Skip to main content
Log in

A simulation study on the depth information of motor units

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomedical Engineering Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The depth information of muscle motor units is important in clinical applications. The purpose of this paper is to investigate relationship between motor unit action potentials from surface electromyography and motor unit (MU) depth.

Methods

Firstly, the skin structure was depicted, and the action potential was considered as a constant current source, which was generated by a tripole model. Secondly, the potential generated by the tripole on the surface was given. Finally, the relationships between MU depth and MU action potential (MUAP) parameters on the skin were studied.

Results

The regression analysis showed a low relative error for the simulated signals. When the position of the detected electrodes was 18 mm, the linear regression analysis yielded 2.47% in the case of arc, and 2.48% in the case of side. The relationships between the peak to peak amplitude of MUAP and the lengths (arc and side) were tested by the nonlinear regression analysis. The sum of the squared errors was less than 0.0202, and the coefficient of determination was more than 0.9939.

Conclusions

These results show that it is possible to estimate MU depth by action potentials on surface electrodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yu S, Jeong E, Hong K, Lee S. Classification of nine directions using the maximum likelihood estimation based on electromyogram of both forearms. Biomed Eng Lett. 2012; 2(2):129–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Venugopal G, Ramakrishnan S. Analysis of progressive changes associated with muscle fatigue in dynamic contraction of biceps brachii muscle using surface EMG signals and bispectrum features. Biomed Eng Lett. 2014; 4(3):269–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Peng Y, He J, Khavari R, Boone T, Zhang Y. PD24-03 identification of innervation zones of the pelvic floor muscle from noninvasive high-density intra-vaginal/rectal surface EMG recordings. J Urology. 2015; 193(4):e487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gracies JM. Pathophysiology of spastic paresis. I:Paresis and soft tissue changes. Muscle Nerve. 2005; 31(5):535–51.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jahn R. A neuronal receptor for botulinum toxin. Science. 2006; 312(5773):540–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lapatki BG, Van Dijk JP, van de Warrenburg BPC, Zwarts MJ. Botulinum toxin has an increased effect when targeted toward the muscle’s endplate zone: a high-density surface EMG guided study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011; 122(8):1611–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu Y, Ning Y, Li S, Zhou P, Rymer WZ, Zhang Y. Threedimensional innervation zone imaging from multi-channel surface EMG recordings. Int J Neural Syst. 2015; doi:10.1142/S0129065715500240.

    Google Scholar 

  8. van den Doel K, Ascher UM, Pai DK. Source localization in electromyography using the inverse potential problem. Inverse Probl. 2011; doi:10.1088/0266-5611/27/2/025008.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wood SM, Jarratt JA, Barker AT, Brown BH. Surface electromyography using electrode arrays: a study of motor neuron disease. Muscle Nerve. 2011; 24(2):223–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu Y, Ning Y, He J, Li S, Zhou P, Zhang Y. Internal muscle activity imaging from multi-channel surface EMG recordings: a validation study. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014; 3559–61.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zwarts MJ, Stegeman DF. Multichannel surface EMG: basic aspects and clinical utility. Muscle Nerve. 2003; 28(1):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roeleveld K, Stegeman DF, Falck B, Stålberg EV. Motor unit size estimation: confrontation of surface EMG with macro EMG. Electroen Clin Neuro. 1997; 105(3):181–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roeleveld K, Blok JH, Stegeman DF, van Oosterom A. Volume conduction models for surface EMG; confrontation with measurements. J Electromyogr Kines. 1997; 7(4):221–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sheean GL. Quantification of motor unit action potential energy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012; 123(3):621–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenfalck P. Intra- and extracellular potential fields of active nerve and muscle fibres. A physico-mathematical analysis of different models. Acta Physiol Scand. 1969; 321:1–168.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Andreassen S, Rosenfalk A. Relationship of intracellular and extracellular action potentials of skeletal muscle fibers. CRC Crit Rev Bioeng. 1981; 6(4):267–306.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Merletti R, Lo Conte L, Avignone E, Guglielminotti P. Modeling of surface myoelectric signals—Part I: Model Implementation. IEEE T Bio-Med Eng. 1999; 46(7):810–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McGill KC, Huynh A. A model of the surface-recorded motorunit action potential. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 1988; 1697–9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. van Veen BK, Wolters H, Wallinga W, Rutten WL, Boom HB. The bioelectrical source in computing single muscle fiber action potentials. Biophys J. 1993; 64(5):1492–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Monster AW, Chan H. Surface electromyogram potentials of motor units: relationship between potential size and unit location in a large human skeletal muscle. Exp Neurol. 1980; 67(2):280–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao Y, Li D. A simulation study on the relation between muscle motor unit numbers and the non- Gaussianity/nonlinearity levels of surface electromyography. Sci China Life Sci. 2012; 55(11):958–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gabriel DA, Kamen G. Experimental and modeling investigation of spectral compression of biceps brachii SEMG activity with increasing force levels. J Electromyogr Kines. 2009; 19(3):437–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ning Y, Zhu X, Zhu S, Zhang Y. Surface EMG decomposition based on k-means clustering and convolution kernel compensation. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2015; 19(2):471–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yavuz U, Negro F, Sebik O, Holobar A, Frömmel C, Türker KS, Farina D. Estimating reflex responses in large populations of motor units by decomposition of the high-density surface electromyogram. J Physiol. 2015; 593(19):4305–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dai C, Li Y, Christie A, Bonato P, Mcgill KC, Clancy EA. Cross-comparison of three electromyogram decomposition algorithms assessed with experimental and simulated data. IEEE T Neur Sys Reh. 2015; 23(1):32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Merletti R, Parker PA. Electromyography: physiology, engineering, and non-invasive applications. John Wiley & Sons; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Farina D, Cescon C, Merletti R. Influence of anatomical, physical, and detection-system parameters on surface EMG. Biol Cybern. 2002; 86(6):445–56.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Mesin L. Real time estimation of generation, extinction and flow of muscle fibre action potentials in high density surface EMG. Comput Biol Med. 2015; 57:8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinbao He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, J., Yi, X. & Luo, Z. A simulation study on the depth information of motor units. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 6, 80–86 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-016-0219-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-016-0219-1

Keywords

Navigation