Skip to main content
Log in

Immersive field experiences lead to higher-level learning and translational impacts on students

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internships in STEM disciplines, especially in fields related to conservation and sustainability, have become more widespread in recent years. Such experiences are thought to go beyond traditional classroom learning and are now required as part of the curriculum in many programs. However, benefits of such internships have largely been presumed up to this point. In this work, we developed and tested a research question asking if there is a gradient of learning that occurs across immersive educational experiences. These range from low-level immersion classroom learning to highly immersive field internships. We found that student learning increases as the level of immersion increases. Furthermore, our findings suggest that highly immersive internships lead to more translational outcomes. This is based on values and dispositional changes relevant to research that are absent in lower-level immersive experiences. These findings suggest that highly immersive internships are likely to be key foundational experiences that help undergraduate student stakeholders develop a set of knowledge, skills, and abilities that are critical to a translational workforce in conservation and sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brunson MW, Baker MA (2016) Translational training for tomorrow’s environmental scientists. J Environ Stud Sci 6(2):295–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0333-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks

  • Crotty M (1998) The foundations of social research : meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe A, Dirks C, Wenderoth MP, Sundberg M (2008) Biology in Bloom: implementing Bloom’s taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. CBE Life Sci Educ 7(4):368–381. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-05-0024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (2011) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks

  • Enquist CA, Jackson ST, Garfin GM, Davis FW, Gerber LR, Littell JA, … Halpern B (2017) Foundations of translational ecology. Front Ecol Environ 15(10):541–550

  • Felege C, Hahn EC, Hunter C, Gleditsch R (2016) Bench, bedside, curbside, and home: translational research to include transformative change using educational research. J Res Pract 12(2):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallett LM, Morelli TL, Gerber LR, Moritz MA, Schwartz MW, Stephenson NL, … Woodhouse CA (2017) Navigating translational ecology: creating opportunities for scientist participation. Front Ecol Environ 15(10):578–586

  • Hofstein A, Lunetta VN (2004) The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Sci Educ 88(1):28–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein M, Weiss F (2011) Is forcing them worth the effort? Benefits of mandatory internships for graduates from diverse family backgrounds at labour market entry. Stud High Educ 36(8):969–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb AY, Kolb DA (2012) Experiential learning theory. In: Seel NM (ed) Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer US, Boston, pp 1215–1219

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl DR (2002) A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract 41(4):212–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell JA (2012) Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. Sage, Thousand Oaks

  • Moustakas C (1994) Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

  • Nakhleh MB, Polles J, Malina E (2002). Learning chemistry in a laboratory environment. Chemical education: towards research-based practice (pp. 69–94). Springer

  • Patton MQ (2015) Qualitative research & evaluation methods. fourth. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

  • Powell LA (2009) Using reflection documents to assess student learning. J Nat Res Life Sci Educ 38(1):33–39. https://doi.org/10.2134/jnrlse2009.38133x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson C, McCartan K (2016) Real world research. John Wiley & Sons

  • Saldaña J (2015) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage, Thousand Oaks

  • Schlesinger WH (2010) Editorial: translational ecology. Science 329(5992):609–609

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz MW, Hiers JK, Davis FW, Garfin GM, Jackson ST, Terando AJ, … Brunson MW (2017) Developing a translational ecology workforce. Front Ecol Environ 15(10):587–596

  • Thiry H, Laursen SL, Hunter A-B (2011) What experiences help students become scientists? A comparative study of research and other sources of personal and professional gains for STEM undergraduates. J High Educ 82(4):357–388

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Felege.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Felege, C., Romsdahl, R., Hunter, J. et al. Immersive field experiences lead to higher-level learning and translational impacts on students. J Environ Stud Sci 9, 286–296 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00555-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00555-y

Keywords

Navigation