Abstract
This article provides a critical evaluation of a technique of analysis, the Social Activity Method, recently offered by Dowling (2013) as a ‘gift’ to mathematics education. The method is found to be inadequate, firstly, because it employs a dichotomy (between ‘expression’ and ‘content’) instead of a finer analysis (into symbols, concepts and setting or phenomena), and, secondly, because the distinction between ‘public’ and ‘esoteric’ mathematics, although interesting, is allowed to obscure the structure of the mathematics itself. There is also criticism of what Dowling calls the ‘myth of participation’, which denies the intimate links between mathematics and the rest of the universe that lie at the heart of mathematical pedagogy. Behind all this lies Dowling’s ‘essentially linguistic’ conception of mathematics, which is criticised on the dual ground that it ignores the chastening experience of formalism in mathematical philosophy and that linguistics itself has taken a wrong turn and ignores lessons that might be learnt from mathematics education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, A., & Dowling, P. (1998). Doing research/reading research: a mode of interrogation for education. Master Classes in Education Series. London: Falmer.
Cable, J. (2014). How-many-ness and rank order—towards the deconstruction of ‘natural number’. In S. Pope (Ed), Proceedings of the 8th British Congress of Mathematics Education: 33-40. www.bsrlm.org.uk
Cooper, B., & Dunne, M. (2000). Assessing children’s mathematical knowledge: social class, sex and problem-solving. Buckingham: Open University Press.
de Saussure, F., Bally, C., Sechehaye, A., Riedlinger, A., & Harris, R. (1983). Course in general linguistics. London: Duckworth.
Detlefsen, M. (2005). Formalism. In S. Shapiro (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic, Chap 8. Oxford: OUP.
Dowling, P. (1998). London. Washington D.C.: Falmer Press. The sociology of mathematics education: mathematical myths, pedagogic texts.
Dowling, P. (2009). Sociology as method. Rotterdam: Sense.
Dowling, P. (2013). Social activity method (SAM): a fractal language for mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25, 317–340.
Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 103–131.
Einstein, A. (2005). Ideas and Opinions. London: Souvenir Press.
Ferreiros, J. (1999). Labyrinth of thought: a history of set theory and its role in modern mathematics. Science networks. Basel: Birkhauser.
Frege, G. (1999). Begriffsshrift [1879]. In J. Van Heijenoort (Ed), From Frege to Godel. San Jose: to Excel Press.
Frege, G., & Gabriel, G. (1984). Collected papers on mathematics, logic, and philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hilbert, D. (1971). Foundations of geometry (2nd ed.). La Salle, Ill: Open Court.
Irwin, T., & Fine, G. (Eds.). (1995). Aristotle selections. Indianapolis: Hacket.
Lewis, C. I., & Langford, C. H. (1956). History of Symbolic Logic. In J. R. Newman (Ed.), The world of Mathematics (pp. 1833–1850). Redmond: Tempus Books.
McDermott, T. (1993). Thomas Aquinas: selected philosophical writings. World’s classics. [Selections.]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morgan, C., Tsatsaroni, A., & Lerman, S. (2002). Teachers’ positions and practices in discourses of assessment. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(3), 445–461.
Newman, J. (1956). The world of Mathematics, vol. one. London: Allen and Unwin.
Ormell, C. (1972). Mathematics, applicable versus pure-and-applied. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 3(2), 125–131.
Ormell, C. (2013). Mathematics, a third way. The Mathematical Gazette, 97(538), 101–106.
Pring, R. (1975). Bernstein’s classification and framing of knowledge. Scottish Educational Studies, 7, 67–74.
Vygotsky, L. S., Lurii, A. R., Golod, V. I., & Knox, J. E. (1993). Studies on the history of behavior: ape, primitive and child. Hillsdale, Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wittgenstein, L., Pears, D., & McGuinness, B. (1974). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Wittgenstein, L., Anscombe, G. E. M., Hacker, P. M. S., & Schulte, J. (2009). Philosophical investigations (4th ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Acknowledgments
I am most grateful for comments and assistance received from various colleagues, especially Margaret Brown and Jeremy Hodgen. I also owe much to Peter Gates and other anonymous reviewers of earlier drafts of the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cable, J. Mathematics is always invisible, Professor Dowling. Math Ed Res J 27, 359–384 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0141-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0141-3