Abstract
Buffer zones, mandatory in the Brazilian protected area network as well as globally common in reserves, are essentially transitional areas within the core protected area (PA) that aim to downgrade the land-use intensity of the surrounding landscape from potentially damaging external influences. Buffer zones are regulated by the management plan and studies comparing these restrictions to land cover dynamics, and landscape configuration in buffer zones of protected areas are not common. Thus, we aimed to assess land use and land cover dynamics since 1995 in the buffer zone of Serra do Mar State Park (in Portuguese: Parque Estadual Serra do Mar: PESM), Southeast Brazil, and to compare them with restrictions imposed by its Management Plan. We hypothesized that, despite restrictions of the management plan, land use and land cover changes have intensified and increased in extent, in the nearest surroundings of PESM, with regards to deforestation, urban expansion, and forest discontinuity, which may further result in threatening conservation values of PESM. To evaluate land use and land cover dynamics in the study site, transition satellite imagery from 1995 to 2020 available at MapBiomas Project was used. We verified that (i) forest cover percentages in the whole area, in each municipality and in legal reserves inside private rural land in the PESM buffer zone did not alter, (ii) the rate at which urban areas expanded during the study period slowed over time, and (iii) the boundary between the protected area and the buffer zone was mostly deforested. Thus, the PESM Management plan and restrictions, together with other environmental policies not analyzed in this study, might be working to contain deforestation and urbanization, and, lately, to maintain conservation values of PESM. However, there is a need for alternatives to improve the implementation of regulations on the buffer zone management plan.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amaral YT, dos Santos EM, Ribeiro MC, Barreto L (2019) Landscape structural analysis of the Lençóis Maranhenses National Park: implications for conservation. J Nat Conserv 51:125725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2019.125725
Ayres JM, Da Fonseca GAB, Rylands AB, Queiroz HL, Pinto LP, Masterson D, Cavalcanti RB (2005) Os corredores ecológicos das florestas tropicais do Brasil. No. 333.7516 C824. Sociedade Civil Mamirauá, Belém, PA, Brasil
Brasil (2000) Lei nº 9985, de 18 de julho de 2000. Regulamenta o art. 225, § 1o, incisos I, II, III e VII da Constituição Federal, institui o Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação da Natureza e dá outras providências. Brasília, 19 julho 2000
Brasil (2006) Lei nº 11428, de 22 de dezembro de 2006. Dispõe sobre a utilização e proteção da vegetação nativa do Bioma Mata Atlântica, e dá outras providências. Brasília, 26 dezembro 2006
Brasil (2012) Lei nº 12651, de 25 de maio de 2012. Dispõe sobre a proteção da vegetação nativa. Brasília, 28 maio 2012
Cabral AIR, Saito C, Pereira H, Laques AE (2018) Deforestation pattern dynamics in protected areas of the Brazilian Legal Amazon using remote sensing data. Appl Geogr 100:101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.10.003
Cadastro Ambiental Rural, CAR (2021) CAR: car.gov.br. Accessed 6 Nov 2021
da Silva RFB, Batistella M, Moran EF (2017) Socioeconomic changes and environmental policies as dimensions of regional land transitions in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Environ Sci Policy 74:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.019
de Lima GN, Rueda VOM (2018) The urban growth of the metropolitan area of Sao Paulo and its impact on the climate. Weather and Climate Extremes 21:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2018.05.002
de Moraes MCP, de Mello K, Toppa RH (2017) Protected areas and agricultural expansion: Biodiversity conservation versus economic growth in the Southeast of Brazil. J Environ Manage 188:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.075
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2021) https://www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias/downloads-geociencias.html. Accessed 18 Aug 2021
Joppa LN, Loarie SR, Pimm SL (2009) On population growth near protected areas. PloS one 4:e4279. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004279
Kubacka M, Zywica P, Subirós JV, Bródka S, Macias A (2022) How do the surrounding areas of national parks work in the context of landscape fragmentation? A case study of 159 protected areas selected in 11 EU countries. Land Use Policy 113:105910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105910
Mapbiomas (2021) “Projeto Mapbiomas – Coleção 6 da série anual de mapas de cobertura e uso de solo do Brasil”. https://mapbiomas.org. Accessed 25 Aug 2021
Martino D (2001) Buffer zones around protected areas: a brief literature review. Electron Green J 1(15)
Metzger JP, Bustamante MM, Ferreira J, Fernandes GW, Librán-Embid F, Pillar VD, Prist PR, Rodrigues RR, Vieira IC, Overbeck GE (2019) Why Brazil needs its legal reserves. Perspect Ecol Conserv 17:91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2019.07.002
MMA (2000) Avaliação e ações prioritárias para a conservação da biodiversidade da Mata Atlântica e Campos Sulinos. Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (SBF), Ministério do Meio Ambiente (MMA), Brasilia, Brasil
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858
Oliveira BRD, Carvalho-Ribeiro SM, Maia-Barbosa PM (2020) A multiscale analysis of land use dynamics in the buffer zone of Rio Doce State Park, Minas Gerais, Brazil. J Environ Planning Manage 63:935–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1617681
Parra-Sanchez E, Banks-Leite C (2020) The magnitude and extent of edge effects on vascular epiphytes across the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Scientific reports 10:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.075
Paula LFD, Pires M (2017) Crise e perspectivas para a economia brasileira. Estudos Avançados 31:125–144. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-40142017.31890013
QGIS-Development-Team QGIS geographic information system Open Source Geospatial Foundation (2017). http://qgis.org
R Central Development Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 3.6.1. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org
Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP, Martensen AC, Ponzoni FJ, Hirotac MM (2009) The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 142:1141–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021
Rezende CL, Scarano FR, Assad ED, Joly CA, Metzger JP, Strassburg BBN, Tabarelli M, Fonseca GA, Mittermeier RA (2018) From hotspot to hopespot: an opportunity for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Perspect Ecol Conserv 16:208–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2018.10.002
Rocha MA, Massi KG, Mendes TSG (2020) Integridade Ecológica de Propriedades Agrícolas de Produtores Orgânicos na Região do Vale do Paraíba Paulista. Paisagem & Ambiente 45:e169741. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2359-5361.paam.2020.169741
São Paulo (Estado) (1977) Decreto nº 10251, de 30 de agosto de 1977. Cria o Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar e dá providências correlatas, 31 August 1977
São Paulo (Estado) (2006) Deliberação Consema nº 34, de 19 de setembro de 2006. 227ª Reunião Ordinária do Plenário do Consema. São Paulo
São Paulo (Estado) (2010) Decreto nº 56572. Dispõe sobre a expansão do Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar em áreas de domínio público e dá providências correlatas, 22 December 2010, São Paulo
São Paulo (Estado) (2013) Decreto nº 58996. Dispõe sobre o Zoneamento Ecológico-Econômico do Setor da Baixada Santista e dá providências correlatas, 25 March 2013, São Paulo
São Paulo (Estado) (2018) Resolução SMA nº 189. Estabelece critérios e procedimentos para exploração sustentável de espécies nativas do Brasil no Estado de São Paulo, 21 December 2018, São Paulo
São Paulo (Estado) (2021) Infraestrutura e Meio Ambiente. Parque Estadual da Serra de Mar, 2021. infraestruturameioambiente.sp.gov.br/pesm. Accessed 14 Dec 2021
São Paulo (Estado) (2022) Secretaria de Infraestrutura e Meio Ambiente. Inventário da cobertura vegetal nativa do estado de São Paulo. São Paulo
SEADE (2021) Seade Fundação Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados. https://municipios.seade.gov.br/. Accessed 20 Dec 2021
Silva MP, Massi KG, Negri RG, Pedrosa F (2023) Jaguars and wild pigs indicate protected area connectivity in the south-east Atlantic Forest (Brazil). Env Conserv 50:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892922000479
SOS MATA ATLÂNTICA & INPE (2019) Atlas dos remanescentes florestais da Mata Atlântica. 2017–2018. Fundação SOS Mata Atlântica
Souza CM Jr, Shimbo Z, Z. Shimbo J, Rosa MR, Parente LL, Parente LL, A.Alencar A, Rudorff BF, Hasenack H, Matsumoto M, G. Ferreira L, Souza-Filho PW, de Oliveira SW, Rocha WF, Fonseca AV, Marques CB, Diniz CG, Costa D, Monteiro D, Rosa ER, Vélez-Martin E, Weber EJ, Lenti FEB, Paternost FF, Pareyn FGC, Siqueira JV, Viera JL, Neto LCF, Saraiva MM, Sales MH, Salgado MPG, Vasconcelos R, Galano S, Mesquita VV, Azevedo T (2020) Reconstructing three decades of land use and land cover changes in Brazilian biomes with Landsat archive and Earth Engine. Remote Sens 12:2735. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172735
Starzynski R, Simões SJC, Soares PV, Mendes TSG (2018) Demographic pressure in Serra do Mar State Park and its buffer zone, southeastern Brazil. Environ Monit Assess 190:511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6889-7
Tiede D (2012) Vector-based landscape analysis tools extension. V-LATE 2.0 beta ed. Z_GIS. University of Salzburg, Salzburg
Villani JP (2007) Zona de amortecimento do Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar-Núcleo Santa Virgínia: subsídios ao manejo sustentável dos fragmentos de Mata Atlântica
Wittemyer G, Elsen P, Bean WT, Burton ACO, Brashares JS (2008) Accelerated human population growth at protected area edges. Science 321:123–126. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158900
Zoneamento Ecológico-Econômico do Estado de São Paulo (ZEE-SP) (2021) https://www.infraestruturameioambiente.sp.gov.br/portalzee/. Accessed 6 Dec 2021
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
de Souza, J.C., Mendes, T.S.G., Bignotto, R.B. et al. Land use dynamics in a tropical protected area buffer zone: is the management plan helping?. J Environ Stud Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-00905-5
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-024-00905-5