Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Improving energy efficiency and fouling mitigation for membrane bioreactor in Al-Rustamiyah sewage treatment plant based on hydrodynamics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Al-Rustamiyah sewage treatment plant in the east of Baghdad city, capital of Iraq, the membrane bioreactor suffering from a severe biofouling problem. The main reason for this problem is inefficient and inadequate aeration process. The objective of this work is to control fouling and to improve the energy efficiency of the submerged membrane bioreactor. Fouling control is achieved by optimizing the two-phase hydrodynamic parameters (air bubble diameter and shear stress), while energy efficiency improved through analysis of flow field. An experimental rig similar to real plant was built, and several operating and design parameters were experimentally tested. The parameters were air flow rate (1–9 L/min), membrane sheets spacing (3, 5, and 7 mm), and air diffuser design (pipe diffuser and disk diffuser). The bubble sizes were measured experimentally using high-speed camera. It was found that larger bubbles were produced at narrow channels between the membrane sheets. Optimization using computational fluid dynamic with ANSYS FLUENT was employed; the results showed that a bubble diameter of 2.5 mm had a slug flow pattern, resulting in better energy saving for a 3 mm space between membrane sheets with a 5 L/min air flow, while maximum shear stress obtained was (4 Pa). Nutrients removal results from synthetic sewage were 97.32, 79.68, and 13% for COD, NH3–N, and PO −34 , respectively, at 6 days retention time. The results obtained are quite significant in practice because it contributes to improve the efficiency of membrane bioreactor in Al-Rustamiyah sewage treatment plant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akita K, Yoshida F (1974) Bubble size, interfacial area and liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient in bubble columns. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 12:76–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bérubé PR, Lin H, Watai Y (2008) Fouling in air sparged submerged hollow fiber membranes at sub- and super-critical flux conditions. J Membr Sci 307:169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm L, Drews A, Prieske H, Berube PR, Kraume M (2012) The importance of fluid dynamics for MBR fouling mitigation. Bioresour Technol 122:50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braak E, Alliet M, Schetrite S, Albasi C (2011) Aeration and hydrodynamics in submerged membrane bioreactors. J Membr Sci 379:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braghetta A, DiGiano FA, Ball WP (1998) NOM accumulation at NF membrane surface: impact of chemistry and shear. J Environ Eng 124(11):1087–1097

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brannock MWD, De Wever H, Wanga Y, Leslie G (2009) Computational fluid dynamics simulations of MBRs: inside submerged versus outside submerged membranes. Desalination 236:244–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brannock M, Wang Y, Leslie G (2010) Mixing characterisation of full-scale membrane bioreactors: CFD modelling with experimental validation. Water Res 44:3181–3191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carreño-Martinez YM, Gozálvez-Zafrilla JM, Mendoza-Roca JA, Santafé-Moros A (2010) Flow simulation in submerged membrane bioreactor at laboratory scale. In: COMSOL conference, Paris, pp 1–7

  • DiGiano FA, Arweiler S, Riddick JA (2000) Alternative tests for evaluating NF fouling. J Am Water Works Assoc 92(2):103–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drews A (2010) Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors—characterization, contradictions, causes and cures. J Membr Sci 363:1–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elimelech M, Zhu X, Childress AE, Hong S (1997) Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci 127(1):101–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne B, Alliet M, Schetrite S, Albasi C (2011) Aeration and hydrodynamics in submerged membrane bioreactors. J Membr Sci 379:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenu A, Roels J, Wambecq T, De Gussem K, Thoeve C, De Gueldre G, Van De Steene B (2010) Energy audit of a full scale MBR system. Desalination 262:121–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghidossi R, Veyret D, Moulin P (2006) Computational fluid dynamics applied to membranes: state of the art and opportunities. Chem Eng Process 45:437–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gil JA, Túa L, Montaño B, Rodríguez DP (2010) Monitoring and analysis of the energy cost of an MBR. Desalination 250:997–1001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández Rojas ME, Van Kaam R, Schetrite S, Albasi C (2005) Role and variations of supernatant compounds in submerged membrane bioreactor fouling. Desalination 179:95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe KJ, Clark MM (2002) Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters. Environ Sci Technol 36(16):3571–3576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jucker C, Clark MM (1994) Adsorption of aquatic humic substances on hydrophobic ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 97:37–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Judd S (2008) The status of membrane bioreactor technology. Trends Biotechnol 26:109–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp PC, Kruithof JC, Folmer HC (2000) UF/RO treatment plant Heemskerk: from challenge to full scale application. Desalination 131(1–3):27–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laine JM, Hagstrom JP, Clark MM, Mallevialle J (1989) Effects of ultrafiltration membrane-composition. J Am Water Works Assoc 81(11):61–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lander DA (2009) Effect of bloom-forming algae on fouling of integrated membrane systems in seawater desalination. Doctoral Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

  • Laura A, Marcano C (2012) Energy optimization of membrane bioreactors. M.Sc. Thesis, Lund University

  • Le-Clech P, Jefferson B, Judd SJ (2005) A comparison of submerged and sidestream tubular membrane bioreactor configurations. Desalination 173:113–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le-Clech P, Chen V, Fane TAG (2006) Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci 284:17–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmon EW (obtained 2010/09) Thermophysical properties of fluid systems, en NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database http://webbook.nist.gov

  • Li QL, Xu ZH, Pinnau I (2007) Fouling of reverse osmosis membranes by biopolymers in wastewater secondary effluent: role of membrane surface properties and initial permeate flux. J Membr Sci 290(1–2):173–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Chae SR, Drews A, Kraume M, Shin HS, Yang F (2009) Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res 43:1489–1512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ndinisa NV, Fane AG, Wiley DE (2006) Fouling control in a submerged flat sheet membrane system. Part II. Two phase flow characterization and CFD simulations. Sep Sci Technol 41:1383–1409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nywening JP, Zhou H (2009) Influence of filtration conditions on membrane fouling and scouring aeration effectiveness in submerged membrane bioreactors to treat municipal wastewater. Water Res 43:3548–3558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Pérez JA, Rodríguez-Porcel EM, Casas López JL, Fernández Sevilla JM, Chisti Y (2006) Shear rate in stirred tank and bubble column bioreactors. Chem Eng J 124:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu Y, Matsushita K, Watanabe A (1994) Influence of shear breakage of microbial cells on cross-flow microfiltration flux. J Ferment Bioeng 78(2):170–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolichin A, Eigenberger G, Lapin A (2004) Simulations of buoyancy driven bubbly flow: established simplifications and open questions. AIChE J 50:24–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson T, Judd S, Jefferson B, Brindle K (2000) Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. IWA Publishing, London, pp 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Talaia MAR (2007) Terminal velocity of a bubble rise in a liquid column. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 28:264–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrijenhoek EM, Hong S, Elimelech M (2001) Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 188(1):115–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Guan J, Santiwong SR, Waite TD (2008) Characterization of floc size and structure under different monomer and polymer coagulants on microfiltration membrane fouling. J Membr Sci 321(2):132–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wicaksana F, Fane AG, Chen V (2006) Fibre movement induced by bubbling using submerged hollow fibre membranes. J Membr Sci 271:186–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X, Elimelech M (1997) Colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis membranes: measurements and fouling mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol 31(12):3654–3662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to gratefully acknowledge the financial support from Chemical and Process Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and Build Environment, the National University of Malaysia (Grant No. 02-01-02 SF 1021). Special thanks addressed to Prof. Abdul Wahab Mohammad, Dean of Faculty of Engineering and Build Environment for his scientific supervision during the sabbatical leave in UKM/Malaysia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Electromechanical Engineering Department, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq

    R. I. Ibrahim

Authors
  1. R. I. Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. I. Ibrahim.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: M Borghei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ibrahim, R.I. Improving energy efficiency and fouling mitigation for membrane bioreactor in Al-Rustamiyah sewage treatment plant based on hydrodynamics. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15, 2369–2380 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1605-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1605-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation