Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sustainable agriculture issues explained by differentiation and structural coupling using social systems analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Agronomy for Sustainable Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In spite of many initiatives to increase sustainability, agriculture moves in the opposite direction with increased pesticide impacts and decreased nature quality. Here, we propose that this issue is not mainly due to lack of agronomic knowledge, but due to the lack of knowledge on social processes of specialization and differentiation. Here, we review the challenge of agriculture and sustainable development based on Niklas Luhmann theory of social systems. We focus on the concepts of differentiation and structural couplings. We use two forms of analysis, discursive differentiation and organizational differentiation, which mutually support each other. First, we analyze discourse categories, named ‘semantics’ in the social systems theory, such as ‘environmental problems’ and ‘food safety’. We then look at how these discourses are related to the discourse of sustainability. Secondly, we describe different forms of organizational differentiation within agriculture and food, e.g., in the pig production chain. Here, we show how sustainability problems can be seen as an unavoidable consequence of the ‘decouplings’ that follow these differentiation and specialization processes. Finally, using the insights from social systems theory, we discuss how these sustainability problems might be mitigated by the following three forms of new structural couplings: (1) functional couplings of organizations to generalized semantic perspectives on e.g., environment and nature, which can reintroduce the sensibility of agri-food systems to their surroundings, (2) structural couplings between organizations that can handle other dimensions than price and quantity, including couplings mediated by labels and network couplings such as partnerships that provide options for co-evolution, and (3) second order couplings to polyocular semantics such as the sustainability semantic; that is, semantics that have their strength and challenge in the fact that they are multiperspectival and must remain indeterminate. Social systems analysis is a novel and strong tool to analyze social differentiation processes in agriculture. Social systems analysis provides researchers, farmers, and companies new ways to understand the sustainability problems that these differentiation processes produce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alrøe BJ, Glover L (2006) Ecological justice and organic agriculture: ethics and practice. In: Halberg N, Alrøe HF, Knudsen MT, Kristensen ES (eds) Global development of organic agriculture: challenges and prospects. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp 75–112

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alrøe HF, Noe E (2008) What makes organic agriculture move—protest, meaning or market? A polyocular approach to the dynamics and governance of organic agriculture. Agric Resour Gov Ecol 7(1/2):5–22. doi:10.1504/IJARGE.2008.016976

    Google Scholar 

  • Alrøe HF, Noe E (2011) A cross-disciplinary approach to multicriteria assessment and communication of the effects of organic food systems. Proc Third Sci Conf ISOFAR 2:313–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Alrøe HF, Noe E (2012) Observing environments. Constructivist Foundations 8 (1): 39–62: Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/8/1/039.alroe

  • Andersen NÅ (2003) Discursive analytical strategies: understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau. The Policy Press, Bristol, Luhmann

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen NÅ (2008) Partnerships: machines of possibility. The Policy Press, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrens R, de Haen H (1980) Aggregate factor input and productivity in agriculture: a comparison for the EC-member countries, 1963–76. Eur Rev Agric Econ 7:109–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming A, Vanclay F (2010) Farmer responses to climate change and sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:11–19. doi:10.1051/agro:2009028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halberg N, Verschuur G, Goodlass G (2005) Farm level environmental indicators; are they useful? An overview of green accounting systems for European farms. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105:195–212. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2004.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen KK, Sørensen JT (1998) The idea of “ethical accounting” for a livestock farm. J Agric Environ Ethics 11(2):85–100. doi:10.1023/A:1009519131191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamine C, Bellon S (2009) Conversion to organic farming: a multidimensional research object at the crossroads of agricultural and social sciences. Rev Agron Sustain Dev 29:97–112. doi:10.1051/agro:2008007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtfouse E, Navarrete M, Debaeke P, Souchère V, Alberola C, Ménassieu J (2009) Agronomy for sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 29:1–6. doi:10.1051/agro:2008054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1989) 1986 Ecological Communication. Polity Press, Cambridge

  • Luhmann, N (1990) Essays on self-reference. New York: Colombia University Press

  • Luhmann N (1991) Operational closure and structural coupling: the differentiation of the legal system. Cardozo Law Rev 13:1419–1441

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (2012) Theory of society, volume 1. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (2013a) Theory of society, volume 2. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (2013b) 2002, 1991–1992 Introduction to systems theory. Polity Press, Cambridge

  • Luttikholt L (2007) Principles of organic agriculture as formulated by the international federation of organic agriculture movements. Life Sci 54:347–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden T (2013) From post-productionism to reflexive governance: contested transitions in securing more sustainable food futures. J Rural Stud 29:123–134. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.10.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana HR, Varela F (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. Reidel Publishing Company

  • Maturana H, Varela F (1981) Introductory remarks. In: Zeleny M (ed) Autopoiesis: a theory of living organization. North-Holland, New York, pp 18–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana HR, Varela F (1987) Tree of knowledge: biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Donagh J (2014) Rural geography II: discourses of food and sustainable rural futures. Progress in Human Geography (in press). doi: 10.1177/0309132513514507

  • Murphy J (2000) Ecological modernisation. Geoforum 31:1–8. doi:10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00039-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noe E, Alrøe HF (2011) Quality, coherence and cooperation: a framework for studying the mediation of qualities in food networks and collective marketing strategies. Int J Sociol Agric Food 18(1):12–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe E, Alrøe HF, Langvad AMS (2008) A polyocular framework for research on multifunctional farming and rural development. Sociol Rural 48:1–15. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9523.2008.00451.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noe E, Alrøe HF et al. (2014) Barriers for developing more robust organic arable farming systems: implementing research knowledge in practice and knowledge asymmetries. Submitted to Sociologia Ruralis

  • Pruzan P, Thyssen O (1994) The renaissance of ethics and the ethical accounting statement. Educ Technol 34(1):23–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup L (2003) The hypercomplex society. P. Lang Publishing Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson PB (2007) Agricultural sustainability: what it is and what it is not. Int J Agric Sustain 5(1):5–16. doi:10.1080/14735903.2007.9684809

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada S, Ruttan VW (1980) International Comparisons of Productivity in Agriculture. In: Kendrick JW, Vaccara BN (eds) New developments in productivity measurement. Univ. Chicago Press, pp. 507–594

  • Uexküll J von (1982) The theory of meaning. Semiotica 42(1): 25–82

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Egon Noe.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noe, E., Alrøe, H.F. Sustainable agriculture issues explained by differentiation and structural coupling using social systems analysis. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35, 133–144 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0243-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0243-4

Keywords

Navigation