Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation of polymerization conditions with drag reduction efficiency of poly(1-hexene) in oil pipelines

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Polymer Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High molecular weight with long linear side branches are frequently used in oil pipelines as one of the main classes of drag reducer agents (DRAs). We studied the effects of polymerization conditions, including reaction temperature, monomer concentration and cocatalyst concentration ratio (Al/Ti), on the polymerization yield and molecular weight of the resultant poly(1-hexene) made by Ziegler–Natta catalyst and their consequent effects on the drag reduction efficiency in a loop test. The experimental results verified that the catalyst activity increased from 115 to 220 kgPH/molTi.atm, while the molecular weight of poly(1-hexene) dropped from 2100 to 1030 kDa, as the reaction temperature was increased from 0 to 50 °C. The loop test results also revealed that the highest pressure drop was achieved using the polymer synthesized at 0 °C and by subsequent increase in reaction temperature the pressure drop decreased. Furthermore, the catalyst activity increased from 143 to 262 kgPH/molTi.atm by increasing Al/Ti ratio, while the molecular weight increased up to a maximum level of 1500 kDa at Al/Ti = 143 and decreased at higher cocatalyst contents. Similarly, the results showed the maximum pressure drop of 20 % at Al/Ti = 143. Finally, by increasing monomer concentration, the catalyst activity and polymer molecular weight increased from 75 to 262 kgPH/molTi.atm for the former, and from 700 to 1800 kDa for the latter which resulted in maximum pressure drop by 25 %. Moreover, the pressure drop for each utilized poly(1-hexene) was increased proportionately with DRA’s concentration, and interestingly enough, DRAs were further effective at more turbulent flows with higher Reynolds numbers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heurtefeu B, Bouilhac C, Cloutet E, Taton D, Deffieux A, Cramail H (2011) Single-site catalyst for heterogeneous olefin polymerization. Prog Polym Sci 36:89–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pan L, Zhang KY, Li YG, Bo SQ, Li YS (2007) Thermal and crystallization behaviors of polyethylene blends synthesized by binary late transition metal catalysts combinations. J Appl Polym Sci 104:4188–4198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmadjo S, Dehghani S, Zohuri G, Nejabat G, Jafarian H, Ahmadi M, Mortazavi SMM (2014) Thermal behavior of polyethylene reactor alloys polymerized by Ziegler–Natta/late transition metal hybrid catalyst. Macromol React Eng 9:8–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mortazavi SMM, Arabi H, Zohuri G, Ahmadjo S, Nekoomanesh M, Ahmadi M (2010) Copolymerization of ethylene/α-olefins using bis(2-phenylindenyl) zirconium dichloride metallocene catalyst: structural study of comonomer distribution. Polym Int 59:1258–1265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zahedi M, Ahmadi M, Nekoomanesh M (2008) Influence of microstructure and morphology on stress–strain behavior of commercial high density polyethylene. J Appl Polym Sci 110:624–631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saeb MR, Mohammadi Y, Ahmadi M, Khorasani MM, Stadler FJ (2015) A Monte Carlo-based feeding policy for tailoring microstructure of copolymer chains: reconsidering the conventional metallocene catalyzed polymerization of α-olefins. Chem Eng J 274:169–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohammadi Y, Ahmadi M, Saeb MR, Khorasani MM, Yang P, Stadler FJ (2014) A detailed model on kinetics and microstructure evolution during copolymerization of ethylene and 1-octene: from coordinative chain transfer to chain shuttling polymerization. Macromolecules 47:4778–4789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Saeb MR, Khorasani MM, Ahmadi M, Mohammadi Y, Stadler FJ (2015) A unified picture of hard–soft segmental development along olefin chain shuttling copolymerization. Polymer 76:245–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kiesewetter ET, Waymouth RM (2013) Octahedral group IV bis(phenolate) catalysts for 1-hexene homopolymerization and ethylene/1-hexene copolymerization. Macromolecules 46:2569–2575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahmadjo S, Arabi H, Zohuri G, Nekoomanesh M, Nejabat G, Mortazavi SMM (2014) Preparation of ethylene/α-olefins copolymers using (2-RInd)2ZrCl2/MCM-41 (R: Ph, H) catalyst, microstructural study. J Therm Calorim 116:417–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu Y, Ouyang M, He X, Chen Y, Wang K (2013) Novel Ni and Pd(benzocyclohexan-ketonaphthylimino)2 complexes for copolymerization of norbornene with octene. J Appl Polym Sci 128:216–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanaka R, Suenaga T, Cai Zh, Nakayama Y, Shiono T (2014) Synthesis and thermal, mechanical, and optical properties of A–B–A or A–B block copolymers containing poly(norbornene-co-1-octene). J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 52:267–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Waters PF, Waters JB (2013) Low molecular weight fuel additive. US Patent 8425630 B2

  14. Choi HJ, Jhon MS (1996) Polymer-induced turbulent drag reduction. Ind Eng Chem Res 35:2993–2998

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hong CH, Jang CH, Choi HJ (2015) Turbulent drag reduction with polymers in rotating disk flow. Polymers 7:1279–1298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bucher BA, Weatherford TM (2015) Drag reducing compositions and methods of manufacture and use. US Patent 89331492

  17. Ping Y, Changyu L, Changqiao Zh, Shiwei Ch, Shu F, Hui S (2011) Drag reduction and shear resistance properties of ionomer and hydrogen bond systems based on lauryl methacrylate. Pet Sci 8:357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jang H, Supartono YC, Lee J (2014) Experimental and numerical study on the effects of surfactant as drag reducing agent in paraffin wax oil pipeline. Korean J Chem Eng 10:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  19. Karimi HR, Mowla D (2012) Investigation of the effects of various parameters on pressure drop reduction in crude oil pipelines by drag reducing agents. J Non Newton Fluid Mech 177–178:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang Z, Chen Z, Li Q, Zhu R, Jing S, Zhou Y, Ma Y, Wang N, Chang W (2014) Experimental research on the drag reduction mechanism of natural gas drag reduction agent and its industrial field test. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:12494–12501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Palou RM, Mosqeira ML, Rendon BZ, Juarez EM, Huicochea CB, Lopez JLC, Aburto J (2011) Transportation of heavy and extra-heavy crude oil by pipeline: a review. J Pet Sci Eng 75:274–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nesyn GV, Manzhai VN, Suleimanova YV, Stankevich VS, Konovalov KB (2012) Polymer drag-reducing agents for transportation of hydrocarbon liquids: mechanism of action, estimation of efficiency, and features of production. Polym Sci Ser A 54:61–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bomfim JAS, Dias ML, Filgueiras CAL, Peruch F, Deffieux A (2008) The effect of polymerization temperature on the structure and properties of poly(1-hexene) and poly(1-decene) prepared with a Ni(II)–diimine catalyst. Catal Today 133–135:879–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmadi M, Jamjah R, Nekoomanesh M, Zohuri G (2007) Ziegler–Natta/metallocene hybrid catalyst for ethylene polymerization. Marcromol React Eng 1:604–610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ahmadjo S, Arabi H, Nekoomanesh M, Mortazavi SMM, Zohuri G, Ahmadi M, Bolandi Sh (2011) Indirect synthesis of bis(2-PhInd) ZrCl2metallocene catalyst, kinetic study and modeling of ethylene polymerization. Chem Eng Technol 34:249–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu W, Ojo AT, Wang WJ, Fan H, Li BG, Zhu S (2015) Preparation of ultrahigh molecular weight ethylene/1-octene block copolymers using ethylene pressure pulse feeding policies. Polym Chem 6:3800–3806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Barabanov AA, Sukulova VV, Matsko MA, Zakharov VA (2015) Kinetic features of ethylene polymerization over titanium–magnesium Ziegler–Natta catalysts: effect of monomer concentration on the number of active centers and propagation rate constant. J Mol Catal A Chem 396:328–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Echevskaya L, Matsko MA, Nikolaeva M, Sergeev S, Zakharov VA (2014) Kinetic features of hexene-1 polymerization over supported titanium–magnesium catalyst. Macromol React Eng 8:666–672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mortazavi SMM, Arabi H, Zohuri G, Ahmadjo S, Nekoomanesh M, Ahmadi M (2009) Ethylene homo-and copolymerization using a bis-IndZrCl-2 metallocene catalyst: structural composition distribution of the copolymer. Macromol React Eng 3:263–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ahmadjo S (2016) Preparation of ultra high molecular weight amorphous poly(1-hexene) by a Ziegler–Natta catalyst. Polym Adv Technol. doi:10.1002/pat.3828

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mowla D, Naderi A (2006) Experimental study of drag reduction by a polymeric additive in slug two-phase flow of crude oil and air in horizontal pipes. Chem Eng Sci 61:1540–1555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Karimi HR, Mowla D (2013) A general model for predicting drag reduction in crude oil pipelines. J Pet Sci Eng 111:78–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McComb WD (1990) The physics of fluid turbulence. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Mortazavi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mortazavi, S.M.M. Correlation of polymerization conditions with drag reduction efficiency of poly(1-hexene) in oil pipelines. Iran Polym J 25, 731–737 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-016-0461-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-016-0461-5

Keywords

Navigation