Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does Distance Among Colonies and Resource Availability Explain the Intercolonial Aggressiveness in Nasutitermes aff. coxipoensis?

  • Ecology, Behavior and Bionomics
  • Published:
Neotropical Entomology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aggressive behaviour can ensure animal access to local resources. To reduce constant costs in the defence of territories, species could save energy with conflicts avoiding aggression with neighbour or in situations with abundance of resources. In the present study, we analysed the effect of distance among colonies and resource availability on the aggression level and responses to chemical cues of Nasutitermes aff. coxipoensis (Holmgren) (Termitidae: Nasutitermitinae). Manipulation of resource offer was conducted in the field, where nests with different distances were kept without addition of baits (control), with addition of three or 16 sugarcane baits/nest. After 3 months, aggressiveness, linear and Y-shaped trail-following bioassays were carried out with all pairwise combinations of colonies in each treatment. Our results showed that aggressive index of N. aff. coxipoensis was affected by the resource availability. However, individuals from colonies with 0 and 3 baits/nest showed a higher number of fighting with neighbours than those from non-neighbours colonies. Termite workers from colonies without baits (control) followed shorter distance in the linear trails compared to those from colonies with addition of baits. In all treatments, there was no preference of workers in relation to the choice of chemical cues from own or other colonies. The response of intercolonial aggressiveness in N. aff. coxipoensis seems to be resource-dependent. These results may contribute to the comprehension of the use of space by N. aff. coxipoensis and could be useful to explain patterns of termite co-occurrence at different spatial scales, from local (inside the nest—e.g. cohabitation of nests by inquilines) to regional (e.g. around the nest).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe T (1987) Evolution life types in termites. In: Evolution and coadaptation in biotic communities. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 125–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams ES, Levings SC (1987) Territory size and population limits in mangrove termites. J Anim Ecol 56:1069–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcock J (2011) Comportamento Animal: Uma abordagem evolutiva., 9a. edição. Artmed, Porto Alegre

  • Almeida CS, Cristaldo PF, DeSouza O, et al (2018) Resource density regulates the foraging investment in higher termite species. Ecol Entomol online first

  • Almeida CS, Cristaldo PF, Florencio DF, Cruz NG, Santos AA, Oliveira AP, Santana AS, Ribeiro EJM, Lima APS, Bacci L, Araújo APA (2016) Combined foraging strategies and soldier behaviour in Nasutitermes aff. coxipoensis (Blattodea: Termitoidea: Termitidae). Behav Process 126:76–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo APA, Cristaldo PF, Florencio DF, Araújo FS, DeSouza O (2017) Resource suitability modulating spatial co-occurrence of soil-forager termites (Blattodea: Termitoidea). Austral Entomol 56:235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Both C, Visser ME (2003) Density dependence, territoriality, and divisibility of resources: from optimality models to population processes. Am Nat 161:326–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbooks HE (1970) Home ranges and territorial behavior of the yellow-pine chipmunk, Eutamias amoenus. J Mammal 51:310–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JLJL (1964) The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems. Wilson Bull 76:160–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen C, Radford AN (2018) Dear enemies or nasty neighbors? Causes and consequences of variation in the responses of group-living species to territorial intrusions. Behav Ecol 0:1–10

  • Crawley MJ (2012) The R book. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cristaldo PF (2018) Trail pheromones in termites. Termites and sustainable management. Springer, In, pp 145–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristaldo PF, Almeida CS, Cruz NG, Ribeiro EJM, Rocha MLC, Santos AA, Santana AS, Araújo APA (2018) The role of resource density on energy allocation in the neotropical termite Nasutitermes aff. coxipoensis (Termitidae: Nasutitermitinae). Neotrop Entomol 47:329–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cristaldo PF, Araujo APA, Almeida CS et al (2016) Resource availability influences aggression and response to chemical cues in the Neotropical termite Nasutitermes aff. coxipoensis (Termitidae: Nasutitermitinae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:1257–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristaldo PF, DeSouza O, Krasulová J et al (2014) Mutual use of trail-following chemical cues by a termite host and its inquiline. PLoS One 9:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimarco RD, Farji-Brener AG, Premoli AC (2010) Dear enemy phenomenon in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex lobicornis: behavioral and genetic evidence. Behav Ecol 21:304–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn R, Messier S (1999) Evidence for the opposite of the Dear Enemy Phenomenon in termites. J Insect Behav 12:461–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher J (1954) Evolution and bird sociality. In: Huxley J, Hardy A, Ford E (eds) Evolution as a process. Allen & Unwin, London, pp 71–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (1989) Ants distinguish neighbours from strangers. Oecologia 81:198–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinze J, Foitzik S, Hippert A, Hölldobler B (1996) Apparent dear-enemy phenomenon and environment-based recognition cues in the ant Leptothorax nylanderi. Ethology 102:510–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holldobler B, Michener CD (1980) Mechanisms of identification and discrimination in social Hymenoptera. In: Evolution of social behavior: hypotheses and empirical tests. Verlag Chemie GmbH., pp 35–58

  • Kaib M, Franke S, Francke W, Brandl R (2002) Cuticular hydrocarbons in a termite: phenotypes and a neighbour ± stranger effect. Physiol Entomol 27:189–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Korb J, Linsenmair KE (2002) Evaluation of predation risk in the collectively foraging termite Macrotermes bellicosus. Insect Soc 49:264–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen TK, McCrary JK, Meyer A (2010) Territorial aggression can be sensitive to the status of heterospecific intruders. Behav Process 84:598–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepage M, Darlington JPEC (2000) Population dynamics of termites. In: Termites: evolution, sociality, symbioses, ecology. Springer, pp 333–361

  • Leponce M, Roisin Y, Pasteels JM (1997) Structure and dynamics of the arboreal termite community in New Guinean coconut plantations. Biotropica 29:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levings SC, Adams ES (1984) Intra- and interspecific territoriality in Nasutitermes (Isoptera: Termitidae) in a Panamanian mangrove forest. J Anim Ecol 53:705–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marins A, Cristaldo PF, Paiva LR et al (2017) A new approach to mark termites (Cornitermes cumulans (Kollar) Blattodea: Isoptera) for laboratory bioassays. Braz J Biol impress

  • Muller CA, Manser MB (2007) “Nasty neighbours” rather than “dear enemies” in a social carnivore. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274:959–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagamitsu T, Inoue T (1996) Aggressive foraging of social of floral resource part. Oecologia 110:432–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey PS, Robson SKA, Crozier RH (2010) Weaver ants Oecophylla smaragdina encounter nasty neighbors rather than dear enemies. Ecology 91:2366–2372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nimer E (1972) Climatologia da região Nordeste do Brasil. Introdução à climatologia dinâmica. Rev Bras Geogr 34:3–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira ERR, Freitas JC, Andrade ARS, Sousa VG (2011) Variability in number of rainy days in state of Sergipe-SE. Appl Res & Agrotec 4:45–64

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Austria, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosell F, Bjørkøyli T (2002) A test of the dear enemy phenomenon in the Eurasian beaver. Anim Behav 63:1073–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanada-Morimura S, Minai M, Yokoyama M et al (2003) Encounter-induced hostility to neighbors in the ant Pristomyrmex pungens. Behav Ecol 14:713–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte-Hostedde AI, Millar JS (2002) “Little chipmunk” syndrome? Male body size and dominance in captive yellow-pine chipmunks (Tamias amoenus). Ethology 108:127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard PK, Beecher MD, Horning CL, Willis MS (1990) Strong neighbor-stranger discrimination in song sparrows. Cooper Ornithol Soc 92:1051–1056

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner CJ, Adler FR (2009) To fight or not to fight: context-dependent interspecific aggression in competing ants. Anim Behav 77:297–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temeles EJ (1994) The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they “dear enemies”? Anim Behav 47:339–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traniello JFA, Robson SK (1995) Trail and territorial communication in social insects. In: chemical ecology of insects 2. Springer, pp 241–286

  • Triefenbach FA, Zakon HH (2008) Changes in signalling during agonistic interactions between male weakly electric knifefish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus. Anim Behav 75:1263–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viera VM, Viblanc VA, Filippi-Codaccioni O, Côté SD, Groscolas R (2011) Active territory defence at a low energy cost in a colonial seabird. Anim Behav 82:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ydenberg RC, Giraldeau LA, Falls JB (1988) Neighbors, strangers, and the asymmetric war of attrition. Anim Behav 36:343–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of Santa Isabel Biological Reserve (REBIO/ICMBio) and the Federal University of Sergipe for logistic support.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and the Brazilian Federal Agency for the Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (CAPES).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lab de Interações Ecológicas, Depto de Ecologia, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Univ Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, SE, Brasil

    D V Ferreira, J J M Sacramento, M L C Rocha, J S Cruz, D L Santana & A P A Araújo

  2. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Univ Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, SE, Brasil

    D V Ferreira, J J M Sacramento & M L C Rocha

  3. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agricultura e Biodiversidade, Univ Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, SE, Brasil

    P F Cristaldo

Authors
  1. D V Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J J M Sacramento
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M L C Rocha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J S Cruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D L Santana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P F Cristaldo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A P A Araújo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A P A Araújo.

Additional information

Edited by Angelo Pallini – UFV

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferreira, D.V., Sacramento, J.J.M., Rocha, M.L.C. et al. Does Distance Among Colonies and Resource Availability Explain the Intercolonial Aggressiveness in Nasutitermes aff. coxipoensis?. Neotrop Entomol 47, 808–814 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-018-0625-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-018-0625-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation