Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in sensory changes between the floor and mattress in the static prone position for healthy science research

  • Original article
  • Published:
Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are limited comparative studies examining physiotherapy performed in various environments and positions. Thus, we conducted a healthy science research, investigating the difference in body pressure-related sensory changes between the floor and mattress while in the static prone position. We used the Body Pressure Measurement System to analyze changes in body pressure. In this measurement system, sensors are attached to existing mattresses and floor surfaces beneath the subjects. The level of pain was evaluated using pain score tools before the static prone position was adopted, at 1, 5, 10, and 15 min, and in total for specific body points. We measured five time points and five body points while placed in the static, prone position. There were no significant differences found in body pressure between floor and mattress placement. However, the pain score values for the arm and abdomen were significantly higher in the floor group compared to the mattress group. In addition, pain score values increased with time for the mattress and floor groups. These results suggest that the properties of time, posture, and environment need to be carefully considered when applying sensory rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scott, E. M. et al. Measurement of interface pressures in the evaluation of operating theatre mattresses. J. Wound. Care. 8, 437–441 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Normand, M. C. et al. Biomechanical effects of a lumbar support in a mattress. J. Can. Chiropr. Assoc. 49, 96–101 (2005).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jensen, G. M., Gwyer, J. & Shepard, K. F. Expert practice in physical therapy. Phys. Ther. 80, 28–43 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Karnath, H. O. & Broetz, D. Understanding and treating “pusher syndrome”. Phys. Ther. 83, 1119–1125 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kovacs, F. M. et al. Effect of firmness of mattress on chronic non-specific low-back pain: randomised, double-blind, controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet 362, 1599–1604 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. López-Torres, M. et al. Objective firmness, average pressure and subjective perception in mattresses for the elderly. Appl. Ergon. 39, 123–130 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, W. D. et al. Analysis of the body pressure-related sensory changes in the static supine position for healthy science research: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Toxicol. Environ. Health. Sci. 7, 211–216 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jamison, R. N. & Edwards, R. R. Integrating pain management in clinical practice. J. Clin. Psychol. Med. Settings 19, 49–64 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheatle, M. D. & O’Brien, C. P. Opioid therapy in patients with chronic noncancer pain: diagnostic and clinical challenges. Adv. Psychosom. Med. 30, 61–91 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoeger Bement, M. K. et al. An interprofessional consensus of core competencies for prelicensure education in pain management: curriculum application for physical therapy. Phys. Ther. 94, 451–465 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nielsen, M. et al. Physical therapist-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy: a qualitative study of physical therapists’ perceptions and experiences. Phys. Ther. 94, 197–209 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Philadelphia Panel. Philadelphia Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on selected rehabilitation interventions for low back pain. Phys. Ther. 81, 1641-1674 (2001).

  13. Sackett, D. L. et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. B. M. J. 312, 71–72 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ritter, B. Considering evidence-based practice. Nurse. Pract. 26, 63–65 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ladeira, C. E. Evidence based practice guidelines for management of low back pain: physical therapy implications. Rev. Bras. Fisioter. 15, 190–199 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Balaguer, A. et al. Infant position in neonates receiving mechanical ventilation. Cochrane. Database. Syst. Rev. 3, CD003668 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Suehiro, T. et al. Comparison of spine motion and trunk muscle activity between abdominal hollowing and abdominal bracing maneuvers during prone hip extension. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 18, 482–488 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Scaravilli, V. et al. Prone positioning improves oxygenation in spontaneously breathing nonintubated patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: A retrospective study. J. Crit. Care. 30, 1390–1394 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sud, S. et al. Effect of prone positioning during mechanical ventilation on mortality among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. C. M. A. J. 186, E381–E390 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gattinoni, L. et al. Prone positioning improves survival in severe ARDS: a pathophysiologic review and individual patient meta-analysis. Minerva. Anestesiol. 76, 448–454 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guérin, C. et al. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 2159–2168 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hess, D. R. Patient positioning and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Respir. Care. 50, 892–898 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Coderre, T. J. Contribution of central neuroplasticity to pathological pain: review of clinical and experimental evidence. Pain 52, 259–285 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, M. Y. et al. Temporal change in pain and sensory threshold of geriatric patients after moist heat treatment. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 23, 797–801 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Heo, J. et al. Serum heavy metals and lung function in a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease cohort. Toxicol. Environ. Health. Sci. 9, 30–35 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bae, Y. M. et al. Serotonin-induced ion channel modulations in mesenteric artery myocytes from normotensive and DOCA-salt hypertensive rats. J. Smooth. Muscle. Res. 43, 85–97 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Park, B. S. et al. Randomized controlled pilot trial of truncal exercises after stroke to improve gait and muscle activity. Neurosci. Med. 7, 149–156 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rim, K. T. Toxicological evaluation of MSG for the manufacturing workers’ health: A literature review. Toxicol. Environ. Health. Sci. 9, 1–11 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junghwan Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, WD., Park, J. & Kim, J. Differences in sensory changes between the floor and mattress in the static prone position for healthy science research. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 9, 130–134 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13530-017-0313-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13530-017-0313-5

Keywords

Navigation