Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence, risk factors and perinatal outcomes of gestational diabetes in Mexican adolescents when applying diagnostic criteria from three different international guidelines

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare the prevalence, risk factors and perinatal outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) for Mexican adolescent population when applying different diagnostic criteria based on the 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, as established by three international guidelines.

Materials and methods

Comparative, observational, and retrospective study, which included pregnant women under 19 years, who underwent screening for GDM in our center. Data were obtained from the hospital’s electronic records and were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The X2 test was used to compare group proportions. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

Results

A total of 999 adolescents were screened for GDM. The observed prevalence was 3%, 14.4%, and 29.3% when using the Fifth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (FIWC), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE-2015), and International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria, respectively. Of our sample, 42.5% presented at least one risk factor. An association was observed regarding the need for cesarean section in patients with GDM diagnosed through IADPSG criteria (OR = 1.35, p = 0.04). On the other hand, the use of the FIWC and NICE standards showed an association between GDM and obstetric hemorrhage (OR = 17.8, p = 0.000, and OR = 4.8, p = 0.01, respectively) and preeclampsia with severity criteria (OR = 5.1, p = 0.001, and OR = 2.4, P = 0.025, respectively).

Conclusions

The prevalence of GDM in adolescents is high, and we can conclude that the prevalence varies based on which international diagnostic guideline is applied. While there is an association with adverse pregnancy outcomes such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, obstetric hemorrhage, and the need for cesarean section, this requires further evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Getahun D, Nath C, Ananth CV, et al. Gestational diabetes in the United States: temporal trends 1989 through 2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:525. e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guarigata L, et al. Global estimates of the prevalence of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103:176–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chu SY, Callaghan WM, Kim SY, et al. Maternal obesity and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:2070–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Karcaaltincaba D, Kandemir O, Yalvac S, Güvendag-Guven S, Haberal A. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and gestational impaired glucose tolerance in pregnant women evaluated by National Diabetes Data Group and Carpenter and Coustan criteria. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;106(3):246–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ogden CL, Flegal KM, Carroll MD, et al. Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 1999-2000. JAMA. 2002;288:1728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). Natalidad y Fecundidad. Porcentaje de nacimientos registrados de madres adolescentes (menores de 20 años). https://www.inegi.org.mx/temas/natalidad/. Accesed 14 January 2020.

  7. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:676–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Diabetes in pregnancy: management from preconception to the postnatal period. Great Britain. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 2015. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng3/resources/diabetes-in-pregnancy-management-from-preconception-to-the-postnatal-period-51038446021. Accesed 11 November 2019.

  9. Metzger BE, Buchanan TA, Coustan DR, De Leiva A, Dunger DB, Hadden DR, et al. Summary and recommendations of the Fifth International Workshop- Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:251–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Task force on hypertension in pregnancy: hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:1122–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 76 Postpartum hemorrhage. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2006;108:1039–47.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Villar J, Cheikh Ismail L, Victora CG, Ohuma EO, et al. International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the newborn cross-sectional study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet. 2014;384(9946):857–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 160: Premature Rupture of Membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(1):e39–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001266.

  14. Feldkamp ML, Carey JC, JLB B, Krikov S, Botto LD. Etiology and clinical presentation of birth defects: a population-based study. BMJ. 2017;357:j2249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown FM, Wyckoff J. Application of one-step IADPSG versus two-step diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in the real world: impact on health services, clinical care, and outcomes. Curr Diab Rep. 2017;17(10):85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reyes-Muñoz E, Reyes-Mayoral C, Sandoval-Osuna NL, et al. Prevalencia y resultados perinatales adversos en adolescentes con diabetes mellitus gestacional según tres criterios diagnósticos internacionales. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2017;85(5):298–305 http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0300-90412017000500298&lng=es. Accesed 2 March 2020.

  17. Sevket O, Ates S, Uysal O. To evaluate the prevalence and clinical outcomes using a one-step method versus a two-step method to screen gestational diabetes mellitus. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(1):36–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Waters TP, Dyer AR, Scholtens DM, Dooley SL, Herer E, Lowe LP, et al. Maternal and neonatal morbidity for women who would be added to the diagnosis of GDM using IADPSG criteria: a secondary analysis of the hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome study. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(12):2204–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hirst JE, Tran TS, Do MA, Morris JM, Jeffery HE. Consequences of gestational diabetes in an urban hospital in Viet Nam: a prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2012;9(7):e1001272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu WW, Yang HX, Wei YM, et al. Evaluation of the value of fasting plasma glucose in the first prenatal visit to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus in China. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(3):586–90. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1157.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Benhalima K, Lens K, Bosteels J, Chantal M. The risk for glucose intolerance after gestational diabetes mellitus since the introduction of the IADPSG criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2019;8(9):1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8091431.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kramer CK, Campbell S, Retnakaran R. Gestational diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular disease in woman: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2019;62(6):905–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shah BR, Retnakaran R, Booth GL. Increased risk of cardiovascular disease in young women following gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(8):1668–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu Y, Zhang C. Prevalence of gestational diabetes and risk of progression to type 2 diabetes: a global perspective. Curr Diab Rep. 2016;16(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-015-0699-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo N. Nava Guerrero.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the Hospital Regional Materno Infantil, Secretaria de Salud de Nuevo León, México. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

This research study employs retrospective and observational research techniques and methodology and does not carry out any intervention or intentional modification to physiological, psychological, or social variables to the participants. For this study, only an electronic file review was used for data collection, creating a database in which the names of the patients were not included. Informed consent is not required as long as the information is anonymized, and the submission does not include images that may identify the person.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nava Guerrero, E.N., Salcedo González, A., Hernández Escobar, C.E. et al. Prevalence, risk factors and perinatal outcomes of gestational diabetes in Mexican adolescents when applying diagnostic criteria from three different international guidelines. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 41, 212–220 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-020-00876-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-020-00876-7

Keywords

Navigation