Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New cutoff values for fat mass index, fat-free mass index and percent body fat in overweight and obese men living in Riyadh, SA

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The frequent clinical use of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) devices has made clinical evaluations of BIA-based parameters mandatory. This study was performed to define new cutoff points for the fat mass index, fat-free mass index, and percent body fat for overweight and obese men living in Riyadh, KSA. Three hundred sixty-two male subjects aged 18 to 62 years were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The participants were divided into two groups; one group was assessed with an InBody 720 (n = 179) device, and the other group was assessed with a Tanita BC-418 (n = 183) device. Fat mass, fat mass index (FMI), fat-free mass, fat-free mass index (FFMI), and percent body fat (PBF) were measured. In addition, anthropometric measures, including weight, height, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, hip circumference, waist hip ratio, and mid-arm circumference were included. Pearson correlation coefficients, Kappa analyses, and ROC curves were used. FMI exhibited the strongest positive correlation with BMI among all of the measured BIA-based parameters in both the InBody and Tanita groups (r = 0.916 and 0.958, respectively, P < 0.00001). ROC curves indicated that FMI was the most accurate parameter for the diagnosis of obesity in both groups (AUCs = 0.970 and 0.980). The FMI, FFMI, and PBF cutoff values with the best sensitivities and specificities in both groups were 7.8 vs. 6.7 kg/m2, 19.2 vs. 20.7 kg/m2, and 27.8 vs. 24 %, respectively, based on the WHO criteria for the diagnosis of obesity in Asian population. FMI was the best predictor of obesity among all of the BIA-based parameters. Considerable differences were noted between the different machines. Knowledge of device-specific cutoff points would increase the clinical value of BIA in the diagnosis of obesity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fontaine KR, Redden DT, Wang C, et al. Years of life lost due to obesity. JAMA. 2003;289:187–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Luciano A, Livieri C, Di Pietro ME, Bergamaschi G, Maffeis C. Definition of obesity in childhood: criteria and limits. Minerva Pediatr. 2003;55(5):453–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zeng Q, Dong SY, Sun XN, Xie J, Cui Y. Percent body fat is a better predictor of cardiovascular risk factors thanbody mass index. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2012;45:591–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Carpenter CL, Yan E, Chen S, Hong K, Arechiga A, Kim WS, et al. Body fat and body-mass index among a multi-ethnic sample of college-age men and women. J Obes Hindawi Publ Corp. 2013;790654:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Whitlock G, Lewington S, Sherliker P, Clarke R, Emberson J, Halsey J, et al. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900,000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57prospective studies. Lancet. 2009;373:1083–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Evans EM, Rowe DA, Racette SB, Ross KM, McAuley E. Is the current BMI obesity classification appropriate for black and white postmenopausal women? IntJ Obes. 2006;30(5):837–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frankenfield DC, Rowe WA, Cooney RN, Smith JS, Becker D. Limits of body mass index to detect obesity and predictbody composition. Nutrition. 2001;17(1):26–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Romero-Corral A, Somers VK, Sierra-Johnson J, et al. Accuracy of body mass index in diagnosing obesity in the adult general population. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32(6):959–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang CJ, Wu CH, Chang CS, et al. Low body mass index but high percent body fat in Taiwanese subjects: implications of obesity cutoffs. Int J Obes (Lond). 2003;27(2):253–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Manuel Gómez J, et al. ESPEN. Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part II: utilization in clinical practice. Clin Nutr. 2004;23(6):1430–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Manuel Gómez J, et al. ESPEN. Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr. 2004;23(5):1226–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta N, Balasekaran G, Victor Govindaswamy V, et al. Comparison of body composition with bioelectric impedance (BIA) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) among Singapore Chinese. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14(1):33–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. WHO Expert Committee on Physical Status. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. WHO Tech Rep Ser. 1995;854:1–416.

    Google Scholar 

  14. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and interventionstrategies. Lancet. 2004;363:157–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schutz Y, Kyle UUG, Pichard C. Fat-free mass index and fat mass index percentiles in Caucasians aged 18–98 years. Int J Obes. 2002;26:953–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang J, Rennie KL, Gu W, Li H, Yu Z, Lin X. Independent associations of body-size adjusted fat mass and fat-free mass with the metabolic syndrome in Chinese. Ann Hum Biol. 2009;36:110–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Prado CM, Siervo M, Mire E, Heymsfield SB, Stephan BC, Broyles S, et al. A population-based approach to define body-composition phenotypes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;99(6):1369–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang DH, Guo LF, Guo T, Wang Y, Liu T, Feng XY, Che XQ. Association of body composition with bone mineral density in northern Chinese men by different criteria for obesity. J Endocrinol Investig. 2014. [Epub ahead of print].

  19. Ribeiro EA, Leall DP, Assis MA. Diagnostic accuracy of anthropometricindices in predicting excess body fat among 7 to 10-year-old children. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2014;243–254.

  20. Zhao D, Zhang Y. Body mass index (BMI) predicts percent body fat better than body adiposity index (BAI) in school children. Anthropol Anz. 2015. doi:10.1127/anthranz/2015/0499 [Epub ahead of print].

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Habib SS. Body mass index and body fat percentage in assessment of obesity prevalence in Saudi adults. Biomed Environ Sci. 2013;26(2):94–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rao KM, Arlappa N, Radhika MS, Balakrishna N, Laxmaiah A, Brahmam GN. Correlation of fat mass index and fat-free mass index with percentage body fat and their association with hypertension among urban South Indian adult men and women. Ann Hum Biol. 2012;39(1):54–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu P, Ma F, Lo U, Liu Y. The utility of fat mass index vs. body mass index and percentage of body fat in the screening of metabolic syndrome. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:629.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Franssen FME, Rutten EPA, Groenen MTJ, Vanfleteren LA, Wouters EFM, Spruit MA. New reference values for body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis in the general population: results from the UK Biobank. JAMDA. 2014;30:e1–6. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2014.03.012.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fernández-Real JM, Vayreda M, Casamitjana R, Saez M, Ricart W. Body mass index (BMI) and percent fat mass. A BMI >27.5 kg/m2 could be indicative of obesity in the Spanish population. Med Clin (Barc). 2001;117(18):681–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramsey R, Isenring E, Daniels L. Comparing measures of fat-free mass in overweight older adults using three different bioelectrical impedance devices and three prediction equations. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;16(1):26–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pateyjohns IR, Brinkworth GD, Buckley JD, Noakes M, Clifton PM. Comparison of three bioelectrical impedance methods with DXA in overweight and obese men. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006;14(11):2064–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wibæk R, Kæstel P, Skov SR, Christensen DL, Girma T, Wells JC, et al. Calibration of bioelectrical impedance analysis for body composition assessment in Ethiopian infants using air-displacement plethysmography. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015. doi:10.1038/ejcn.2015.51 [Epub ahead of print].

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fakhrawi DH, Beeson L, Libanati C, Feleke D, Kim H, Quansah A, et al. Comparison of body composition by bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in overweight/obese postmenopausal women. J Clin Densitom. 2009;12(2):238–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Boneva-Asiova Z, Boyanov MA. Body composition analysis by leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in non-obese and obese individuals. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008;10(11):1012–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thomson R, Brinkworth GD, Buckley JD, Noakes M, Clifton PM. Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women. Clin Nutr. 2007;26(6):771–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lazzer S, Boirie Y, Meyer M, Vermorel M. Which alternative method to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessing body composition in overweight and obese adolescents? Arch Pediatr. 2005;12(7):1094–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saudi University, KSA, for funding the work through this research group project no RGP-VPP-193).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinical Nutrition Program, Community Health Sciences Department, King Saud University, PO Box 10219, Riyadh, 11433, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Mahmoud Mustafa Ali Abulmeaty, Ali Madi Almajwal & Heba Mohammed Zaher Hassan

  2. Obesity Research and Management Unit, Medical Physiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

    Mahmoud Mustafa Ali Abulmeaty

Authors
  1. Mahmoud Mustafa Ali Abulmeaty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Madi Almajwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Heba Mohammed Zaher Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmoud Mustafa Ali Abulmeaty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abulmeaty, M.M.A., Almajwal, A.M. & Hassan, H.M.Z. New cutoff values for fat mass index, fat-free mass index and percent body fat in overweight and obese men living in Riyadh, SA. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 36, 204–212 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-015-0402-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-015-0402-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation