Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of pyrolysis temperature on production and physicochemical characterization of biochar derived from coconut fiber biomass through slow pyrolysis process

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purposes of this research were to investigate the competence of coconut fiber to produce biochar by slow pyrolysis process and analyze the effects of different pyrolysis temperatures on the yield and physicochemical properties of biochars. Coconut fiber biomass was subjected to slow pyrolysis process using a laboratory scale fixed bed reactor at six different temperatures ranging from 350 to 600 °C (at an interval of 50 °C). The slow pyrolysis process was carried out in an inert environment for 1 (one) hour at a constant heating rate of 10 °C/min. The physicochemical properties of biomass and obtained biochars were characterized by proximate analysis (VM, FC, ash), ultimate analysis (CHNSO), higher heating value (HHV), bulk density, BET surface area, pH, and electrical conductivity (EC). Functional groups and particle sizes of biomass and biochars were identified by FTIR and particle size distribution respectively. Surface morphology and pore distribution of the biochars were observed by SEM images. The pyrolysis temperature had a negative effect on biochar yield and reduced from 48.13 to 29.34% as the pyrolysis temperature increased from 350 to 600 °C. Fixed carbon, ash content, pH, organic carbon, specific surface area, EC, degree of aromaticity, and porosity of the biochars enhanced as the pyrolysis temperature rose from 350 to 600 °C. However, the volatile matter, VM/FC ratio, H/C ratio, HHV, bulk density, and particle sizes of biochars were negatively correlated with the pyrolysis temperatures. Higher pyrolysis temperatures increased aromatic C groups and recalcitrant characteristics, yielded smaller particles, and formed elongated and porous structures. The physicochemical properties of high-temperature biochars (500–600 °C) showed the potential to be used as soil amendments and an efficient tool for C sequestration and retention of nutrients, and water. The porous structures of high-temperature biochars can accommodate suitable soil-microorganism activities, increase water sorption, and increase soil density. Moreover, the high alkalinity of the biochars can assist to neutralize acidic soil and increases soil fertility and plant growth. On the contrary, low-temperature biochars (350–450 °C) are promising tools for solid fuels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tasim B, Masood T, Shah ZA, Arif M, Ullah A, Miraj G, Samiullah M (2019) Quality evaluation of biochar prepared from different agricultural residues. Sarhad J Agric 35(1):134–143

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gaskin J, Steiner C, Harris K, Das K, Bibens B (2008) Effect of low-temperature pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agricultural use. Trans ASABE 51(6):2061–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Radlein DSA, Piskorz JK, Majerski PA (1997) Method of producing slow-release nitrogenous organic fertilizer from biomass. Google Patents

  4. Hunt J, DuPonte M, Sato D, Kawabata A (2010) The basics of biochar: a natural soil amendment. Soil Crop Manag 30(7):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lehmann J (2007) Bio-energy in the black. Front Ecol Environ 5(7):381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gunarathne DS, Udugama IA, Jayawardena S, Gernaey KV, Mansouri SS, Narayana M (2019) Resource recovery from bio-based production processes in developing Asia. Sustain Prod Consum 17:196–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Esmeraldo MA, Gomes AC, Freitas JE, Fechine PB, Sombra AS, Corradini E, Mele G, Maffezzoli A, Mazzetto SE (2010) Dwarf-green coconut fibers: a versatile natural renewable raw bioresource. Treatment, morphology, and physicochemical properties. Bioresources 5(4):2478–2501

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tripathi M, Sahu JN, Ganesan P (2016) Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 55:467–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mimmo T, Panzacchi P, Baratieri M, Davies C, Tonon G (2014) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on miscanthus (Miscanthus× giganteus) biochar physical, chemical and functional properties. Biomass Bioenergy 62:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Spokas KA (2010) Review of the stability of biochar in soils: predictability of O: C molar ratios. Carbon Manag 1(2):289–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rees F, Simonnot M-O, Morel J-L (2014) Short-term effects of biochar on soil heavy metal mobility are controlled by intra-particle diffusion and soil pH increase. Eur J Soil Sci 65(1):149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mollinedo J, Schumacher TE, Chintala R (2015) Influence of feedstocks and pyrolysis on biochar’s capacity to modify soil water retention characteristics. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 114:100–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee Y, Park J, Gang K, Ryu C, Yang W, Jung J, Hyun S (2013) Production and characterization of biochar from various biomass materials by slow pyrolysis. Technical Bulletin-Food and Fertilizer Technology Center 197(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bispo MD, Schneider JK, da Silva OD, Tomasini D, da Silva Maciel GP, Schena T, Onorevoli B, Bjerk TR, Jacques RA, Krause LC (2018) Production of activated biochar from coconut fiber for the removal of organic compounds from phenolic. J Environ Chem Eng 6(2):2743–2750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu Z, Han G (2015) Production of solid fuel biochar from waste biomass by low temperature pyrolysis. Fuel 158:159–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shariff A, Aziz NSM, Saleh NM, Ruzali NSI (2016) The effect of feedstock type and slow pyrolysis temperature on biochar yield from coconut wastes. Int J Chem Mol Nucl Mater Metall Eng 10(12):1361–1365

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gonzaga MIS, Mackowiak C, de Almeida AQ, de Carvalho Junior JIT, Andrade KR (2018) Positive and negative effects of biochar from coconut husks, orange bagasse and pine wood chips on maize (Zea mays L.) growth and nutrition. Catena 162:414–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Suman S, Gautam S (2017) Pyrolysis of coconut husk biomass: analysis of its biochar properties. Energy Sources Part A 39(8):761–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jindo K, Mizumoto H, Sawada Y, Sanchez-Monedero MA, Sonoki T (2014) Physical and chemical characterization of biochars derived from different agricultural residues. Biogeosciences 11(23):6613–6621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sonobe T, Pipatmanomai S, Worasuwannarak N (2006) Pyrolysis characteristics of Thai-agricultural residues of rice straw, rice husk, and corncob by TG-MS technique and kinetic analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Joint International Conference on “Sustainable Energy and Environment (SEE’06). pp 21–23

  21. Madari BE, Maia CMBdF, Novotny EH (2012) Context and importance of biochar research. Pesq Agrop Brasileira 47(5):1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh H, Sapra PK, Sidhu BS (2013) Evaluation and characterization of different biomass residues through proximate & ultimate analysis and heating value. Asian J Eng Appl Technol 2(2):6–10

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ronsse F, Van Hecke S, Dickinson D, Prins W (2013) Production and characterization of slow pyrolysis biochar: influence of feedstock type and pyrolysis conditions. GCB Bioenergy 5(2):104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Adeeyo O, Oresegun OM, Oladimeji TE (2015) Compositional analysis of lignocellulosic materials: evaluation of an economically viable method suitable for woody and non-woody biomass. Am J Eng Res (AJER) 4(4):14–19

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ververis C, Georghiou K, Danielidis D, Hatzinikolaou D, Santas P, Santas R, Corleti V (2007) Cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin and ash content of some organic materials and their suitability for use as paper pulp supplements. Bioresour Technol 98(2):296–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rajkovich S, Enders A, Hanley K, Hyland C, Zimmerman AR, Lehmann J (2012) Corn growth and nitrogen nutrition after additions of biochars with varying properties to a temperate soil. Biol Fertil Soils 48(3):271–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Crombie K, Mašek O, Sohi SP, Brownsort P, Cross A (2013) The effect of pyrolysis conditions on biochar stability as determined by three methods. GCB Bioenergy 5(2):122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bazargan A, Rough SL, McKay G (2014) Compaction of palm kernel shell biochars for application as solid fuel. Biomass Bioenergy 70:489–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kakitis A, Ancans D, Nulle I (2014) Evaluation of combustion properties of biomass mixtures. Eng Rural Dev 423–427

  30. Obernberger I, Thek G (2004) Physical characterisation and chemical composition of densified biomass fuels with regard to their combustion behaviour. Biomass Bioenergy 27(6):653–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tao G, Lestander TA, Geladi P, Xiong S (2012) Biomass properties in association with plant species and assortments I: a synthesis based on literature data of energy properties. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(5):3481–3506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu X, Yu W (2006) Evaluating the thermal stability of high performance fibers by TGA. J Appl Polym Sci 99(3):937–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tikhonov NA, Arkhangelsky IV, Belyaev SS, Matveev AT (2009) Carbonization of polymeric nonwoven materials. Thermochim Acta 486(1–2):66–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang T, Jin J, Yang S, Hu D, Li G, Jiang J (2009) Synthesis and characterization of fluorinated PBO with high thermal stability and low dielectric constant. J Macromol Sci Part B 48(6):1114–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Antal MJ, Grønli M (2003) The art, science, and technology of charcoal production. Ind Eng Chem Res 42(8):1619–1640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bulmău C, Mărculescu C, Badea A, Apostol T (2010) Pyrolysis parameters influencing the bio-char generation from wooden biomass. University Politehnica of Bucharest Scientific Bulletin-Serie C: Electrical Engineering 72(1):29–38

    Google Scholar 

  37. Song G, Shen L, Xiao J (2011) Estimating specific chemical exergy of biomass from basic analysis data. Ind Eng Chem Res 50(16):9758–9766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mohammad I, Abakr Y, Kabir F, Yusuf S, Alshareef I, Chin S (2015) Pyrolysis of Napier grass in a fixed bed reactor: effect of operating conditions on product yields and characteristics. BioResources 10(4):6457–6478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang Y, Ma Z, Zhang Q, Wang J, Ma Q, Yang Y, Luo X, Zhang W (2017) Comparison of the physicochemical characteristics of bio-char pyrolyzed from moso bamboo and rice husk with different pyrolysis temperatures. BioResources 12(3):4652–4669

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hill CA, Khalil HA, Hale MD (1998) A study of the potential of acetylation to improve the properties of plant fibres. Ind Crop Prod 8(1):53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Geethamma V, Mathew KT, Lakshminarayanan R, Thomas S (1998) Composite of short coir fibres and natural rubber: effect of chemical modification, loading and orientation of fibre. Polymer 39(6–7):1483–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kelley SS, Rowell RM, Davis M, Jurich CK, Ibach R (2004) Rapid analysis of the chemical composition of agricultural fibers using near infrared spectroscopy and pyrolysis molecular beam mass spectrometry. Biomass Bioenergy 27(1):77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Xueyong Z, Zhe Y, Huifen L, Xianzhi L, Jianchao H (2018) Effect of soil organic matter on adsorption and insecticidal activity of toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis. Pedosphere 28(2):341–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems–a review. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 11(2):403–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Nair VD, Nair P, Dari B, Freitas AM, Chatterjee N, Pinheiro FM (2017) Biochar in the agroecosystem–climate-change–sustainability nexus. Front Plant Sci 8:2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal–a review. Biol Fertil Soils 35(4):219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Joseph S, Camps-Arbestain M, Lin Y, Munroe P, Chia C, Hook J, Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Cowie A, Singh B (2010) An investigation into the reactions of biochar in soil. Soil Res 48(7):501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lin Y, Munroe P, Joseph S, Henderson R, Ziolkowski A (2012) Water extractable organic carbon in untreated and chemical treated biochars. Chemosphere 87(2):151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rondon MA, Lehmann J, Ramírez J, Hurtado M (2007) Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with bio-char additions. Biol Fertil Soils 43(6):699–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Singh B, Singh BP, Cowie AL (2010) Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment. Soil Res 48(7):516–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Domingues RR, Trugilho PF, Silva CA, de Melo ICN, Melo LC, Magriotis ZM, Sanchez-Monedero MA (2017) Properties of biochar derived from wood and high-nutrient biomasses with the aim of agronomic and environmental benefits. PLoS One 12(5):e0176884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zimmerman AR (2010) Abiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory-produced black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44(4):1295–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Denyes MJ, Parisien MA, Rutter A, Zeeb BA (2014) Physical, chemical and biological characterization of six biochars produced for the remediation of contaminated sites. JoVE (J Vis Exp) (93):e52183

  54. Mukherjee A, Zimmerman A, Harris W (2011) Surface chemistry variations among a series of laboratory-produced biochars. Geoderma 163(3–4):247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Fernandes MB, Brooks P (2003) Characterization of carbonaceous combustion residues: II. Nonpolar organic compounds. Chemosphere 53(5):447–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Luo L, Xu C, Chen Z, Zhang S (2015) Properties of biomass-derived biochars: combined effects of operating conditions and biomass types. Bioresour Technol 192:83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Enders A, Hanley K, Whitman T, Joseph S, Lehmann J (2012) Characterization of biochars to evaluate recalcitrance and agronomic performance. Bioresour Technol 114:644–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Cross A, Sohi SP (2011) The priming potential of biochar products in relation to labile carbon contents and soil organic matter status. Soil Biol Biochem 43(10):2127–2134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Yuan J-H, Xu R-K, Zhang H (2011) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol 102(3):3488–3497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Jha P, Biswas A, Lakaria B, Rao AS (2010) Biochar in agriculture–prospects and related implications. Curr Sci 1218–1225

  61. Fellet G, Marchiol L, Delle Vedove G, Peressotti A (2011) Application of biochar on mine tailings: effects and perspectives for land reclamation. Chemosphere 83(9):1262–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Guo M, Shen Y, He Z (2012) Poultry litter-based biochar: preparation, characterization, and utilization. Applied research of animal manure: challenges and opportunities beyond the adverse environmental concerns Nova Sci, New York:169–202

  63. Alburquerque JA, Calero JM, Barrón V, Torrent J, del Campillo MC, Gallardo A, Villar R (2014) Effects of biochars produced from different feedstocks on soil properties and sunflower growth. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177(1):16–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Nartey OD, Zhao B (2014) Biochar preparation, characterization, and adsorptive capacity and its effect on bioavailability of contaminants: an overview. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2014:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Noor NM, Shariff A, Abdullah N, Aziz NSM (2019) Temperature effect on biochar properties from slow pyrolysis of coconut flesh waste. Malays J Fundam Appl Sci 15(2):153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology, 1st edition.  Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, pp 183-206

  67. Keiluweit M, Nico PS, Johnson MG, Kleber M (2010) Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44(4):1247–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Cybulak M, Sokolowska Z, Boguta P (2016) Hygroscopic moisture content of podzolic soil with biochar. Acta Agrophysica 23 (4)

  69. Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrott A, Lehmann J, Joseph S (2010) Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat Commun 1(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Novak JM, Lima I, Xing B, Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Das K, Ahmedna M, Rehrah D, Watts DW, Busscher WJ (2009) Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Ann Environ Sci

  71. Chen B, Zhou D, Zhu L (2008) Transitional adsorption and partition of nonpolar and polar aromatic contaminants by biochars of pine needles with different pyrolytic temperatures. Environ Sci Technol 42(14):5137–5143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Wu W, Yang M, Feng Q, McGrouther K, Wang H, Lu H, Chen Y (2012) Chemical characterization of rice straw-derived biochar for soil amendment. Biomass Bioenergy 47:268–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Ding Y, Liu Y-X, Wu W-X, Shi D-Z, Yang M, Zhong Z-K (2010) Evaluation of biochar effects on nitrogen retention and leaching in multi-layered soil columns. Water Air Soil Pollut 213(1–4):47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Scheffer F, Schachtschabel P (2002) Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde (Textbook of soil science). Spektrum Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  75. Oberlin A (2002) Pyrocarbons. Carbon 40(1):7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Rehrah D, Reddy M, Novak J, Bansode R, Schimmel KA, Yu J, Watts D, Ahmedna M (2014) Production and characterization of biochars from agricultural by-products for use in soil quality enhancement. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 108:301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Ding W, Dong X, Ime IM, Gao B, Ma LQ (2014) Pyrolytic temperatures impact lead sorption mechanisms by bagasse biochars. Chemosphere 105:68–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Malhi S, Nyborg M, Harapiak J (1998) Effects of long-term N fertilizer-induced acidification and liming on micronutrients in soil and in bromegrass hay. Soil Tillage Res 48(1–2):91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Mary GS, Sugumaran P, Niveditha S, Ramalakshmi B, Ravichandran P, Seshadri S (2016) Production, characterization and evaluation of biochar from pod (Pisum sativum), leaf (Brassica oleracea) and peel (Citrus sinensis) wastes. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 5(1):43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Liu X-H, Zhang X-C (2012) Effect of biochar on pH of alkaline soils in the Loess Plateau: results from incubation experiments. Int J Agric Biol 14(5)

  81. Lua AC, Yang T, Guo J (2004) Effects of pyrolysis conditions on the properties of activated carbons prepared from pistachio-nut shells. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 72(2):279–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Huang Z-K, Lü Q-F, Lin Q, Cheng X (2012) Microstructure, properties and lignin-based modification of wood–ceramics from rice husk and coal tar pitch. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 22(5):1113–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Byrne CE, Nagle DC (1997) Carbonization of wood for advanced materials applications. Carbon 35(2):259–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Bansal R, Jean-Baptiste D, Fritz S (1988) Active carbon Marcel Dekker Inc. New York

  85. Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Grossman J, O’neill B, Skjemstad JO, Thies J, Luizão FJ, Petersen J (2006) Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70(5):1719–1730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Lei O, Zhang R (2013) Effects of biochars derived from different feedstocks and pyrolysis temperatures on soil physical and hydraulic properties. J Soils Sediments 13(9):1561–1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Tomczyk A, Boguta P, Sokołowska Z (2019) Biochar efficiency in copper removal from Haplic soils. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16(8):4899–4912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Fernández RG, García CP, Lavín AG, de las Heras JLB (2012) Study of main combustion characteristics for biomass fuels used in boilers. Fuel Process Technol 103:16–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Downie A, Crosky A, Munroe P, Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 13–32

    Google Scholar 

  90. Cantrell KB, Hunt PG, Uchimiya M, Novak JM, Ro KS (2012) Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour Technol 107:419–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Gao Y, Yue Q, Gao B, Sun Y, Wang W, Li Q, Wang Y (2013) Preparation of high surface area-activated carbon from lignin of papermaking black liquor by KOH activation for Ni (II) adsorption. Chem Eng J 217:345–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Liu Z, Dugan B, Masiello CA, Gonnermann HM (2017) Biochar particle size, shape, and porosity act together to influence soil water properties. PLoS One 12(6):e0179079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Briones MJI (2014) Soil fauna and soil functions: a jigsaw puzzle. Front Environ Sci 2:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Weyers SL, Spokas KA (2011) Impact of biochar on earthworm populations: a review Appl Environ Soil Sci 2011

  95. Mierzwa-Hersztek M, Gondek K, Baran A (2016) Effect of poultry litter biochar on soil enzymatic activity, ecotoxicity and plant growth. Appl Soil Ecol 105(1):144–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Sugiyama J, Persson J, Chanzy H (1991) Combined infrared and electron diffraction study of the polymorphism of native celluloses. Macromolecules 24(9):2461–2466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Rafiq MK, Bachmann RT, Rafiq MT, Shang Z, Joseph S, Long R (2016) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on physico-chemical properties of corn stover (Zea mays L.) biochar and feasibility for carbon capture and energy balance. PLoS One 11(6):e0156894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Åkerholm M, Salmén L (2003) The oriented structure of lignin and its viscoelastic properties studied by static and dynamic FT-IR spectroscopy. Holzforschung 57(5):459–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Singh BP, Cowie AL, Smernik RJ (2012) Biochar carbon stability in a clayey soil as a function of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature. Environ Sci Technol 46(21):11770–11778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Peng X, Ye L, Wang C, Zhou H, Sun B (2011) Temperature-and duration-dependent rice straw-derived biochar: characteristics and its effects on soil properties of an Ultisol in southern China. Soil Tillage Res 112(2):159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Lee JW, Kidder M, Evans BR, Paik S, Buchanan Iii A, Garten CT, Brown RC (2010) Characterization of biochars produced from cornstovers for soil amendment. Environ Sci Technol 44(20):7970–7974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Duong VT, Khanh NM, Nguyen NTH, Phi NN, Duc NT, Xo DH (2017) Impact of biochar on the water holding capacity and moisture of basalt and grey soil. J Sci Ho Chi Minh City Open Univ 7(2):36–43

    Google Scholar 

  103. Ghani WAWAK, Mohd A, da Silva G, Bachmann RT, Taufiq-Yap YH, Rashid U, Ala’a H (2013) Biochar production from waste rubber-wood-sawdust and its potential use in C sequestration: chemical and physical characterization. Ind Crop Prod 44:18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Hosoya T, Kawamoto H, Saka S (2007) Cellulose–hemicellulose and cellulose–lignin interactions in wood pyrolysis at gasification temperature. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 80(1):118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Valenzuela-Calahorro C, Bernalte-Garcia A, Gomez-Serrano V, Bernalte-García MJ (1987) Influence of particle size and pyrolysis conditions on yield, density and some textural parameters of chars prepared from holm-oak wood. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 12(1):61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Chen J, Li S, Liang C, Xu Q, Li Y, Qin H, Fuhrmann JJ (2017) Response of microbial community structure and function to short-term biochar amendment in an intensively managed bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) plantation soil: effect of particle size and addition rate. Sci Total Environ 574:24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Masiello CA, Dugan B, Brewer CE, Spokas KA, Novak JM, Liu Z, Sorrenti G (2015) Biochar effects on soil hydrology. In: Biochar for environmental management. Routledge, pp. 575–594

  108. Blanco-Canqui H (2017) Biochar and soil physical properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 81(4):687–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Gąsior D, Tic WJ (2017) Application of the biochar-based technologies as the way of realization of the sustainable development strategy. Econ Environ Stud 17(43):597–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research work was supported by the Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (BCSIR), an organization under the Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of Bangladesh.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sajib Aninda Dhar.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dhar, S.A., Sakib, T.U. & Hilary, L.N. Effects of pyrolysis temperature on production and physicochemical characterization of biochar derived from coconut fiber biomass through slow pyrolysis process. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 12, 2631–2647 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01116-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01116-y

Keywords

Navigation