Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of biochar particle size on the hydraulic conductivity of two different compacted engineered soils

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biochar is a recalcitrant material obtained after pyrolysis of labile biomass under oxygen-limited condition. The conversion of biomass into biochar is considered to be a sustainable way of generating bioenergy, minimizing the emission of greenhouse gases and managing the waste. Recently, the amendment of biochar in soil gained attention due to its multiple soil ameliorating features. Many studies have investigated the effect of biochar particle size on the physicochemical and hydraulic properties of relatively loose agricultural soil. However, such study is rarely conducted for compacted soil suitable for bioengineered structures. The objective of the current study is to investigate the effect of biochar particle size on the hydraulic conductivity of compacted soil for bioengineered structures. Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) of different compacted soils amended with biochar of different particle sizes ranging from 0.075 to 4.75 mm has been investigated. The results showed that the amendment of 5% to 15% (w/w) biochar of different particle sizes led to the change in Ksat of the silty sand. When compared with bare soil, a higher Ksat with biochar of particle size larger than 0.425 mm and a lower Ksat with particles of size smaller than 0.425 mm was observed. However, in pure sand, a lower Ksat irrespective of particle size of biochar was observed and the lowest Ksat was noted with biochar of particle size smaller than 150 mm. These changes in the Ksat after biochar amendment were attributed to the alteration of pore structure mainly, inter-pores of the soil, which is controlled by the particle size of the biochar. The findings of the present study could be useful for the field application i.e. in bioengineered structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2015) Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. Routledge, New York

  2. Cao CT, Farrell C, Kristiansen PE, Rayner JP (2014) Biochar makes green roof substrates lighter and improves water supply to plants. Ecol Eng 71:368–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reddy KR, Yaghoubi P, Yukselen-Aksoy Y (2015) Effects of biochar amendment on geotechnical properties of landfill cover soil. Waste Manag Res 33(6):524–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yargicoglu EN, Reddy KR (2017) Biochar-amended soil cover for microbial methane oxidation: effect of biochar amendment ratio and cover profile. J Geotech Geoenviron 144(3):04017123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ni J, Chen X, Ng C, Guo H (2018) Effects of biochar on water retention and matric suction of vegetated soil. Géotechnique Lett 8(2):124–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Garg A, Bordoloi S, Ni J, Cai W, Maddibiona PG, Mei G, Poulsen TG, Lin P (2019) Influence of biochar addition on gas permeability in unsaturated soil. Géotechnique Lett 9(1):66–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hussain R, Garg A, Ravi K (2020) Soil-biochar-plant interaction: differences from the perspective of engineered and agricultural soils. Bull Eng Geol Environ:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01846-3

  8. Wang J, Xiong Z, Kuzyakov Y (2016) Biochar stability in soil: meta-analysis of decomposition and priming effects. GCB Bioenergy 8:512–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fellet G, Marchiol L, Delle Vedove G, Peressotti A (2011) Application of biochar on mine tailings: effects and perspectives for land reclamation. Chemosphere 83(9):1262–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abel S, Peters A, Trinks S, Schonsky H, Facklam M, Wessolek G (2013) Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil. Geoderma 202:183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reddy KR, Yargicoglu EN, Yue D, Yaghoubi P (2014) Enhanced microbial methane oxidation in landfill cover soil amended with biochar. J Geotech Geoenviron 140(9):04014047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen XW, Wong JTF, Ng CWW, Wong MH (2016) Feasibility of biochar application on a landfill final cover—a review on balancing ecology and shallow slope stability. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(8):7111–7125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bordoloi S, Garg A, Sreedeep S, Lin P, Mei G (2018) Investigation of cracking and water availability of soil-biochar composite synthesized from invasive weed water hyacinth. Bioresour Technol 263:665–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wong JTF, Chen Z, Wong AYY, Ng CWW, Wong MH (2018) Effects of biochar on hydraulic conductivity of compacted kaolin clay. Environ Pollut 234:468–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hussain R, Bordoloi S, Garg A, Ravi K, Sreedeep S, Sahoo L (2020) Effect of biochar type on infiltration, water retention and desiccation crack potential of a silty sand. Biochar 2(4):465–478

  16. Shafiee A (2008) Permeability of compacted granule–clay mixtures. Eng Geol 97(3–4):199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lim TJ, Spokas KA, Feyereisen G, Novak JM (2016) Predicting the impact of biochar additions on soil hydraulic properties. Chemosphere 142:136–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ren X, Zhao Y, Deng Q, Kang J, Li D, Wang D (2016) A relation of hydraulic conductivity—void ratio for soils based on Kozeny-Carman equation. Eng Geol 213:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Klute A (1965) Laboratory measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated soil. Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical properties, including statistics of measurement and sampling. Methods of Soil Analysis 6:210–221

  20. Lei O, Zhang R (2013) Effects of biochars derived from different feedstocks and pyrolysis temperatures on soil physical and hydraulic properties. J Soils Sediments 13(9):1561–1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Barnes RT, Gallagher ME, Masiello CA, Liu Z, Dugan B (2014) Biochar-induced changes in soil hydraulic conductivity and dissolved nutrient fluxes constrained by laboratory experiments. PLoS One 9(9):e108340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Igalavithana AD, Ok YS, Niazi NK, Rizwan M, Al-Wabel MI, Usman AR, Moon DH, Lee SS (2017) Effect of corn residue biochar on the hydraulic properties of sandy loam soil. Sustainability 9(2):266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Castellini M, Giglio L, Niedda M, Palumbo AD, Ventrella D (2015) Impact of biochar addition on the physical and hydraulic properties of a clay soil. Soil Tillage Res 154:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Spokas KA, Novak JM, Masiello CA, Johnson MG, Colosky EC, Ippolito JA, Trigo C (2014) Physical disintegration of biochar: an overlooked process. Environ Sci Tech Let 1(8):326–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu Z, Dugan B, Masiello CA, Gonnermann HM (2017) Biochar particle size, shape, and porosity act together to influence soil water properties. PLoS One 12(6):e0179079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhai Q, Rahardjo H, Satyanaga A (2018) A pore-size distribution function based method for estimation of hydraulic properties of sandy soils. Eng Geol 246:288–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lim TJ, Spokas KA, Feyereisen GW, Weis R, Koskinen WC (2017) Influence of biochar particle size and shape on soil hydraulic properties. J Environ Sci Eng 5:8–15

    Google Scholar 

  28. Trifunovic B, Gonzales HB, Ravi S, Sharratt BS, Mohanty SK (2018) Dynamic effects of biochar concentration and particle size on hydraulic properties of sand. Land Degrad Dev 29(4):884–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. de Jesus DS, Glaser B, Pellegrino Cerri CE (2019) Effect of biochar particle size on physical, hydrological and chemical properties of loamy and sandy tropical soils. Agronomy 9(4):165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Verheijen FG, Zhuravel A, Silva FC, Amaro A, Ben-Hur M, Keizer JJ (2019) The influence of biochar particle size and concentration on bulk density and maximum water holding capacity of sandy vs sandy loam soil in a column experiment. Geoderma 347:194–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ghavanloughajar M, Valenca R, Le H, Rahman M, Borthakur A, Ravi S, Stenstrom MK, Mohanty SK (2020) Compaction conditions affect the capacity of biochar-amended sand filters to treat road runoff. Sci Total Environ 735:139180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Le H, Valenca R, Ravi S, Stenstrom MK, Mohanty SK (2020) Size-dependent biochar breaking under compaction: implications on clogging and pathogen removal in biofilters. Environ Pollut 266:115195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. GCO (Geotechnical Control Office) (2000) Geotechnical manual for slopes. Geotechnical Control Office, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hussain R, Ravi K, Garg A (2020) Influence of biochar on the soil water retention characteristics (SWRC): potential application in geotechnical engineering structures. Soil Tillage Res 204:104713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Williams JM, Latifi N, Vahedifard F (2018) In: Effects of biochar amendment on mechanical properties of buckshot clay. IFCEE, pp 125–134

  36. Hussain R, Ghosh KK, Garg A, Ravi K (2020) Effect of biochar produced from mesquite on the compaction characteristics and shear strength of a clayey sand. Geotech Geol Eng:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01549-2

  37. ASTM C128 (2015) Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of fine aggregate. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  38. ASTM D422–63 (2007) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils, vol 10. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, p 1520

    Google Scholar 

  39. ASTM D698 (2012) Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  40. ASTM D854 (2010) Standard test method for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  41. ASTM D2487 (2011) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purpose (unified soil classification system). ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  42. ASTM D4318 (2010) Standard test methods for liquid limit. Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index of Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  43. ASTM D4972 (2018) Standard test method for pH of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jindo K, Mizumoto H, Sawada Y, Sanchez-Monedero MA, Sonoki T (2014) Physical and chemical characterization of biochars derived from different agricultural residues. Biogeosciences 11(23):6613–6621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bird M, Keitel C, Meredith W (2017) Analysis of biochars for C, H, N, O and S by elemental analyser. Biochar: a guide to analytical methods. CSIRO publishing, Clayton, p 39

    Google Scholar 

  46. Thomas GW (1982) Exchangeable cations. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, (methodsofsoilan2). Amer Soc of Agron Inc., Madison, pp 159–165

    Google Scholar 

  47. ASTM E1755–01 (2007) Standard method for the determination of ash in biomass. 2003 Annual book of ASTM standards, vol 11.05. ASTM International, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jeffery S, Meinders MB, Stoof CR, Bezemer TM, van de Voorde TF, Mommer L, van Groenigen JW (2015) Biochar application does not improve the soil hydrological function of a sandy soil. Geoderma 251:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. ASTM D4253 (2016) Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  50. Li JH, Li L, Chen R, Li DQ (2016) Cracking and vertical preferential flow through landfill clay liners. Eng Geol 206:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. ASTM D5856 (2015) Standard test method for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of porous material using a rigid-wall, compaction mold permeameter. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ranjan G, Rao ASR (2007) Basic and applied soil mechanics. New Age International, Chennai

    Google Scholar 

  53. Abdin Y, Usman A, Ok YS, Tsang YF, Al-Wabel M (2020) Competitive sorption and availability of coexisting heavy metals in mining-contaminated soil: contrasting effects of mesquite and fishbone biochars. Environ Res 181:108846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. van der Spoel D, van Maaren PJ, Larsson P, Tîmneanu N (2006) Thermodynamics of hydrogen bonding in hydrophilic and hydrophobic media. J Phys Chem B 110(9):4393–4398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kumar H, Ganesan SP, Bordoloi S, Sreedeep S, Lin P, Mei G, Garg A, Sarmah AK (2019) Erodibility assessment of compacted biochar amended soil for geo-environmental applications. Sci Total Environ 672:698–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Angalaeeswari K, Kamaludeen SPB (2017) Production and characterization of coconut shell and mesquite wood biochar. Int J Chem Stud 5:442–446

    Google Scholar 

  57. Das O, Sarmah AK (2015) The love–hate relationship of pyrolysis biochar and water: a perspective. Sci Total Environ 512:682–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Gray M, Johnson MG, Dragila MI, Kleber M (2014) Water uptake in biochars: the roles of porosity and hydrophobicity. Biomass Bioenergy 61:196–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Gnanasaravanan S, Rajkumar P (2013) Characterization of minerals in natural and manufactured sand in Cauvery River belt, Tamilnadu, India. Infrared Phys Technol 58:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wong JTF, Chen Z, Chen X, Ng CWW, Wong MH (2017) Soil-water retention behavior of compacted biochar-amended clay: a novel landfill final cover material. J Soils Sediments 17(3):590–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Lim TJ, Spokas K (2018) Impact of biochar particle shape and size on saturated hydraulic properties of soil. Korean J Environ Agric 37(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Laird DA, Fleming P, Davis DD, Horton R, Wang B, Karlen DL (2010) Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158(3–4):443–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ouyang L, Wang F, Tang J, Yu L, Zhang R (2013) Effects of biochar amendment on soil aggregates and hydraulic properties. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 13(4):991–1002

    Google Scholar 

  64. Novak J, Sigua G, Watts D, Cantrell K, Shumaker P, Szogi A, Johnson MG, Spokas K (2016) Biochars impact on water infiltration and water quality through a compacted subsoil layer. Chemosphere 142:160–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H, Fredlund MD (2012) Unsaturated soil mechanics in engineering practice. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, India

    Rojimul Hussain, Kishore Kumar Ghosh & K Ravi

Authors
  1. Rojimul Hussain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kishore Kumar Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K Ravi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K Ravi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hussain, R., Ghosh, K.K. & Ravi, K. Influence of biochar particle size on the hydraulic conductivity of two different compacted engineered soils. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 801–811 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01226-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01226-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation