Abstract
There is increasing impetus for large-scale deployment of carbon dioxide removal geoengineering approaches to help keep temperatures to below 2 °C, as provided for under the Paris Agreement. The primary option that has been discussed to date is Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). While BECCS could sequester very large amounts of carbon dioxide, it also poses substantial socio-economic risks to society, as well as threats to biodiversity. This essay suggests that a human rights-based approach can help to protect the interests of those who might be adversely impacted by BECCS deployment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amigun B, Musango J, Stafford W (2011) Biofuels and sustainability in Africa. Renew Sust Energy Rev 15(2):1360–1372
Anderson K, Peters G (2016) The trouble with negative emissions. Nature 354:182–183
Association for Temperate Agroforestry (2017) What is Agroforestry? http://www.aftaweb.org/about/what-is-agroforestry.html
Balan V (2014) Current challenges in commercially producing biofuels from lignocellulosic biomass, ISRN Biotechnol, 1–31
Barrett S (2014) Solar geoengineering’s brave new world: thoughts on the governance of an unprecedented technology. Rev Environ Econ Policy 8(2):249–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/reu011
Beringer T, Lucht W, Schaphoff S (2011) Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints. GCB Energy 3(4):299–312
Bernhard A (2010) The nitrogen cycle: processes, players, and human impact, Nature Education Knowledge Project, https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/the-nitrogen-cycle-processes-players-and-human-15644632
Bonsch M, Humpenöder F, Popp A, Bodirsky B, Dietrich JP, Rolinski S, Biewald A, Lotze-Campen H, Weindl I, Gerten D, Stevanovic M (2016) Trade-offs between land and water requirements for large-scale bioenergy production. GCB Bioenergy 8(1):11–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12226
Boysen LR et al (2016) Impacts devalue the potential of large-scale terrestrial CO2 removal through biomass plantations. Environ Res Lett 11:129502
Bracmort K, Lattanzio RK (2013) Geoengineering: governance and technology policy, Congressional Research Service 1–42
Buck HJ (2016) Rapid scale-up of negative emissions technologies: social barriers and social implications. Clim Chang 139(2):155–177
Bui M et al (2017) Bio-energy with CCS (BECCS) performance evaluation: efficiency enhancement and emissions reduction. Appl Energy 195:289–302
Burns WCG (2012) Geoengineering the climate: an overview of solar radiation management options. Tulsa Law Rev 46:283–304
Burns WCG (2016a) Human Rights Dimensions of Bioenergy With Carbon Capture and Storage: A Framework for Climate Justice in the Realm of Climate Geoengineering, in Climate Justice: Case Studies in Global and Regional Governance Challenges 150–170 (Randall Abate, ed. 2016)
Burns WCG (2016b) The Paris agreement and climate geoengineering governance: the need for a human rights-based component, CIGI papers, No 211, 1–44
Burns W, Nicholson S (2016) Governing climate geoengineering, in New Earth Politics, 346–366
Buyx A, Tait J (2011) Ethical Framework for Biofuels. Science 332(6209):540–541
Catula L, Dyer N, Vermeulen S (2008) Fuelling exclusion? The biofuels boom and poor people’s access to land, International Institute for the Environment and Development and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, IIED Order No: 12551IIED
Center for Carbon Dioxide Removal (2016) Philanthropy Beyond Carbon Neutrality, 1–67, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54a2e4c1e4b043bf83114773/t/56f085ad8259b594db051230/1458603444288/Philanthropy+Report+Final+%28small+file%29.pdf
Center for Carbon Dioxide Removal (2017) Carbon Sequestration Through Direct Air Capture, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54a2e4c1e4b043bf83114773/t/560ad701e4b0034dd1bf50e8/1443550977612/Direct+Air+Capture+Fact+Sheet%28final+web%29.pdf
Chaturvedi V, Hejazi M, Edmonds J, Clarke L, Kyle P, Davies E, Wise M (2015) Climate mitigation policy implications for global irrigation water demand. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 20(3):389–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9497-4
Clark PU et al (2016) Consequences of twenty-first century policy for multi-millennial climate and sea-level change. Nat Clim Chang 6:360–369
Cox P, Jeffery H (2009) Engineering the climate, Environmentalresearchweb, September 2, http://environmentalresearchweb.org/cws/article/opinion/40275
Creutzig F (2012) Reconciling top-down and bottom-up modelling on future bioenergy deployment. Nat Clim Chang 2:320–327
Creutzig F (2014) Economic and ecological views on climate change mitigation with bioenergy and negative emission. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy 8(1):4–10
Creutzig F (2017) Govern land as a global commons. Nature, 546:28–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/546028a
Crutzen PJ (2006) Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Climate Change 77:211–19
Dale BE et al (2010) Biofuels done right: land efficient animal feeds enable large environmental and energy benefits. Environ Sci Technol 44:8385–8389
Delucchi MA (2010) Impacts of biofuels on climate change, water use, and land use, 1195(1):28–45
De Schutter O (2013) Note on the impacts of the EU biofuels policy on the right to food, United Nations Office of the high commissioner, Mandate of the special rapporteur on the right to food, Apr 23, 2013
Demirbas A (2004) Bioenergy, Global Warming, and Environmental Impacts. Energy Sources 26(3):225–236
