Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Water Boiling Test of carbonized briquettes produced from charcoal fines using African Elemi (Canarium schweinfurthii) resin as an organic binder

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study evaluated carbonized briquettes produced from charcoal fines using African Elemi (Canarium schweinfurthii) resin as a binder. Briquette samples (B25, B30, B35, B40) with the ratio of charcoal fines:binder of 3:1, 7:3, 13:7, and 3:2, respectively, were produced. The phases of the Water Boiling Test (WBT) considered were Cold start high power (CSHP), Hot start high power (HSHP), and simmer phases. Ignition properties, combustion properties, gas temperature, water temperature, ambient temperature, emissions, and WBT performance metrics were investigated using the Laboratory Emission Monitoring System. The ignition properties evaluated included ignition time, flame, and incandescence. The combustion properties included smoke, flame, soot, and ash. The emissions measured were PM2.5, S\({\mathrm{O}}_{2}\), \({\mathrm{NO}}_{x}\), \({\mathrm{C}}_{x}{\mathrm{H}}_{y}\), \(\mathrm{CO}\), and \({\mathrm{CO}}_{2}\). The WBT performance metrics evaluated were time to boil, burning rate, thermal efficiency, specific fuel consumption (sfc), firepower, total emissions, emissions per MJ, specific emissions, and emissions rate. The ash from charcoal fines was analysed using x-ray diffraction. The results showed that ignition time was 6.47–7.01 min, time to boil was 14.7–41.9 min, burning rate was 1.1–8.2 g/min, thermal efficiency was 21.79–54.61%, sfc was 21.7–70.1 g/L, and firepower was 535.9–4123.2 W. The ash was found to contain \({\mathrm{CaCO}}_{3}\) (76.6 wt%) followed by \(\mathrm{CaO}\) (13.1 wt%) and the remainder was the amorphous compounds (10.3 wt%). The briquettes can be used as an alternative source of fuel to wood fuel since they exhibit similar combustion properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO (2014) WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: household fuel combustion. WHO Document Production Services, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. Turns SR (2000) An introduction to combustion; concepts and applications, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  3. Khlifi S, Lajili M, Tabet F et al (2019) Investigation of the combustion characteristics of briquettes prepared from olive mill solid waste blended with and without a natural binder in a fixed bed reactor. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00449-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen Y, Shen G, Su S et al (2016) Efficiencies and pollutant emissions from forced-draft biomass-pellet semi-gasifier stoves : comparison of international and Chinese Water Boiling Test protocols. Energy Sustain Dev 32:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2016.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clean Cooking Alliance (2014) The Water Boiling Test version 4.2.3. 1750 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20006

  6. Nagawa C, Böhmdorfer S, Rosenau T (2015) Chemical composition and anti-termitic activity of essential oil from Canarium schweinfurthii Engl. Ind Crops Prod 71:75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.03.078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Šiler B, Mišić D (2016) Biologically active compounds from the genus Centaurium s.l. (Gentianaceae): current knowledge and future prospects in medicine. In: Atta-ur-Rahman FRS (ed) Studies in natural products chemistry. Elsevier B.V, Amsterdam, pp 363–397

  8. Yousuf S, Kamdem RST, Ngadjui BT, et al. (2011) 3a-Hydroxytirucalla-8,24-dien-21-oic acid. Acta Crystallogr E67:. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536811008956

  9. Ameh PO (2018) Electrochemical and computational study of gum exudates from Canarium schweinfurthii as green corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in HCl solution. J Taibah Univ Sci 12:783–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/16583655.2018.1514147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sotannde OA, Oluyege AO, Abah GB (2016) Physical and combustion properties of briquettes from sawdust of Azadirachta indica. Int Agrophysics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-010-0010-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thoms LJ, Snape CE, Taylor D (1999) Physical characteristics of cold cured anthracite/coke breeze briquettes prepared from a coal tar acid resin. Fuel 78:1691–1695. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(99)00116-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Benk A (2010) Utilisation of the binders prepared from coal tar pitch and phenolic resins for the production metallurgical quality briquettes from coke breeze and the study of their high temperature carbonization behaviour. Fuel Process Technol 91:1152–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.03.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kivumbi B, Jande YAC, Kirabira JB, et al. (2021) Production of carbonized briquettes from charcoal fines using African Elemi (Canarium schweinfurthii) resin as an organic binder. Energy Sources, Part A Recover Util Environ Eff 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2021.1977870

  14. ASTM (2014) Standard test method for compositional analysis by thermogravimetry. In: ASTM Standards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  15. Aprovecho Research Center (2018) Instructions for use of the Laboratory Emissions Monitoring System (LEMS). Oregon

  16. ISO (2018) Clean cookstoves and clean cooking solutions — harmonized laboratory test protocols — Part 1: standard test sequence for emissions and performance, safety and durability

  17. Wikipedia (2021) Makerere. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makerere. Accessed 3 Aug 2021

  18. Clean Cooking Alliance (2013) Guidelines for testing charcoal stoves with WBT 4.2.2

  19. Aprovecho Research Center (2020) sensor box processing wbt 4.2.3 apr.28.20.xls

  20. Moqbel S, Reinhart D, Chen RH (2010) Factors influencing spontaneous combustion of solid waste. Waste Manag 30:1600–1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Balat M (2011) Production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic materials via the biochemical pathway: a review. Energy Convers Manag 52:858–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nwabue FI, Unah U, Itumoh EJ (2017) Production and characterisation of smokeless bio-coal briquettes incorporating plastic waste materials. Environ Technol Innov 8:233–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2017.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ormeño E, Céspedes B, Sánchez IA et al (2009) The relationship between terpenes and flammability of leaf litter. For Ecol Manage 257:471–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Obi OF (2015) Evaluation of the effect of palm oil mill sludge on the properties of sawdust briquette. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:1749–1758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Di BC (1993) Modeling and simulation of combustion processes of charring and non-charring solid fuels. Prog Energy Combust Sci 19:71–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1285(93)90022-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fernandez-Anez N, Slatter DJF, Saeed MA et al (2018) Ignition sensitivity of solid fuel mixtures. Fuel 223:451–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mitchell EJS, Lea-Langton AR, Jones JM et al (2016) The impact of fuel properties on the emissions from the combustion of biomass and other solid fuels in a fixed bed domestic stove. Fuel Process Technol 142:115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.09.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Romallosa ARD, Kraft E (2017) Feasibility of biomass briquette production from municipal waste streams by integrating the informal sector in the Philippines. Resources 6:1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources6010012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang Y, Cui G, Lan CQ (2019) Developments in evaporative cooling and enhanced evaporative cooling - a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 113:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Amer O, Boukhanouf R, Ibrahim HG (2015) A review of evaporative cooling technologies. Int J Environ Sci Dev 6:111–117. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijesd.2015.v6.571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Quist CM, Jones MR, Lewis RS (2020) Influence of variability in testing parameters on cookstove performance metrics based on the Water Boiling Test. Energy Sustain Dev 58:112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2020.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. (Jo) Hermans LJF (2012) Boiling water. In: Europhys. news. http://www.europhysicsnews.org. Accessed 28 Jul 2021

  33. Glarborg P, Jensen AD, Johnsson JE (2003) Fuel nitrogen conversion in solid fuel fired systems. Prog Energy Combust Sci 29:89–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1285(02)00031-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Deac T, Fechete-tutunaru L, Gaspar F (2016) Environmental impact of sawdust briquettes use - experimental approach. Energy Procedia 85:178–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.12.324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Arora P, Das P, Jain S, Kishore VVN (2014) A laboratory based comparative study of Indian biomass cookstove testing protocol and Water Boiling Test. Energy Sustain Dev 21:81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2014.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Oketch PO, Ndiritu HM, Gathitu BB (2014) Experimental study of fuel efficiency and emissions comparison from bio-ethanol gel stoves. Eur Int J Sci Technol 3:328–339

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lask K, Booker K, Han T et al (2015) Performance comparison of charcoal cookstoves for Haiti: laboratory testing with water boiling and controlled cooking tests. Energy Sustain Dev 26:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2015.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lubwama M, Yiga VA (2017) Development of groundnut shells and bagasse briquettes as sustainable fuel sources for domestic cooking applications in Uganda. Renew Energy 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.041

  39. Grimsby LK, Rajabu HM, Treiber MU (2016) Multiple biomass fuels and improved cook stoves from Tanzania assessed with the Water Boiling Test. Sustainable Energy Technol Assessments 14:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2016.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Medina P, Berrueta V, Martínez M, et al. (2016) Comparative performance of five Mexican plancha-type cookstoves using Water Boiling Tests. Dev Eng 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.deveng.2016.06.001

  41. Burnett RT, Arden Pope C, Ezzati M et al (2014) An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure. Environ Health Perspect 122:397–403. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Demeyer A, VoundiNkana JC, Verloo MG (2001) Characteristics of wood ash and influence on soil properties and nutrient uptake: an overview. Bioresour Technol 77:287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00043-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pitman RM (2006) Wood ash use in forestry – a review of the environmental impacts. Forestry 79:563–588. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpl041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Steenari B-M, Karlsson LG, Lindqvist O (1999) Evaluation of the leaching characteristics of wood ash and the influence of ash agglomeration. Biomass Bioenerg 16:119–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(98)00070-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Steenari B-M, Lindqvist O (1997) Stabilization of biofuel ashes for recycling to forest soil. Biomass Bioenerg 13:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Misra MK, Ragland KW, Baker AJ (1993) Wood ash composition as a function of furnace temperature. Biomass Bioenerg 4:103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tongpoothorn W, Sriuttha M, Homchan P et al (2011) Preparation of activated carbon derived from Jatropha curcas fruit shell by simple thermo-chemical activation and characterization of their physico-chemical properties. Chem Eng Res Des 89:335–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2010.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Etiégni L, Campbell AG (1991) Physical and chemical characteristics of wood ash. Bioresour Technol 37:173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(91)90207-Z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to extend their sincere gratitude to Water, Infrastructure and Sustainable Energy Futures (WISE-Futures) Centre for the financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas T. Kivevele.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kivumbi, B., Jande, Y.A.C., Kirabira, J.B. et al. Water Boiling Test of carbonized briquettes produced from charcoal fines using African Elemi (Canarium schweinfurthii) resin as an organic binder. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 10435–10450 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-02000-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-02000-z

Keywords

Navigation