Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterization and quality analysis of wood pellets: effect of pelletization and torrefaction process variables on quality of pellets

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A lab-scale single-channel press was employed for producing pellets and the effect of pressure, die temperature, moisture content (MC), particle size, and binding agent on pellet quality was investigated. Meanwhile, torrefaction subsequent to pelletization was performed and the quality of pellets was evaluated under different torrefaction conditions. From the analysis of variance (at p < 0.05), temperature (70–200 °C), pressure (70–160 MPa), and MC (5.5–28%) were found most significant factors for density, strength, and compression energy of pellets. Particle density and strength of raw wood pellets were significantly affected by temperature and pressure. The highest particle density and strength (1.307 g/cm3, 11.8 N/mm2) for particles of 0.25–0.5 mm and (1.300 g/cm3 and 10.7 N/mm2) for particles of 0.5–1.41 mm were found at a temperature of 200 °C (pressure ≥ 100 MPa and MC 5.5%), indicating that pelletization at a temperature of 200 °C was beneficial. The relaxed density of pellets remained the same as of particle initial density after storage time of 2 weeks. The expansion ratio of the pellet was found lower. Use of synthetic resin as a binder in the proportion of 1:9 was found optimum, the particle density increased from 1.19 to 1.24 g/cm3 (0.25–0.5 mm) and from 1.17 to 1.22 g/cm3 (0.5–1.41 mm) and energy consumption reduced by 9.39% (0.25–0.5 mm) and 8.7% (0.5–1.41 mm). Pellets made at a temperature of 200 °C were found water-resistive as compared to those made at other temperatures. The highest lower heating value, i.e., 26.76 MJ/kg of torrefied pellets (TOPs) was achieved at 300 °C and 120 min. Torrefaction process parameters adversely affected the particle density, volumetric energy density, strength, and durability of TOPs. The highest true density (1.85 g/cm3) and porosity (65 v %) for TOPs were achieved at 300 °C and 120 min, much higher than those of raw pellets. Moisture uptake of TOPs at 300 °C was 2.0–2.8 wt.%, showing strong water-resistant ability. From the results of FTIR, O–H bond was destroyed after torrefaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Findings of the current study are included within the article and in supplementary file.

References

  1. Panwar N, Kothari R, Tyagi V (2012) Thermo chemical conversion of biomass - eco friendly energy routes. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:1801–1816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn BJ, Sun CH, Lee SM et al (2014) Effect of binders on the durability of wood pellets fabricated from Larix kaemferi C. and Liriodendron tulipifera L. sawdust. Renew Energy 62:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.06.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rentizelas AA, Tolis AJ, Tatsiopoulos IP (2009) Logistics issues of biomass: the storage problem and the multi-biomass supply chain. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13:887–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stolarski MJ, Szczukowski S, Tworkowski J, Krzyżaniak M, Gulczyński P, Mleczek M (2013) Comparison of quality and production cost of briquettes made from agricultural and forest origin biomass. Renew Energy 57:20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Saidur R, Abdelazi E, Demirbas A et al (2011) A review on biomass as a fuel for boilers. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:2262–2289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sikkema R, Steiner M (2011) The European wood pellet markets : current status and prospects for 5:2020–2278. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mobini M, Meyer J, Trippe F et al (2014) Assessing the integration of torrefaction into wood pellet production. J Clean Prod 78:216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Puig-Arnavat M, Shang L, Sarossy Z et al (2016) From a single pellet press to a bench scale pellet mill - pelletizing six different biomass feedstocks. Fuel Process Technol 142:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tumuluru JS (2016) Specific energy consumption and quality of wood pellets produced using high-moisture lodgepole pine grind in a flat die pellet mill. Chem Eng Res Des 110:82–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stelte W, Holm JK, Sanadi AR, Barsberg S, Ahrenfeldt J, Henriksen UB (2011) Fuel pellets from biomass: the importance of the pelletizing pressure and its dependency on the processing conditions. Fuel 90:3285–3290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang L, Liang J, Yuan X, Li H, Li C, Xiao Z, Huang H, Wang H, Zeng G (2014) Co-pelletization of sewage sludge and biomass: the density and hardness of pellet. Bioresour Technol 166:435–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Forbes EGA, Easson DL, Lyons GA, McRoberts WC (2014) Physico-chemical characteristics of eight different biomass fuels and comparison of combustion and emission results in a small scale multi-fuel boiler. Energy Convers Manag 87:1162–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.06.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Razuan R, Finney KN, Chen Q, Sharifi VN, Swithenbank J (2011) Pelletised fuel production from palm kernel cake. Fuel Process Technol 92:609–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.11.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaliyan N, Morey RV (2010) Natural binders and solid bridge type binding mechanisms in briquettes and pellets made from corn stover and switchgrass. Bioresour Technol 101:1082–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Obernberger I, Thek G (2010) The pellet handbook - the production and thermal utilization of pellets. Earthscan Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Amber NH, Shankar TJ, Teymouri A et al (2014) Effect of pelleting process variables on physical properties and sugar yields of ammonia fiber expansion pretreated corn stover. Bioresour Technol 164:128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nunes LJR, Matias JCO, Catalão JPS (2013) Energy recovery from cork industrial waste: production and characterisation of cork pellets. Fuel 113:24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tumuluru JS (2014) Effect of process variables on the density and durability of the pellets made from high moisture corn stover. Biosyst Eng 119:44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.11.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Carone MT, Pantaleo A, Pellerano A (2011) Influence of process parameters and biomass characteristics on the durability of pellets from the pruning residues of Olea europaea L. Biomass Bioenergy 35:402–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wongsiriamnuay T, Tippayawong N (2015) Effect of densification parameters on the properties of maize residue pellets. Biosyst Eng 139:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen QN, Cloutier A, Achim A, Stevanovic T (2015) Effect of process parameters and raw material characteristics on physical and mechanical properties of wood pellets made from sugar maple particles. Biomass Bioenergy 80:338–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaliyan N, Vance Morey R (2009) Factors affecting strength and durability of densified biomass products. Biomass Bioenergy 33:337–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kambo HS, Dutta A (2014) Strength, storage, and combustion characteristics of densified lignocellulosic biomass produced via torrefaction and hydrothermal carbonization. Appl Energy 135:182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pradhan P, Mahajani SM, Arora A (2018) Production and utilization of fuel pellets from biomass : a review. Fuel Process Technol 181:215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hu Q, Yang H, Yao D, Zhu D, Wang X, Shao J, Chen H (2020) The densification of bio-char : effect of pyrolysis temperature on the qualities of pellets. Bioresour Technol 200:521–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pak Yiu L, Pak Sui L, Shahab S et al (2014) Effects of pelletization conditions on breaking strength and dimensional stability of Douglas fir pellet. Fuel 117:1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.10.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ahn BJ, Sun CH, Lee SM et al (2014) Effects of densification variables on the durability of wood pellets fabricated with Larix kaempferi C. and Liriodendron tulipifera L. sawdust. Renew Energy 62:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.06.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nielsen NPK, Gardner D, Poulsen T, Felby C (2009) Importance of temperature, moisture content, and species for the conversion process of wood residues into fuel pellets. Wood and Fiber Science 41:414–425. Volume 41, Number 4 / October 2009 Journal Wood and Fiber Science Publisher Society of Wood Science & Technology ISSN 0735–6161 (Print) Subject Materials Science, Engineering, Agriculture, Ecology and Forestry Online Date Friday, October 16, 2009 Add to s

  29. Stelte W, Holm JK, Sanadi AR, Barsberg S, Ahrenfeldt J, Henriksen UB (2011) A study of bonding and failure mechanisms in fuel pellets from different biomass resources. Biomass Bioenergy 35:910–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bergman PCA (2005) Combined torrefaction and pelletisation. Analysis 29:ECN-C--05-073

    Google Scholar 

  31. Manouchehrinejad M, Mani S (2018) Torrefaction after pelletization (TAP): analysis of torrefied pellet quality and co-products. Biomass Bioenergy 118:93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim YH, Lee SM, Lee HW, Lee JW (2012) Physical and chemical characteristics of products from the torrefaction of yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera). Bioresour Technol 116:120–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen WH, Kuo PC (2010) A study on torrefaction of various biomass materials and its impact on lignocellulosic structure simulated by a thermogravimetry. Energy 35:2580–2586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pimchuai A, Dutta A, Basu P (2010) Torrefaction of agriculture residue to enhance combustible properties. Energy and Fuels 24:4638–4645. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef901168f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. van der Stelt MJC, Gerhauser H, Kiel JHA, Ptasinski KJ (2011) Biomass upgrading by torrefaction for the production of biofuels: a review. Biomass Bioenergy 35:3748–3762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.06.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen WH, Kuo PC (2011) Torrefaction and co-torrefaction characterization of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin as well as torrefaction of some basic constituents in biomass. Energy 36:803–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.12.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pimchuai A, Animesh Dutta PB (2010) Torrefaction of agriculture residue to enhance combustible properties. Energy Fuel 24:638–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Li H, Liu X, Legros R, Bi XT, Jim Lim C, Sokhansanj S (2012) Pelletization of torrefied sawdust and properties of torrefied pellets. Appl Energy 93:680–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rudolfsson M, Stelte W, Lestander TA (2015) Process optimization of combined biomass torrefaction and pelletization for fuel pellet production - a parametric study. Appl Energy 140:378–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu Z, Quek A, Balasubramanian R (2014) Preparation and characterization of fuel pellets from woody biomass, agro-residues and their corresponding hydrochars. Appl Energy 113:1315–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ghiasi B, Kumar L, Furubayashi T, Lim CJ, Bi X, Kim CS, Sokhansanj S (2014) Densified biocoal from woodchips : is it better to do torrefaction before or after densification ? Appl Energy 134:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ali A, Mao X, Liu Y et al (2020) Torrefaction subsequent to pelletization : characterization and analysis of furfural residue and sawdust pellets. Waste Manag 113:210–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Abedi A, Dalai AK (2017) Study on the quality of oat hull fuel pellets using bio-additives. Biomass Bioenergy 106:166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.08.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Brachi P, Chirone R, Miccio M, Ruoppolo G (2019) Fluidized bed torrefaction of biomass pellets: a comparison between oxidative and inert atmosphere. Powder Technol 357:97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.08.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Brachi P, Chirone R, Miccio M, Ruoppolo G (2018) Fluidized bed torrefaction of commercial wood pellets: process performance and solid product quality. Energy and Fuels 32:9459–9469. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b01519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Iftikhar M, Asghar A, Ramzan N, Sajjadi B, Chen WY (2019) Biomass densification: effect of cow dung on the physicochemical properties of wheat straw and rice husk based biomass pellets. Biomass Bioenergy 122:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Muazu RI, Stegemann JA (2017) Biosolids and microalgae as alternative binders for biomass fuel briquetting. Fuel 194:339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.01.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. A.S.T.M.Standard D 3967–08 (2008) Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of intact rock core specimens. ASTM 2008:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  50. Liu Z, Liu X, Fei B et al (2013) The properties of pellets from mixing bamboo and rice straw. Renew Energy 55:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kambo HS, Dutta A (2015) Comparative evaluation of torrefaction and hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass for the production of solid biofuel. Energy Convers Manag 105:746–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.08.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Jezerska L, Zajonc O, Vyletelek J, et al (2016) Mechanical material properties effect on pelletization 61:307–320

  53. Lindley, J.A., Vossoughi M (2008) Physical properties of biomass briquettes. Transactions of the ASAE, American Society of Agricultural Engineers

  54. Dhamodaran A, Afzal MT (2012) Compression and springback properties of hardwood and softwood pellets. BioResources 7:4362–4376

