Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrodynamic behaviour and its effects on the treatment performance of panelled anaerobic baffle-cum filter reactor

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to present the influence of hydraulic behaviour in the treatment of sewage (domestic wastewater) using panelled anaerobic baffle-cum filter reactor (PABFR). The PABFR has five compartments of equal size in which the first three compartments operate as anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) followed by anaerobic filters (AF). The combined reactor has a great potential for its application due to its panelled structure and arrangement of baffles inside each compartment. Hydrodynamic behaviour of the reactor was determined by means of a pulse tracer test and by calculating the residence time distribution curves at different flow rates. At high flow rates [with hydraulic retention time (HRT) <4 h], the mixing pattern in ABR showed a completely mixed type with a maximum dead space of 14 % and as the flow decreased (HRT of 8 and 12 h), the ABR’s mixing behaviour was intermediate between plug flow and completely mixed. In the case of AF, as the flow increased, the dispersion was intermediate between completely mixed and plug flow, and as the flow rate decreased, the reactor became completely plug flow with the dead space ranging between 2.2 and 7.4 %. On the whole, PABFR treatment performance in terms of chemical oxygen demand removal was 90, 89 and 64 % for 12-, 8- and 4-h HRT, respectively, which clearly shows the correlation between mixing and reactor process performance. Thus, the outcome of this research in general highlights the importance of hydrodynamic behaviour for a better operation of the reactor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Public Health and Association (APHA) (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th edn. United Book Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber WP, Stuckey DC (1999) The use of anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for wastewater treatment: a review. Water Res 33(7):1559–1578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bodin H, Mietto A, Ehde PM, Persson J, Weisner S (2012) Tracer behaviour and analysis of hydraulics in experimental free water surface wetland. J Ecotechnol 49:201–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodkhe SY (2009) A modified anaerobic baffled reactor for municipal wastewater treatment. J Environ Manag 90(8):2488–2493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Capela I, BiléM J, Silva F, Nadais H, Prates A, Arroja L (2009) Hydrodynamic behaviour of a full-scale anaerobic contact reactor using residence time distribution technique. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 84(5):716–724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Zheng P, Guo Y, Mahmood Q, Tang C, Ding S (2010) Flow patterns of super-high-rate anaerobic bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 101(20):7731–7735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feng H, Hu L, Shan D, Fang C, Dong S (2008) Effects of temperature and hydraulic residence time (HRT) on treatment of dilute wastewater in a carrier anaerobic baffled reactor. Biomed Environ Sci 21:460–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fogler HS (2006) Elements of chemical reaction engineering, 4th edn. Pearson Education, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopala Krishna GVT, Kumar P, Kumar P (2008) Treatment of low strength complex wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). Bioresour Technol 99(17):8193–8200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grobicki A, Stuckey DC (1992) Hydrodynamic characteristics of the anaerobic baffled reactor. Water Res 26(3):371–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JF, Martin JF, Granata T, Bouchard V, Quigley M, Brown L (2004) Effects of wetland depth and flow rate on residence time distribution characteristics. Ecol Eng 23(3):189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji J, Zhe K, Xing Y, Zheng P (2012) Hydraulic characteristics and their effects on working performance of compartmentalized anaerobic reactor. Bioresour Technol 116:47–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ji Y-X, Xing B-S, Yang G-F, Ni W-M, Guo L-X, Jin R-C (2014) Performance and hydrodynamic features of a staged up-flow ANAMMOX sludge bed (SUASB) reactor. Chem Eng J 253:298–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez B, Noyola A, Capdeville B (1988) Selected dye for residence time distribution evaluation in bioreactors. Biotechnol Tech 2(2):77–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi T, Li Y-Y (2011) Performance and characterization of a newly developed self-agitated anaerobic reactor with biological desulfurization. Bioresour Technol 102(10):5580–5588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie Grady CP, Daigger GT, Lim HC (1999) Biological wastewater treatment, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenspiel O (1999) Chemical reaction engineering, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindmark J, Thorin E, Fdhila RB, Dahlquist E (2014) Effects of mixing on the result of anaerobic digestion: review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40:1030–1047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Ren N, Wan C (2007) Hydrodynamic characteristics of a four-compartment periodic anaerobic baffled reactor. J Environ Sci (China) 19(10):1159–1165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mansouri Y, Zinatizadeh AA, Mohammadi P, Irandoust M, Akhbari A, Davoodi R (2012) Hydraulic characteristics analysis of an anaerobic rotatory biological contracto (AnRBC) using tracer experiments and response surface methodology (RSM). Korean J Chem Eng 28(7):891–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf and Eddy (2003) Wastewater engineering: treatment, disposal, and reuse, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson J, Somes NLG, Wong THF (1999) Hydraulics efficiency of wetlands and ponds. Water Sci Technol 40(3):291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard DW, Carpenter JH (1960) Measurements of turbulent diffusion in estuarine and inshore waters. Int Assoc Sci Hydrol Bull 5(4):37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi W-K, Hojo T, Li Y-Y (2013) Hydraulic characteristics simulation of an innovative self-agitation anaerobic baffled reactor (SA-ABR). Bioresour Technol 136:94–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajakumar R, Meenambal T, RajeshBanu J, Yeom IT (2011) Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater in upflow anaerobic filter under low upflow velocity. Int J Environ Sci Technol 8(1):149–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ren TT, Mu Y, Yu HQ, Harada H, Li YY (2008) Dispersion analysis of an acidogenic UASB reactor. Chem Eng J 142:182–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarathai Y, Koottatep T, Morel A (2010) Hydraulic characteristics of an anaerobic baffled reactor as onsite wastewater treatment system. J Environ Sci (China) 22(9):1319–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CL, Elliot DJ, James A (1996) Mixing in upflow anaerobic filter and its influence on performance and scaleup. Water Res 30(2):3066–3076

    Google Scholar 

  • Tembhurkar AR, Mhaisalkar VA (2006) Study of hydrodynamic behavior of a laboratory scale upflow anaerobic fixed film fixed bed reactor. J Environ Eng 48(2):75–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terashima M, Goel R, Komatsu K, Yasui H, Takahashi H, Li YY, Noike T (2009) CFD simulation of mixing in anaerobic digesters. Bioresour Technol 100(7):2228–2233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thackston EL, Shields FD, Schroeder PR (1987) Residence time distribution of shallow basins. J Environ Eng ASCE 113(6):1319–1332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson EJ, Chambers B (1979) The effect of longitudinal mixing on the settleability of activated sludge. Technical report TR 122, Stevenage, England

  • Tsai DDW, Ramaraj R, Chen PH (2012) A method of short-circuiting comparison. Water Resour Manag 26(9):2689–2702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolkersdorfer C (2011) Tracer test in a settling pond: the passive mine water treatment plant of the 1 B mine pool, Nova Scotia, Canada. Mine Water Environ. doi:10.1007/s10230-011-0147-3

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project was sponsored by University Grants Commission (UGC). The authors would like to thank the management of STP at the Anna University Campus for their cooperation throughout the study, and the authors extend their thanks to Ms. Anu Rachel Thomas and Ms. Sowmiya for their technical assistance during the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Renuka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Renuka, R., Mariraj Mohan, S. & Amal Raj, S. Hydrodynamic behaviour and its effects on the treatment performance of panelled anaerobic baffle-cum filter reactor. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13, 307–318 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0824-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0824-z

Keywords

Navigation