Abstract
In spite of many initiatives to increase sustainability, agriculture moves in the opposite direction with increased pesticide impacts and decreased nature quality. Here, we propose that this issue is not mainly due to lack of agronomic knowledge, but due to the lack of knowledge on social processes of specialization and differentiation. Here, we review the challenge of agriculture and sustainable development based on Niklas Luhmann theory of social systems. We focus on the concepts of differentiation and structural couplings. We use two forms of analysis, discursive differentiation and organizational differentiation, which mutually support each other. First, we analyze discourse categories, named ‘semantics’ in the social systems theory, such as ‘environmental problems’ and ‘food safety’. We then look at how these discourses are related to the discourse of sustainability. Secondly, we describe different forms of organizational differentiation within agriculture and food, e.g., in the pig production chain. Here, we show how sustainability problems can be seen as an unavoidable consequence of the ‘decouplings’ that follow these differentiation and specialization processes. Finally, using the insights from social systems theory, we discuss how these sustainability problems might be mitigated by the following three forms of new structural couplings: (1) functional couplings of organizations to generalized semantic perspectives on e.g., environment and nature, which can reintroduce the sensibility of agri-food systems to their surroundings, (2) structural couplings between organizations that can handle other dimensions than price and quantity, including couplings mediated by labels and network couplings such as partnerships that provide options for co-evolution, and (3) second order couplings to polyocular semantics such as the sustainability semantic; that is, semantics that have their strength and challenge in the fact that they are multiperspectival and must remain indeterminate. Social systems analysis is a novel and strong tool to analyze social differentiation processes in agriculture. Social systems analysis provides researchers, farmers, and companies new ways to understand the sustainability problems that these differentiation processes produce.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alrøe BJ, Glover L (2006) Ecological justice and organic agriculture: ethics and practice. In: Halberg N, Alrøe HF, Knudsen MT, Kristensen ES (eds) Global development of organic agriculture: challenges and prospects. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp 75–112
Alrøe HF, Noe E (2008) What makes organic agriculture move—protest, meaning or market? A polyocular approach to the dynamics and governance of organic agriculture. Agric Resour Gov Ecol 7(1/2):5–22. doi:10.1504/IJARGE.2008.016976
Alrøe HF, Noe E (2011) A cross-disciplinary approach to multicriteria assessment and communication of the effects of organic food systems. Proc Third Sci Conf ISOFAR 2:313–316
Alrøe HF, Noe E (2012) Observing environments. Constructivist Foundations 8 (1): 39–62: Available at http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/8/1/039.alroe
Andersen NÅ (2003) Discursive analytical strategies: understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau. The Policy Press, Bristol, Luhmann
Andersen NÅ (2008) Partnerships: machines of possibility. The Policy Press, Bristol
Behrens R, de Haen H (1980) Aggregate factor input and productivity in agriculture: a comparison for the EC-member countries, 1963–76. Eur Rev Agric Econ 7:109–146
Fleming A, Vanclay F (2010) Farmer responses to climate change and sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:11–19. doi:10.1051/agro:2009028
Halberg N, Verschuur G, Goodlass G (2005) Farm level environmental indicators; are they useful? An overview of green accounting systems for European farms. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105:195–212. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2004.04.003
Jensen KK, Sørensen JT (1998) The idea of “ethical accounting” for a livestock farm. J Agric Environ Ethics 11(2):85–100. doi:10.1023/A:1009519131191
Lamine C, Bellon S (2009) Conversion to organic farming: a multidimensional research object at the crossroads of agricultural and social sciences. Rev Agron Sustain Dev 29:97–112. doi:10.1051/agro:2008007
Lichtfouse E, Navarrete M, Debaeke P, Souchère V, Alberola C, Ménassieu J (2009) Agronomy for sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 29:1–6. doi:10.1051/agro:2008054
Luhmann N (1989) 1986 Ecological Communication. Polity Press, Cambridge
Luhmann, N (1990) Essays on self-reference. New York: Colombia University Press
Luhmann N (1991) Operational closure and structural coupling: the differentiation of the legal system. Cardozo Law Rev 13:1419–1441
Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Luhmann N (2012) Theory of society, volume 1. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Luhmann N (2013a) Theory of society, volume 2. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Luhmann N (2013b) 2002, 1991–1992 Introduction to systems theory. Polity Press, Cambridge
Luttikholt L (2007) Principles of organic agriculture as formulated by the international federation of organic agriculture movements. Life Sci 54:347–360
Marsden T (2013) From post-productionism to reflexive governance: contested transitions in securing more sustainable food futures. J Rural Stud 29:123–134. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.10.001
Maturana HR, Varela F (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. Reidel Publishing Company
Maturana H, Varela F (1981) Introductory remarks. In: Zeleny M (ed) Autopoiesis: a theory of living organization. North-Holland, New York, pp 18–19
Maturana HR, Varela F (1987) Tree of knowledge: biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala Publishers, Boston
Mc Donagh J (2014) Rural geography II: discourses of food and sustainable rural futures. Progress in Human Geography (in press). doi: 10.1177/0309132513514507
Murphy J (2000) Ecological modernisation. Geoforum 31:1–8. doi:10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00039-1
Noe E, Alrøe HF (2011) Quality, coherence and cooperation: a framework for studying the mediation of qualities in food networks and collective marketing strategies. Int J Sociol Agric Food 18(1):12–27
Noe E, Alrøe HF, Langvad AMS (2008) A polyocular framework for research on multifunctional farming and rural development. Sociol Rural 48:1–15. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9523.2008.00451.x
Noe E, Alrøe HF et al. (2014) Barriers for developing more robust organic arable farming systems: implementing research knowledge in practice and knowledge asymmetries. Submitted to Sociologia Ruralis
Pruzan P, Thyssen O (1994) The renaissance of ethics and the ethical accounting statement. Educ Technol 34(1):23–28
Qvortrup L (2003) The hypercomplex society. P. Lang Publishing Co., New York
Thompson PB (2007) Agricultural sustainability: what it is and what it is not. Int J Agric Sustain 5(1):5–16. doi:10.1080/14735903.2007.9684809
Yamada S, Ruttan VW (1980) International Comparisons of Productivity in Agriculture. In: Kendrick JW, Vaccara BN (eds) New developments in productivity measurement. Univ. Chicago Press, pp. 507–594
Uexküll J von (1982) The theory of meaning. Semiotica 42(1): 25–82
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Noe, E., Alrøe, H.F. Sustainable agriculture issues explained by differentiation and structural coupling using social systems analysis. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35, 133–144 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0243-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0243-4