Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Corncob bio-waste and boron nitride particles reinforced epoxy-based composites for lightweight applications: fabrication and characterization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present investigation, corncob waste obtained from local agricultural fields in conjunction with boron nitride particles has been used as the reinforcement material to fabricate epoxy–based composite. The purpose of this research work is to use bio-waste in composite fabrication due to its low cost, non-abrasive, and eco-friendly nature. Aim of this investigation is to provide effective measure for waste disposal and enhance the flexural and tensile strength of the epoxy-based composites to increase its application in day to day life. Fabricated composite material is been characterized through tensile strength, flexural strength, the water up-take test, and fire resistance test. Nine different laminates are prepared with different proportions of corncob and epoxy through the hand layup process. Natural fibers may play important role in developing bio-degradable composite to resolve the current ecological and environmental problems. This report shows that natural water reinforcement also possesses good mechanical properties, and then, fiber composite can also be used in various engineering applications. Results shows that 3.5/3.5 boron nitride and corncob ratio (wt./wt.) composition possess the best flexural strength of about 36.7 N/mm2, and further characterization has been done only to this composition composite. 3.5/3.5 boron nitride and corncob ratio (wt./wt.) composite shows 2 to 3 times improvement in tensile strength as compared to the neat epoxy resin. Moreover, thermal decomposition of laminate occurs in three phases corresponding to 34%, 16%, and 27% of weight loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Jagadeesh P, Thyavihalli Girijappa YG, Puttegowda M, Rangappa SM, Siengchin S (2020) Effect of natural filler materials on fiber reinforced hybrid polymer composites: An Overview. J Nat Fib 19(11):4132–4147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ilyas RA, Aisyah HA, Nordin AH, Ngadi N, Zuhri MYM, Asyraf MRM, Sapuan SM, Zainudin ES, Sharma S, Abral H, Asrofi M (2022) Natural-fiber-reinforced chitosan, chitosan blends and their nanocomposites for various advanced applications. Polymers 14(5):874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Parlato MCM, Cuomo M, Porto SMC (2022) Natural fibers reinforcement for earthen building components: mechanical performances of a low quality sheep wool (“Valle del Belice” sheep). Construct Build Mater 326:126855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharhan HA, Rasheed ZN, Oleiwi JK (2022) Effect of polypropylene (PP) and polyacrylonitrile (PAN) fibers reinforced acrylic resin on compression, hardness and surface-roughness for denture applications. In: Key Engineering Materials, vol 911. Trans Tech Publications Ltd., pp 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fouly A, Alnaser IA, Assaifan AK, Abdo HS (2022) Evaluating the performance of 3D-printed PLA reinforced with date pit particles for its suitability as an acetabular liner in artificial hip joints. Polymers 14(16):3321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fouly A, Nabhan A, Badran A (2022) Mechanical and tribological characteristics of PMMA reinforced by natural materials. Egypt J Chem 65(4):543–553

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kabir MM, Wang H, Lau KT, Cardona F (2012) Chemical treatments on plant-based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: an overview. Comp Part B 43(7):2883–2892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meyers MA, Lin AY, Seki Y, Chen PY, Kad BK, Bodde S (2006) Structural biological composites: an overview. JOM 58(7):35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Akampumuza O, Wambua PM, Ahmed A, Li W, Qin XH (2017) Review of the applications of biocomposites in the automotive industry. Polymer Comp 38(11):2553–2569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dinakaran K, Ramesh H, Joseph AD, Murugan R, Jothi S (2019) Mater Today 18:934–940

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fouly A, Abdo HS, Seikh AH, Alluhydan K, Alkhammash HI, Alnaser IA, Abdo MS (2021) Evaluation of mechanical and tribological properties of corn cob-reinforced epoxy-based composites—theoretical and experimental study. Polymers 13(24):4407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Uppal N, Pappu A, Gowri VKS, Thakur VK (2022) Cellulosic fibres-based epoxy composites: from bioresources to a circular economy. Ind Crop Prod 182:114895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fouly A, Alkalla MG (2020) Effect of low nanosized alumina loading fraction on the physicomechanical and tribological behavior of epoxy. Tribol Int 152:106550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (2001) Surface modifications of natural fibers and performance of the resulting biocomposites: an overview. Comp Interfaces 8(5):313–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bledzki AK, Gassan J (1999) Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog Polym Sci 24(2):221–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sapuan SM, Pua FL, El-Shekeil YA, AL-Oqla FM (2013) Mechanical properties of soil buried kenaf fibre reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane composites. Mat Des 50:467–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Desai RH, Krishnamurthy L, Shridhar TN (2016) Indian J Adv Chem Sci 1:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  18. Agarwal J, Sahoo S, Mohanty S, Nayak SK (2020) Progress of novel techniques for lightweight automobile applications through innovative eco-friendly composite materials: A review. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 33(7):978–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink HP, Sain M (2014) Progress report on natural fiber reinforced composites. Macromol Mater Eng 299(1):9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanjay MR, Arpitha GR, Senthamaraikannan P, Kathiresan M, Saibalaji MA, Yogesha B (2019) J Nat Fibers 16(4):600–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sarmin SN, Jawaid M, Awad SA, Saba N, Fouad H, Alothman OY, Sain M (2022) Olive fiber reinforced epoxy composites: dimensional stability, and mechanical properties. Polym Compos 43(1):358–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leman Z, Sapuan SM, Azwan MMHM, Ahmad MMHM, Maleque MA (2008) The effect of environmental treatments on fiber surface properties and tensile strength of sugar palm fiber-reinforced epoxy composites. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 47(6):606–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Manu S, Radhika N, Sidvilash V, Mohanraj T (2022) Investigation on the mechanical and wear behaviour of Al-6082-BN-B4C-corn cob ash hybrid composites. Tribol Ind 44(2):294

    Google Scholar 

  24. Das O, Bhattacharyya D, Sarmah AK (2016) Sustainable eco–composites obtained from waste derived biochar: a consideration in performance properties, production costs, and environmental impact. J Clean Prod 129:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mullen CA, Boateng AA, Goldberg NM, Lima IM, Laird DA, Hicks KB (2010) Bio-oil and bio-char production from corn cobs and stover by fast pyrolysis. Biomass Bioenergy 34(1):67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mestry O, Patil S, Padwale N, Mulik A, Kumar S, Deshmukh S, Shrivastava R (2022) Investigation into tribological performance of corn cob ash reinforced epoxy composites using RSM based TLBO algorithm. Mater Today 60:2076–2083

    Google Scholar 

  27. Qu WH, Xu YY, Lu AH, Zhang XQ, Li WC (2015) Converting biowaste corncob residue into high value added porous carbon for supercapacitor electrodes. Bioresour Technol 189:285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fouly A, Assaifan AK, Alnaser IA, Hussein OA, Abdo HS (2022) Evaluating the mechanical and tribological properties of 3D printed polylactic-acid (PLA) green-composite for artificial implant: hip joint case study. Polymers 14(23):5299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Anukam AI, Goso BP, Okoh OO, Mamphweli SN (2017) Studies on characterization of corn cob for application in a gasification process for energy production. J Chem 2017:6478389. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6478389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Watt E, Abdelwahab MA, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2021) Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 145:106340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dean C, Young AF, Wang L, Meric I, Lee GH, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Shepard K, Kim P, Hone J (2012) Graphene based heterostructures. Solid State Commun 152(15):1275–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Verma A, Parashar A, Packirisamy M (2018) Atomistic modeling of graphene/hexagonal boron nitride polymer nanocomposites: a review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev 8(3):e1346

    Google Scholar 

  33. Verma A, Parashar A, Packirisamy M (2019) Effect of grain boundaries on the interfacial behaviour of graphene-polyethylene nanocomposite. Appl Surf Sci 470:1085–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Verma A, Kumar R, Parashar A (2019) Enhanced thermal transport across a bi-crystalline graphene–polymer interface: an atomistic approach. Phys Chem Chem Phys 21(11):6229–6237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Verma A, Parashar A (2018) Structural and chemical insights into thermal transport for strained functionalised graphene: a molecular dynamics study. Mater Res Express 5(11):115605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Verma A, Parashar A (2017) The effect of STW defects on the mechanical properties and fracture toughness of pristine and hydrogenated graphene. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19(24):16023–16037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Verma A, Parashar A (2018) Molecular dynamics based simulations to study failure morphology of hydroxyl and epoxide functionalised graphene. Comput Mater Sci 143:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Verma A, Parashar A (2018) Molecular dynamics based simulations to study the fracture strength of monolayer graphene oxide. Nanotechnology 29(11):115706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kumar S, Zindani D, Bhoomani R, Kumar KS (2019) Study the mechanical properties of corncob husk filler reinforced epoxy composite. In: AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2200, No. 1, p. 020095)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Verma A, Baurai K, Sanjay MR, Siengchin S (2020) Mechanical, microstructural, and thermal characterization insights of pyrolyzed carbon black from waste tires reinforced epoxy nanocomposites for coating application. Polym Compos 41(1):338–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Muñoz E, García-Manrique JA (2015) Water absorption behaviour and its effect on the mechanical properties of flax fibre reinforced bioepoxy composites. Int J Polym Sci 2015:390275. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/390275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Venkateshwaran N, ElayaPerumal A, Alavudeen A, Thiruchitrambalam M (2011) Mechanical and water absorption behaviour of banana/sisal reinforced hybrid composites. Mater Des 32(7):4017–4021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Verma A, Singh VK (2018) Mechanical, microstructural and thermal characterization of epoxy-based human hair–reinforced composites. J Test Eval 47(2):1193–1215

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Verma A, Negi P, Singh VK (2019) Experimental analysis on carbon residuum transformed epoxy resin: chicken feather fiber hybrid composite. Polym Compos 40(7):2690–2699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Neves ACC, Rohen LA, Mantovani DP, Carvalho JP, Vieira CMF, Lopes FP, Simonassi NT, da Luz FS, Monteiro SN (2020) J Mater Res Technol 9(2):1296–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Low IM, Shi C (1998) Vickers indentation responses of epoxy polymers. J Mater Sci Lett 17(14):1181–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Cheng B, Zhang X, Lin Q, Xin F, Sun R, Wang X, Ren J (2018) Biotechnol Biofuels 11(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The corresponding author would like to thank the University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India (SEED Grant program) for the academic support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors equally contributed to conceptualization, methodology, writing, reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akarsh Verma.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The authors hereby state that the present work is in compliance with the ethical standards.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arpitha, G.R., Jain, N., Verma, A. et al. Corncob bio-waste and boron nitride particles reinforced epoxy-based composites for lightweight applications: fabrication and characterization. Biomass Conv. Bioref. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03717-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03717-1

Keywords

Navigation