Skip to main content
Log in

Morphology, Biology and Predation Capacity of Amphiareus constrictus (Stål) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae)

  • Biological Control
  • Published:
Neotropical Entomology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A minute pirate bug, Amphiareus constrictus (Stål) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), the biology of which has been less studied, was successfully reared in the laboratory for more than 20 generations. Studies were conducted to understand its biology, life table parameters, and predatory potential. Besides the adult, the egg and all five nymphal instars are described with live images, which can serve as additional characters for identification. The biological parameters were studied at different temperatures. Rearing temperatures of 25 and 30°C were found to be suitable for hatching and nymphal survival to adult stage (88.5 and 75%, respectively). Life table parameters like net reproductive rate (R0), precise intrinsic rate of increase (rm), finite rate of increase (λ) and hypothetical F2 females were higher at 25°C. A nymph could consume a total of 32.8 ± 1.8 Corcyra cephalonica Stainton eggs. Male and female adult consumed a total of 179.0 ± 15.6 and 388.5 ± 58.6 C. cephalonica eggs, respectively. The data generated through studies on biology, fertility, and predatory potential led to the standardization of a simple production protocol for A. constrictus utilizing the eggs of the rice moth C. cephalonica. Predatory potential studies on Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) indicated that a nymph could consume 154.8 eggs during nymphal duration. Male and female adults could consume 1280.5 and 1435 eggs, respectively. The mass-reared A. constrictus can be field evaluated against the tomato pinworm TT absoluta and the brown plant hopper Nilaparvata lugens Stål.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold CY (1959) The determination and significance of the base temperature in a linear heat unit system. Proc Am Soc Horti Sci 74:430–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballal CR, Singh SP, Poorani J (2003) Biology and rearing requirements of an anthocorid predator, Blaptostethus pallescens Poppius (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). J Biol Control 17:29–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballal CR, Gupta T, Joshi S (2012) Effect of different laboratory hosts on the fertility table parameters and continuous rearing of an anthocorid predator Orius tantillus (Motsch.). Pest Manage Hort Ecosyst 18:24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch LC (1948) The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. J Anim Ecol 17:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner GJ, Lattin JD (2001) Notes on three species of Anthocoridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) from Hawaii, including the first record of Buchananiella continua (White). Proc Entomol Soc Wash 103:386–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Brito JP, Vacari AM, Thuler RT, De Bortoli SA (2009) Aspectos biológicos de Orius insidiosus (Say, 1832) predando ovos de Plutella xylostella (L., 1758) e Anagasta kuehniella (Zeller, 1879). Arq Instit Biol 76(4):627–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpintero DL (2002) Minute pirate bugs (Anthocoridae and Lyctocoridae). In: Panizzi AR, Grazia J (eds) True bugs (Heteroptera) of the neotropics. Springer, pp 217–236

  • Cassis G, Gross GF (1995) Hemiptera: Heteroptera (Coleorrhyncha to Cimicomorpha). In: WWK H, Maynard GV (eds) Zoological Catalogue of Australia, vol 27. CSIRO, Melbourne, p 3A 506 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobben RH (1968) Part 1. Eggs, architecture of the shell, gross embryology and eclosion. In: Evolutionary trends in Heteroptera. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, 475 pp

  • Distant WL (1906) Order Rhynchota. Suborder Heteroptera. Family Anthocoridae. In: Bingham CT (ed) The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma, vol 3. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Distant WL (1910) Order Rhynchota. Suborder Heteroptera. Family Anthocoridae. In: Bingham CT (ed) The fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma, vol 5. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 295–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Gontijo LM, Celestino D, Queiroz OS, Guedes RNC, Picanco MC (2015) Impacts of azadirachtin and chlorantraniliprole on developmental stages of pirate bug predators (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) of the tomato pinworm Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Fla Entomol 98:59–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henry TJ (1988) Family Anthocoridae Fieber, 1837. The minute flower bugs. In: Henry TJ, Froeschner RC (eds) Catalog of the Heteroptera, or true bugs, of Canada and the continental United States. E.J. Brill, Leiden, pp 12–28 958 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry TJ, Wheeler AG Jr, Steiner WE Jr (2008) First North American records of Amphiareus obscuriceps (Poppius) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Anthocoridae), with a discussion of dead-leaf microhabitats. Proc Entomol Soc Wash 110:402–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattin JD, Lewis T (2001) Amphiareus constrictus (Stål) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) from California: clarification of previous record and citation. Proc Entomol Soc Wash 103:334–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Manjunath TM, Rai PS, Gowda G (1978) Parasites and predators of Nilaparvata lugens in India. PANS 24:265–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris RF, Fulton WC (1970) Models for the development and survival of Hyphantriacunea in relation to temperature and humidity. Mem Entomol Soc Canada 70:1–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muraleedharan N, Ananthakrishnan TN (1974) The genus Buchananiella Reuter from India with description of a new species (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). Orient Insects 8:33–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muraleedharan N, Ananthakrishnan TN (1978) On the tribes Cardiastethini and Almeidini from South India (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Bull Zool Surv India 1:55–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieto JAA, Rincon FC, Caicedo DR (2016) Life table of Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) feeding on Sitotroga cerealella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) eggs. Rev Fac Agron 69(1):7773–7782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira RR, Picanco MC, Santana PA Jr, Moreira SS, Guedes RNC, Correa AS (2014) Insecticide toxicity and walking response of three pirate bug predators on the tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta. Agric For Entomol 16:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Péricart J (1996) Family Anthocoridae Fieber, 1836- flower bugs, minute pirate bugs. In: Aukema B, Rieger C (eds) Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic Region.Cimicomorpha I, vol 2. Netherlands Entomological Society, Amsterdam, pp 108–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Queiroz OS, Ramos RS, Gontijo LM, Picanço MC (2015) Functional response of three species of predatory pirate bugs attacking eggs of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Environ Entomol 44:246–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russo A, Cocuzza GE, Vasta MC (2004) Life tables of Xylocoris flavipes (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) feeding on Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera:Tenebrionidae). J Stored Prod Res 40:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salehi Z, Yarahmadi F, Rasekh A, Sohani NZ (2016) Functional responses of Orius albidipennis Reuter (Hemiptera, Anthocoridae) to Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) on two tomato cultivars with different leaf morphological characteristics. Entomol Gen 36(2):127–136. https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2016/0339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sands WA (1957) The immature stages of some British Anthocoridae (Hemiptera). Trans R Entomol Soc London 109:295–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2011). Base SAS® 9.3 Procedures Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

  • Schuldiner-Harpaz T, Coll M (2012) Identification of Orius (Hetroptera: Anthocoridae) females based on egg operculum structure. J Econ Entomol 105:1520–1523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Jalali SK, Bhumannavar BS, Bakthavatsalam N, Pushpalatha NA (1994a) Production and use of Chrysopid predators. Project Directorate of Biological Control, Bangalore, Tech Bull No 10, 14pp

  • Singh SP, Jalali SK, Bhumannavar BS, Bakthavatsalam N, Pushpalatha NA (1994b) Production and use of trichogrammatid egg parasitoids. Project Directorate of Biological Control, Bangalore, Tech Bull No. 11, 16 pp

  • Southwood TRE (1956) The structure of eggs of the terrestrial heteroptera and its relationship to the classification of the group. Trans R Entomol Soc London 108:163–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc. Released 2009. PASW statistics for windows, version 18.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago

  • Stål C (1860) Bidrag till Rio Janeiro-traktens Hemiptera-fauna, 1. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskaps Akademiens Handlinger 2:1–84 (In Swedish)

  • Steiner WE Jr (1984) A review of the biology of phalacrid beetles (Coleoptera). In: Wheeler Q, Black M (eds) Fungus insect relationships: perspectives in ecology and evolution. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 424–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Tommasini MG, Van Lenteren JC, Burgio G (2004) Biological traits and predation capacity of four Orius species on two prey species. Bull Insectol 57:79–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada K (2008) Taxonomy of the genus Amphiareus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) in Southeast Asia. Eur J Entomol 105:909–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada K, Hirowatari T (2003) Japanese species of the genus Amphiareus Distant (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae), with descriptions of two new species. Entomol Sci 6:289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada K, Hirowatari T (2011) Distributional records of seven flower bugs (Heteroptera: Lyctocoridae, Anthocoridae) from Japan. Rostria 53:63–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Yano E, Watanabe K, Yara K (2002) Life history parameters of Orius sauteri (Poppius) (Het., Anthocoridae) reared on Ephestia kuehniella eggs and the minimum amount of the diet for rearing individuals. J Appl Ent 126:389–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman EG (1984) Insects of Hawaii. Heteroptera, vol 3. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu 255 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr. V. V. Ramamurthy, National Co-ordinator, Network Project on Insect Bio-systematics, Division of Entomology, IARI, New Delhi, India, for the EM facilities provided and to Dr. K. Yamada, Tokushima Prefectural Museum, Tokushima, Japan, for taxonomic identification of Amphiareus constrictus. The authors are also thankful to Mr. Jogesha for technical assistance and Mr. Raja for continuous maintenance of the Amphiareus constrictus culture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CRB and SJ conceived the study. CRB, RV, and SJ performed experiments and analyzed the data. CRB and RV wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Varshney.

Additional information

Edited by Madelaine Venzon – UFL

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ballal, C.R., Varshney, R. & Joshi, S. Morphology, Biology and Predation Capacity of Amphiareus constrictus (Stål) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Neotrop Entomol 48, 668–677 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-019-00684-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-019-00684-7

Keywords

Navigation