Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical features of type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients with suspected fungal foot infections: a single-center experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background/aim

Fungal foot infections are common and increase the risk of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) in patients with diabetes. We aimed to investigate the clinical features and related risk factors in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with suspected fungal feet infection (SFFI) in an outpatient setting.

Methods

This is a single center, cross-sectional study. A total of 816 patients with diabetes patients were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of clinical SFFI (group 1; SFFI ( +); n = 487 and group 2; SFFI (-); n = 329). Groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, disease information (type and duration of diabetes, diabetes treatment, presence of retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, DFU, and hypertension), HbA1c level, daily foot care activities (frequency of foot washing, keeping toes dry after washing, religious habits, etc.), and skin condition.

Results

Signs of SFFI were detected in 59.7% of the patients. Type 2 diabetes, insulin treatment, female sex, and skin dryness were significantly more common among patients with SFFI (p = 0. 000, 0.005,0.013, and 0.000, respectively). Religious habits and social lifestyle were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.109 and 0.703, respectively). Retinopathy, neuropathy, and hypertension were more prevalent in patients with SFFI (p = 0.006, 0.012, and 0.001, respectively). SFFI correlated with age and dryness of skin (OR:0.024, 95% CI: 0.959–0.993, p = 0.007; OR: 1.094, 95% CI: 2.484–3.589, p = 0.000 respectively).

Conclusion

Patients at risk of SFFI should be educated about regular nail and skin care, including prevention of dry skin conditions for early prevention of subsequent diabetic foot problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P. IDF Diabetes Atlas Committee. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from IDF Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Raspovic KM, Wukich DK. Self reported quality of life and diabetic foot infections. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;53:716–9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2014.06.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lipsky BA, Aragón-Sánchez J, Diggle M. IWGDF guidance on the diagnosis and management of foot infections in persons with diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32(Suppl. 1):45–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2699.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reiber GE, Pecoraro RE, Koepsell TD. Risk factors for amputation in patients with diabetes mellitus A case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:97–105. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-117-2-97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Winston JA, Miller JL. Treatment of onychomycosis in diabetic patients. Clin Diabetes. 2006;24:160–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Romano C, Massai L, Asta F. Prevalence of dermatophytic skin and nail infections in diabetic patients. Mycoses. 2001;44:83–6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0507.2001.00624.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Powers AC, Stafford MJ, Rickels MR. Diabetes mellitus: complications. In: Jameson JL, Kasper DL, Longo DL, Fauci AS, Hauser SL, Loscalzo J. Harrison‘s Principles of internal medicine. 20th Ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 2018; 2:2882.

  8. Gupta AK, Konnikov N, MacDonald P. Prevalence and epidemiology of toenail onychomycosis in diabetic subjects: a multicentre survey. Br J Dermatol. 1998;139:665–71. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02464.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stiegler H. Diabetic foot syndrome. Herz. 2004;29:104–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-004-2534-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rich P, Hare A. Onychomycosis in a special patient population: focus on the diabetic. Int J Dermatol. 1999;38(2):17–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-4362.1999.00009.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bokyo WL, Doyle JJ, Ryu S. PDD5: Onychomycosis and its impact on secondary infection development in the diabetic population. Value Health. 1999;2(3):199.

  12. Mayfield JA, Sugarman JR. Use of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament and other threshold tests for preventing foot ulceration and amputation in persons with diabetes. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(11):17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meijer JW, Smit AJ, Lefrandt JD. Back to basics in diagnosing diabetic polyneuropathy with the tuning fork! Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2201–5. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.9.2201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain. 2005;114(1–2):29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oz Y, Qoraan I, Oz A. Prevalence and epidemiology of tinea pedis and toenailonychomycosis and antifungal susceptibility of the causativeagents in patients with type 2 diabetes in Turkey. Int J Dermatol. 2017;56(1):68–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.13402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Peleg A, Weerarathna T, McCarthy JS. Common infections in diabetes: pathogenesis, management and relationship to glycaemic control. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2007;23:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.682.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dogra S, Kumar B, Bhansali A. Epidemiology of onychomycosis in patients with diabetes mellitus in India. Int J Dermatol. 2002;41:647–51. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-4362.2002.01528.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Raboobee N, Aboobaker J, Peer AK. Tinea pedis et unguium in the Muslim community of Durban. South Africa Int J Dermatol. 1998;37:759–65. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-4362.1998.00550.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ilkit M, Tanir F, Hazar S. Epidemiology of tinea pedis and toenail tinea unguium in worshippers in the mosques in Adana. Turkey J Dermatol. 2005Sep;32(9):698–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1346-8138.2005.tb00828.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Litzelman DK, Marriott DJ, Vinicor F. The role of footwear in the prevention of foot lesions in patients with NIDDM. Conventional wisdom or evidence-based practice? Diabetes Care. 1997;20:156–62. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.20.2.156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. American Diabetes Association. 11 Microvascular complications and foot care: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(Suppl. 1):151–67. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-S011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Celik S, Yenidunya G, Temel E. Utility of DN4 questionnaire in assessment of neuropathic pain and its clinical correlations in Turkish patients with diabetes mellitus. Prim Care Diabetes. 2016;10(4):259–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2015.11.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gupta AK, Gupta MA, Summerbell RC. Epidemiology of onychomycosis: possible role of smoking and peripheral arterial disease. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000;14:466–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3083.2000.00124.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bristow I. Non-ulcerative skin pathologies of the diabetic foot. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008;24(Suppl 1):84–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vinik AI, Maser RE, Mitchell BD. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1553–79. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.5.1553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pham HT, Exelbert L, Segal-Owens AC. A prospective, randomized, controlled double-blind study of a moisturizer for xerosis of the feet in patients with diabetes. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002;48:30–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selda Celik.

Ethics declarations

This study was performed in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local ethical review committee of Istanbul University, Istanbul Medical Faculty (Approval number: 2015/1855). A signed informed consent was obtained from all of the participants.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Celik, S., Bagdemir, E., Purisa, S. et al. Clinical features of type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients with suspected fungal foot infections: a single-center experience. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 43, 654–660 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-022-01147-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-022-01147-3

Keywords

Navigation