Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Applying Technique for Dual Frequency Sonication on Esterification

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior to biodiesel production of a high free fatty acid (FFA) oil, esterification of the oil is recommended to reduce the FFA to less than 1%. In this work, dual frequency ultrasound-assisted esterification with three different techniques was investigated. Three wave applying techniques have been proposed with the same energy used during the process. Firstly, for technique A, 28 kHz (100 W) and 40 kHz (100 W) waves were concurrently applied for a total time of T min. Secondly, for technique B, 28 kHz (200 W) waves were firstly applied for a total time of T/2 min and followed by 40 kHz (200 W) for a total time of T/2 min. Lastly, for technique C, 28 kHz (200 W) and 40 kHz (200 W) waves were concurrently applied for a total time of T/2 min. Pertinent parameters, i.e., methanol to oil molar ratio, catalyst loading, and reaction time, were investigated. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used as a tool for optimization. The amount of final FFA and energy used during the process were the key indices to optimize the most suitable condition. The results revealed that technique C* gave the highest FFA conversion of 99.40% with specific energy consumption of 23.73 Wh/% for methanol to oil (M/O) molar ratio of 12:1, catalyst loading of 2.2%wt., and 40 min reaction time. However, when considering both final FFA less than 1% and least energy used, it was suggested that M/O ratio 15:1, catalyst loading of 1.5%wt., and 22.5 min reaction time could give as high as 94.5% conversion yield with 14 Wh/% for technique C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen H, Xie B, Ma J, Chen Y (2018) NOx emission of biodiesel compared to diesel: higher or lower? Appl Therm Eng 137:584–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Azad AK, Rasul M, Khan MM, Sharma S (2017) Macadamia biodiesel as a sustainable and alternative transport fuel in Australia. Energy Procedia 110:543–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vilkhu K, Mawson R, Simons L, Bates D (2008) Applications and opportunities for ultrasound assisted extraction in the food industry—a review. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 9(2):161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banković-Ilić IB, Stamenković OS, Veljković VB (2012) Biodiesel production from non-edible plant oils. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(6):3621–3647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chanakaewsomboon I, Tongurai C, Photaworn S, Kungsanant S, Nikhom R (2020) Investigation of saponification mechanisms in biodiesel production: microscopic visualization of the effects of FFA, water and the amount of alkaline catalyst. J Environ Chem Eng 8(2):103538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Canakci M, Van Gerpen J (1999) Biodiesel production via acid catalysis. Transactions of the ASAE 42(5):1203–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khan MA, Yusup S, Ahmad MM (2010) Acid esterification of a high free fatty acid crude palm oil and crude rubber seed oil blend: optimization and parametric analysis. Biomass Bioenerg 34(12):1751–1756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kara K, Ouanji F, Lotfi EM, El Mahi M, Kacimi M, Ziyad M (2018) Biodiesel production from waste fish oil with high free fatty acid content from Moroccan fish-processing industries. Egypt J Pet 27(2):249–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Farabi MA, Ibrahim ML, Rashid U, Taufiq-Yap YH (2019) Esterification of palm fatty acid distillate using sulfonated carbon-based catalyst derived from palm kernel shell and bamboo. Energy Convers Manage 181:562–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Roslan NA, Abdullah N, Abidin SZ (2019) The synthesis of sulphonated hypercrosslinked exchange resin for free fatty acid esterification. C R Chim 22(11–12):761–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ibrahim NA, Rashid U, Taufiq-Yap YH, Yaw TCS, Ismail I (2019) Synthesis of carbonaceous solid acid magnetic catalyst from empty fruit bunch for esterification of palm fatty acid distillate (PFAD). Energy Convers Manage 195:480–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Akinfalabi SI, Rashid U, Shean TYC, Nehdi IA, Sbihi HM, Gewik MM (2019) Esterification of palm fatty acid distillate for biodiesel production catalyzed by synthesized kenaf seed cake-based sulfonated catalyst. Catalysts 9(5):482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mueanmas C, Nikhom R, Petchkaew A, Iewkittayakorn J, Prasertsit K (2019) Extraction and esterification of waste coffee grounds oil as non-edible feedstock for biodiesel production. Renewable Energy 133:1414–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Na S, Minhua Z, Xiuqin D, Lingtao W (2019) Preparation of sulfonated ordered mesoporous carbon catalyst and its catalytic performance for esterification of free fatty acids in waste cooking oils. RSC Adv 9(28):15941–15948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bureros GMA, Tanjay AA, Cuizon DE, Go AW, Cabatingan LK, Agapay RC, Ju YH (2019) Cacao shell-derived solid acid catalyst for esterification of oleic acid with methanol. Renewable Energy 138:489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Farouk H, Zahraee SM, Atabani AE, Mohd Jaafar MN, Alhassan FH (2020) Optimization of the esterification process of crude jatropha oil (CJO) containing high levels of free fatty acids: a Malaysian case study. Biofuels 11(6):655–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Silva SM, Peixoto AF, Freire C (2020) Organosulfonic acid functionalized montmorillonites as solid catalysts for (trans) esterification of free fatty acids and (waste) oils. Renewable Energy 146:2416–2429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Litinas A, Geivanidis S, Faliakis A, Courouclis Y, Samaras Z, Keder A, Krasnoholovets V, Gandzha I, Zabulonov Y, Puhach O, Dmytriyuk M (2020) Biodiesel production from high FFA feedstocks with a novel chemical multifunctional process intensifier. Biofuel Research Journal 7(2):1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ibrahim SF, Asikin-Mijan N, Ibrahim ML, Abdulkareem-Alsultan G, Izham SM, Taufiq-Yap YH (2020) Sulfonated functionalization of carbon derived corncob residue via hydrothermal synthesis route for esterification of palm fatty acid distillate. Energy Conver Manag 210:112698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Y, Ou S, Liu P, Zhang Z (2007) Preparation of biodiesel from waste cooking oil via two-step catalyzed process. Energy Convers Manage 48(1):184–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maghami M, Sadrameli SM, Ghobadian B (2015) Production of biodiesel from fishmeal plant waste oil using ultrasonic and conventional methods. Appl Therm Eng 75:575–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Urrutia C, Sangaletti-Gerhard N, Cea M, Suazo A, Aliberti A, Navia R (2016) Two step esterification–transesterification process of wet greasy sewage sludge for biodiesel production. Biores Technol 200:1044–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Prabhu AV, Gogate PR, Pandit AB (2004) Optimization of multiple-frequency sonochemical reactors. Chem Eng Sci 59(22–23):4991–4998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gole VL, Gogate PR (2012) A review on intensification of synthesis of biodiesel from sustainable feed stock using sonochemical reactors. Chem Eng Process 1(53):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mohod AV, Subudhi AS, Gogate PR (2017) Intensification of esterification of non edible oil as sustainable feedstock using cavitational reactors. Ultrason Sonochem 1(36):309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen D, Sharma SK, Mudhoo A (2011) Handbook on applications of ultrasound: sonochemistry for sustainability. CRC Press

  27. Vyas S, Ting YP (2018) A review of the application of ultrasound in bioleaching and insights from sonication in (bio) chemical processes. Resources 7(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ibrahim H, Silitonga AS, Rahmawaty SD, Sebayang AH, Khairil S, Sutrisno J, Razak A (2020) An ultrasound assisted transesterification to optimize biodiesel production from rice bran oil. Mech Eng 11(2):225–234

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zou H, Lei M (2012) Optimum process and kinetic study of Jatropha curcas oil pre-esterification in ultrasonical field. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 43(5):730–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Boffito DC, Galli F, Pirola C, Bianchi C, Patience GS (2014) Ultrasonic free fatty acids esterification in tobacco and canola oil. Ultrason Sonochem 21(6):1969–1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hayyan A, Hashim MA, Mirghani ME, Hayyan M, AlNashef IM (2014) Treatment of industrial low grade palm oil via esterification reaction using sonoreactor. J Ind Eng Chem 20(4):2066–2070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Andrade-Tacca CA, Chang CC, Chen YH, Manh DV, Chang CY (2014) Esterification of jatropha oil by sequential ultrasonic irradiation with auto-induced temperature rise and dosing of methanol and sulfuric acid catalyst. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 45(4):1523–1531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Andrade-Tacca CA, Chang CC, Chen YH, Ji DR, Wang YY, Yen YQ, Chang CY (2014) Reduction of FFA in jatropha curcas oil via sequential direct-ultrasonic irradiation and dosage of methanol/sulfuric acid catalyst mixture on esterification process. Energy Convers Manage 88:1078–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Manickam S, Arigela VND, Gogate PR (2014) Intensification of synthesis of biodiesel from palm oil using multiple frequency ultrasonic flow cell. Fuel Process Technol 128:388–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hajamini Z, Sobati MA, Shahhosseini S, Ghobadian B (2016) Waste fish oil (WFO) esterification catalyzed by sulfonated activated carbon under ultrasound irradiation. Appl Therm Eng 94:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Joshi SM, Gogate PR, Kumar SS (2018) Intensification of esterification of karanja oil for production of biodiesel using ultrasound assisted approach with optimization using response surface methodology. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification 124:186–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Trinh H, Yusup S, Uemura Y (2018) Optimization and kinetic study of ultrasonic assisted esterification process from rubber seed oil. Biores Technol 247:51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Malani RS, Shinde V, Ayachit S, Goyal A, Moholkar VS (2019) Ultrasound–assisted biodiesel production using heterogeneous base catalyst and mixed non–edible oils. Ultrason Sonochem 52:232–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Masri AN, Mutalib MA, Yahya WZN, Aminuddin NF, Leveque JM (2020) Rapid esterification of fatty acid using dicationic acidic ionic liquid catalyst via ultrasonic-assisted method. Ultrason Sonochem 60:104732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Al-Sakkari EG, Abdeldayem OM, El-Sheltawy ST, Abadir MF, Soliman A, Rene ER, Ismail I (2020) Esterification of high FFA content waste cooking oil through different techniques including the utilization of cement kiln dust as a heterogeneous catalyst: a comparative study. Fuel 279:118519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yan J, Zhao Y, Li K, Zhang H, Fan L, Lu Z (2020) Efficient production of biodiesel from ionic liquid catalyzed esterification using ultrasonic-microwave combined intensification. Chem Eng Process Process Intensi 149:107870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Seithtanabutara V, Sungnat C, Wongwuttanasatian T (2020) Comparison of free fatty acid conversion yields for esterification assisted by single- and dual-frequency sonication. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00659-4

  43. Jookjantra K, Wongwuttanasatian T (2017) Optimization of biodiesel production from refined palm oil with heterogeneous CaO catalyst using pulse ultrasonic waves under a vacuum condition. Energy Convers Manage 154:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mathews PG (2005) Design of experiments with MINITAB. American Society for Quality, Quality Press, Milwaukee

  45. Secula MS, Suditu GD, Poulios I, Cojocaru C, Cretescu I (2008) Response surface optimization of the photocatalytic decolorization of a simulated dyestuff effluent. Chem Eng J 141(1–3):18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. De Luna MD, Millanar JM, Yodsa-Nga A, Wantala K (2017) Gas phase catalytic oxidation of VOCS using hydrothermally synthesized nest-like K-OMS 2 catalyst. Sains Malays 46(2):275–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wantala K, Suwannaruang T, Palalerd J, Chirawatkul P, Chanlek N, Wannapaiboon S, Saiyasombat C, Khunphonoi R (2021) Influence of in-situ and ex-situ Cu-Fe doping in K-OMS-2 catalysts on dye degradation via Fenton-like reaction with focus on catalytic properties and performances. Surf Interface 1(23):101030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gole VL (2012) Gogate PR (2012) A review on intensification of synthesis of biodiesel from sustainable feed stock using sonochemical reactors. Chem Eng Process 1(53):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research team would like to thank the Center of alternative energy research and development, Khon Kaen University, for supporting our work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Varinrumpai Seithtanabutara.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• High FFA-crude palm oil was esterified by 3 techniques of dual frequency ultrasound assisted-esterification.

• CCD and optimization using response surface methodology were studied.

• Applying dual frequency waves in parallel and series were investigated.

• Technique C* gave the best potential results.

• Final FFA less than 1% at minimum SECP was achieved by technique C.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wongwuttanasatian, T., Kaewkannetra, P. & Seithtanabutara, V. Impact of Applying Technique for Dual Frequency Sonication on Esterification. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 6527–6542 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01646-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01646-z

Keyword

Navigation