Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Utilizing dissimilar feedstocks derived biochar amendments to alter soil biological indicators in acidic soil of Northeast India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biochar application to soil has been projected as an approach to improve soil quality, which can also influence soil microbial activities. In this experiment, we have utilized four dissimilar feedstocks derived biochar amendments. The highest microbial biomass carbon was found in Lantana camara (LC) biochar followed by pine needle (PN), maize stalk (MS) and lowest in black gram (BG) biochar. The dehydrogenase activity in different biochar treatment increased significantly along with control with increase in incubation days except pine biochar where dehydrogenase decreased. Biochar application in soil increased acid phosphatase compared to control. The highest alkaline phosphatase was found in MS and it was 20.56, 31.27, 42.52, 57.62 and 69.56 at 1, 7, 30, 60 and 90 days of incubation, respectively. The highest urease was found in LC followed by BG, MS and lowest in PN among the biochar at both the biochar application rate. The biochar application augmented the protease enzyme activity in soil, which might be due to augmenting the accessibility of inorganic nitrogen. The highest fluorescein diacetate was found in LC and it was 10.12, 17.62, 24.62, 32.86 and 37.56 at 1, 7, 30, 60 and 90 days of incubation, respectively. The increased biological indicator was more at 2.5 t/ha biochar application rate than 5.0 t/ha i.e. lower concentration of biochar enhanced more than higher concentration. This laboratory study demonstrated that biochar application can profit incubated acid soils by improving microbial biomass carbon up-lift while increasing potential soil enzyme activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Collard F-X, Blin J (2014) A review on pyrolysis of biomass constituents: mechanisms and composition of the products obtained from the conversion of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 38:594–608

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fidel RB, Laird D, Thompson AML (2013) Evaluation of modified Boehm titration methods for use with biochars. J Environ Qual 42:1771–1778

    Google Scholar 

  3. Singh M, Gupta B, Das SK (2015) Assessment of economic viability of different agroforestry systems in Giri catchment, Himachal Pradesh. Econ Aff 60(3):557–561

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yuan H, Lu T, Huang H, Zhao D, Kobayashi N, Chen Y (2015) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on physical and chemical properties of biochar made from sewage sludge. J Anal Appl Pyrol 112(3):284–289

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barman H, Roy A, Das SK (2015) Evaluation of plant products and antagonistic microbes against leaf blight (Alternaria alternata), A devastating pathogen of Tomato. Trends Biosci 8(13):3374–3377

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang A, Cheng G, Hussain Q, Zhang M, Feng H, Dyck M, Wang X (2017) Contrasting effects of straw and straw–derived biochar application on net global warming potential in the Loess Plateau of China. Field Crop Res 205:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  7. Das SK (2013) Integrated nutrient management using only through organic sources. Pop Kheti 1(4):126

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao L, Cao X, Masek O, Zimmerman A (2013) Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures. J Hazard Mater 256–257:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barman H, Roy A, Das SK, Singh NU, Dangi DK, Tripathi AK (2016) Antifungal properties of some selected plant extracts against leaf blight (Alternaria alternata) in tomato. Res Crop 17(1):151–156

    Google Scholar 

  10. Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe RK (2021) Conversion of crop, weed and tree biomass into biochar for heavy metal removal and wastewater treatment. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01334-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yuan JH, Xu RK, Zhang H (2011) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Biores Technol 102:3488–3497

    Google Scholar 

  12. Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe RK, Kundu MC, Choudhury BU, Baruah K, Lama A (2021) Innovative biochar and organic manure co-composting technology for yield maximization in maize-black gram cropping system. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01519-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barman H, Roy A, Das SK (2015) Evaluation of plant products and antagonistic microbes against grey blight (Pestalotiopsis theae), a devastating pathogen of tea. Afr J Microbiol Res 9(18):1263–1267

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barman H, Das SK, Roy A (2018) Zinc in soil environment for plant health and management strategy. Univers J Agric Res 6:149–154

    Google Scholar 

  15. Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe RK, Choudhury BU, Mishra VK, Kundu MC, Roy A, Mondal T, Lama A and Dhakre DS (2021) Organic nutrient sources and biochar technology on microbial biomass carbon and soil enzyme activity in maize-black gram cropping system. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01625-4

  16. Mukherjee I, Das SK, Kumar A (2016) Degradation of flubendiamide as affected by elevated CO2, temperature, and carbon mineralization rate in soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(19):19931–19939

    Google Scholar 

  17. Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrott FA, Lehmann J, Joseph S (2010) Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nature Commun 1(5):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roy A, Das SK, Tripathi AK, Singh NU (2015) Biodiversity in North East India and their conservation. Progress Agric 15(2):182–189

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wisniewski D, Golaszewski J, Bialowiec A (2015) The pyrolysis and gasification of digestate from agricultural biogas plant. Arc Environ Prot 41:70–75

    Google Scholar 

  20. Das SK, Avasthe RK (2015) Carbon farming and credit for mitigating greenhouse gases. Curr Sci 109(7):1223

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mukherjee I, Das SK, Kumar A (2012) A Fast Method for determination of flubendiamide in vegetables by liquid chromatography. Pestic Res J 24(2):159–162

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kavitha B, Reddy PVL, Kim B, Lee SS, Pandey SK, Kim KH (2018) Benefits and limitations of biochar amendment in agricultural soils: a review. J Environ Manag 227:146–154

    Google Scholar 

  23. Das SK, Avasthe RK, Singh R, Babu S (2014) Biochar as carbon negative in carbon credit under changing climate. Curr Sci 107(7):1090–1091

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mate CJ, Mukherjee I, Das SK (2015) Persistence of spiromesifen in soil: influence of moisture, light, pH and organic amendment. Environ Monit Assess 187(2):7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4207-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mukherjee I, Das SK, Kumar A (2018) Atmospheric CO2 level and temperature affect degradation of pretilachlor and butachlor in Indian soil. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 100(6):856–861

    Google Scholar 

  26. Das SK, Avasthe RK, Yadav A (2017) Secondary and micronutrients: deficiency symptoms and management in organic farming. Innov Farm 2(4):209–211

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brewer CE, Schmidt-Rohr K, Satrio JA, Brown RC (2009) Characterization of biochar from fast pyrolysis and gasification systems. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 28(3):386–396

    Google Scholar 

  28. Das SK, Ghosh GK (2017) Soil hydro-physical environment as influenced by different biochar amendments. Int J Bio-resour Stress Manag 8(5):668–673

    Google Scholar 

  29. Al-Wabel MI, Hussain Q, Usman ARA, Ahmad M, Abduljabbar A, Sallam AS, Ok YS (2017) Impact of biochar properties on soil conditions and agricultural sustainability: a review. Land Degrad Dev 29(7):2124–2161

    Google Scholar 

  30. Das SK (2019) Soil carbon sequestration strategies under organic production system: a policy decision. Agrica 8(1):1–6

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Roy A, Das A, Das SK, Datta M, Datta J, Tripathi AK, Singh NU (2018) Impact analysis of National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP): a paradigm shift in income and consumption in Tripura. Green Farm 9(3):559–564

    Google Scholar 

  32. Das SK, Avasthe RK, Singh M, Roy A (2018) Managing soil fertility under organic production system through integrated approach. Green Farm 9(3):449–454

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hung CY, Tsai WT, Chen JW, Lin YQ, Chang YM (2017) Characterization of biochar prepared from biogas digestate. Waste Manag 66:53–60

    Google Scholar 

  34. Das SK, Avasthe RK (2018) Plant nutrition management strategy: a policy for optimum yield. Acta Sci Agric 2(5):65–70

    Google Scholar 

  35. Singh NS, Mukherjee I, Das SK, Varghese E (2018) Leaching of clothianidin in two different Indian soils: effect of organic amendment. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 100(4):553–559

    Google Scholar 

  36. Das SK, Avasthe RK, Singh M, Yadav A (2018) Soil health improvement using biochar application in Sikkim: a success story. Innov Farm 3(1):48–50

    Google Scholar 

  37. Karim AA, Kumar M, Mohapatra S, Singh SK (2019) Nutrient rich biomass and effluent sludge wastes co-utilization for production of biochar fertilizer through different thermal treatments. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Das SK, Avasthe RK (2018) Development of innovative low cost biochar production technology. J Krishi Vigyan 7(1):223–225

    Google Scholar 

  39. Roy A, Singh NU, Tripathi AK, Yumnam A, Sinha PK, Kumar B, Das SK (2017) Dynamics of pulse production in north-east region of India — a state-wise analysis. Econ Aff 62(4):655–662

    Google Scholar 

  40. Das SK, Avasthe RK (2017) Livelihood improvement of rural tribal farmers through soil health management, input support system and training — a success story. Innov Farm 2(3):171–173

    Google Scholar 

  41. Das SK, Avasthe RK, Sharma K, Singh M, Sharma P (2017) Soil fertility assessment in different villages of east Sikkim district. Indian J Hill Farm 30(1):14–16

    Google Scholar 

  42. Li S, Chen G (2018) Thermogravimetric, thermochemical, and infrared spectral characterization of feedstocks and biochar derived at different pyrolysis temperatures. Waste Manag 78:198–207

    Google Scholar 

  43. Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe RK (2017) Biochar amendments on physico-chemical and biological properties of soils. Agrica 6(2):79–87

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sharma M, Rana M, Sharma P, Das SK (2016) Effect of different organic substrates and plant botanicals on growth and flowering of chincherinchee (Ornithogalum thyrosides Jacq). Indian J Hill Farm 29(2):72–74

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gopi R, Avasthe RK, Kalita H, Kapoor C, Yadav A, Babu S, Das SK (2016) Traditional pest and disease management practices in Sikkim himalayan region. Int J Bio-resour Stress Manag 7(3):471–476

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sharma P, Sharma K, Das SK (2016) Ethno medicinal plants uses in health care by the Himalayan tribal people in India. Pop Kheti 4(3):41–45

    Google Scholar 

  47. Liu CH, Chu W, Li H, Boyd SA, Teppen BJ, Mao J, Zhang W (2019) Quantification and characterization of dissolved organic carbon from biochars. Geoderma 335:161–169

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gopi R, Kapoor C, Kalita H, Das SK, Avasthe RK (2015) A new report of downy mildew on buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) caused by Perenospora sp Sikkim. J Mycopathol Res 53(2):95–297

    Google Scholar 

  49. Roy A, Dkhar DS, Tripathi AK, Singh NU, Kumar D, Das SK, Debnath A (2014) Growth performance of agriculture and allied sectors in the North East India. Econ Aff 59(Special):783–795

    Google Scholar 

  50. Singh M, Das SK, Avasthe RK (2018) Effect of multipurpose trees on production and soil fertility on large cardamom based agro forestry system in Sikkim Himalaya. Indian J Agrofor 20(2):25–29

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mukherjee I, Das SK, Kumar A, Shukla L (2020) Sludge amendment affects the persistence, carbon mineralization and enzyme activity of atrazine and bifenthrin. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 105(2):291–298

    Google Scholar 

  52. Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe RK (2020) Ecotoxicological responses of weed biochar on seed germination and seedling growth in acidic soil. Environ Technol Innov 20(4):101074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101074

  53. Mukome FND, Zhang X, Silva LCR, Six J, Parikh SJ (2013) Use of chemical and physical characteristics to investigate trends in biochar feedstocks. J Agric Food Chem 61:2196–2204

    Google Scholar 

  54. Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe RK (2020) Evaluating biomass-derived biochar on seed germination and early seedling growth of maize and black gram. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00887-8

  55. Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe RK (2020) Valorizing biomass to engineered biochar and its impact on soil, plant, water, and microbial dynamics: a review. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00836-5

  56. Das SK (2020) Influence of phosphorus and organic matter on microbial transformation of arsenic. Environ Technol Innov 19(3):100930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.100930

  57. Das SK, Avasthe RK (2020) Packages of organic nutrient management as soil policy for upgrading cropping system to restore soil productivity, organic agriculture, Shaon Kumar Das, IntechOpen, https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91928. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/organic-agriculture/packages-of-organic-nutrient-management-as-soil-policy-for-upgrading-cropping-system-to-restore-soil

  58. Wang M, Zhu Y, Cheng L, Andserson B, Zhao X, Wang D, Ding A (2018) Review on utilization of biochar for metal-contaminated soil and sediment remediation. J Environ Sci 63(1):156–173

    Google Scholar 

  59. Das SK, Ghosh GK (2020) Soil Health Management Through Low Cost Biochar Technology. In: Singh J, Singh C (eds) Biochar Applications in Agriculture and Environment Management. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40997-5_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  60. Gopi R, Avasthe RK, Kalita H, Yadav A, Das SK, Rai D (2020) Eco-friendly management of tomato late blight using botanicals, bio-control agents, compost tea and copper fungicides. Indian J Agric Sci 90(1):35–39

    Google Scholar 

  61. Das SK, Avasthe RK (2018) Soil organic nutrients management through integrated approach: a policy for environment & ecology. Environ Anal Ecol Stud 4(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  62. Biederman LA, Harpole WS (2013) Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy 5:202–214

    Google Scholar 

  63. Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe RK (2020) Applications of biomass derived biochar in modern science and technology. Environ Technol Innov 21:101306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Crane-Droesch A, Abiven S, Jeffery S, Torn MS (2013) Heterogeneous global crop yield response to biochar: a meta-regression analysis. Environ Res Lett 8(4):044–049

    Google Scholar 

  65. Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe RK, Sinha K (2021) Compositional heterogeneity of different biochar: effect of pyrolysis temperature and feedstocks. J Environ Manag 278(2):111501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe RK, Sinha K (2020) Morpho-mineralogical exploration of crop, weed and tree derived biochar. J Hazard Mater 407(5):124370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124370

  67. Kamara A, Kamara A, Mansaray M, Sawyerr PE (2014) Effects of biochar derived from maize stover and rice straw on the germination of their seeds. Am J Agric 2:246–249

    Google Scholar 

  68. Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe RK (2020) Biochar application for environmental management and toxic pollutant remediation. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01078-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Das SK, Ghosh GK, Avasthe RK (2020) Application of biochar in agriculture and environment, and its safety issues. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01013-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Jaiswal AK, Elad Y, Graber ER, Frenkel O (2014) Rhizoctonia solani suppression and plant growth promotion in cucumber as affected by biochar pyrolysis temperature, feedstock and concentration. Soil Biol Biochem 69:110–118

    Google Scholar 

  71. Das SK, Avasthe RK, Kalita H, Yadav A and Gopi R (2020) Organic soil nutrient practices in Sikkim and impact at field level for tribal farmers’: a success story. Biotica Res Today. 2, 2 (Feb. 2020), 24–26

  72. Singh M, Gupta B, Das SK (2018) Soil organic carbon density under different agroforestry systems along an elevation gradient in north-western Himalaya. Range Manag Agrofor 39(1):8–13

    Google Scholar 

  73. Singh M, Gupta B, Babu S, Avasthe RK, Das SK (2017) Fodder, fuelwood consumption pattern and energy dynamics along elevation gradient in Giri Catchment, Himachal Pradesh India. Indian J Agric Sci 87(2):261–265

    Google Scholar 

  74. Das SK, Avasthe RK, Singh M (2016) Carbon-negative biochar from weed biomass for agricultural research in India. Curr Sci 110(11):2045–2046

    Google Scholar 

  75. Robertson SJ, Rutherford PM, Lo’ pez-Gutie´rrez JC, Massicotte HB (2012) Biochar enhances seedling growth and alters root symbioses and properties of sub-boreal forest soils. Can J Soil Sci 92:329–340

    Google Scholar 

  76. Pluchon N, Gundale MJ, Nilsson MC, Kardol P, Wardle DA (2014) Stimulation of boreal tree seedling growth by wood-derived charcoal: effects of charcoal properties, seedling species and soil fertility. Funct Ecol 28:766–775

    Google Scholar 

  77. Li Y, Yang Y, Shen F, Yang G, Zhang Y, Deng S, Zhang J, Zeng Y, Hu Y (2017) Mitigating biochar phytotoxicity via lanthanum (La) participation in pyrolysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:10267–10278

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author Shaon Kumar Das is thankful to the Director, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya, India and Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Palli Siksha Bhavana, Visva Bharati, Shantiniketan, India for providing necessary facility during the entire period of the research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Sikkim Centre, Gangtok, Sikkim, 737102, India

    Shaon Kumar Das, Sudip Kr. Dutta & E. Lamalakshmi Devi

  2. Palli Siksha Bhavana, Visva Bharati, Sriniketan, Birbhum, West Bengal, 731236, India

    Shaon Kumar Das & Goutam Kr. Ghosh

  3. ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya, 793103, India

    Vinay Kr. Mishra, Burhan U. Choudhury, Samarendra Hazarika, N. Uttam Singh & A. Balusamy

  4. ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Arunachal Pradesh Centre, Basar, 791101, India

    H. Kalita

  5. Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur, 848125, India

    Aniruddha Roy

  6. ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Research Centre, Kannur, Kerala, 670002, India

    R. Gopi

  7. ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India

    Irani Mukherjee & Chandan Kapoor

  8. ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil & Water Conservation, Dehradun, UK, 248195, India

    Matber Singh

  9. Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Lucknow, 226101, India

    Ashish Yadav

  10. Department of Chemistry, Sikkim University, Tadong, Gangtok, Sikkim, 737102, India

    K. Baruah

Authors
  1. Shaon Kumar Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Goutam Kr. Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vinay Kr. Mishra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Burhan U. Choudhury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sudip Kr. Dutta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Samarendra Hazarika
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. H. Kalita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Aniruddha Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. N. Uttam Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. R. Gopi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. E. Lamalakshmi Devi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Irani Mukherjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. A. Balusamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Matber Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Ashish Yadav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Chandan Kapoor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. K. Baruah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaon Kumar Das.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, S.K., Ghosh, G.K., Mishra, V.K. et al. Utilizing dissimilar feedstocks derived biochar amendments to alter soil biological indicators in acidic soil of Northeast India. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 10203–10214 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01670-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01670-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation