Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Lignocellulose-derived monosugars: a review of biomass pre-treating techniques and post-methods to produce sustainable biohydrogen

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biohydrogen (H2) is considered as a prospective energy source for altering of exhausting fossil fuel-based hydrogen in the coming years. Among biomaterials, lignocellulose is the most abundant renewable feedstock for the second generation biohydrogen production through many processes. The conventional microbial fermentation and the photocatalytic reforming have received considerable attention that could convert the monosugars (mainly glucose and xylose) of the lignocellulosic materials into biohydrogen. In general, to obtain these monosugars, the lignocellulosic materials must be pre-treated through various complicated processes. This review focuses on various integrated pre-treating lignocellulosic material techniques and their advantages and disadvantages, including pretreatment, hydrolysis, and detoxification methods to get monosugars. Additionally, the state-of-the-art accomplishments in the post-methods, including microbial fermentation (including photo-fermentation and dark fermentation), microbial electrolysis, and photocatalytic reforming, for further converting monosugars into sustainable biohydrogen, are favorably highlighted. Finally, the perspectives for material pre-treating techniques and future challenges for post-methods to enhance biohydrogen are also discussed and intensified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AAS:

Aqueous ammonia soaking

AFEX:

Ammonia fiber explosion

NCNCNx :

Cyanamide-functionalized carbon nitride

CO2 :

Carbon dioxide

CS:

Cassava stem

CB:

Conduction band

(e−):

electron

(h+):

hole

(•OH):

Hydroxyl radicals

H2 :

Hydrogen/ Biohydrogen

HMF:

Hydroxymethyl furfural

PIL:

Protic ionic liquid

VB:

Valence band

References

  1. Chen R, Wang YZ, Liao Q, Zhu X, Xu TF (2013) Hydrolysates of lignocellulosic materials for biohydrogen production. BMB Rep 46:244–251

    Google Scholar 

  2. Show K-Y, Yan Y-G, Lee D-J (2019) Biohydrogen production: status and perspectives, biofuels: alternative feedstocks and conversion processes for the production of liquid and gaseous biofuels, pp. 693-713

  3. Veeravalli SS, Shanmugam SR, Ray S, Lalman JA, Biswas N (2019) Biohydrogen production from renewable resources, advanced bioprocessing for alternative fuels, biobased chemicals, and bioproducts, pp. 289–312

  4. Cormos C-C (2011) Hydrogen production from fossil fuels with carbon capture and storage based on chemical looping systems. Int J Hydrog Energy 36:5960–5971

    Google Scholar 

  5. Twigg MV, Dupont V (2014) Hydrogen production from fossil fuel and biomass feedstocks, Advances in Hydrogen Production, Storage and Distribution, pp. 43–84

  6. Chandrasekhar K, Lee YJ, Lee DW (2015) Biohydrogen production: strategies to improve process efficiency through microbial routes. Int J Mol Sci 16:8266–8293

    Google Scholar 

  7. El-Shafie M, Kambara S, Hayakawa Y (2019) Hydrogen production technologies overview. J Power Energy Eng 07:107–154

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kamaraj M, Ramachandran KK, Aravind J (2019) Biohydrogen production from waste materials: benefits and challenges. Int J Environ Sci Technol 17:559–576

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yadav M, Paritosh K, Vivekanand V (2019) Lignocellulose to bio-hydrogen: an overview on recent developments. Int J Hydrog Energy 45:18195–18210

  10. Argun H, Gokfiliz P, Karapinar I (2017) Biohydrogen production potential of different biomass sources, Biohydrogen Production: Sustainability of Current Technology and Future Perspective, pp. 11–48

  11. Nguyen V-C, Ke N-J, Nam LD, Nguyen B-S, Xiao Y-K, Lee Y-L, Teng H (2019) Photocatalytic reforming of sugar and glucose into H2 over functionalized graphene dots. J Mater Chem A 7:8384–8393

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sutthipattanasomboon C, Wongthanate J (2017) Enhancement of biohydrogen production from starch processing wastewater and further inside its ecosystem disclosed by 16S rDNA sequencing and FISH. Braz Arch Biol Technol 60:e17160260

  13. Boddiger D (2007) Boosting biofuel crops could threaten food security. Lancet 370:923–924

    Google Scholar 

  14. Popp J, Lakner Z, Harangi-Rákos M, Fári M (2014) The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment. Renew Sust Energ Rev 32:559–578

    Google Scholar 

  15. Go AW, Conag AT, Igdon RMB, Toledo AS, Malila JS (2019) Potentials of agricultural and agro-industrial crop residues for the displacement of fossil fuels: a Philippine context. Energy Strategy Rev 23:100–113

    Google Scholar 

  16. Passoth V, Sandgren M (2019) Biofuel production from straw hydrolysates: current achievements and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:5105–5116

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tripathi N, Hills CD, Singh RS, Atkinson CJ (2019) Biomass waste utilisation in low-carbon products: harnessing a major potential resource. NPJ Clim Atmos Sci 2:35

  18. Adessi A, De Philippis R (2012) Hydrogen production: photofermentation, Microbial technologies in advanced biofuels production, pp. 53–75

  19. Bundhoo ZMA (2019) Potential of bio-hydrogen production from dark fermentation of crop residues: a review. Int J Hydrog Energy 44:17346–17362

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hassan AHS, Mietzel T, Brunstermann R, Schmuck S, Schoth J, Kuppers M, Widmann R (2018) Fermentative hydrogen production from low-value substrates. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 34:176

    Google Scholar 

  21. Łukajtis R, Hołowacz I, Kucharska K, Glinka M, Rybarczyk P, Przyjazny A, Kamiński M (2018) Hydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 91:665–694

    Google Scholar 

  22. Masset J, Calusinska M, Hamilton C, Hiligsmann S, Joris B, Wilmotte A, Thonart P (2012) Fermentative hydrogen production from glucose and starch using pure strains and artificial co-cultures ofClostridium spp. Biotechnol Biofuels 5:35

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mishra P, Krishnan S, Rana S, Singh L, Sakinah M, Ab Wahid Z (2019) Outlook of fermentative hydrogen production techniques: an overview of dark, photo and integrated dark-photo fermentative approach to biomass. Energy Strategy Rev 24:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reungsang A, Zhong N, Yang Y, Sittijunda S, Xia A, Liao Q (2018) Hydrogen from photo fermentation, Bioreactors for Microbial Biomass and Energy Conversion, pp. 221–317

  25. Caravaca A, Jones W, Hardacre C, Bowker M (2016) H2 production by the photocatalytic reforming of cellulose and raw biomass using Ni, Pd, Pt and Au on titania. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci 472:20160054

    Google Scholar 

  26. Christoforidis KC, Fornasiero P (2017) Photocatalytic hydrogen production: a rift into the future energy supply. ChemCatChem 9:1523–1544

    Google Scholar 

  27. Da Vià L, Recchi C, Gonzalez-Yañez EO, Davies TE, Lopez-Sanchez JA (2017) Visible light selective photocatalytic conversion of glucose by TiO2. Appl Catal B 202:281–288

    Google Scholar 

  28. Imizcoz M, Puga AV (2019) Assessment of Photocatalytic hydrogen production from biomass or wastewaters depending on the metal co-catalyst and its deposition method on TiO2, catalysts, 9

  29. Kennedy J, Bahruji H, Bowker M, Davies PR, Bouleghlimat E, Issarapanacheewin S (2018) Hydrogen generation by photocatalytic reforming of potential biofuels: polyols, cyclic alcohols, and saccharides. J Photochem Photobiol A 356:451–456

    Google Scholar 

  30. Singh A, Sevda S, Abu Reesh I, Vanbroekhoven K, Rathore D, Pant D (2015) Biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic biomass: technology and sustainability. Energies 8:13062–13080

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kucharska K, Rybarczyk P, Holowacz I, Lukajtis R, Glinka M, Kaminski M (2018) Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic materials as substrates for fermentation processes. Molecules 23:2937

  32. Jensen CU, Rodriguez Guerrero JK, Karatzos S, Olofsson G, Iversen SB (2017) Fundamentals of Hydrofaction™: renewable crude oil from woody biomass. Biomass Convers Biorefin 7:495–509

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bajpai P (2016) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass, Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Biofuel Production, pp. 17–70

  34. Ghaemi F, Abdullah LC, Ariffin H (2019) Lignocellulose Structure and the effect on nanocellulose production, Lignocellulose for Future Bioeconomy, pp. 17–30

  35. Zoghlami A, Paes G (2019) Lignocellulosic biomass: understanding recalcitrance and predicting hydrolysis. Front Chem 7:874

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shahzadi T, Mehmood S, Irshad M, Anwar Z, Afroz A, Zeeshan N, Rashid U, Sughra K (2014) Advances in lignocellulosic biotechnology: a brief review on lignocellulosic biomass and cellulases. Adv Biosci Biotechnol 05:246–251

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tayyab M (2018) Bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass by environment-friendly pretreatment methods: a review. Appl Ecol Environ Res 16:225–249

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rajendran K, Drielak E, Sudarshan Varma V, Muthusamy S, Kumar G (2017) Updates on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic feedstocks for bioenergy production–a review. Biomass Convers Biorefin 8:471–483

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sarkar N, Ghosh SK, Bannerjee S, Aikat K (2012) Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: an overview. Renew Energy 37:19–27

    Google Scholar 

  40. Daud Z, Mohd Hatta MZ, Abdul Latiff AA, Awang H (2016) Corn stalk fiber material by chemical pulping process for pulp and paper industry. Adv Mater Res 1133:608–611

    Google Scholar 

  41. Flandez J, González I, Resplandis JB, Mansouri N-EE, Vilaseca F, Mutjé P (2012) Management of corn stalk waste as reinforcement for polypropylene injection moulded composites. Bioresources 7:1836–1849

    Google Scholar 

  42. Templeton DW, Sluiter AD, Hayward TK, Hames BR, Thomas SR (2009) Assessing corn stover composition and sources of variability via NIRS. Cellulose 16:621–639

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pordesimo LO, Hames BR, Sokhansanj S, Edens WC (2005) Variation in corn stover composition and energy content with crop maturity. Biomass Bioenergy 28:366–374

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kosinkova J, Ramirez JA, Ristovski ZD, Brown R, Rainey TJ (2016) Physical and chemical stability of bagasse biocrude from liquefaction stored in real conditions. Energy Fuel 30:10499–10504

    Google Scholar 

  45. Guerra A, Filpponen I, Lucia LA, Argyropoulos DS (2006) Comparative evaluation of three lignin isolation protocols for various wood species. J Agric Food Chem 54:9696–9705

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pham P, Tuyet-Le D, ThuHuong L, Trong-Anh N (2019) Recycling cassava stem to bioethanol by inoculating a novel xylose–glucose fermenting yeast at high initial concentration. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 39:e13286

  47. Sivamani S, Baskar R (2018) Bioconversion of cassava stem to ethanol: oxalic acid pretreatment and co-culture fermentation. Biofuels 9:559–566

    Google Scholar 

  48. Held MA, Jiang N, Basu D, Showalter AM, Faik A (2015) Plant cell wall polysaccharides: structure and biosynthesis, Polysaccharides, pp. 3–54

  49. Kong-Win Chang J, Duret X, Berberi V, Zahedi-Niaki H, Lavoie JM (2018) Two-step thermochemical cellulose hydrolysis with partial neutralization for glucose production. Front Chem 6:117

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tanjore D, Richard TL (2015) A systems view of lignocellulose hydrolysis. In: Ravindra P. (eds) Advances in Bioprocess Technology. Springer, Cham, pp 387–419

  51. Li L, Rowbotham JS, Christopher Greenwell H, Dyer PW (2013) Chapter 8 - an introduction to pyrolysis and catalytic pyrolysis: versatile techniques for biomass conversion. In: Suib SL (ed) New and future developments in catalysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 173–208

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kumar AK, Sharma S (2017) Recent updates on different methods of pretreatment of lignocellulosic feedstocks: a review. Bioresour Bioprocess 4:7

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P (2009) Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:3713–3729

    Google Scholar 

  54. Cunha-Pereira Fd, Hickert LR, Rech R, Dillon AP, Ayub MAZ (2017) Fermentation of hexoses and pentoses from hydrolyzed soybean hull into ethanol and xylitol by Candida guilliermondii BL 13. Braz J Chem Eng 34:927–936

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kim JH, Block DE, Mills DA (2010) Simultaneous consumption of pentose and hexose sugars: an optimal microbial phenotype for efficient fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 88:1077–1085

    Google Scholar 

  56. Cavka A, Jonsson LJ (2013) Detoxification of lignocellulosic hydrolysates using sodium borohydride. Bioresour Technol 136:368–376

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chen J, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Ji X, Zhang L, Mi X, Huang H (2013) Removal of inhibitors from lignocellulosic hydrolyzates by vacuum membrane distillation. Bioresour Technol 144:680–683

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kim D (2018) Physico-chemical conversion of lignocellulose: inhibitor effects and detoxification strategies: a mini review. Molecules 23:309

  59. Tanaka K, Koyama M, Pham PT, Rollon AP, Habaki H, Egashira R, Nakasaki K (2019) Production of high-concentration bioethanol from cassava stem by repeated hydrolysis and intermittent yeast inoculation. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 138:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  60. Haldar D, Sen D, Gayen K (2016) A review on the production of fermentable sugars from lignocellulosic biomass through conventional and enzymatic route—a comparison. Int J Green Energy 13:1232–1253

    Google Scholar 

  61. Haldar D, Purkait MK (2020) Lignocellulosic conversion into value-added products: a review. Process Biochem 89:110–133

    Google Scholar 

  62. Haldar D, Purkait MK (2020) Thermochemical pretreatment enhanced bioconversion of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum): insight on the production of sugars and lignin. Biomass Convers Biorefin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00689-y

  63. Baruah J, Nath BK, Sharma R, Kumar S, Deka RC, Baruah DC, Kalita E (2018) Recent trends in the pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for value-added products. Front Energy Res 6:141

  64. Bhatt SM, Shilpa (2015) Lignocellulosic feedstock conversion, inhibitor detoxification and cellulosic hydrolysis – a review. Biofuels 5:633–649

    Google Scholar 

  65. Sasmal S, Mohanty K (2018) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass toward biofuel production. In: Kumar S., Sani R. (eds) Biorefining of Biomass to Biofuels. Biofuel and Biorefinery Technologies, vol 4. Springer, Cham, pp. 203–221

  66. Achinas S, Achinas V, Euverink GJW (2017) A technological overview of biogas production from biowaste. Engineering 3:299–307

    Google Scholar 

  67. Rezania S, Din MFM, Mohamad SE, Sohaili J, Tai SM, Yusof MBM, Kamy H, Darajeh N, Ahsan A (2017) Review on pretreatment methods and ethanol production from cellulosic water hyacinth. Bioresources 12:2108–2124

    Google Scholar 

  68. Tsegaye B, Balomajumder C, Roy P (2019) Microbial delignification and hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass to enhance biofuel production: an overview and future prospect. Bull Natl Res Cent 43:51

  69. Andlar M, Rezić T, Marđetko N, Kracher D, Ludwig R, Šantek B (2018) Lignocellulose degradation: an overview of fungi and fungal enzymes involved in lignocellulose degradation. Eng Life Sci 18:768–778

    Google Scholar 

  70. Su Y, Yu X, Sun Y, Wang G, Chen H, Chen G (2018) Evaluation of screened lignin-degrading fungi for the biological pretreatment of corn Stover. Sci Rep 8:5385

    Google Scholar 

  71. Cheah WY, Sankaran R, Show PL, Tg TNB, Ibrahim KW, Chew AC, Chang J-S (2020) Pretreatment methods for lignocellulosic biofuels production: current advances, challenges and future prospects. Biofuel Res J 7:1115–1127

    Google Scholar 

  72. Conde-Mejía C, Jiménez-Gutiérrez A, El-Halwagi M (2012) A comparison of pretreatment methods for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic materials. Process Saf Environ Prot 90:189–202

    Google Scholar 

  73. Kim TH, Lee YY (2007) Pretreatment of corn stover by soaking in aqueous ammonia at moderate temperatures. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 137–140:81–92

    Google Scholar 

  74. Yadav KS, Naseeruddin S, Prashanthi GS, Sateesh L, Rao LV (2011) Bioethanol fermentation of concentrated rice straw hydrolysate using co-culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis. Bioresour Technol 102:6473–6478

    Google Scholar 

  75. Shirkavand E, Baroutian S, Gapes DJ, Young BR (2017) Pretreatment of radiata pine using two white rot fungal strains Stereum hirsutum and Trametes versicolor. Energy Convers Manag 142:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  76. Suhara H, Kodama S, Kamei I, Maekawa N, Meguro S (2012) Screening of selective lignin-degrading basidiomycetes and biological pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of bamboo culms. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 75:176–180

    Google Scholar 

  77. Sun YG, Ma YL, Wang LQ, Wang FZ, Wu QQ, Pan GY (2015) Physicochemical properties of corn stalk after treatment using steam explosion coupled with acid or alkali. Carbohydr Polym 117:486–493

    Google Scholar 

  78. Ascencio JJ, Chandel AK, Philippini RR, da Silva SS (2019) Comparative study of cellulosic sugars production from sugarcane bagasse after dilute nitric acid, dilute sodium hydroxide and sequential nitric acid-sodium hydroxide pretreatment. Biomass Convers Biorefin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00547-6

  79. Kucharska K, Lukajtis R, Slupek E, Cieslinski H, Rybarczyk P, Kaminski M (2018) Hydrogen production from energy poplar preceded by MEA pre-treatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Molecules 23:3029

  80. Haldar D, Gayen K, Sen D (2018) Enumeration of monosugars’ inhibition characteristics on the kinetics of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Process Biochem 72:130–136

    Google Scholar 

  81. Haldar D, Sen D, Gayen K (2018) Enzymatic hydrolysis of banana stems (Musa acuminata): optimization of process parameters and inhibition characterization. Int J Green Energy 15:406–413

    Google Scholar 

  82. Castaño HP, Reales A JG, Montoya JZ (2015) Enzymatic hydrolysis of cassava stalks pretreated with the alkaline method. Agron Colomb 33:238–243

    Google Scholar 

  83. Nuwamanya E, Chiwona-Karltun L, Kawuki RS, Baguma Y (2012) Bio-ethanol production from non-food parts of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Ambio 41:262–270

    Google Scholar 

  84. Sun ZY, Tang YQ, Iwanaga T, Sho T, Kida K (2011) Production of fuel ethanol from bamboo by concentrated sulfuric acid hydrolysis followed by continuous ethanol fermentation. Bioresour Technol 102:10929–10935

    Google Scholar 

  85. Dziekońska-Kubczak U, Berłowska J, Dziugan P, Patelski P, Balcerek M, Pielech-Przybylska K, Robak K (2019) Two-stage pretreatment to improve saccharification of oat straw and Jerusalem artichoke biomass. Energies 12:1715

  86. Heer D, Sauer U (2008) Identification of furfural as a key toxin in lignocellulosic hydrolysates and evolution of a tolerant yeast strain. Microb Biotechnol 1:497–506

    Google Scholar 

  87. Almeida JR, Bertilsson M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Gorsich S, Liden G (2009) Metabolic effects of furaldehydes and impacts on biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82:625–638

    Google Scholar 

  88. Jönsson JL, Alriksson B, Nilvebrant N (2013) Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:16

  89. Schirmer-Michel AC, Flores SH, Hertz PF, Matos GS, Ayub MA (2008) Production of ethanol from soybean hull hydrolysate by osmotolerant Candida guilliermondii NRRL Y-2075. Bioresour Technol 99:2898–2904

    Google Scholar 

  90. Reginatto V, Antonio RV (2015) Fermentative hydrogen production from agroindustrial lignocellulosic substrates. Braz J Microbiol 46:323–335

    Google Scholar 

  91. Zhang L, Li Y, Liu X, Ren N, Ding J (2019) Lignocellulosic hydrogen production using dark fermentation by Clostridium lentocellum strain Cel10 newly isolated from Ailuropoda melanoleuca excrement. RSC Adv 9:11179–11185

    Google Scholar 

  92. Sun Y, Wang Y, Yang G, Sun Z (2019) Optimization of biohydrogen production using acid pretreated corn stover hydrolysate followed by nickel nanoparticle addition. Int J Energy Res 44:1843–1857

    Google Scholar 

  93. Sheng T, Gao L, Zhao L, Liu W, Wang A (2015) Direct hydrogen production from lignocellulose by the newly isolated Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum strain DD32. RSC Adv 5:99781–99788

    Google Scholar 

  94. Asadi N, Karimi Alavijeh M, Zilouei H (2018) Biological hydrogen production by Enterobacter aerogenes: structural analysis of treated rice straw and effect of substrate concentration. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:8718–8728

    Google Scholar 

  95. Dhanasekar R, Jonesh S (2018) Identification of a novel hydrogen producing bacteria from sugarcane bagasse waste. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 15:277–282

    Google Scholar 

  96. Yang H, Shi B, Ma H, Guo L (2015) Enhanced hydrogen production from cornstalk by dark- and photo-fermentation with diluted alkali-cellulase two-step hydrolysis. Int J Hydrog Energy 40:12193–12200

    Google Scholar 

  97. Catal T (2016) Comparison of various carbohydrates for hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 30:75–80

    Google Scholar 

  98. Wakerley DW, Kuehnel MF, Orchard KL, Ly KH, Rosser TE, Reisner E (2017) Solar-driven reforming of lignocellulose to H2 with a CdS/CdOx photocatalyst. Nat Energy 2:17021

  99. Kasap H, Achilleos DS, Huang A, Reisner E (2018) Photoreforming of lignocellulose into H2 using nanoengineered carbon nitride under benign conditions. J Am Chem Soc 140:11604–11607

    Google Scholar 

  100. Speltini A, Sturini M, Dondi D, Annovazzi E, Maraschi F, Caratto V, Profumo A, Buttafava A (2014) Sunlight-promoted photocatalytic hydrogen gas evolution from water-suspended cellulose: a systematic study. Photochem Photobiol Sci 13:1410–1419

    Google Scholar 

  101. Miller A, Singh L, Wang L, Liu H (2019) Linking internal resistance with design and operation decisions in microbial electrolysis cells. Environ Int 126:611–618

    Google Scholar 

  102. Hamelers HVM, Ter Heijne A, Sleutels THJA, Jeremiasse AW, Strik DPBTB, Buisman CJN (2010) New applications and performance of bioelectrochemical systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:1673–1685

    Google Scholar 

  103. Liu H, Grot S, Logan BE (2005) Electrochemically assisted microbial production of hydrogen from acetate. Environ Sci Technol 39:4317–4320

    Google Scholar 

  104. Miandad R, Rehan M, Ouda OKM, Khan MZ, Shahzad K, Ismail IMI, Nizami AS (2017) Waste-to-hydrogen energy in Saudi Arabia: challenges and perspectives. In: Singh A, Rathore D (eds) Biohydrogen production: sustainability of current technology and future perspective. Springer India, New Delhi, pp 237–252

    Google Scholar 

  105. Huang C-W, Nguyen B-S, Wu JCS, Nguyen V-H (2020) A current perspective for photocatalysis towards the hydrogen production from biomass-derived organic substances and water. Int J Hydrog Energy 45:18144–18159

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Lac Hong University, Bien Hoa, Dong Nai, 810000, Vietnam

    Pham Thi Phan & Trong-Anh Nguyen

  2. Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials for Energy and Environmental Applications, Lac Hong University, Bien Hoa, Dong Nai, 810000, Vietnam

    Ba-Son Nguyen

  3. Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Jaypee University of Information Technology, Waknaghat, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, 173 234, India

    Ashok Kumar

  4. Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, 550000, Vietnam

    Van-Huy Nguyen

Authors
  1. Pham Thi Phan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ba-Son Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Trong-Anh Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ashok Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Van-Huy Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Van-Huy Nguyen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phan, P.T., Nguyen, BS., Nguyen, TA. et al. Lignocellulose-derived monosugars: a review of biomass pre-treating techniques and post-methods to produce sustainable biohydrogen. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 8425–8439 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01161-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01161-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation