Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Union Transitions and Fertility Within First Premarital Cohabitations in Canada: Diverging Patterns by Education?

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

Cohabitation has become increasingly accepted and normalized as part of the family system in Canada and has become the most common way to form a first union. The changing role of cohabitation in the family system is often understood as being driven by the ideational changes associated with the second demographic transition, but increasing international evidence indicates that this explanation is incomplete. Using nationally representative retrospective data from Canadians born between 1940 and 1979 from the 2011 General Social Survey, this study examines transitions out of first premarital cohabitation and fertility within these unions as two measures of the changing role of cohabitation. Across birth cohorts, Canadians are increasingly likely to use cohabitation as an alternative to marriage and less likely to use cohabitation as a short-lived prelude to marriage. These overall trends support the second demographic transition perspective. However, this study also finds that Canadians without a bachelor’s degree are far more likely to experience a birth within cohabitation and that their likelihood of transitioning to marriage has declined steeply across birth cohorts. This educational gradient in childbearing in cohabitation and the increasing educational differences in union transitions over time provide support for the diverging destinies thesis in Canada.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. At the national level, scholars have characterized cohabitation as an alternative to marriage. However, Le Bourdais and Lapierre-Adamcyk (2004) found that regional variation is so large that in the province of Québec, cohabitation is better characterized as indistinguishable from marriage, while in the rest of Canada, it remains a prelude to marriage. These differences are discussed in more depth throughout.

  2. Sensitivity analyses were conducting using cohabitation cohort rather than birth cohort as the measure of change over time, and the results are consistent across these different specifications.

References

  • Allison, P. D. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series No. 07-046). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Beaujot, R., Du, C. J., & Ravanera, Z. (2013). Family policies in Québec and the rest of Canada: Implications for fertility, child-care, women’s paid work, and child development indicators. Canadian Public Policy, 39, 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, G., Furstenberg, F. F., Jr., & Waters, M. C. (2010). Introducing the issue. Future of Children, 20(1), 3–18.

  • Boothby, D., & Drewes, T. (2006). Post-secondary education in Canada: Returns to university, college and trades education. Canadian Public Policy, 32, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & Jones, B. S. (2004). Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bramlett, M. D., & Mosher, W. D. (2002). Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States (Vital Health Statistics Report, Series 23, No. 22). Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

  • Bumpass, L. L. (1990). What’s happening to the family? Interaction between demographic and institutional change. Demography, 27, 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L. L., & Lu, H. H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch, T. K., & Madan, A. K. (1986). Union formation and dissolution: Results from the 1984 Family History Survey (Catalogue No. 99–963). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

  • Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. J. (2010). Demographic trends in the United States: A review of research in the 2000s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, S., & Ratner, D. (2010). Labor market outcomes and the transition to adulthood. Future of Children, 20(1), 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fussell, E., Gauthier, A. H., & Evans, A. (2007). Heterogeneity in the transition to adulthood: The cases of Australia, Canada, and the United States. European Journal of Population, 23, 389–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. R., & Kenny, C. T. (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review, 66, 506–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, P. Y., Mosher, W. D., & Chandra, A. (2010). Marriage and cohabitation in the United States: A statistical portrait based on Cycle 6 (2002) of the National Survey of Family Growth (Vital Health Statistics Report, Series 23, No. 28). Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

  • Guzzo, K. B. (2009). Marital intentions and the stability of first cohabitations. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 179–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, K. B. (2014). Trends in cohabitation outcomes: Compositional changes and engagement among never-married young adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 826–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamplova, D., Le Bourdais, C., & Lapierre-Adamcyk, E. (2014). Is the cohabitation-marriage gap in money pooling universal? Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 983–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayford, S. H., & Morgan, S. P. (2008). The quality of retrospective data on cohabitation. Demography, 45, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuveline, P., & Timberlake, J. M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1214–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S. P. (2005). Survival analysis with Stata [Data set]. Essex, UK: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex. Retrieved from http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/survival-analysis

  • Kennedy, S., & Bumpass, L. L. (2008). Cohabitation and children’s living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research, 19(article 47), 1663–1692. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, D., Moyser, M., & Beaujot, R. (2006). Marriage and cohabitation: Demographic and socioeconomic differences in Québec and Canada. Canadian Studies in Population, 33, 83–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan, K. (2001). The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in Western Europe. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 15, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, J. C.-L., & Raley, R. K. (2016). Diverging patterns of union transition among cohabitors by race/ethnicity and education: Trends and marital intentions in the United States. Demography, 53, 921–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laplante, B., & Fostik, A. L. (2015). Disentangling the Québec fertility paradox: The recent evolution of fertility within marriage and consensual union in Québec and Ontario. Canadian Studies in Population, 42, 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bourdais, C., & Lapierre-Adamcyk, E. (2004). Changes in conjugal life in Canada: Is cohabitation progressively replacing marriage? Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 929–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bourdais, C., & Marcil-Gratton, N. (1996). Family transformations across the Canadian/American border: When the laggard becomes the leader. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 27, 415–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition in western countries: An interpretation. In K. O. Mason & A.-M. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 17–62). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

  • Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36, 211–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R. (2014). The second demographic transition: A concise overview of its development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 18112–18115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R., & Surkyn, J. R. (2002). New forms of household formation in Central and Eastern Europe: Are they related to newly emerging value orientations? In UNECE (Ed.), Economic Survey of Europe, 2002 (Vol. 1, pp. 197–216). Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Commission for Europe.

  • Lesthaeghe, R. J., & Neidert, L. (2006). The second demographic transition in the United States: Exception or textbook example? Population and Development Review, 34, 669–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R. J., & van de Kaa, D. (1986). Twee demografische transities? [Two demographic transitions?]. In R. Lesthaeghe & D. J. van de Kaa (Eds.), Mens en maatschappij: Groei of krimp [People and Society: Growth or shrinkage] (pp. 9–24). Deventer, the Netherlands: Van Loghum-Slaterus.

  • Lichter, D. T., & Qian, Z. (2008). Serial cohabitation and the marital life course. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 861–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., Qian, Z., & Mellott, L. M. (2006). Marriage or dissolution? Union transitions among poor cohabiting women. Demography, 43, 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., Sassler, S., & Turner, R. N. (2014). Cohabitation, post-conception unions, and the rise in nonmarital fertility. Social Science Research, 47, 134–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W. D. (1993). Marriage and cohabitation following premarital conception. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 839–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W. D. (2004). Children and the stability of cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 674–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W. D., Brown, S. L., & Payne, K. K. (2014). Two decades of stability and change in age at first union formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2007). The changing institution of marriage: Adolescents’ expectations to cohabit and to marry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 559–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography, 41, 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M. (2004). Stability and change: The structuration of partnership histories in Canada, the Netherlands and the Russian Federation. European Journal of Population, 20, 141–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musick, K. (2007). Cohabitation, nonmarital childbearing, and the marriage process. Demographic Research, 16(article 9), 249–286. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.16.9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Kreyenfeld, M., Lappegård, T., Keizer, R., & Berghammer, C. (2010). The educational gradient of childbearing within cohabitation in Europe. Population and Development Review, 36, 775–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, M. S., & Wu, Z. (1998). Divergence of marriage patterns in Québec and elsewhere in Canada. Population and Development Review, 24, 329–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raley, R. K. (2001). Increasing fertility in cohabiting unions: Evidence for the second demographic transition in the United States. Demography, 38, 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss, R. R., & VandenHeuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single? Population and Development Review, 16, 703–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassler, S., & Goldscheider, F. K. (2004). Revisiting Jane Austen’s theory of marriage timing: Changes in union formation among American men in the late 20th century. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 139–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, J. A. (2000). Families formed outside of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1247–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settersten, R. A., & Ray, B. (2010). What’s going on with young people today? The long and twisting path to adulthood. Future of Children, 20(1), 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smock, P. J., & Gupta, S. (2002). Cohabitation in contemporary North America. In A. Booth & A. C. Crouter (Eds.), Just living together: Implications for children, families, and public policy (pp. 53–84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence-Erlbaum.

  • Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Porter, M. (2005). “Everything’s there except money”: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 680–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, M. M. (2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67, 132–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte, P., & Belanger, A. (1997). The dynamics of formation and dissolution of first common-law unions in Canada. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte, P., & Goldschieder, F. (1998). Evolution of factors influencing first union formation in Canada. Canadian Studies in Population, 25, 145–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Kaa, D. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42(1), 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weakliem, D. L. (2002). The effects of education on political opinions: An international study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14, 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L. (2016). Type and timing of first union formation in Québec and the rest of Canada: Continuity and change across the 1930–1979 birth cohorts. Canadian Studies in Population, 43, 234–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. (2017). Trends in births to single and cohabiting mothers, 1980–2014 (Family Profiles, No. FP-17-04). Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family & Marriage Research.

  • Wu, Z., & Balakrishnan, T. R. (1995). Dissolution of premarital cohabitation in Canada. Demography, 32, 521–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z., & Pollard, M. S. (2000). Economic circumstances and the stability of nonmarital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Rachel Margolis, three anonymous reviewers, and the editors for their insightful comments and suggestions at various stages of this manuscript. A previous version of this manuscript was presented at the 2016 annual meeting of the Population Association of America.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Saskatchewan, 1019 Arts Building, 9 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5A5, Canada

    Laura Wright

Authors
  1. Laura Wright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Wright.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 108 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wright, L. Union Transitions and Fertility Within First Premarital Cohabitations in Canada: Diverging Patterns by Education?. Demography 56, 151–167 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0741-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0741-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation