Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Fragment Size on Isospin Effects in Transverse and Elliptic Flows and Nuclear Stopping in Intermediate Energy Heavy-Ion Collision

  • Nuclear Physics
  • Published:
Brazilian Journal of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We performed a comprehensive study of collective flow and nuclear-stopping observables for reactions of \(^{129}\)Xe+\(^{120}\)Sn at incident energies of 50, 100, and 400 MeV/nucleon using isospin quantum molecular dynamics (IQMD) model. The role of nuclear symmetry energy and isospin-dependent nucleon-nucleon cross-section is examined for various sizes of fragment size. Our finding revealed that the dual sensitivity of these two isospin effects is present when observables are examined collectively for all fragments. However, the dual sensitivity is removed when flows and stopping observables are calculated exclusively for specific particles/fragments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Stöcker, W. Greiner, Phys. Rep. 137, 277 (1986)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Lattimer, M. Prakash, Astrophys. J. 550, 426 (2001)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Lehaut, D. Durand et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 232701 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Carbone, G. Col‘o, et al., Phys. Rev. C 81, 041301 (2010)

  5. J. Lukasik et al., Phys. Lett. B 608, 223 (2005)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. D.J. Majestro et al., Phys. Rev. C 61, 021602(R) (2000)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. D.J. Majestro, W. Bauer, G.D. Westfall, Phys. Rev. C 62, 041603(R) (2000)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Buta et al., Nucl. Phys. A 584, 397 (1995)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. V. de la Mota, F. Sebille, M. Farine, B. Remaud, P. Schuck, Phys. Rev. C 46, 677 (1992)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Zhou, Z. Li, Y. Zhou, G. Mao, Nucl. Phys. A 580, 627 (1994)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Andronic et al., Phys. Lett. B 612, 173 (2005)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Krofcheck et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2028 (1989)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. C 74, 014602 (2006)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. J.-Y. Liu, W.-J. Guo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 975 (2001)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. W. Scheid, H. Müller, W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 741 (1974)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. H.A. Gustafsson, H.H. Gutbrod et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1590 (1984)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. J.J. Molitoris, H. Stocker, Phys. Lett. B 162, 47 (1985)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. W. Scheid, H. Muller, W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 741 (1974)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. H.A. Gustafsson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1590 (1984)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. K.G.R. Doss et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 302 (1986)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Klakow, G. Welke, W. Bauer, Phys. Rev. C 48, 1982 (1993)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. C. Hartnack, J. Jaenicke, L. Sehn, H. Stocker, J. Aichelin, Nucl. Phys. A 580, 643 (1994)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. D.H. Youngblood, H.L. Clark, Y.W. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 691 (1999)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. E. Khan, J. Margueron, I. Vidana, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 092501 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. C. Hartnack, R.K. Puri, J. Aichelin, J. Konopka, S.A. Bass, H. Stocker, W. Greiner, Eur. Phys. J. A 1, 151 (1998)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. B.A. Li, Z.Z. Ren, C.M. Ko, S.J. Yennello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4492 (1996)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. B.A. Li, G.C. Yong, W. Zuo, Phys. Rev. C 71, 014608 (2005)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. B.A. Li, L.W. Chen, Phys. Rev. C 72, 064611 (2005)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. B.A. Li, L.W. Chen, C.M. Ko, Phys. Rep. 464, 113 (2008)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Deepshikha, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 975, 29 (2018)

  31. X.-H. Fan, et al., Phys. Rev. C 97, 034604 (2018)

  32. O. Lopez et al., Phys. Rev. C 90, 064602 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. J. Cugnon et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 111, 215 (1996)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. R. Rana et al., Nucl. Phys. A 1016, 122324 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  35. S. Kumar. S. Kumar, R.K. Puri, Phys. Rev. C 81, 014601 (2010)

  36. J. Aichelin, Phys. Rep. 202, 233 (1991)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. S. Hama, B.C. Clark, E.D. Cooper, H.S. Sherif, R.L. Mercer, Phys. Rev. C 41, 2737 (1990)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. J. Aichelin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1926 (1987)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. R. Kumar, S. Gautam, R.K. Puri, Phys. Rev. C 89, 064608 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. S. Kumar, R.K. Puri, Phys. Rev. C 58, 320 (1998)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. S. Kumar, R.K. Puri, Phys. Rev. C 58, 2858 (1998)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. S. Goyal, R.K. Puri, Phys. Rev. C 83, 047601 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. R.K. Puri, J. Aichelin, J. Comput. Phys. 162, 245 (2000)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. A.L. Févre et al., J. Phys. Rev. C 100, 034904 (2019)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. J. Singh, R.K. Puri, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 27, 2091 (2001)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Y. Zhang, S. Voloshin, Z. Phys. C 70, 665 (1996)

  47. P. Danielwicz, G. Odyniec, Phys. Lett. B 157, 146 (1985)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. J.W. Harris et al., Nucl. Phys. A 471, 241c (1987)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. H.A. Gustafsson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1590 (1984)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. W.G. Meyer, H.H. Gutbrod, Ch. Lunker, A. Sandoval, Phys. Rev. C 22, 179 (1980)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. S. Gautam, at al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 034606 (2011)

  52. W. Reisdorf et al., Nucl. Phys. A 876, 1 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. C. Williams et al., Phys. Rev. C 55, R2132 (1997)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. W. Reisdorf et al., Nucl. Phys. A 848, 366 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. J. Su et al., Eur. Phys. A 52, 207 (2016)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajat Rana.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rana, R., Choudhary, G., Dhillon, N.K. et al. Influence of Fragment Size on Isospin Effects in Transverse and Elliptic Flows and Nuclear Stopping in Intermediate Energy Heavy-Ion Collision. Braz J Phys 53, 132 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-023-01344-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-023-01344-3

Keywords

Navigation