    Google Scholar 

  55. Fang Z (2013) Pretreatment techniques for biofuels and biorefineries. Springer

  56. Tilay A, Azargohar R, Drisdelle M, Dalai A, Kozinski J (2015) Canola meal moisture-resistant fuel pellets: study on the effects of process variables and additives on the pellet quality and compression characteristics. Ind Crop Prod 63:337–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Samuelsson R, Thyrel M, Sjöström M, Lestander TA (2009) Effect of biomaterial characteristics on pelletizing properties and biofuel pellet quality. Fuel Process Technol 90:1129–1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Adapa P, Tabil L, Schoenau G (2011) Grinding performance and physical properties of non-treated and steam exploded barley, canola, oat and wheat straw. Biomass Bioenergy 35:549–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Theerarattananoon K, Xu F, Wilson J, Ballard R, Mckinney L, Staggenborg S, Vadlani P, Pei ZJ, Wang D (2011) Physical properties of pellets made from sorghum stalk, corn stover, wheat straw, and big bluestem. Ind Crop Prod 33:325–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.11.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Tumuluru JS (2015) High moisture corn stover pelleting in a flat die pellet mill fitted with a 6 mm die: physical properties and specific energy consumption. Energy Science & Engineering 3:327–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Chen WH, Peng J, Bi XT (2015) A state-of-the-art review of biomass torrefaction, densification and applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 44:847–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Huang Y, Finell M, Larsson S, Wang X, Zhang J, Wei R, Liu L (2017) Biofuel pellets made at low moisture content-influence of water in the binding mechanism of densified biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 98:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Tsai WT, Liu SC (2013) Effect of temperature on thermochemical property and true density of torrefied coffee residue. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 102:47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2013.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Nielsen NPK, Nørgaard L, Strobel BWFC (2009) Effect of storage on extractives from particle surfaces of softwood and hardwood raw materials for wood pellets. Eur J Wood Prod 67:19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Lam PS (2011) Steam explosion of biomass to produce durable wood pellets. 1–166. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0059133

  66. Keipi T, Tolvanen H, Kokko L, Raiko R (2014) The effect of torrefaction on the chlorine content and heating value of eight woody biomass samples. Biomass Bioenergy 66:232–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.02.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Song X, Yang Y, Zhang M, Zhang K, Wang D (2018) Ultrasonic pelleting of torrefied lignocellulosic biomass for bioenergy production. Renew Energy 129:56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Shang L, Nielsen NPK, Dahl J, Stelte W, Ahrenfeldt J, Holm JK, Thomsen T, Henriksen UB (2012) Quality effects caused by torrefaction of pellets made from scots pine. Fuel Process Technol 101:23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Bergman PC, Boersma A R, Zwart RWR, Kiel JH A (2005) Torrefaction for biomass co-firing in existing coal-fired power stations

  70. Tumuluru JS, Sokhansanj S, Hess JR et al (2011) A review on biomass torrefaction process and product properties for energy applications. Ind Biotechnol 7:384–401. https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2011.0014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Graham S, Ogunfayo I, Hall MR, Snape C, Quick W, Weatherstone S, Eastwick C (2016) Changes in mechanical properties of wood pellets during artificial degradation in a laboratory environment. Fuel Process Technol 148:395–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.03.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Carroll JP, Finnan J (2012) Physical and chemical properties of pellets from energy crops and cereal straws. Biosyst Eng 112:151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Colley Z, Fasina OO, Bransby DYYL (2006) Moisture effect on the physical characteristics of switchgrass pellets. T ASAE 49:1845–1851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Kallis KX, Pellegrini Susini GA, Oakey JE (2013) A comparison between Miscanthus and bioethanol waste pellets and their performance in a downdraft gasifier. Appl Energy 101:333–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.01.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. ISO/TS 17225–8 (2016) Solid biofuels-fuel specifications and classes; part 8: graded thermally treated and densified biomass fuels, Swedish Stand. Institute, Stock. Sweden. 2016 ISO/TC 238 N638

  76. Zhigang L, Yan G, Hua J, Shihua Y (2015) Study on natural cellulose crystallinity determinated by the technology of XRD peak separation. CHINA MEASUREMENT & TEST 41:38–41

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2017YFE0124800).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Asif Ali Siyal: conceptualization, investigation, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. Yang Liu: methodology and investigation. Xiao Mao: writing—review and editing. Babar Ali: formal analysis and investigation. Sakhawat Hussain: data curation. Tianhao Zhang: methodology. Jianjun Dai and Guangqing Liu: project administration, supervision, funding acquisition, and writing—review and editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jianjun Dai or Guangqing Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Code availability

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 30.1 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siyal, A.A., Liu, Y., Mao, X. et al. Characterization and quality analysis of wood pellets: effect of pelletization and torrefaction process variables on quality of pellets. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 11, 2201–2217 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01235-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01235-6

Keywords

Navigation