Edgerton MD (2009) Increasing crop productivity to meet global needs for feed, food, and fuel. Plant Physiology 149(1):7–13
Erb K-H, Haberl H, Plutzar C (2012) Dependency of global primary bioenergy crop potentials in 2050 on food systems, yields, biodiversity conservation and political stability. Energy Policy 47:260–269
European Biofuels Technology Platform (2015) Biomass with CO2 Capture and Storage, 1–32, http://www.etipbioenergy.eu/images/EBTP-ZEP-Report-Bio-CCS-The-Way-Forward.pdf
Ewing M, Msangi S (2008) Biofuels production in developing countries: assessing tradeoffs in welfare and food security. Environ Sci Pol 12:520–528
Field CB, Mach KJ (2017) Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal. Science 356(6339):706–707
Galston WA, et al (2017) Trump’s Paris agreement withdrawal: what it means and what comes next, Brookings, PlanetPolicy, https://www.brookings.edu/blog/planetpolicy/2017/06/01/trumps-paris-agreement-withdrawal-what-it-means-and-what-comes-next/
Gough C, Vaughan NE (2015) Synthesising existing knowledge on the feasibility of BECCS, AVOID2, 1–39
Greene C, Monger B, Huntley M (2010) Geoengineering: the inescapable truth of getting to 350. Solutions 1(5):57–66
Greene CH et al (2017) Geoengineering, marine microalgae, and climate stabilization in the 21st century. Earth’s Future 5(3):278–284
Hansen J et al (2017) Young people’s burden: requirement of negative CO2 Emissions. Earth Syst Dynam 8:577–616
Hoffner E (2016) “Carbon farming” good for the climate, farmers, and biodiversity, Mongabay, https://news.mongabay.com/2016/07/carbon-farming-can-fight-climate-change-boost-diversity-and-feed-people-author-interview/
Humpenöder F et al (2014) Investigating afforestation and bioenergy CCS as climate change mitigation strategies. Environ Res Lett 9(6):064029
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2005) Special report: carbon dioxide capture and storage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change, contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2017) Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, http://www.ipcc.ch/report/sr15/
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2011) Combining bioenergy with CCS, IEA Working Paper
International Food Policy Research Institute (2014) 2014 Global hunger index: The challenge of hidden hunger, 1–56, http://www.ifpri.org/publication/2014-global-hunger-index
Jha A (2009) Fake trees, algae tubes and white roofs among UK engineers’ climate solutions, The Guardian, August 26, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/aug/27/geo-engineering-ime-report
Jones N (2009) Climate crunch: sucking it up. Nature 459(7249):901
Kartha S, Dooley K (2016) The risks of relying on tomorrow’s ‘negative emissions’ to guide today’s mitigation action, Stockholm Environment Institute. SEI Working Paper No 2016-08
Kemper J (2015) Biomass and carbon dioxide capture and storage: a review. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 40:401–430
Kerr RA (2006) Pollute the planet for climate’s sake? Science 314(5798):401–403. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.314.5798.401a
Kinver M (2016) Boosting food crop yields ‘can protect biodiversity’, BBC news, Jan 29, 2016, http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35427741
Klepper G, Rickels W (2014) Climate engineering: economic considerations and research challenges. Rev Environ Econ Policy 8:270–289
Kornneeff J, van Breevoort P, Hamelinck C, Hendriks C, Hoogwijk M, Koop K, Koper M, Dixon T, Camps A (2012) Global potential for biomass and carbon dioxide capture, transport and storage up to 2050. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 11:117–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.07.027
Krauss L (2013) Cutting carbon dioxide isn’t enough, Slate, May 13, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2013/05/direct_air_carbon_capture_technology_must_be_developed_to_help_fight_climate.html
Limayem A, Ricke SE (2012) Lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: current perspectives, potential issues and future prospects. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38:449–467
Lohmann U, Gasparini B (2017) A cirrus cloud dial? Science 357(6348):248–249
Lomax G, Workman M, Lenton T, Shah N (2015) Reframing the policy approach to greenhouse gas removal technologies, Energy Policy 78:125–36
Long J (2017) Coordinated action against climate change: a new world symphony, Issues Sci Technol XXXIII(3), http://issues.org/33-3/coordinated-action-against-climate-change-a-newworld-symphony/
MacCracken M (2009) Beyond mitigation: potential options for counter-balancing the climatic and environmental consequences of the rising concentrations of greenhouse gases, policy research working paper 4938, World Bank, Development Economics, 1–45, http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-4938
Mclaren DP (2012) Procedural justice in carbon capture and storage. Energy Environ 23(2/3):319–328
Meadowcraft J (2010) Exploring negative territory carbon dioxide removal and climate policy initiatives. Clim Chang 118:137–149
Mirzabaev A et al (2014) Bioenergy, food security and poverty reduction, Center for Development Research, University of Bonn, working paper no.135, 1–52
MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change (2017) Food, Water, Energy, Climate Outlook, Perspectives from 2016 1–48, https://globalchange.mit.edu/sites/default/files/newsletters/files/2016-JP-Outlook.pdf
Moreira JM, Romeiro V, Fuss S, Kraxner F, Paccae SA (2016) BECCS potential in brazil: achieving negative emissions in ethanol and electricity production based on sugar cane bagasse and other residues. Appl Energy 179:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.044
Morgan MG, et al (2010) Cooling the earth through solar radiation management: the need for research and an approach to governance, International Risk Governance Council 1–24
National Research Council (2015) Climate intervention: carbon dioxide removal and reliable sequestration. National Academies Press, Washington DC. 10.17226/18805
Niemeier U, Tilmes S (2017) Sulfur injections for a cooler planet. Science 357(6348):246–247
Oloman R (2009) Carbon recycling: an alternative to carbon capture and storage. Pipeline and Gas J 236(8)
Olson RL (2011) Geoengineering for decision makers, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. STIP 02
Pasztor J, Scharf C, Schmidt K-U (2017) How to govern geoengineering. Science 357(6348):231
Popp A et al (2011) The economic potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation with special attention given to implications for the land system. Environ Res Lett 6:34–44
Popp A et al (2014) The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment. Renew Sust Energ Rev 32:559–578
Read P, Lermit J (2005) Bio-energy with carbon storage (BECS): a sequential decision approach to the threat of abrupt climate change. Energy 30(14):2654–2671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2004.07.003
Robock A (2008) 20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea. Bull Atomic Sci 64(2):14–18, 59. https://doi.org/10.2968/064002006
Rockström J et al (2017) A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. Science 355(6331):1269–1271
Rogelj A et al (2016) Paris agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C. Nature 531:631–637
Russell LM et al (2012) Ecosystem impacts of geoengineering: a review for developing a science plan. Ambio 41(4):350–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0258-5
Scott KN (2013) International law in the anthropocene: responding to the geoengineering challenge. Mich J Int Law 34(2):309–358
Searchinger T, Heimlich R (2015) Avoiding bioenergy competition for food crops and land, World Resources Institute, 1–44
Sileshi GW, Debusho LK, Akinnifesi FK (2012) Can integration of legume trees increase yield stability in rainfed maize cropping systems in Southern Africa. Agron J 104(5):1392–1398
Smith P (2016) Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies. Global Change Biol 22(3):1315–1324. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13178
Smith L, Torn M (2013) Ecological limits to terrestrial biological carbon dioxide removal. Clim Chang 118(1):89–103
Smith P et al (2016) Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions. Nat Clim Chang 6:42–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2870
Smits B, Park A-H, Gadikota G (2014) The grand challenges in carbon capture, utilization, and storage. Front Energy Res. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2014.00055
Smolker R, Ernsting A (2012) BECCS (Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage): climate saviour or dangerous hype?, 1–25. http://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/BECCS-report.pdf
Tavoni M, Socolow (2013) Modeling meets science and technology: an introduction to a special issue on negative emissions. Clim Chang 118:1–14
The Royal Society (2009) Geoengineering the climate: science, Governance and Uncertainty, 1–98, http://royalsociety.org/Geoengineering-the-climate/
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2016) Carbon dioxide capture and sequestration, http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ccs/#CO2Capture, site visited on Aug. 30, 2016
U.S. Government Accounting Office (GAO) (2011) Climate engineering: technical status, future directions, and potential responses, GAO-11-71
UN Water, Wastewater (2017) The Untapped Resource, 1–198
UNEP (2014) Towards sustainable production and use of resources: Assessing biofuels, 1–40, http://www.compete-bioafrica.net/publications/publ/Assessing%20Biofuels-Summary-Web.pdf
United Kingdom, House of Commons (2010) Science and technology committee—fifth report the regulation of geoengineering, session 2009–10, https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/221/22102.htm
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Conference of the Parties (2015) The Paris Agreement, FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1
van Vuuren DP, van Vliet J, Stehfest E (2009) Future bio-energy potential under various natural constraints. Energy Policy 37:4220–4230
Venton D (2016) Core concept: can bioenergy with carbon capture and storage make an impact? Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(47):13260–13262
Victor DG (2008) On the regulation of geoengineering. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 24(2):322–36
Williamson P (2016) Emissions reduction: scrutinize CO2 removal methods. Nature 530(7589):153–155
Wiltshire A, Davies-Barnard T (2015) Planetary limits to BECCS negative emissions, AVOID2, Version 1.1
Zheng B, Xu J (2014) Carbon capture and storage development trends from a techno-paradigm perspective. Energies 7(8):5221–5250. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7085221
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burns, W., Nicholson, S. Bioenergy and carbon capture with storage (BECCS): the prospects and challenges of an emerging climate policy response. J Environ Stud Sci 7, 527–534 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-017-0445-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-017-0445-6