Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Thermochemical conversion of non-edible fruit waste for dye removal from wastewater

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, slow pyrolysis was employed for the thermochemical conversion of peach stones (PS), lignocellulosic waste (LCW) from food industry, to prepare biochar (PS-B), a new and efficient sorbent for the removal of toxic dye, brilliant green (BG), from aqueous solution. Detailed characteristics of PS and PS-B were analysed using pH suspension, pHPZC, zeta potential, particle size distribution, thermogravimetric method (TG-DTG), scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDX), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The results revealed that material loss during slow pyrolysis not only altered the chemical structure of the samples, but also induced the volume shrinking phenomenon, resulting in production of a rougher, porous structure with decreased crystallinity. Also, five times less total organic carbon (TOC) release was demonstrated by biochar compared to native material. Comparison of experimental results for BG sorption by PS and PS-B showed that sorption capacity increased after pyrolysis and that sorption kinetic was significantly improved. The BG sorption by both sorbents followed the pseudo-second-order reaction kinetic model, with the intraparticle diffusion model within pores controlling the adsorption rate in PS-B. Isotherm equilibrium modelling revealed that the Sips isotherm provided the best model fit with maximum sorption capacity of 82.53 and 101.11 mg/g for PS and PS-B, respectively. A possible sorption mechanism of BG was achieved through pore filling (porous diffusion), hydrogen bonding, electrostatic attraction and π-π interactions. The results demonstrated that biochar derived from peach stones can be used as a promising green material for removing BG from contaminated waters.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that has been used is confidential.

References

  1. Elgarahy AM, Elwakeel KZ, Mohammad SH, Elshoubaky GA (2021) A critical review of biosorption of dyes, heavy metals and metalloids from wastewater as an efficient and green process. Clean Eng Technol 4:100209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kismir Y, Aroguz AZ (2011) Adsorption characteristics of the hazardous dye Brilliant Green on Saklikent mud. Chem Eng J 172:199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Siregar (2022) Global dyes & pigments market size report, 2021–2028. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/dyes-and-pigments-market. Accessed 26 Oct 2022

  4. Gupta VK, Suhas TI et al (2016) Column operation studies for the removal of dyes and phenols using a low cost adsorbent. Glob J Environ Sci Manag 2:1–10. https://doi.org/10.7508/gjesm.2016.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhaumik M, Maity A, Brink HG (2022) Metallic nickel nanoparticles supported polyaniline nanotubes as heterogeneous Fenton-like catalyst for the degradation of brilliant green dye in aqueous solution. J Colloid Interface Sci 611:408–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2021.11.181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar R, Barakat MA (2013) Decolourization of hazardous brilliant green from aqueous solution using binary oxidized cactus fruit peel. Chem Eng J 226:377–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.04.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nandi BK, Goswami A, Purkait MK (2009) Adsorption characteristics of brilliant green dye on kaolin. J Hazard Mater 161:387–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bayramoglu G, Altintas B, Arica MY (2009) Adsorption kinetics and thermodynamic parameters of cationic dyes from aqueous solutions by using a new strong cation-exchange resin. Chem Eng J 152:339–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.04.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ikram M, Naeem M, Zahoor M, et al (2022) Biological degradation of the azo dye basic orange 2 by Escherichia coli: a sustainable and ecofriendly approach for the treatment of textile wastewater. Water 14:2063. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14132063

  10. Dalvand A, Ehrampoush MH, Ghaneian MT et al (2017) Application of chemical coagulation process for direct dye removal from textile wastewater. J Environ Heal Sustain Dev 2:333–339

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marszałek J, Żyłła R (2021) Recovery of water from textile dyeing using membrane filtration processes. Processes 9:1833. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9101833

  12. Arumugham T, Kaleekkal NJ, Rana D (2018) Fabrication of novel aromatic amine functionalized nanofiltration (NF) membranes and testing its dye removal and desalting ability. Polym Test 72:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.09.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yabalak E, Mahmood Al-Nuaimy MN, Saleh M et al (2022) Catalytic efficiency of raw and hydrolyzed eggshell in the oxidation of crystal violet and dye bathing wastewater by thermally activated peroxide oxidation method. Environ Res 212:113210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Su M, Li H, He X, Xu Z (2022) Significant enhancement of pesticide and organic dyes degradation by ion-exchange within a metal–organic framework. Polyhedron 215:115651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2022.115651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barquilha CER, Braga MCB (2021) Adsorption of organic and inorganic pollutants onto biochars: challenges, operating conditions, and mechanisms. Bioresour Technol Reports 15:100728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goswami L, Kushwaha A, Kafle SR, Kim BS (2022) Surface modification of biochar for dye removal from wastewater. Catalysts 12:817. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12080817

  17. Okoye CC, Onukwuli OD, Onyesolu CFO, Okafo IAO (2020) Remediation of crystal violet dye aqueous solution using agro waste based activated carbon: equilibrium and kinetics studies. J Eng Res Reports 15:1–11. https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2020/v15i417149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hussain Z, Chang N, Sun J et al (2022) Modification of coal fly ash and its use as low-cost adsorbent for the removal of directive, acid and reactive dyes. J Hazard Mater 422:126778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saif Ur Rehman M, Munir M, Ashfaq M et al (2013) Adsorption of Brilliant Green dye from aqueous solution onto red clay. Chem Eng J 228:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.04.094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thines KR, Abdullah EC, Mubarak NM, Ruthiraan M (2017) Synthesis of magnetic biochar from agricultural waste biomass to enhancing route for waste water and polymer application: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 67:257–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu Y, Zhao X, Li J, Ma DHR (2012) Characterization of bio-char from pyrolysis of wheat straw and its evaluation on methylene blue adsorption. Desalin Water Treat 46:115–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.677408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goswami S, Kushwaha A, Goswami L, Gupta NR, Kumar V, Bhan U TK (2022) Nanobiochar—a green catalyst for wastewater remediation. In Bio-Based Nanomater, Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85148-0.00010-5

  23. Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE et al (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Goswami L, Kushwaha A, Singh A et al (2022) Nano-biochar as a sustainable catalyst for anaerobic digestion: a synergetic closed-loop approach. Catalysts 12:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12020186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fdez-Sanromán A, Pazos M, Rosales E, Sanromán MA (2020) Unravelling the environmental application of biochar as low-cost biosorbent: a review. Appl Sci 10:1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pal DB, Singh A, Jha JM et al (2021) Low-cost biochar adsorbents prepared from date and delonix regia seeds for heavy metal sorption. Bioresour Technol 339:125606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. (2022) Statistical office of the Republic of Serbia. https://data.stat.gov.rs/Home/Result/130102?languageCode=en-US. Accessed 26 March 2022.

  28. Velenturf APM, Purnell P (2021) Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustain Prod Consum 27:1437–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kahraman HT, Pehlivan E (2017) Cr6 + removal using oleaster (Elaeagnus) seed and cherry (Prunus avium) stone biochar. Powder Technol 306:61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.10.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Brown R (2012) Biochar for environmental management. Biochar production technology, Earthscan, London

  31. Lopičić Z (2017) Sorption properties and thermal behaviour of Prunus persica L. waste biomass. Dissertation, University of Belgrade

  32. Milonjić SK, Ruvarac AL, Šušić MV (1975) The heat of immersion of natural magnetite in aqueous solutions. Thermochim Acta 11:261–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6031(75)85095-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stojanović Z, Marković S, Uskoković D (2010) Merenje raspodele veličina čestica metodom difrakcije laserske svetlosti. Novi Mater 19:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lopičić ZR, Stojanović MD, Marković SB et al (2019) Effects of different mechanical treatments on structural changes of lignocellulosic waste biomass and subsequent Cu(II) removal kinetics. Arab J Chem 12:4091–4103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee Y, Park J, Ryu C et al (2013) Comparison of biochar properties from biomass residues produced by slow pyrolysis at 500°C. Bioresour Technol 148:196–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Laskar N, Kumar U (2019) Removal of Brilliant Green dye from water by modified Bambusa Tulda: adsorption isotherm, kinetics and thermodynamics study. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16:1649–1662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1760-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jasper EE, Ajibola VO, Onwuka JC (2020) Nonlinear regression analysis of the sorption of crystal violet and methylene blue from aqueous solutions onto an agro-waste derived activated carbon. Appl Water Sci 10:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01218-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lopičić Z, Avdalović J, Milojković J et al (2021) Removal of diesel pollution by biochar – support in water remediation. Hem Ind 75:329–339. https://doi.org/10.2298/HEMIND210514029L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Martín-Lara MA, Pérez A, Vico-Pérez MA et al (2019) The role of temperature on slow pyrolysis of olive cake for the production of solid fuels and adsorbents. Process Saf Environ Prot 121:209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.10.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Paunovic O, Pap S, Maletic S et al (2019) Ionisable emerging pharmaceutical adsorption onto microwave functionalised biochar derived from novel lignocellulosic waste biomass. J Colloid Interface Sci 547:350–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sridhar A, Ponnuchamy M, Kapoor A, Prabhakar S (2022) Valorization of food waste as adsorbents for toxic dye removal from contaminated waters: a review. J Hazard Mater 424:127432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Marković S, Stanković A, Lopičić Z et al (2015) Application of raw peach shell particles for removal of methylene blue. J Environ Chem Eng 3:716–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wan Ngah WS, Hanafiah MAKM (2008) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater by chemically modified plant wastes as adsorbents: a review. Bioresour Technol 99:3935–3948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Seo JH, Kim N, Park M et al (2020) Evaluation of metal removal performance of rod-type biosorbent prepared from sewage-sludge. Environ Eng Res 25:700–706. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2019.201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Yu H, Wang J, Yu JX et al (2020) Adsorption performance and stability of the modified straws and their extracts of cellulose, lignin, and hemicellulose for Pb2+: pH effect. Arab J Chem 13:9019–9033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.10.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Suryawanshi SS, Kamble PP, Gurav R et al (2021) Statistical comparison of various agricultural and non-agricultural waste biomass-derived biochar for methylene blue dye sorption. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01636-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Brar V, Kaur G (2018) Preparation and characterization of polyelectrolyte complexes of Hibiscus esculentus (Okra) gum and chitosan. Int J Biomater 1:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4856287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ali U, Shaaban M, Bashir S et al (2020) Rice straw, biochar and calcite incorporation enhance nickel (Ni) immobilization in contaminated soil and Ni removal capacity. Chemosphere 244:125418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ahmad M, Ahmad M, Usman ARA et al (2019) Date palm waste-derived biochar composites with silica and zeolite: synthesis, characterization and implication for carbon stability and recalcitrant potential. Environ Geochem Health 41:1687–1704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-017-9947-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gao Y, Wang X, Chen Y et al (2017) Pyrolysis of rapeseed stalk: Influence of temperature on product characteristics and economic costs. Energy 122:482–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yeboah ML, Li X, Zhou S (2020) Facile fabrication of biochar from palm kernel shell waste and its novel application to magnesium-based materials for hydrogen storage. Materials (Basel) 13:625. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Crini G, Badot PM (2008) Application of chitosan, a natural aminopolysaccharide, for dye removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption processes using batch studies: a review of recent literature. Prog Polym Sci 33:399–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Šoštarić T, Petrović M, Stojanović J et al (2022) Structural changes of waste biomass induced by alkaline treatment: the effect on crystallinity and thermal properties. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 12:2377–2387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00766-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ukkund SJ, Puthiyillam P, Alshehri HM et al (2021) Adsorption method for the remediation of brilliant green dye using halloysite nanotube: isotherm, kinetic and modeling studies. Appl Sci 11:8088. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lai KC, Lee LY, Hiew BYZ et al (2020) Utilisation of eco-friendly and low cost 3D graphene-based composite for treatment of aqueous Reactive Black 5 dye: characterisation, adsorption mechanism and recyclability studies. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 114:57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2020.09.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Haykiri-Acma H, Yaman S, Kucukbayrak S (2015) Does carbonization avoid segregation of biomass and lignite during co-firing? Thermal analysis study. Fuel Process Technol 137:312–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Santos CM, Dweck J, Viotto RS et al (2015) Application of orange peel waste in the production of solid biofuels and biosorbents. Bioresour Technol 196:469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lopičić ZR, Milojković JV, Šoštarić TD et al (2013) Influence of pH value on Cu (II) biosorption by lignocellulose peach shell waste material. Hem Ind 67:1007–1015. https://doi.org/10.2298/HEMIND121225018L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Srivastava VC, Mall ID, Mishra IM (2008) Removal of cadmium(II) and zinc(II) metal ions from binary aqueous solution by rice husk ash. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 312:172–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.06.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Mane VS, Babu PVV (2011) Studies on the adsorption of Brilliant Green dye from aqueous solution onto low-cost NaOH treated saw dust. Desalination 273:321–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Saif Ur Rehman M, Kim I, Rashid N et al (2016) Adsorption of Brilliant Green dye on biochar prepared from lignocellulosic bioethanol plant waste. Clean - Soil Air Water 44:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201300954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Yang Y, Wei X, Sun P, Wan J (2010) Preparation, characterization and adsorption performance of a novel anionic starch microsphere. Molecules 15:2872–2885. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15042872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. SuklaBaidya K, Kumar U (2021) Adsorption of brilliant green dye from aqueous solution onto chemically modified areca nut husk. South African J Chem Eng 35:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2020.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Vyavahare G, Gurav R, Patil R et al (2021) Sorption of brilliant green dye using soybean straw-derived biochar: characterization, kinetics, thermodynamics and toxicity studies. Environ Geochem Health 43:2913–2926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-020-00804-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Özcan AS, Erdem B, Özcan A (2004) Adsorption of Acid Blue 193 from aqueous solutions onto Na-bentonite and DTMA-bentonite. J Colloid Interface Sci 280:44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.07.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Mane VS, Deo Mall I, Chandra Srivastava V (2007) Kinetic and equilibrium isotherm studies for the adsorptive removal of Brilliant Green dye from aqueous solution by rice husk ash. J Environ Manage 84:390–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.06.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Fiaz R, Hafeez M, Mahmood R (2020) Removal of brilliant green (BG) from aqueous solution by using low cost biomass salix alba leaves (SAL): thermodynamic and kinetic studies. J Water Reuse Desalin 10:70–81. https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2020.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Xiao X, Chen B (2015) Interaction mechanisms between biochar and organic pollutants. In: Mingxin Guo, Zhongqi He SMU (ed) Agricultural and environmental applications of biochar: advances and barriers. pp 225–257

  69. Kasozi GN, Zimmerman AR, Nkedi-Kizza P, Gao B (2010) Catechol and humic acid sorption onto a range of laboratory-produced black carbons (biochars). Environ Sci Technol 44:6189–6195. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1014423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Goswami L, Pakshirajan K, Pugazhenthi G (2020) Biological treatment of biomass gasification wastewater using hydrocarbonoclastic bacterium Rhodococcus opacus in an up-flow packed bed bioreactor with a novel waste-derived nano-biochar based bio-support material. J Clean Prod 256:120253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Phuong DTM, Loc NX, Miyanishi T (2019) Efficiency of dye adsorption by biochars produced from residues of two rice varieties, Japanese Koshihikari and Vietnamese IR50404. Desalin Water Treat 165:333–351. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2019.24496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Goswami L, Manikandan NA, Taube JCR et al (2019) Novel waste-derived biochar from biomass gasification effluent: preparation, characterization, cost estimation, and application in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon biodegradation and lipid accumulation by Rhodococcus opacus. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:25154–25166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05677-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Ambaye TG, Vaccari M, van Hullebusch ED et al (2021) Mechanisms and adsorption capacities of biochar for the removal of organic and inorganic pollutants from industrial wastewater. Int J Environ Sci Technol 18:3273–3294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-03060-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Yadav MK, Saidulu D, Ghosal PS et al (2022) A review on the management of arsenic-laden spent adsorbent: insights of global practices, process criticality, and sustainable solutions. Environ Technol Innov 27:102500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Baskar AV, Bolan N, Hoang SA et al (2022) Recovery, regeneration and sustainable management of spent adsorbents from wastewater treatment streams: a review. Sci Total Environ 822:153555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Bilal M, Ihsanullah I, Hassan Shah MU et al (2022) Recent advances in the removal of dyes from wastewater using low-cost adsorbents. J Environ Manage 321:115981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115981

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Smilja Marković, PhD, from the Institute of Technical Sciences of SASA for performing the particle size measurements.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia (grant number 451–03-47/2023–01/200023).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Anja Antanasković: investigation, conceptualization, experiments, data curation, writing—original draft; Zorica Lopičić: investigation, conceptualization, visualization, writing—reviewing and editing; Erol Pehlivan: writing—reviewing and editing; Vladimir Adamović: data curation, writing—reviewing and editing; Tatjana Šoštarić: data curation, writing—reviewing and editing, Jelena Milojković: data curation, writing—reviewing and editing, Milan Milivojević: validation and supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anja Antanasković.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 321 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Antanasković, A., Lopičić, Z., Pehlivan, E. et al. Thermochemical conversion of non-edible fruit waste for dye removal from wastewater. Biomass Conv. Bioref. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04083-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04083-2

Keywords

Navigation