Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Moment invariants for cancer classification based on electron–ion interaction pseudo potentials (EIIP)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Network Modeling Analysis in Health Informatics and Bioinformatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cancer is considered one of the most dangerous diseases leading to imminent death during recent decades. It spreads quickly at a frightening pace to all parts of the body and early detection of such diseases may help reduce the risks. Many methods have been used to classify and predict the outcome of cancer, such as image processing techniques, artificial intelligence, and nanotechnology. Out of these methods, artificial intelligence techniques have played an essential role and have provided satisfying results from different investigations in various fields. Considering that cancer is a genetic disease, electron–ion interaction pseudo potential can be used to convert DNA sequences from string shape into number values so that genomic signal processing can be applied for the feature extraction step. In this paper, 51 healthy and 51 cancer genes from multiple cells obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Genbank were used for analysis. Then, 7 invariant moments were extracted into 2 types of learning machine methods: supervised and unsupervised learning. Finally, their results were compared using Receiver Operating Characteristic parameters. From these results, the best accuracy was obtained from the trainable cascade-forward backpropagation network. The calculated parameters were 0.3333, 0.3158, 0.6842, 0.6667, and 67.5% for the Kohonen network, 0.1053, 0.1429, 0.8571, 0.8947, and 87.5% for the feed-forward network, and 0.0000, 0.0909, 0.9091, 1.0000, and 95% for the cascade-forward network for FPR, FNR, TPR, TNR, and accuracy respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altarawneh MS (2012) Lung cancer detection using image processing techniques. Leonardo Electron J Pract Technol 20:147–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin Z, Altunbasak Y (2006) A signal processing application in genomic research: protein secondary structure prediction. IEEE Signal Process Mag 23:128–131. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2006.1657827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barman S, Roy M, Biswas S, Saha S (2011) Prediction of cancer cell using digital signal processing. annuals of faculty engineering Hunedoara. Int J Eng 3:91–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Wheeler DL (2007) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 35(suppl_1):D21–D25. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl986

  • Cruz JA, Wishart DS (2007) Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis. Cancer Inform 2:59–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett T (2004) ROC graphs: notes and practical considerations for researchers. HP Laboratories, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Flusser J (2006) Moment invariants in image analysis. In: Processing of Worlad Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology

  • Goyal S, Goyal GK (2011) Cascade and feed-forward backpropagation artificial neural network models for prediction of sensory quality of instant coffee flavoured sterilized drink. Can J Artif Intell Mach Learn Pattern Recogn 2:78–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney K (1997) An introduction to neural networks. UCL Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariprasad SA, Cleatus S, Chitaranjan A, Datta A, Ganesh MM (2014) Novel approach on cancer detection. In: Proc. ASAR international conference, Mysore, India

  • Huang Z, Leng J (2010) Analysis of Hu’s moment invariants on image scaling and rotation. In: Proc. 2010 2nd international conference on Computer Engineering and Technology (ICCET). IEEE, Chengdu. pp 476–480

  • Kumar R, Indrayan A (2011) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers. Indian Pediatr 48:277–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo-Ginori J, Rodriguez-Fuentes A, Abalo R, Rodriguez R (2009) Digital signal processing in the analysis of genomic sequences. Curr Bioinform 4:28–40. https://doi.org/10.2174/157489309787158134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabrouk MS (2011) A nonlinear pattern recognition of pandemic H1N1 using a state space based methods. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol 3:25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabrouk MS, Naeem SM, Eldosoky MA (2017) Different genomic signal processing methods for eukaryotic gene prediction: a systematic review. Biomed Eng Appl Basis Commun 29:18

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamistvalov AG (1974) On the construction of affine invariants of n-dimensional patterns. Boll Acad Sci Ga SSR 76:61–64

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal S, Banerjee I (2015) Cancer classification using neural network. Int J Emerg Eng Res Technol 3:172–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansoori GA, Mohazzabi P, McCormack P, Jabbari S (2007) Nanotechnology in cancer prevention, detection and treatment: bright future lies ahead. World Rev Sci Technol Sustain Dev 4:226–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Ming-Kuei H (1962) Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants. Inf Theory IRE Trans 8:179–187

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell T (1997) Machine learning. McGraw-Hill, ISBN, p 0070428077

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeem SM, Mabrouk MS, Eldosoky MA (2017) Detection of breast cancer using different power spectrum methods. In: 13th International computer engineering conference (ICENCO), Cairo, pp 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICENCO.2017.8289779

  • Nair AS, Sreenathan SP (2006) A coding measure scheme employing electron-ion interaction pseudopotential (EIIP). Bioinformation 1(6):197–202

  • Nielsen F (2001) Neural networks—algorithms and applications. Niels Brock Business College, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman E (2015) What is cancer? National Cancer Institute. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/what-is-cancer. Accessed 2 Feb 2020

  • Qiu P, Jane WZ, Liu KJ (2007) Genomic processing of cancer classification and prediction. IEEE Signal Process Mag 24:100–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassfy HM, Abd Elnaby MM, Salem ML, Mabrouk MS, Zidan AA (2016) Eukaryotic gene prediction using advanced dna numerical representation schemes. In: Proc fifth international conference advances in applied science and environmental engineering (ASEE), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  • Zhang XY, Chen F, Zhang YT, Agner SC, Akay M, Lu ZH, Waye MY, Tsui SK (2002) Signal processing techniques in genomic engineering. Proc IEEE 9:1822–1833

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Y. Sayed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naeem, S.M., Mabrouk, M.S., Eldosoky, M.A. et al. Moment invariants for cancer classification based on electron–ion interaction pseudo potentials (EIIP). Netw Model Anal Health Inform Bioinforma 9, 63 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13721-020-00270-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13721-020-00270-7

Keywords

Navigation