36–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achal V, Kawasaki S (2016) Biogrout: a novel binding material for soil improvement and concrete repair. Front Microbiol 7:314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akiyama M, Kawasaki S (2012a) Microbially mediated sand solidification using calcium phosphate compounds. Eng Geol 137:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akiyama M, Kawasaki S (2012b) Novel grout material comprised of calcium phosphate compounds: in vitro evaluation of crystal precipitation and strength reinforcement. Eng Geol 125:119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Thawadi S (2008) High strength in situ biocementation of soil by calcite precipitating locally isolated ureolytic bacteria. Murdoch University, Murdoch

    Google Scholar 

  • Benini S, Rypniewski WR, Wilson KS, Miletti S, Ciurli S, Mangani S (1999) A new proposal for urease mechanism based on the crystal structures of the native and inhibited enzyme from Bacillus pasteurii: why urea hydrolysis costs two nickels. Structure 7:205–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berdonosov S, Znamenskaya I, Melikhov I (2005) Mechanism of the vaterite-to-calcite phase transition under sonication. Inorg Mater 41:1308–1312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng L, Cord-Ruwisch R (2012) In situ soil cementation with ureolytic bacteria by surface percolation. Ecol Eng 42:64–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng L, Shahin M, Cord-Ruwisch R (2014) Bio-cementation of sandy soil using microbially induced carbonate precipitation for marine environments. Géotechnique 64:1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dejong JT, Fritzges MB, Nüsslein K (2006) Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shear. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 132:1381–1392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dejong JT, Mortensen BM, Martinez BC, Nelson DC (2010) Bio-mediated soil improvement. Ecol Eng 36:197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dejong J, Soga K, Kavazanjian E, Burns S, van Paassen L, Al Qabany A, Aydilek A, Bang S, Burbank M, Caslake LF (2013) Biogeochemical processes and geotechnical applications: progress, opportunities and challenges. Geotechnique 63:287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick J, de Windt W, de Graef B, Saveyn H, van der Meeren P, de Belie N, Verstraete W (2006) Bio-deposition of a calcium carbonate layer on degraded limestone by Bacillus species. Biodegradation 17:357–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U. A. C. O. Engineers (1995) Chemical grouting. Engineering Manual (EM 1110-1-3500) Washington, DC

  • Falini G, Albeck S, Weiner S, Addadi L (1996) Control of aragonite or calcite polymorphism by mollusk shell macromolecules. Science 271:67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita Y, Ferris FG, Lawson RD, Colwell FS, Smith RW (2000) Subscribed content calcium carbonate precipitation by ureolytic subsurface bacteria. Geomicrobiol J 17:305–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita Y, Taylor JL, Wendt LM, Reed DW, Smith RW (2010) Evaluating the potential of native ureolytic microbes to remediate a 90Sr contaminated environment. Environ Sci Technol 44:7652–7658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Funke G, Hutson RA, Bernard KA, Pfyffer GE, Wauters G, Collins MD (1996) Isolation of Arthrobacter spp. from clinical specimens and description of Arthrobacter cumminsii sp. nov. and Arthrobacter woluwensis sp. nov. J Clin Microbiol 34:2356–2363

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammes F, Seka A, de Knijf S, Verstraete W (2003) A novel approach to calcium removal from calcium-rich industrial wastewater. Water Res 37:699–704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harkes MP, van Paassen LA, Booster JL, Whiffin VS, van Loosdrecht MC (2010) Fixation and distribution of bacterial activity in sand to induce carbonate precipitation for ground reinforcement. Ecol Eng 36:112–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov V, Chu J (2008) Applications of microorganisms to geotechnical engineering for bioclogging and biocementation of soil in situ. Rev Environ Sci Bio/Technol 7:139–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James G, Warwood B, Hiebert R, Cunningham A (2000) Microbial barriers to the spread of pollution. In: Bioremediation. Springer

  • Li M, Cheng X, Guo H (2013) Heavy metal removal by biomineralization of urease producing bacteria isolated from soil. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 76:81–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer F, Bang S, Min S, Stetler L, Bang S (2011) Microbiologically-induced soil stabilization: application of Sporosarcina pasteurii for fugitive dust control. In: Proceedings of geo-frontiers, pp 4002–4011

  • Montoya BM, Dejong J (2015) Stress–strain behavior of sands cemented by microbially induced calcite precipitation. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 141:04015019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nemati M, Voordouw G (2003) Modification of porous media permeability, using calcium carbonate produced enzymatically in situ. Enzyme Microbial Technol 33:635–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okwadha GD, Li J (2010) Optimum conditions for microbial carbonate precipitation. Chemosphere 81:1143–1148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran SK, Ramakrishnan V, Bang SS (2001) Remediation of concrete using micro-organisms. ACI Mater J 98:3–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rong H, Qian C-X, Li L-Z (2012) Study on microstructure and properties of sandstone cemented by microbe cement. Constr Build Mater 36:687–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusu C, Cheng XH, Li M (2011) Biological clogging in Tangshan sand columns under salt water intrusion by Sporosarcina pasteurii. Advanced Materials Research, 2011. Trans Tech Publ, pp 2040–2046

  • Salifu E, Maclachlan E, Iyer KR, Knapp CW, Tarantino A (2016) Application of microbially induced calcite precipitation in erosion mitigation and stabilisation of sandy soil foreshore slopes: a preliminary investigation. Eng Geol 201:96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarda D, Choonia HS, Sarode D, Lele S (2009) Biocalcification by Bacillus pasteurii urease: a novel application. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36:1111–1115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sel I, Ozhan HB, Cibik R, Buyukcangaz E (2015) Bacteria-induced cementation process in loose sand medium. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 33:403–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Paassen L, Harkes M, van Zwieten G, van der Zon W, van der Star W, van Loosdrecht M (2009a) Scale up of BioGrout: a biological ground reinforcement method. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. Lansdale IOS Press, pp 2328–2333

  • van Paassen LA, van Loosdrecht M, Pieron M, Mulder A, Ngan-Tillard D, van der Linden T (2009b) Strength and deformation of biologically cemented sandstone. ISRM Regional Symposium-EUROCK 2009. International Society for Rock Mechanics

  • van Paassen LA, Daza CM, Staal M, Sorokin DY, van der Zon W, van Loosdrecht MC (2010a) Potential soil reinforcement by biological denitrification. Ecol Eng 36:168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Paassen LA, Ghose R, van der Linden TJ, van der Star WR, van Loosdrecht MC (2010b) Quantifying biomediated ground improvement by ureolysis: large-scale biogrout experiment. J Geotechn Geoenvironm Eng 136:1721–1728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer K-H, Whitman W (2011) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology: Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology: volume 3: the Firmicutes. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren LA, Maurice PA, Parmar N, Ferris FG (2001) Microbially mediated calcium carbonate precipitation: implications for interpreting calcite precipitation and for solid-phase capture of inorganic contaminants. Geomicrobiol J 18:93–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss JV, Emerson D, Megonigal JP (2005) Rhizosphere iron(III) deposition and reduction in a L.-dominated wetland. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1861–1870

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whiffin VS (2004) Microbial CaCO3 precipitation for the production of biocement. Murdoch University, Murdoch

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiffin VS, van Paassen LA, Harkes MP (2007) Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvement technique. Geomicrobiol J 24:417–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman WB, Goodfellow M, Kämpfer P, Busse H, Trujillo M, Ludwig W, Suzuki Ki PA (2012) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol 5. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Cheng X (2013) A performance study of high-strength microbial mortar produced by low pressure grouting for the reinforcement of deteriorated masonry structures. Constr Build Mater 41:505–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms. R. Bazzaz zadeh and Dr. F. Tabande for their useful comments and Mr. B. Mirzaie for her assistance in the laboratory tests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Kahani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests relevant to this article.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Josef Trögl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalantary, F., Kahani, M. Optimization of the biological soil improvement procedure. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16, 4231–4240 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1821-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1821-9

Keywords

Navigation