Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dependence of pyrolysis temperature and lignocellulosic physical-chemical properties of biochar on its wettability

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, high attention is paid to the knowledge on wettability of biochar, which is still very complicated, since it is acknowledged that it can depend either on primary feedstock, pyrolysis conditions or on environmental factors. Until now, it is known that the main factor responsible for the production of hydrophobic biochar is aliphatic functional groups forming tar compounds which vapour only at a high temperature. High-temperature (> 500 °C) biochar types are considered as hydrophilic due to the effect of the release of pores from the tars. However, it is still not known what the relation between wettability of biochar and other physical-chemical properties of it is and, if it is possible, is there a need to predict wettability of biochar based on other available properties. The article focuses main attention on the determination of physical-chemical properties of biochar made of five different lignocellulosic feedstocks depending on the pyrolysis temperature (300–700 °C) and their relation with the water holding capacity and wettability of biochar using the multiple regression analysis. The results showed that 54% of variation of biochar wettability could be predicted by its average pore size and 77% of variation of biochar water holding capacity could be predicted according to its ash content. Relation of wettability of biochar with its average pore size can be explained by the physical capacity of biochar to adsorb water on its surface and internal pores as well as retention of water among its particles due to capillary forces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed MB, Zhou JL, Ngo HH, Guo W, Johir MAH, Sornalingam K, Rahman MS (2017) Chloramphenicol interaction with functionalized biochar in water: sorptive mechanism, molecular imprinting effect and repeatable application. Sci Total Environ 609:885–895

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmed MB, Zhou JL, Ngo HH, Guo W, Chen M (2016) Progress in the preparation and application of modified biochar for improved contaminant removal from water and wastewater. Bioresour Technol 214:836–851

  3. Angin D, Senzor S (2014) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on chemical and surface properties of biochar of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Int J Phytoremediation 16(7–8):684–693

    Google Scholar 

  4. ASTM (2005) D2216–98. Standart test method for laboratory determination of water content of soil and rock by mass. ASTM, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baltrėnaitė E, Baltrėnas P, Bhatnagar A, Vilppo T, Selenius M, Koistinen A, Dahl M, Penttinen O-P (2017) A multicomponent approach to using waste-derived biochar in biofiltration: a case study based on dissimilar types of waste. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 119:565–576

    Google Scholar 

  6. Batista EMCC, Shultz J, Matos TTS, Fornari MR, Ferreira TM, Szpoganicz B, de Freitas RA, Mangrich AS (2018) Effect of surface and porosity of biochar on water holding capacity aiming indirectly at preservation of the Amazon biome. Sci Rep 8(1):10677

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bauters TWJ, Steenhuis TSS, DiCarlo DA, Nieber JL, Dekker LW, Ritsema CJ, Parlange J-Y, Haverkamp R (2000) Physics of water reppelent soils. J Hydrol 231–232:233–243

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brewer CE (2012) Biochar characterization and engineering. In: Doctoral dissertation. Iowa State University, pp 55–57

  9. Bubici S, Korb J-P, Kucerik J, Conte P (2016) Evaluation of the surface affinity of water in three biochars using fast field cycling NMR relaxometry. Magn Reson Chem 54:365–370

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng C-H, Lehmann J, Thies JE, Burton SD, Engelhard MH (2006) Oxidation of the black carbon by biotic and abiotic processes. Org Geochem 37(11):1477–1488

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chia CH, Gong B, Joseph SD, Marjo C, Munroe P, Rich AM (2012) Imaging of mineral-enriched biochar by FTIR, Raman and SEM-EDX. Vib Spectrosc 62:248–257

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chun Y, Sheng G, Chiou T, Xing B (2004) Compositions and sorptive properties of crop residue-derived chars. Environ Sci Technol 38:4649–4655

    Google Scholar 

  13. Conz RF, Abbruzzini TF, de Andrade CA, Milori DMBP, Cerri CEP (2017) Effect of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type on agricultural properties and stability of biochars. Agric Sci 8:914–933

    Google Scholar 

  14. Das O, Sarmah AK (2015) The love-hate relationship of pyrolysis biochar and water: a perspective. Sci Total Environ 512–513:682–685

    Google Scholar 

  15. Das O, Hedenqvist M (2018) Wettability properties of biochar added wood / polypropylene composites. Acad J Polym Sci 1(4). https://doi.org/10.19080/AJOP.2018.01.555570

  16. de Figueredo NA, de Costa LM, Melo LCA, Siebeneichlerd EA, Tronto J (2017) Characterization of biochars from different sources and evaluation of release of nutrients and contaminants. Rev Ciênc Agron 48(3):395–403

    Google Scholar 

  17. Denyes MJ, Parisien MA, Rutter A, Zeeb BA (2014) Physical, chemical and biological characterization of six biochars produced for the remediation of contaminated sites. J Vis Exp 93:52183

