Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancing student engagement through the affordances of mobile technology: a 21st century learning perspective on Realistic Mathematics Education

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several recent curriculum reforms aim to address the shortfalls traditionally associated with mathematics education through increased emphasis on higher-order-thinking and collaborative skills. Some stakeholders, such as the US National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and the UK Joint Mathematical Council, advocate harnessing the affordances of digital technology in conjunction with social constructivist pedagogies, contextual scenarios, and/or approaches aligned with Realistic Mathematics Education (RME). However, it can be difficult to create technology-mediated, collaborative and contextual activities within a conventional classroom setting. This paper explores how a combination of a transformative, mobile technology-mediated approach, RME, and a particular model of 21st century learning facilitates the development of mathematics learning activities with the potential to increase student engagement and confidence. An explanatory case study with multiple embedded units and a pre-experimental design was conducted with a total of 54 students in 3 schools over 25 hours of class time. Results from student interviews, along with pre-test/post-test analysis of questionnaires, suggest that the approach has the potential to increase student engagement with, and confidence in, mathematics. This paper expands on these results, proposing connections between aspects of the activity design and their impact on student attitudes and behaviours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. illuminations.nctm.org/Lesson.aspx?id=2157

  2. www.openoffice.org/product/calc.html

  3. www.kinovea.org

  4. www.cabrillo.edu/~dbrown/tracker

  5. www.geogebra.org

  6. phet.colorado.edu/sims/projectile-motion/projectile-motion_en.html

  7. www.kinovea.org

  8. http://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/plinko-probability

References

  • Ainley, J., Button, T., Clark-Wilson, A., Hewson, S., Johnston-Wilder, S., Martin, D., . . . Sutherland, R. (2011). Digital technologies and mathematics education. Retrieved from London, UK.

  • Anderson, J., White, P., & Wong, M. (2012). Mathematics curriculum in the schooling years. In B. Perry, T. Lowrie, T. Logan, A. MacDonald, & J. Greenlees (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2008–2011 (pp. 219–244). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. (1997). Numeracy = everyone’s business. Retrieved from South Australia: www.aamt.edu.au/Professional-reading/Numeracy/Numeracy-Everyone-s-Business/(language)/eng-AU

  • Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2013). Mathematics, pedagogy and technology—seeing the wood from the trees. In 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2013) (pp. 57–63).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, A., Oldham, E., & Tangney, B. (2013). The human catapult and other stories—adventures with technology in mathematics education. In 11th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching (ICTMT11) (pp. 77–83).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., & Howson, G. (2013). Toward an international mathematics curriculum. In M. A. K. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 949–974). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, M. A., Keitel, C., Bishop, A. J., Kilpatrick, J., & Leung, F. K. S. (2013). From the few to the many: historical perspectives on who should learn mathematics. In M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 7–40). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Confrey, J., Hoyles, C., Jones, D., Kahn, K., Maloney, A. P., Nguyen, K. H., . . . Pratt, D. (2010). Designing software for mathematical engagement through modeling. In C. Hoyles & J. B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology—rethinking the terrain: the 17th ICMI Study (Vol. 13, pp. 19-45): Springer.

  • Conway, P. F., & Sloane, F. C. (2005). International trends in post-primary mathematics education (NCCAth ed.). Dublin, Ireland: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, H. (2013). A historical overview of mobile learning: toward learner-centered education. In Z. L. Berge & L. Y. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 3–14). Florence, KY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science. (2004). A brief description of the Irish education system. Ireland: Department of Education and Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Skills. (2012). A framework for junior cycle. Retrieved from Dublin: http://www.juniorcycle.ie/NCCA_JuniorCycle/media/NCCA/Documents/JC-Framework_FINAL_02oct12.pdf

  • Drijvers, P., Mariotti, M. A., Olive, J., & Sacristán, A. I. (2010). Introduction to section 2. In C. Hoyles & J. B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology—rethinking the terrain: the 17th ICMI Study (Vol. 13, pp. 81 - 88): Springer.

  • Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures (Vol. 9). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, V., Faragher, R., & Goos, M. (2010). CAS-enabled technologies as ‘agents provocateurs’ in teaching and learning mathematical modelling in secondary school classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(2), 48–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht: CDbeta Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyles, C., & Lagrange, J. B. (2010). Mathematics education and technology: rethinking the terrain: the 17th ICMI study (C. Hoyles & J. B. Lagrange Eds. Vol. 13): Springerverlag Us.

  • Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, K., Conneely, C., Murchan, D., & Tangney, B. (2014). Enacting key skills-based curricula in secondary education: lessons from a technology-mediated, group-based learning initiative. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1 - 20

  • Krippendorff, K. H. (2004). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laborde, C. (2002). Integration of technology in the design of geometry tasks with Cabri-geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6(3), 283–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 33, 363–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawlor, J., Conneely, C., & Tangney, B. (2010). Towards a pragmatic model for group-based, technology-mediated, project-oriented learning—an overview of the B2C model. In M. D. Lytras, P. Ordonez De Pablos, D. Avison, J. Sipior, Q. Jin, W. Leal, L. Uden, M. C. Thomas, S., & D. G. Horner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2010 TechEduca Conference (pp. 602-609). Athens.

  • Lawlor, J., Marshall, K., & Tangney, B. (2015). Bridge21—exploring the potential to foster intrinsic student motivation through a team-based, technology mediated learning mode. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, in press, 1-20.

  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namey, E., Guest, G., Thairu, L., & Johnson, L. (2007). Data reduction techniques for large qualitative data sets. In G. Guest & K. M. MacQueen (Eds.), Handbook for team-based qualitative research (pp. 137–162). Plymouth, UK: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olive, J., Makar, K., Hoyos, V., Kor, L. K., Kosheleva, O., & Sträßer, R. (2010). Mathematical knowledge and practices resulting from access to digital technologies. Mathematics education and technology—rethinking the terrain: the 17th ICMI Study (Vol. 13, pp. 133-177): Springer.

  • Ozdamli, F., Karabey, D., & Nizamoglu, B. (2013). The effect of technology supported collaborative learning settings on behaviour of students towards mathematics learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 1063–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, B., Arnedillo Sánchez, I., & Tangney, B. (2006). Designing collaborative, constructionist and contextual applications for handheld devices. Computers & Education, 46(3), 294–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R., Stacey, K., & Barkatsas, A. (2007). A scale for monitoring students’ attitudes to learning mathematics with technology. Computers & Education, 48(2), 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puentedura, R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education. Retrieved from http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 3e (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, B., Bray, A., & Oldham, E. (2015). Realistic mathematics education, mobile technology & the Bridge21 model for 21st century learning—a perfect storm. In H. Crompton & J. Traxler (Eds.), Mobile learning and mathematics: foundations, design, and case studies (pp. 96–106). Oxon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2002). Realistic mathematics education: work in progress. Common sense in mathematics education: The Netherlands and Taiwan Conference on Mathematics Education, 1 - 39.

  • Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijers, M., Jonker, V., & Kerstens, K. (2008). MobileMath: the phone, the game and the math. Proceedings of the European Conference on Game Based Learning, 507-516.

  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland

    Aibhín Bray & Brendan Tangney

Authors
  1. Aibhín Bray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brendan Tangney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aibhín Bray.

Ethics declarations

Ethical clearance was obtained, including permission to use the student images.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bray, A., Tangney, B. Enhancing student engagement through the affordances of mobile technology: a 21st century learning perspective on Realistic Mathematics Education. Math Ed Res J 28, 173–197 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0158-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0158-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation