Skip to main content
Log in

Taxonomy and First Records of Two Megaselia Rondani Species (Diptera: Phoridae) Preying upon Eggs of Phyllomedusa iheringii Boulenger (Anura: Phyllomedusidae)

  • Systematics, Morphology and Physiology
  • Published:
Neotropical Entomology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-aquatic reproductive modes have evolved among frogs possibly favored by some advantages such as the avoidance of aquatic predators. These reproductive modes, however, make the egg clutches susceptible to terrestrial predators, among which Diptera larvae are some of the most harmful. The present work reports the predation by phorid flies of 22 egg clutches of Phyllomedusa iheringii Boulenger in the South of Brazil. Phorid specimens were identified as Megaselia bruchiana (Borgmeier & Schmitz) and Megaselia necrophaga (Enderlein), species that were reported previously to be associated with ants and dead beetles, respectively. Frog-feeding in these species is hypothesized to be use of an alternative seasonal food source. We amend the diagnoses of both Megaselia species and provide new illustrations to facilitate their identification. We also describe the male of M. bruchiana for the first time and associate males with females of both species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bickel D (2009) Why Hilaria is not amusing: the problem of open-ended taxa and the limits of taxonomic knowledge. In: Pape T, Bickel D, Meyer R (eds) Diptera diversity: status, challenges, and tools. Brill, Leiden, pp 279–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgmeier T (1935) Die Typen der von Prof. G. Enderlein im Jahre 1912 beschrieben en suedamerikanischen Phoriden. Rev Entomol 5:427–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgmeier T (1962) Versuch einer Uebersicht ueber die neotropischen Megaselia-Arten, sowie neue oder wenig bekannte Phoriden verschiedener Gattungen. Studia Entomologica 5:289–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgmeier T, Schmitz H (1923) Dois Phorideos novos da Argentina. Rev Mus La Plata 27:212–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Both C, Kaefer IL, Santos TG (2008) An austral anuran assemblage in the Neotropics: seasonal occurrence correlated with photoperiod. J Nat Hist 42(3–4):205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown BV, Horan RV (2012) A key to Neotropical region frog-egg-feeding species of Megaselia (Diptera: Phoridae), with a new species from Panama. Contr Sci 520:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Castanho LM (1996) Phyllomedusa distincta (leaf-frog) predation. Herpetol Rev 27:141

    Google Scholar 

  • Crump M (2015) Anuran reproductive modes: evolving perspectives. J Herpetol 49:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis RA, Disney RHL (2003) Natural history and description of Aphiura breviceps Schmitz, a scuttle fly (Diptera: Phoridae) whose larvae prey on the eggs of frogs (Anura: Myobatrachidae) in Western Australia. Australian J Entomol 42:18–21

  • Dias TM, Maragno FP, Santos TG, Cechin SZ (2012) Phyllomedusa iheringii: egg predation. Herpetol Bull 121:38–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Disney RHL (2008) Natural history of the scuttle fly, Megaselia scalaris. Annu Rev Entomol 53:39–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duellman WE (1999) Distribution patterns of amphibians in South America. In: Duellman WE (ed) Patterns of distribution of amphibians: a global perspective. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 255–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Enderlein G (1912) Die Phoridenfauna Sued-Brasiliens. Stett Ent Zeitg 73:16–45

  • Frost DR (2016) Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York. Electronic Database accessible at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html. Accessed 25 Feb 2016

  • Gomez-Mestre I, Pyron RA, Wiens JJ (2012) Phylogenetic analyses reveal unexpected patterns in the evolution of reproductive modes in frogs. Evolution 66:3687–3700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gururaja KV (2010) Novel reproductive mode in a torrent frog Micrixalus saxicola (Jerdon) from the Western Ghats, India. Zootaxa 2642:45–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Gururaja KV, Dinesh KP, Priti H, Ravikanth G (2014) Mudpacking frog: a novel breeding behavior and parental care in a stream dwelling new species of Nyctibatrachus (Amphibia, Anura, Nyctibatrachidae). Zootaxa 3796:33–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad CFB, Prado CPA (2005) Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Bioscience 55(3):207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartop EA, Brown BV (2015) The tip of the iceberg: a distinctive new spotted-wing Megaselia species (Diptera: Phoridae) from a tropical cloud forest survey and a new, streamlined method for Megaselia descriptions. Biodivers Data J 2:e4093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iskandar DT, Evans BJ, Mcguire JA (2014) A novel reproductive mode in frogs: a new species of fanged frog with internal fertilization and birth of tadpoles. PLoS ONE 9(12):e115884

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Langone JA (1994) Ranas y sapos del Uruguay (reconocimiento y aspectos biológicos). Museo Damaso Antonio Larrañaga, Montevideo, p 123

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson EW, Hero JM (1991) Predation and the evolution of complex oviposition behaviour in Amazon rainforest frogs. Oecologia 86:310–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maneyro R, Carreira S (2012) Guía de anfíbios del Uruguay. Ediciones de la Fuga, Montevideo, p 207

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins M, Oliveira ME (1998) Natural history of snakes in forests of the Manaus region, Central Amazônia, Brazil. Herpetol Nat Hist 6:78–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Neckel-Oliveira S, Wachlevski M (2004a) Effects of landscape change on clutches of Phyllomedusa tarsius, a Neotropical treefrog. Biol Conserv 118:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neckel-Oliveira S, Wachlevski M (2004b) Predation on the arboreal eggs of three species of Phyllomedusa in Central Amazônia. J Herpetol 38(2):244–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos TG, Kopp K, Spies MR, Trevisan R, Cechin SZ (2008) Distribuição temporal e espacial de anuros em área de Pampa, Santa Maria, RS. Iheringia, Série Zoologia 98:244–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seshadri KS, Gururaja KV, Bickford DP (2014) Breeding in bamboo: a novel anuran reproductive strategy discovered in Rhacophorid frogs of the Western Ghats, India. Biol J Linn Soc 114(1):1–11. doi:10.1111/bij.12388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukontason KL, Boonsriwong W, Siriwattanarungsee S, Piangjai S, Sukontason K (2006) Morphology of puparia of Megaselia scalaris (Diptera: Phoridae), a fly species of medical and forensic importance. Parasitol Res 98:268–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vonesh JR (2000) Dipteran predation on the arboreal eggs of four Hyperolius frog species in western Uganda. Copeia 2000:560–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells KD (2007) The ecology and behavior of amphibians. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p 1148

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Maria Isabel P. Balbi for her kind help with slides preparation and identification of the Sarcophagidae immatures. DCA research was funded by FAPESP (proc. 2011/03563-0). TGS is grateful to CNPq for the research fellowship (proc. 307352/2013-7).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D C Ament.

Additional information

Edited by José A Martins Fernandes – UFPA

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ament, D.C., dos Santos, T.G. Taxonomy and First Records of Two Megaselia Rondani Species (Diptera: Phoridae) Preying upon Eggs of Phyllomedusa iheringii Boulenger (Anura: Phyllomedusidae). Neotrop Entomol 46, 289–294 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-016-0462-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-016-0462-2

Keywords

Navigation