Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contrast-induced neurotoxicity related to neurological endovascular procedures: a systematic review

  • Original article
  • Published:
Acta Neurologica Belgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contrast-induced neurotoxicity (CIN) is an adverse reaction to contrast agents which can occur in the context of diagnostic and therapeutic neurological endovascular procedures. Our goal was to conduct a systematic review of patients reported in the literature diagnosed with CIN after neurological endovascular procedures. A systematic search of EMBASE and MEDLINE databases was conducted. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years; neurological endovascular procedure performed ≤ 24 h before ictus; new manifestations compatible with encephalic dysfunction; imaging performed < 7 days after ictus; exclusion of other causes and manifestations attributed to pre-existing conditions. Forty-eight patients were included, of which 60.4% were female and 60.4% had arterial hypertension; median age was 63 years. The most frequent procedure was diagnostic cerebral angiography (n = 24, 50.0%) and non-ionic contrast agents were more frequently used (n = 40, 83.3%). Twenty-six patients (54.2%) developed clinical manifestations compatible with CIN during or immediately after the procedure, and the most frequent manifestations were encephalopathy, cortical blindness and motor deficit. The most frequent imaging findings were cortical contrast enhancement on CT (n = 23/42), and cortical sulci effacement (n = 18/48). Most patients presented complete clinical recovery (89.6%) at a median time of 3 days. Among patients with neuroimaging changes who underwent follow-up, complete regression of the abnormalities was shown in 81.5% at a median time of 5 days. CIN is a rare adverse reaction in the context of neurological endovascular procedures. Recognition of clinical manifestations and typical imaging abnormalities, while excluding other causes, is essential for diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antunes JL (1974) Egas Moniz and cerebral angiography. J Neurosurg 40:427–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Silverman SM, Bergman PS, Bender MB (1961) The dynamics of transient cerebral blindness. Arch Neurol 4:333–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spina R, Simon N, Markus R, Muller DW, Kathir K (2017) Contrast-induced encephalopathy following cardiac catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 90:257–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mentzel HJ, Blume J, Malich A, Fitzek C, Reichenbach JR, Kaiser WA (2003) Cortical blindness after contrast-enhanced CT: complication in a patient with diabetes insipidus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:1114–1116

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wishart DL (1971) Complications in vertebral angiography as compared to non-vertebral cerebral angiography in 447 studies. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 11:527–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Niimi Y, Kupersmith MJ, Ahmad S, Song J, Berenstein A (2008) Cortical blindness, transient and otherwise, associated with detachable coil emobolization of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR AM J Neuroradiol 29:603–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 151:W65–W94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buschur M, Aspelin P (2014) Contrast Media: History and Chemical Properties. Interv Cardiol Clin 3:333–339

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomsen HS, Bush WH Jr (1998) Adverse effects of contrast media: incidence, prevention and management. Drug Saf 19:313–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leong S, Fanning NF (2012) Persistent neurological deficit from iodinated contrast encephalopathy following intracranial aneurysm coiling. A case report and review of the literature. Interv Neuroradiol 18:33–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Potsi S, Chourmouzi D, Moumtzouoglou A, Nikiforaki A, Gkouvas K, Drevelegas A (2012) Transient contrast encephalopthy after carotid angiography mimicking diffuse subarachnoid haemorrhage. Neurol Sci 33:445–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu J, Dangas G (2011) Commentary: new insights into the risk factors of contrast-induced encephalopathy. J Endovasc Ther 18:545–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Torvik A, Walday P (1995) Neurotoxicity of water-soluble contrast media. Acta Radiol Suppl 399:221–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Romano DG, Frauenfelder G, Locatelli G et al (2019) Arterial spin labelling MRI to diagnose contrast-induced vasospasm after intracranial stent embolization. World Neurosurg 126:341–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pagani-Estévez GL, Nasr DM, Brinjikji W, Perry A, Fugate JE (2017) Dual-energy CT to diagnose pseudoedema in contrast-induced encephalopathy following cerebral angiography. Neurocrit Care 27:261–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MQ-N: acquisition of data, clinical and imaging data review, literature review, and final manuscript writing. JMA: clinical data review and literature review. SAX: acquisition of data, imaging data review, and literature review. JMA: imaging data review and important intellectual contribution. VCS: imaging data review and literature review. JP: acquisition of data, clinical and imaging data review, literature review, final manuscript writing, and important intellectual contribution.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Quintas-Neves.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

As this is a systematic review of the literature, informed consent is not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

13760_2020_1508_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Online Resource 1: Contrast-induced neurotoxicity: individual information from cases reported in the literature with the respective references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quintas-Neves, M., Araújo, J.M., Xavier, S.A. et al. Contrast-induced neurotoxicity related to neurological endovascular procedures: a systematic review. Acta Neurol Belg 120, 1419–1424 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-020-01508-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-020-01508-x

Keywords

Navigation