    Google Scholar 

  18. Domingues RR, Trugilho PF, Silva CA, de Melo ICNA, Melo LCA, Magriotis ZM, Sanchez-Monedero (2017) Properties of biochar derived from wood and high-nutrient biomasses with the aim of agronomic and environmental benefits. PLoS One 12(5):e0176884. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Duwiejuah AB, Cobbina SJ, Bakobie N (2017) Review of eco-friendly biochar used in the removal of trace metals on aqueous phases. Int J Environ Bioremed Biodegr 5(2):27–40

    Google Scholar 

  20. EBC, 2012. European biochar certificate – guidelines for a sustainable production of biochar. European Biochar Foundation (EBC), Arbaz, Switzerland. http//http://www.european-biochar.org/en. Version 6.3E of 14th August 2017: http://www.european-biochar.org/en/download%20the%20certificate

  21. Elnour AY, Alghyamah AA, Shaikh HM, Poulose AM, Al-Zahrani SM, Anis A, Al-Wablel MI (2019) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on biochar microstructural evolution, physicochemical characteristics, and its influence on biochar/polypropylene composites. Appl Sci 9(6):1149

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fuschs M, Garcia-Perez M, Sjoding D (2012) Biochar: background and early steps to market development. Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gai X, Wang H, Liu J, Zhai L, Liu S, Ren T, Liu H (2014) Effects of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature on biochar adsorption of ammonium and nitrate. PLoS One 9(12):e113888. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gray M, Johnson MG, Dragila MI, Kleber M (2014) Water uptake in biochars: the roles of porosity and hydrophobicity. Biomass Bioenergy 61:196–205

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hallin IL, Douglas P, Doerr SH, Bryant R (2015) The effect of addition of a wettable biochar on soil water repellency. Eur J Soil Sci 66:1063–1073

    Google Scholar 

  26. Inyang M, Dickenson E (2015) The potential role of biochar in the removal of organic and microbial contaminants from potable and reuse water: a review. Chemosphere 134:232–240

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jeffery S, Meinders MBJ, Stoof CR, Bezemer TM, van de Voorde TFJ, Mommer L, van Groenigen JW (2015) Biochar application does not improve the soil hydrological function of a sandy soil. Geoderma 251–252:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jindo K, Mizumoto H, Sawada Y, Sanchez-Monedero MA, Sonoki T (2014) Physical and chemical characterization of biochars derived from different agricultural residues. Biogeosciences 11:6613–6621

    Google Scholar 

  29. Keiluweit M, Kleber M, Sparrow MA, Simoneit BRT, Prahl FG (2012) Solvent-extractable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biochar: influence of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock. Environ Sci Technol 46(17):9333–9341

    Google Scholar 

  30. Keiluweit M, Nico PS, Johnson MG, Kleber M (2010) Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44:1247–1253

    Google Scholar 

  31. Khanmohammadi Z, Afyuni M, Mosaddeghi MR (2015) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on chemical and physical properties of sewage sludge biochar. Waste Manag Res 33(3):275–83

  32. Kinney TJ, Masiello CA, Dugan B, Hockaday WC, Dean MR, Zygourakis K, Barnes RT (2012) Hydrologic properties of biochars produced at different temperatures. Biomass Bioenergy 41:34–43

    Google Scholar 

  33. Li N, Ma X, Zha Q, Kim K, Chen Y (2011) Maximizing the number of oxygen-containing functional groups on activated carbon by using ammonium persulfate and improving the temperature-programmed desorption characterization of carboj surface chemistry. Carbon 49(15):5002–5013

    Google Scholar 

  34. Liu Z, Dugan B, Masiello CA, Gonnermann HM (2017) Biochar particle size, shape, and porosity act together to influence soil water properties. PLoS One 12(6):e0179079. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ma W, Li H, Yao X, Li L, Shih K (2015) Preparation of hydrophilic avtivated carbon through alkaline hydrolysis of ester for effective water-vapor adsorption. Sep Sci Technol 51(2):193–201

  36. Marshall J, Muhlack R, Morton BJ, Dunnigan L, Chittleborough D, Kwong CW (2019) Pyrolysis temperature effects on biochar-water interactions and application for improved water holding capacity in vineyard soils. Soil Systems 3(27). https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems30220027

  37. Mary GS, Sugumaran P, Niveditha S, Ramalakshmi B, Ravichandran P, Seshadri S (2016) Porduction, characterization and evaluation of biochar from pod (Pisum sativum), leaf (Brassica oleracea) and peel (Citrus sinensis) wastes. Int J Recycl Org Waste 5:43–53

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mollinedo J, Schumacher TE, Chintala R (2015) Influence of feedstocks and pyrolysis on biochar‘s capacity to modify soil water retention characteristics. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 114:100–108

    Google Scholar 

  39. Moreno JJM, Pol AP, Abad AS, Blasco BC (2013) Using the R-MAPE index as a resistant measure of forecast accuracy. Psicothema 25(4):500–506

    Google Scholar 

  40. Naeem MA, Khalid M, Arshad M, Ahmad R (2014) Yield and nutrient composition of biochar produced from different feedstocks at varying pyrolytic temperatures. Pak J Agric Sci 51(1):75–82

    Google Scholar 

  41. Narzari R, Bordoloi N, Sarma B (2017) Fabrication of biochars obtained from valorization of biowaste and evaluation of its physichochemical properties. Bioresour Technol 242:324–328

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nwajiaku IM, Olanrewaju JS, Sato K, Tokunari T, Kitano S, Masunaga T (2018) Changein nutrient composition of biochar from rice husk and sugarcane bagasse at varying pyrolytic temperatures. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 7(4):269–276

    Google Scholar 

  43. Oliveira FR, Patel AK, Jaisi DP, Adhikari S, Lu H, Khanal SK (2017) Environmental application of biochar: current status and perspectives. Bioresour Technol 246:110–122

    Google Scholar 

  44. Patle GT, Sikar TT, Rawat KS, Singh SK (2017) Estimation of infiltration rate from soil properties using regression model for cultivated land. Geol Ecol Landscapes 3(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  45. Pimchuai A, Dutta A, Basu P (2010) Torrefaction of agriculture residue to enhance combustible properties. Energy Fuels 24:4638–4645

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pituello C, Francioso O, Simonetti G, Pisi A (2014) Characterization of chemical-physical, structural and morphological properties of biochars from biowastes produced at different temperatures. J Soils Sediments 15(4):792–804

  47. Pituya P, Sriburi T, Wijitkosum S Properties of biochar prepared from Acacia wood and coconut shell for soil amendment. Environ Energy Nat Resour 21(3). https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2017.21.3.63

  48. Rafiq MK, Bachmann RT, Rafiq MT, Shang Z, Joseph S, Long R (2016) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on physico-chemical properties of corn stover (Zea mays L.) bioachar and feasibility for carbon capture and energy balance. Plos One 11(6):e0156894. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rasa K, Heikkinen J, Hannula M, Arstila K, Kulju S, Hyvaluoma J (2018) How and why does willow biochar increase a clay soil water retention capacity? Biomass Bioenergy 119:346–353

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ronewicz K, Kluskas J, Heda L, Kardas D (2016) Chemical and physical properties of pine wood during pyrolysis. Drv Ind 68(1):29–36

  51. Saletnik B, Zagula G, Bajcar M, Tarapatskyy M, Bobula G, Puchalski C (2019) Bioachar as multifunctional component of the environment – a review. Appl Sci 9:1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9061139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Shelukindo HB, Semu E, Msanya BM, Singh BR, Munishi PKT (2014) Predictor variables for soil organic carbon contents in the Miombo woodlands ecosystem of Kitonga forest reserve, Tanzania. Int J Agric Sci 4(7):222–231

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sigmund G, Huffer T, Hofmann T, Kah M (2017) Biochar total surface area and total pore volume determined by N2 and CO2 physisorption are strongly influenced by degassing temperature. Sci Total Environ 580:770–775

    Google Scholar 

  54. Smetanova A, Dotterweich D, Ulrich U, Fohrer N (2013) Influence of biochar and terra preta substrates on wettability and erodibility of soild. Z Geomorphologie 57:111–134

  55. Spokas KA, Novak JM, Masiello CA, Johnson MG, Colosky EC, Ippolito JA, Trigo C (2014) Physical disintegration of biochar: an overlooked process. Environ Sci Technol Lett 1(8):326–332

    Google Scholar 

  56. Spokas KA, Novak JM, Stewart CE, Cantrell KB, Uchimiya M, DuSaire MG, Ro KS (2011) Qualitative analysis of volatile organic compounds on biochar. Chemosphere 85(5):869–882

    Google Scholar 

  57. Suarez-Hernandez L, Ardila- A, Alba N, Barrera R (2017) Morphological and physicochemical characterization of biochar produced by gasification of selected forestry species. Rev Fac Ingenieria 26(46):123–130

  58. Subedi R, Bertora C, Zavattaro L, Grignani C (2017) Crop response to soils amended with biochar: expected benefits and unintended risks. Ital J Agron 12:794

    Google Scholar 

  59. Suliman WSO (2015) Toward an understanding of the role of biochar as an agro-environmental tool: potential for control water release, bacterial retention, and greenhouse gas emissions, dissertation of philosophy. Washington State university, pp 49–53

  60. Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortuna A-M, Dallmeyer I, Garcia-Perez M (2017) The role of biochar porosity and surface functionality in augmenting hydrologic properties of a sandy soil. Sci Total Environ 574:139–147

    Google Scholar 

  61. Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortuna A-M, Dallmeyer I, Garcia-Perez M (2016) Modification of biochar surface by air oxidation: role of pyrolysis temperature. Biomass Bioenergy 85:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sun X, Shan R, Li X, Pan J, Liu X, Deng R, Song J (2017) Characterization of 60 types of Chinese biomass waste and resultant biochars in terms of their candidacy for soil spplication. GCB Bioenergy 9:1423–1435

    Google Scholar 

  63. Usman ARA, Ahmad M, El-Mahrouky M, Al-Omran A, Sik Ok Y, Sallam AS, El-Naggar AH, Al-Wabel M (2015) Chemically modified biochar produced from conocarpus waste increases NO3 removal from aqueous solutions. Environ Geochem Health 38(2):511–521

    Google Scholar 

  64. Valipour NM, Birjandi FC, Sargolzaei J (2014) Super-non-wettable surfaces: a review. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 448:93–106

    Google Scholar 

  65. Vikrant K, Kim K-H, Ok YS, Tsang DCW, Tsang YF, Giri BS, Singh RS (2018) Engineered/designer biochar for the removal of phosphate in water and wastewater. Sci Total Environ 616–617:1242–1260

    Google Scholar 

  66. Viswanathan B, Neel IN, Varadarajan TK (2009) Methods of activation and specific applications of carbon materials, p 160

    Google Scholar 

  67. Weber K, Quicker P (2018) Properties of biochar. Fuel 217:240–261

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wiedner K, Rumpel C, Steiner C, Pozzi A, Maas R, Glaser B (2013) Chemical evaluation of chars produced by thermochemical conversion (gasification, pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization) of agro-industrial biomass on a commercial scale. Biomass Bioenergy 59:264–278

    Google Scholar 

  69. Woschnagg E, Cipan J (2004) Evaluating forecast accuracy, 406347 Okonometrische Prognose. University of Vienna, Austria, Department of Economics, pp 13–14

  70. Xiao F, Pignatello JJ (2016) Effects of post-pyrolysis air oxidation of biomass chars on adsorption of neutral and ionizable compounds. Environ Sci Technol 50(12):6276–6283

    Google Scholar 

  71. Xiao Q, Zhu L-X, Shen Y-F, Li S-Q (2016) Sensitivity of soil water retention and availability to biochar addition in rainfed semi-arid farmland during a three-year field experiment. Field Crop Res 196:284–293

    Google Scholar 

  72. Yakout SM (2015) Monitoring the changes of chemical properties of rice straw-derived biochars modified by different oxidizing agents and their adsorptive performance for organics. Bioremed J 19(2):171–182

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  73. Yang H, Sheng K (2012) Characterization of biochar properties affected by different pyrolysis temperature using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy. Int Scholar Res Network Spectrosc 2012:7

  74. Yi, S. C. 2018. The impact of biochar surface properties on sand and on sandy loam regarding water repellency, water retention, and gas transmissivity, dissertation of philosophy in civil engineering

    Google Scholar 

  75. Yu O-Y, Harper M, Hoepfl M, Domermuth D (2017) Characterization of biochar and its effects on the water holding capacity of loamy sand soil: comparison of hemlock biochar and switchblade grass biochar characteristics. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 36(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12592

  76. Yu O-Y, Raichle B, Sink S (2013) Impact of biochar on the water holding capacity of loamy sand soil. Int J Energy Environ Eng 4:44

    Google Scholar 

  77. Yuan JH, Xu RK, Zhang H (2011) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol 102(3):3488–3497

    Google Scholar 

  78. Zhang J, You C (2013) Water holding capacity and absorption properties of wood shars. Energy Fuel 27(5):2643–2648

    Google Scholar 

  79. Zhang Z, Zhu Z, Shen B, Liu L (2019) Insights into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: a review. Energy 171:581–598

    Google Scholar 

  80. Zhao S-X, Ta N, Wang X-D (2017) Effect of temperature on the structural and physicochemical properties of biochar with apple tree branches as feedstock material. Energies 10(9):1293

    Google Scholar 

  81. Zornoza R, Moreno-Barriga JA, Acosta MA, Munoz AF (2016) Stability, nutrient availability and hydrophobicity of biochars derived from manure, crop residues, and municipal solid waste for their use as soil amendments. Chemosphere 144:122–130

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio Avenue 11, LT-10223, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Luiza Usevičiūtė & Edita Baltrėnaitė-Gedienė

Authors
  1. Luiza Usevičiūtė
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Edita Baltrėnaitė-Gedienė
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luiza Usevičiūtė.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Usevičiūtė, L., Baltrėnaitė-Gedienė, E. Dependence of pyrolysis temperature and lignocellulosic physical-chemical properties of biochar on its wettability. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 11, 2775–2793 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00711-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00711-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation